• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | General Discussion

    The end of online gambling is near

    «First Previous 121314 ... 192021 Next Last»
    Greyhound
    Hoyasaxa
    vanzack
    Renton2010
    Barnstorm
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 82342
    Posts: 512
    «First Previous 121314 ... 192021 Next Last»
     
    Greyhound
    Greyhound
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2007
    Posts: 22305
    Posted: Apr. 18, 2011 - 4:17 PM ET #276

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    Yeah, if you want to bet in to parimutuel lines at 20% house hold compared to 4.5% house hold even at -110 in sports.

    Horse racing is a losers proposition.  Nobody wins, I dont care who you are.  You cant beat 20% house hold - not only that - you cant beat lines that adjust when you bet 100 bucks on it because the markets are so shallow.  Bet 100 bucks to win on a typical horse race and your odds move - so not only do you have to beat 20% house hold - you have to beat the disadvantage you are giving yourself by making a wager in the first place!

     



    Despite the takeout you can still find value if you know what your are doing.  And I'm not insinuating that I'm one of the ones that knows what he's doing.     

     At the big tracks on the weekends for the better races,  the pools are pretty big so a decent size wager isn't going to kill the odds that much.   I'm talking about Churchill, Belmont, Santa Anita, Del Mar,  etc   that type of track.    Those are the races that are least likely to be fixed also.

    It's a tough game to beat though not doubt about that.    If you're an action freak and you gotta bet every race every day at 5 or 6 tracks then you're going to get killed.     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    Yeah, if you want to bet in to parimutuel lines at 20% house hold compared to 4.5% house hold even at -110 in sports.

    Horse racing is a losers proposition.  Nobody wins, I dont care who you are.  You cant beat 20% house hold - not only that - you cant beat lines that adjust when you bet 100 bucks on it because the markets are so shallow.  Bet 100 bucks to win on a typical horse race and your odds move - so not only do you have to beat 20% house hold - you have to beat the disadvantage you are giving yourself by making a wager in the first place!

     



    Despite the takeout you can still find value if you know what your are doing.  And I'm not insinuating that I'm one of the ones that knows what he's doing.     

     At the big tracks on the weekends for the better races,  the pools are pretty big so a decent size wager isn't going to kill the odds that much.   I'm talking about Churchill, Belmont, Santa Anita, Del Mar,  etc   that type of track.    Those are the races that are least likely to be fixed also.

    It's a tough game to beat though not doubt about that.    If you're an action freak and you gotta bet every race every day at 5 or 6 tracks then you're going to get killed.     

     
    Hoyasaxa
    Hoyasaxa
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 5248
    Posted: Apr. 18, 2011 - 7:08 PM ET #277

    My book overseas, the Greek said the worst that can happen is they can't operate on line but their money is good because it's not tied to US Banks in any way,shape or form. They can return all accounts one way or another if need be.

    Thoughts?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    My book overseas, the Greek said the worst that can happen is they can't operate on line but their money is good because it's not tied to US Banks in any way,shape or form. They can return all accounts one way or another if need be.

    Thoughts?

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 18, 2011 - 9:21 PM ET #278

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:

    My book overseas, the Greek said the worst that can happen is they can't operate on line but their money is good because it's not tied to US Banks in any way,shape or form. They can return all accounts one way or another if need be.

    Thoughts?

    Yeah right.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:

    My book overseas, the Greek said the worst that can happen is they can't operate on line but their money is good because it's not tied to US Banks in any way,shape or form. They can return all accounts one way or another if need be.

    Thoughts?

    Yeah right.

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 18, 2011 - 9:23 PM ET #279

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:

    My book overseas, the Greek said the worst that can happen is they can't operate on line but their money is good because it's not tied to US Banks in any way,shape or form. They can return all accounts one way or another if need be.

    Thoughts?

    Let me give you another "worst that can happen".

    The Jamaican govt cooperates with the US Govt and allows a raid and confiscation of all Greek bank accts. 

    Hows that?  Is that worse than they told you?

    Please.....

     

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:

    My book overseas, the Greek said the worst that can happen is they can't operate on line but their money is good because it's not tied to US Banks in any way,shape or form. They can return all accounts one way or another if need be.

    Thoughts?

    Let me give you another "worst that can happen".

    The Jamaican govt cooperates with the US Govt and allows a raid and confiscation of all Greek bank accts. 

    Hows that?  Is that worse than they told you?

    Please.....

     

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 18, 2011 - 9:24 PM ET #280

    Im not saying that IS going to happen, but I am saying that to think that what they told you is the worst case scenario is fairy tale land.

    Im NOT commenting on the likelihood, but anyone who says it is not possible - well - you havent had your eyes open for the last several years.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Im not saying that IS going to happen, but I am saying that to think that what they told you is the worst case scenario is fairy tale land.

    Im NOT commenting on the likelihood, but anyone who says it is not possible - well - you havent had your eyes open for the last several years.

     
    Renton2010
    Renton2010
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2010
    Posts: 764
    Posted: Apr. 18, 2011 - 9:34 PM ET #281

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:

    My book overseas, the Greek said the worst that can happen is they can't operate on line but their money is good because it's not tied to US Banks in any way,shape or form. They can return all accounts one way or another if need be.

    Thoughts?

    The asset freeze of the poker companies reportedly involved bank accounts in 14 countries.

     

    Will this money be confiscated for good? Who knows? Saying it can't happen... is a lie...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:

    My book overseas, the Greek said the worst that can happen is they can't operate on line but their money is good because it's not tied to US Banks in any way,shape or form. They can return all accounts one way or another if need be.

    Thoughts?

    The asset freeze of the poker companies reportedly involved bank accounts in 14 countries.

     

    Will this money be confiscated for good? Who knows? Saying it can't happen... is a lie...

     
    Barnstorm
    Barnstorm
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2006
    Posts: 4719
    Posted: Apr. 18, 2011 - 10:19 PM ET #282

    https://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/156655-rep-barney-frank-blasts-obama-admin-for-online-poker-crackdown

    Barney Frank mocked the seizures and lamented that the Justice Department is more focused on prosecuting online poker sites than those responsible for the mortgage crisis and financial meltdown.

    "Go after the people responsible for empty houses, not full houses," Frank added.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    https://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/156655-rep-barney-frank-blasts-obama-admin-for-online-poker-crackdown

    Barney Frank mocked the seizures and lamented that the Justice Department is more focused on prosecuting online poker sites than those responsible for the mortgage crisis and financial meltdown.

    "Go after the people responsible for empty houses, not full houses," Frank added.
     
    Hoyasaxa
    Hoyasaxa
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 5248
    Posted: Apr. 18, 2011 - 10:49 PM ET #283

    Vanzak-what would you do? Take withdrawals frequently from your sports book, keep a low balance?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Vanzak-what would you do? Take withdrawals frequently from your sports book, keep a low balance?
     
    Raiderpug
    Raiderpug
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 3006
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 3:13 AM ET #284

    Anyone need a friend in Vegas?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Anyone need a friend in Vegas?
     
    blacksheep
    blacksheep
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2002
    Posts: 303
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 3:53 AM ET #285

    Quote Originally Posted by lemonsky:

    And as of today Steve Wynn severed ties to PokerStars. Van, I don't know if I'd hold my breath about legalization. For it to have any chance, there needs to be a Democrat occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue as well as Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, possibly a filibuster-proof majority in that chamber. Practically all Republicans serving in Congress are religious zealots or kowtow to them (like member of the tribe, Eric Cantor). There are only a smattering of Senate Rs that may vote for legalizing online poker like Scott Brown of Massachusetts and Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine but that's practically it. Don't forget that the UIGEA was pushed through by VA Republican Goodlatte in 2006. And yes, many Democrats voted for it because gambling is so stigmatized, voting "nay" may have been frowned upon but this kind of law would never have been introduced by a Democratic-led House or Senate.

    But if anything is going to be legalized, it's poker only. There is no way in the abysmal depths of hell that sports wagering will ever be legal outside of Nevada. Even though tens of millions enjoy it, Republicans and Democrats, it's too politically radioactive to touch because of the visceral stigma associated with it.

     P.S. Sorry if anything went awry with this post because I'm typing this from my iPhone and had to employ some cut-and-paste trickery for my comment to go through.

     

    Totally agree. Excellent points throughout.

    As others have stated. Time to consider Canada, and preferably warmer climates to live that actually are free countries that allow you to actually have the freedom to do what you want to do with your own money. The USA is no longer that place, and it certainly isn't a free country any more. Living here becomes more and more disturbing every day with less and less freedom all of the time.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by lemonsky:

    And as of today Steve Wynn severed ties to PokerStars. Van, I don't know if I'd hold my breath about legalization. For it to have any chance, there needs to be a Democrat occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue as well as Democratic majorities in the House and Senate, possibly a filibuster-proof majority in that chamber. Practically all Republicans serving in Congress are religious zealots or kowtow to them (like member of the tribe, Eric Cantor). There are only a smattering of Senate Rs that may vote for legalizing online poker like Scott Brown of Massachusetts and Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe of Maine but that's practically it. Don't forget that the UIGEA was pushed through by VA Republican Goodlatte in 2006. And yes, many Democrats voted for it because gambling is so stigmatized, voting "nay" may have been frowned upon but this kind of law would never have been introduced by a Democratic-led House or Senate.

    But if anything is going to be legalized, it's poker only. There is no way in the abysmal depths of hell that sports wagering will ever be legal outside of Nevada. Even though tens of millions enjoy it, Republicans and Democrats, it's too politically radioactive to touch because of the visceral stigma associated with it.

     P.S. Sorry if anything went awry with this post because I'm typing this from my iPhone and had to employ some cut-and-paste trickery for my comment to go through.

     

    Totally agree. Excellent points throughout.

    As others have stated. Time to consider Canada, and preferably warmer climates to live that actually are free countries that allow you to actually have the freedom to do what you want to do with your own money. The USA is no longer that place, and it certainly isn't a free country any more. Living here becomes more and more disturbing every day with less and less freedom all of the time.

     
    Lucan
    Lucan
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2010
    Posts: 1645
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 4:10 AM ET #286

    Quote Originally Posted by cd329:

    You cant even be a little serious with this post. Man just once i would love to see a republican say the republicans fucked us up.

    This shit was added to the bill in the middle of the night and there was no way the democrats could have not voted yes for the bill because of all the security stuff that was all part of the port security bill. The republicans knew that they could have put anything in the bill and it would have been pased by the democrats.

    So for once lay the blame on who did this crap to all of us. The republicans.

    The Obama admin has nothing to do with this shit and the justice dept is only carrying out the laws that are on the books now with this crap.  Some of the things they are going after now had dates when they would start being enforced.  The justice dept cant just ignore laws that are being broken because they dont agree with them. Until congress changes this shit, no matter what President is in office, their justice dept is going to enforce laws that are to be enforced.

    Thank you bush, kyl and goodlatte, hope all 3 rot in hell

    Republicans have fucked this country up, and or steady trying to stop democrats from cleaning up their shit...fuck the republicans party and fuck Obama to because he is just a puppet.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by cd329:

    You cant even be a little serious with this post. Man just once i would love to see a republican say the republicans fucked us up.

    This shit was added to the bill in the middle of the night and there was no way the democrats could have not voted yes for the bill because of all the security stuff that was all part of the port security bill. The republicans knew that they could have put anything in the bill and it would have been pased by the democrats.

    So for once lay the blame on who did this crap to all of us. The republicans.

    The Obama admin has nothing to do with this shit and the justice dept is only carrying out the laws that are on the books now with this crap.  Some of the things they are going after now had dates when they would start being enforced.  The justice dept cant just ignore laws that are being broken because they dont agree with them. Until congress changes this shit, no matter what President is in office, their justice dept is going to enforce laws that are to be enforced.

    Thank you bush, kyl and goodlatte, hope all 3 rot in hell

    Republicans have fucked this country up, and or steady trying to stop democrats from cleaning up their shit...fuck the republicans party and fuck Obama to because he is just a puppet.

     

     
    iceman67
    iceman67
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2009
    Posts: 3253
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 5:10 AM ET #287

    Quote Originally Posted by chump:

    Barney "back-door" Frank has some interesting things to say about the Feds ... go to "thehill.com" ... there is still hope !!!

    my favorite comment about that piece------   

    " Franks using the phrase "inside straight" made me cringe…"

    God help me,  I still snicker at some Bevis and Butthead humor, sad I know,

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by chump:

    Barney "back-door" Frank has some interesting things to say about the Feds ... go to "thehill.com" ... there is still hope !!!

    my favorite comment about that piece------   

    " Franks using the phrase "inside straight" made me cringe…"

    God help me,  I still snicker at some Bevis and Butthead humor, sad I know,

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 8:13 AM ET #288

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:

    Vanzak-what would you do? Take withdrawals frequently from your sports book, keep a low balance?

    Heres the thing - and I guess I should articluate it maybe a little bit better:

    There will always be places to bet if you want to bet.

    But, if you are like me - you make money by having the following conditions - and these are required:

    1. Free market with competitve available lines amongs dozens of options of SB's.
    2. Free movement of funds between books and home banks
    3. Risk of forfeiture of money low due to books going under or confiscation.

    You cannot accomplish those three things as an American bettor (unless you set up an offshore presence). In fact, you cant accomplish ANY ONE of those. Up until 2006 we had ALL of those.

    So this post is not telling anyone that there wont be a sportsbook somewhere that is always willing to take a deposit and allow you to bet, or find a track to bet at, or a local. This post is saying that if you relied on the 3 things listed above in your method - you are screwed.

    If you choose to keep money at Greek or BM, or any other SB that accepts Americans, you are PAYING A FEE FOR RISK. Risk is higher than ever, and if you are willing to accept that risk, there is a cost to it. Im not telling you not to do it (as I have been asked several times in this thread "should I take my money out") - I am simply telling you that you have to evaluate your risk tolerance - because pretending that there is no risk is silly.

    You cant compete across sportsbooks for lines, you cant assure getting the lowest line available because you only have a couple of options, you cant move money freely and there is a cost and a risk cost to doing so that has never been higher - throw those things together and you have a recipe for non-profitabliity. I cant see how you can beat that longterm.

    Can you go set yourself up in a foreign country with banking, address, and have sportsbooks like Pinnacle, Betfair, Matchbook etc and insulate yoursel? Yes. Does the average person want or have the means to do that? No.

    From my point of view (opinion) - I dont know how anyone can make money doing this betting in to -110 lines, with very little competitiion for diversity of spreads, no exchange marketplace, no way to move money freely, and added risk cost. It seems impossible to me. The threshold is just way too high, out of the range of mortal handicappers to win longterm.

    So make your own decisions. Keep your eyes and ears open. I wouldnt be surprised if these SB's were shut down tomorrow, and I wouldnt be surprised if they were open in 10 years. The US govt might not be too interested in them because sportsbetting is not going to be legalized anytime soon - and this was just a Hiroshima move to clear the way for the rebuilding contract to be issued to the corporate casinos - who now have a clean slate. But none of this matters to the guy who is trying to be profitable, and finds that the landscape is like trying to play ice hockey on a frozen waterfall.

    I dont know much about the inner workings of SB's. I do know that they are not run by rocket scientists and beacons of legitimate business. I also know that poker sites and SB's share processors, and processor techniques.

    I think the biggest protection SB's have is that the DOJ might deem them just too small to even matter right now, and that they dont fit the profile of what their objective is - which I feel is to clear the way for corporate legalization.

    But dont you think the DOJ has experimented with sending the same WU's you do? Dont you think they know that Michael Jackson Gonzalez is not a real person living in the Philippines and that the SB's have set up a network of WU processors who give out dummy names? Dont you think they could and would squash this if they wanted to and felt the time was right?

    Once again, you the sender are in no danger - but the risk here is simply knowing that there are lots of Jamie Moyer fastballs sitting belt high waiting for the DOJ to hit out of the park when they want to. This is my opinion, I have nothing concrete to back this up other than my own observations - but I think you have to be in serious denial to assume that if the DOJ wanted to that they couldnt unravel this ball of yarn anytime they wanted to.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:

    Vanzak-what would you do? Take withdrawals frequently from your sports book, keep a low balance?

    Heres the thing - and I guess I should articluate it maybe a little bit better:

    There will always be places to bet if you want to bet.

    But, if you are like me - you make money by having the following conditions - and these are required:

    1. Free market with competitve available lines amongs dozens of options of SB's.
    2. Free movement of funds between books and home banks
    3. Risk of forfeiture of money low due to books going under or confiscation.

    You cannot accomplish those three things as an American bettor (unless you set up an offshore presence). In fact, you cant accomplish ANY ONE of those. Up until 2006 we had ALL of those.

    So this post is not telling anyone that there wont be a sportsbook somewhere that is always willing to take a deposit and allow you to bet, or find a track to bet at, or a local. This post is saying that if you relied on the 3 things listed above in your method - you are screwed.

    If you choose to keep money at Greek or BM, or any other SB that accepts Americans, you are PAYING A FEE FOR RISK. Risk is higher than ever, and if you are willing to accept that risk, there is a cost to it. Im not telling you not to do it (as I have been asked several times in this thread "should I take my money out") - I am simply telling you that you have to evaluate your risk tolerance - because pretending that there is no risk is silly.

    You cant compete across sportsbooks for lines, you cant assure getting the lowest line available because you only have a couple of options, you cant move money freely and there is a cost and a risk cost to doing so that has never been higher - throw those things together and you have a recipe for non-profitabliity. I cant see how you can beat that longterm.

    Can you go set yourself up in a foreign country with banking, address, and have sportsbooks like Pinnacle, Betfair, Matchbook etc and insulate yoursel? Yes. Does the average person want or have the means to do that? No.

    From my point of view (opinion) - I dont know how anyone can make money doing this betting in to -110 lines, with very little competitiion for diversity of spreads, no exchange marketplace, no way to move money freely, and added risk cost. It seems impossible to me. The threshold is just way too high, out of the range of mortal handicappers to win longterm.

    So make your own decisions. Keep your eyes and ears open. I wouldnt be surprised if these SB's were shut down tomorrow, and I wouldnt be surprised if they were open in 10 years. The US govt might not be too interested in them because sportsbetting is not going to be legalized anytime soon - and this was just a Hiroshima move to clear the way for the rebuilding contract to be issued to the corporate casinos - who now have a clean slate. But none of this matters to the guy who is trying to be profitable, and finds that the landscape is like trying to play ice hockey on a frozen waterfall.

    I dont know much about the inner workings of SB's. I do know that they are not run by rocket scientists and beacons of legitimate business. I also know that poker sites and SB's share processors, and processor techniques.

    I think the biggest protection SB's have is that the DOJ might deem them just too small to even matter right now, and that they dont fit the profile of what their objective is - which I feel is to clear the way for corporate legalization.

    But dont you think the DOJ has experimented with sending the same WU's you do? Dont you think they know that Michael Jackson Gonzalez is not a real person living in the Philippines and that the SB's have set up a network of WU processors who give out dummy names? Dont you think they could and would squash this if they wanted to and felt the time was right?

    Once again, you the sender are in no danger - but the risk here is simply knowing that there are lots of Jamie Moyer fastballs sitting belt high waiting for the DOJ to hit out of the park when they want to. This is my opinion, I have nothing concrete to back this up other than my own observations - but I think you have to be in serious denial to assume that if the DOJ wanted to that they couldnt unravel this ball of yarn anytime they wanted to.

     
    johnboy7541
    johnboy7541
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2009
    Posts: 86
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 4:19 PM ET #289

    I haven't posted in Covers in a while because I decided to give up sports betting and focus on playing poker.  I haven't had a chance to read the whole thread so some of my points may have already been mentioned.

    The DOJ shutting down the big three poker sites is more about money than anything else.  At some point in the near future online Poker in the US will be legalized and regulated by the government.  The events of Friday April 15 just clears the American poker market for the Vegas casinos who will soon launch their own online poker rooms that will be licensed and taxed by the government.  The American government will try to squeeze out what they can from the Big 3 in this lawsuit and will then banish them from the American market.

    Will the DOJ look to take down the Sportsbooks next?  Maybe, but I don't think so.  The online poker market is way bigger than the sports betting market.  If you don't believe me go to pokerscout and look at how many people played on the big sites before Black Friday, and how many people worldwide are playing even after what happened.  I could be wrong but I don't think there's enough money in it for the government to try to take down these sports sites.  The DOJ did not even go after some of the smaller poker sites (like Merge, Bodog, etc.), because they just aren't worth their time.

    While online poker will one day be legal again in the US, the same cannot be said of online sports betting.  It is generally accepted that poker is a game of skill while sports betting is not.  I'm sure many on the forum would disagree with that but that is the view of most people and that will not change. 

    Some of the sports betting sites may stop accepting US customers for fear that they will end up being prosecuted  but I think the underground online sports betting market will continue to exist and not change too much.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I haven't posted in Covers in a while because I decided to give up sports betting and focus on playing poker.  I haven't had a chance to read the whole thread so some of my points may have already been mentioned.

    The DOJ shutting down the big three poker sites is more about money than anything else.  At some point in the near future online Poker in the US will be legalized and regulated by the government.  The events of Friday April 15 just clears the American poker market for the Vegas casinos who will soon launch their own online poker rooms that will be licensed and taxed by the government.  The American government will try to squeeze out what they can from the Big 3 in this lawsuit and will then banish them from the American market.

    Will the DOJ look to take down the Sportsbooks next?  Maybe, but I don't think so.  The online poker market is way bigger than the sports betting market.  If you don't believe me go to pokerscout and look at how many people played on the big sites before Black Friday, and how many people worldwide are playing even after what happened.  I could be wrong but I don't think there's enough money in it for the government to try to take down these sports sites.  The DOJ did not even go after some of the smaller poker sites (like Merge, Bodog, etc.), because they just aren't worth their time.

    While online poker will one day be legal again in the US, the same cannot be said of online sports betting.  It is generally accepted that poker is a game of skill while sports betting is not.  I'm sure many on the forum would disagree with that but that is the view of most people and that will not change. 

    Some of the sports betting sites may stop accepting US customers for fear that they will end up being prosecuted  but I think the underground online sports betting market will continue to exist and not change too much.
     
    lbcake
    lbcake
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2005
    Posts: 27074
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 6:00 PM ET #290

    Party at the DOJ
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Party at the DOJ
     
    MACX
    MACX
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2008
    Posts: 82
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 7:08 PM ET #291

    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    Heres the thing - and I guess I should articluate it maybe a little bit better:

    There will always be places to bet if you want to bet.

    But, if you are like me - you make money by having the following conditions - and these are required:

    1. Free market with competitve available lines amongs dozens of options of SB's.
    2. Free movement of funds between books and home banks
    3. Risk of forfeiture of money low due to books going under or confiscation.

    You cannot accomplish those three things as an American bettor (unless you set up an offshore presence). In fact, you cant accomplish ANY ONE of those. Up until 2006 we had ALL of those.

    So this post is not telling anyone that there wont be a sportsbook somewhere that is always willing to take a deposit and allow you to bet, or find a track to bet at, or a local. This post is saying that if you relied on the 3 things listed above in your method - you are screwed.

    If you choose to keep money at Greek or BM, or any other SB that accepts Americans, you are PAYING A FEE FOR RISK. Risk is higher than ever, and if you are willing to accept that risk, there is a cost to it. Im not telling you not to do it (as I have been asked several times in this thread "should I take my money out") - I am simply telling you that you have to evaluate your risk tolerance - because pretending that there is no risk is silly.

    You cant compete across sportsbooks for lines, you cant assure getting the lowest line available because you only have a couple of options, you cant move money freely and there is a cost and a risk cost to doing so that has never been higher - throw those things together and you have a recipe for non-profitabliity. I cant see how you can beat that longterm.

    Can you go set yourself up in a foreign country with banking, address, and have sportsbooks like Pinnacle, Betfair, Matchbook etc and insulate yoursel? Yes. Does the average person want or have the means to do that? No.

    From my point of view (opinion) - I dont know how anyone can make money doing this betting in to -110 lines, with very little competitiion for diversity of spreads, no exchange marketplace, no way to move money freely, and added risk cost. It seems impossible to me. The threshold is just way too high, out of the range of mortal handicappers to win longterm.

    So make your own decisions. Keep your eyes and ears open. I wouldnt be surprised if these SB's were shut down tomorrow, and I wouldnt be surprised if they were open in 10 years. The US govt might not be too interested in them because sportsbetting is not going to be legalized anytime soon - and this was just a Hiroshima move to clear the way for the rebuilding contract to be issued to the corporate casinos - who now have a clean slate. But none of this matters to the guy who is trying to be profitable, and finds that the landscape is like trying to play ice hockey on a frozen waterfall.

    I dont know much about the inner workings of SB's. I do know that they are not run by rocket scientists and beacons of legitimate business. I also know that poker sites and SB's share processors, and processor techniques.

    I think the biggest protection SB's have is that the DOJ might deem them just too small to even matter right now, and that they dont fit the profile of what their objective is - which I feel is to clear the way for corporate legalization.

    But dont you think the DOJ has experimented with sending the same WU's you do? Dont you think they know that Michael Jackson Gonzalez is not a real person living in the Philippines and that the SB's have set up a network of WU processors who give out dummy names? Dont you think they could and would squash this if they wanted to and felt the time was right?

    Once again, you the sender are in no danger - but the risk here is simply knowing that there are lots of Jamie Moyer fastballs sitting belt high waiting for the DOJ to hit out of the park when they want to. This is my opinion, I have nothing concrete to back this up other than my own observations - but I think you have to be in serious denial to assume that if the DOJ wanted to that they couldnt unravel this ball of yarn anytime they wanted to.

     

    These exact thoughts have been rattling around my head since Matchbook walked away in February

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

    Heres the thing - and I guess I should articluate it maybe a little bit better:

    There will always be places to bet if you want to bet.

    But, if you are like me - you make money by having the following conditions - and these are required:

    1. Free market with competitve available lines amongs dozens of options of SB's.
    2. Free movement of funds between books and home banks
    3. Risk of forfeiture of money low due to books going under or confiscation.

    You cannot accomplish those three things as an American bettor (unless you set up an offshore presence). In fact, you cant accomplish ANY ONE of those. Up until 2006 we had ALL of those.

    So this post is not telling anyone that there wont be a sportsbook somewhere that is always willing to take a deposit and allow you to bet, or find a track to bet at, or a local. This post is saying that if you relied on the 3 things listed above in your method - you are screwed.

    If you choose to keep money at Greek or BM, or any other SB that accepts Americans, you are PAYING A FEE FOR RISK. Risk is higher than ever, and if you are willing to accept that risk, there is a cost to it. Im not telling you not to do it (as I have been asked several times in this thread "should I take my money out") - I am simply telling you that you have to evaluate your risk tolerance - because pretending that there is no risk is silly.

    You cant compete across sportsbooks for lines, you cant assure getting the lowest line available because you only have a couple of options, you cant move money freely and there is a cost and a risk cost to doing so that has never been higher - throw those things together and you have a recipe for non-profitabliity. I cant see how you can beat that longterm.

    Can you go set yourself up in a foreign country with banking, address, and have sportsbooks like Pinnacle, Betfair, Matchbook etc and insulate yoursel? Yes. Does the average person want or have the means to do that? No.

    From my point of view (opinion) - I dont know how anyone can make money doing this betting in to -110 lines, with very little competitiion for diversity of spreads, no exchange marketplace, no way to move money freely, and added risk cost. It seems impossible to me. The threshold is just way too high, out of the range of mortal handicappers to win longterm.

    So make your own decisions. Keep your eyes and ears open. I wouldnt be surprised if these SB's were shut down tomorrow, and I wouldnt be surprised if they were open in 10 years. The US govt might not be too interested in them because sportsbetting is not going to be legalized anytime soon - and this was just a Hiroshima move to clear the way for the rebuilding contract to be issued to the corporate casinos - who now have a clean slate. But none of this matters to the guy who is trying to be profitable, and finds that the landscape is like trying to play ice hockey on a frozen waterfall.

    I dont know much about the inner workings of SB's. I do know that they are not run by rocket scientists and beacons of legitimate business. I also know that poker sites and SB's share processors, and processor techniques.

    I think the biggest protection SB's have is that the DOJ might deem them just too small to even matter right now, and that they dont fit the profile of what their objective is - which I feel is to clear the way for corporate legalization.

    But dont you think the DOJ has experimented with sending the same WU's you do? Dont you think they know that Michael Jackson Gonzalez is not a real person living in the Philippines and that the SB's have set up a network of WU processors who give out dummy names? Dont you think they could and would squash this if they wanted to and felt the time was right?

    Once again, you the sender are in no danger - but the risk here is simply knowing that there are lots of Jamie Moyer fastballs sitting belt high waiting for the DOJ to hit out of the park when they want to. This is my opinion, I have nothing concrete to back this up other than my own observations - but I think you have to be in serious denial to assume that if the DOJ wanted to that they couldnt unravel this ball of yarn anytime they wanted to.

     

    These exact thoughts have been rattling around my head since Matchbook walked away in February

     
    ManassaMauler
    ManassaMauler
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 57577
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 7:14 PM ET #292

    Quote Originally Posted by blacksheep:

     

    Totally agree. Excellent points throughout.

    As others have stated. Time to consider Canada, and preferably warmer climates to live that actually are free countries that allow you to actually have the freedom to do what you want to do with your own money. The USA is no longer that place, and it certainly isn't a free country any more. Living here becomes more and more disturbing every day with less and less freedom all of the time.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by blacksheep:

     

    Totally agree. Excellent points throughout.

    As others have stated. Time to consider Canada, and preferably warmer climates to live that actually are free countries that allow you to actually have the freedom to do what you want to do with your own money. The USA is no longer that place, and it certainly isn't a free country any more. Living here becomes more and more disturbing every day with less and less freedom all of the time.

     
    Hoyasaxa
    Hoyasaxa
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2008
    Posts: 5248
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 7:45 PM ET #293

    Thanks for all the input fellas-excellent stuff-I'm a college educated  self-employed businessmen but I don't drink, smoke, play golf or other crap-just like out thinking the public and playing against the grain like in th stock market.

    I guess I could live without betting on line and there are still bookies out here in Cali but I got caught in a sting 20 years ago for that and those memories are hard.

    I assume my $ could dry up anytime and I don't like limited options but I believe Sports Betting is small on line and these overseas books don't use US Banks so how can they be taxed and how much money can the gov't gain here?

    I will take it carefully and withdrawal as needed-it's not my kids college fund....I do believe Wynn and others are ready to roll in,,,

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Thanks for all the input fellas-excellent stuff-I'm a college educated  self-employed businessmen but I don't drink, smoke, play golf or other crap-just like out thinking the public and playing against the grain like in th stock market.

    I guess I could live without betting on line and there are still bookies out here in Cali but I got caught in a sting 20 years ago for that and those memories are hard.

    I assume my $ could dry up anytime and I don't like limited options but I believe Sports Betting is small on line and these overseas books don't use US Banks so how can they be taxed and how much money can the gov't gain here?

    I will take it carefully and withdrawal as needed-it's not my kids college fund....I do believe Wynn and others are ready to roll in,,,

     

     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 7:49 PM ET #294

    I have another thought.....  And this just came to me.

    I do think that there will be "services" opening up now to make it easy for poker players to become virtual citizens of their choice of locales.  This would easily lend itself to sports bettors too, but since we are much smaller - I think this event will lead to the formation of such services in which a sports gambler could piggyback.

    Something like:

    For XXX per month, get a foreign physical address, a foreign bank acct, and a VPN in that locale.......

    Wait and see.  I thought of this while reading at 2+2, and the number of poker refugees looking for a home is astounding.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I have another thought.....  And this just came to me.

    I do think that there will be "services" opening up now to make it easy for poker players to become virtual citizens of their choice of locales.  This would easily lend itself to sports bettors too, but since we are much smaller - I think this event will lead to the formation of such services in which a sports gambler could piggyback.

    Something like:

    For XXX per month, get a foreign physical address, a foreign bank acct, and a VPN in that locale.......

    Wait and see.  I thought of this while reading at 2+2, and the number of poker refugees looking for a home is astounding.

     
    buxwin
    buxwin
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 218
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 8:37 PM ET #295

    Doyle's room is still operating and advertising to pick up PS and FT's players.  I wonder what the difference is?  Maybe to small, but to still be advertising seems to be asking for problems.  Maybe Doyle made a big donation to Obama's 2012 campaign??  Anyway, I would be scared to deposit.  Any thoughts?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Doyle's room is still operating and advertising to pick up PS and FT's players.  I wonder what the difference is?  Maybe to small, but to still be advertising seems to be asking for problems.  Maybe Doyle made a big donation to Obama's 2012 campaign??  Anyway, I would be scared to deposit.  Any thoughts?
     
    johnboy7541
    johnboy7541
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2009
    Posts: 86
    Posted: Apr. 19, 2011 - 8:49 PM ET #296

    Quote Originally Posted by buxwin:

    Doyle's room is still operating and advertising to pick up PS and FT's players.  I wonder what the difference is?  Maybe to small, but to still be advertising seems to be asking for problems.  Maybe Doyle made a big donation to Obama's 2012 campaign??  Anyway, I would be scared to deposit.  Any thoughts?


    Doyle's room is tiny, no one plays there.  The DOJ is only going after the giants for now.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by buxwin:

    Doyle's room is still operating and advertising to pick up PS and FT's players.  I wonder what the difference is?  Maybe to small, but to still be advertising seems to be asking for problems.  Maybe Doyle made a big donation to Obama's 2012 campaign??  Anyway, I would be scared to deposit.  Any thoughts?


    Doyle's room is tiny, no one plays there.  The DOJ is only going after the giants for now.
     
    dl36
    dl36
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2003
    Posts: 27850
    Posted: Apr. 20, 2011 - 12:48 AM ET #297

    Vanzack,

    Thank you for this thread and having an intelligent dialogue about an important issue to people on this site

    I wonder why you have so many "haters" on this site... but when you consider that some people get mad when ever a logical/intelligent exchange of ideas occurs, you probably piss them off alot...


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Vanzack,

    Thank you for this thread and having an intelligent dialogue about an important issue to people on this site

    I wonder why you have so many "haters" on this site... but when you consider that some people get mad when ever a logical/intelligent exchange of ideas occurs, you probably piss them off alot...


     
    vanzack
    vanzack
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2001
    Posts: 60107
    Posted: May. 9, 2011 - 4:47 PM ET #298

    BetUS - square central for US players - says goodbye to US players.

    Just the beginning boys.

    Keep your eyes and ears open.

    Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    BetUS - square central for US players - says goodbye to US players.

    Just the beginning boys.

    Keep your eyes and ears open.

     
    Bodogjoe
    Bodogjoe
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 926
    Posted: May. 9, 2011 - 5:48 PM ET #299

    are we talking about  nfl  nba baseball  getting  shut down to.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    are we talking about  nfl  nba baseball  getting  shut down to.
     
     
    Bodogjoe
    Bodogjoe
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 926
    Posted: May. 9, 2011 - 5:52 PM ET #300

    are we talking about  nfl  nba baseball  getting  shut down to.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    are we talking about  nfl  nba baseball  getting  shut down to.
    All Forums | General Discussion
    «First Previous 121314 ... 192021 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 446,200 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 302,016 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/10/2026 1,000 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,797 Covers arrow
    • 9/10 Fast Cash Five 💰??🔥 5,177 Covers arrow
    • 49ers vs Rams in-game live from down under 1,646 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 4,742 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 95,574 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,316 Covers arrow
    • ALL IN 401K Bet Rams -4.5 1,423 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.