the one where he tried to rationalize the g*y hating by pretending it wasn't about his bible brainwashing may never be topped.
So in other words, you're happy to criticize something you are pretendng I said.
I mean, I'm like totally incapable of saying "this is Obama's fault" if that is what I meant.
Really. I am.
So in other words, you're happy to criticize something you are pretendng I said.
I mean, I'm like totally incapable of saying "this is Obama's fault" if that is what I meant.
Really. I am.
How about you read what I wrote and get back to me?
Or is that something you can't do?
![]()
How about you read what I wrote and get back to me?
Or is that something you can't do?
![]()
So in other words, you're happy to criticize something you are pretendng I said.
I mean, I'm like totally incapable of saying "this is Obama's fault" if that is what I meant.
Really. I am.
So in other words, you're happy to criticize something you are pretendng I said.
I mean, I'm like totally incapable of saying "this is Obama's fault" if that is what I meant.
Really. I am.
Since you can't grasp what I even wrote, how would you know?
Since you can't grasp what I even wrote, how would you know?
I meant exactly what I wrote.
Not what you wish I said
Not what someone else suggests I said.
Want to guess why you and others are so busy attacking what I never said?
I mean, even you can see how transparent this little ploy is, right?
![]()
I meant exactly what I wrote.
Not what you wish I said
Not what someone else suggests I said.
Want to guess why you and others are so busy attacking what I never said?
I mean, even you can see how transparent this little ploy is, right?
![]()
I'm begining to doubt that you're reading what I wrote.
I never said or suggested that "everything in the world" is Obama's fault.
It is comical to watch you and these other people continue to knock down strawmen.
Though not unexpected.
![]()
I'm begining to doubt that you're reading what I wrote.
I never said or suggested that "everything in the world" is Obama's fault.
It is comical to watch you and these other people continue to knock down strawmen.
Though not unexpected.
![]()
![]()
Uh, saying a group of people are "strangely silent" is not blaming them for an occurance. No matter how many times you suggest or imply that it is.
You guys responding with "you're blaming Obama!!!" is silly.
![]()
Uh, saying a group of people are "strangely silent" is not blaming them for an occurance. No matter how many times you suggest or imply that it is.
You guys responding with "you're blaming Obama!!!" is silly.
I meant exactly what I wrote.
Isn't it funny that the party that pretends to care so much about school children (more funding, more teachers, no more school shootings!) is strangely silent on this?
Instead of being a principled person and saying "yeah, they engage in selective outrage" or "they are hypocrites" you have to come back and attack things I never said and bash.
Which of course means you're nothing more than a partisan trying to defend your team.
And the resposnes here prove that.
I meant exactly what I wrote.
Isn't it funny that the party that pretends to care so much about school children (more funding, more teachers, no more school shootings!) is strangely silent on this?
Instead of being a principled person and saying "yeah, they engage in selective outrage" or "they are hypocrites" you have to come back and attack things I never said and bash.
Which of course means you're nothing more than a partisan trying to defend your team.
And the resposnes here prove that.
![]()
Note: when you can't legitimately explain or defend an idea you suppport, you type things like ^that.
Don't you think it is funny you can't engage in a defense of something you think is a good idea without name calling and suggesting that people are saying things they did not say?
Why do you think that is?
![]()
![]()
Note: when you can't legitimately explain or defend an idea you suppport, you type things like ^that.
Don't you think it is funny you can't engage in a defense of something you think is a good idea without name calling and suggesting that people are saying things they did not say?
Why do you think that is?
![]()
![]()
I'm not going to read what you wrote, I'm going to pretend what the intent was!!!!
![]()
I meant exactly what I wrote. I wrote what I inteded to say.
Isn't it funny that the party that pretends to care so much about school children (more funding, more teachers, no more school shootings!) is strangely silent on this?
Instead of being a principled person and saying "yeah, they engage in selective outrage" or "they are hypocrites" you have to come back and attack things I never said and now absurdly say I was implying something.
Because again, I'm so incapble of saying "this is Obama's fault" if I were to actually believe that.
You really don't have any interest in not looking silly over this. You just want to defend team Dem.
Again, totally expected.
![]()
![]()
I'm not going to read what you wrote, I'm going to pretend what the intent was!!!!
![]()
I meant exactly what I wrote. I wrote what I inteded to say.
Isn't it funny that the party that pretends to care so much about school children (more funding, more teachers, no more school shootings!) is strangely silent on this?
Instead of being a principled person and saying "yeah, they engage in selective outrage" or "they are hypocrites" you have to come back and attack things I never said and now absurdly say I was implying something.
Because again, I'm so incapble of saying "this is Obama's fault" if I were to actually believe that.
You really don't have any interest in not looking silly over this. You just want to defend team Dem.
Again, totally expected.
![]()
Alternatively,
Team Democrat is esentially responding with "look ma, squirrel!!!" because they don't like their own hypocrisy shoved in their face.
![]()
Alternatively,
Team Democrat is esentially responding with "look ma, squirrel!!!" because they don't like their own hypocrisy shoved in their face.
![]()
Since you can't grasp what I even wrote, how would you know?
Since you can't grasp what I even wrote, how would you know?
Team Democrat is esentially responding with "look ma, squirrel!!!" because they don't like their own hypocrisy shoved in their face.
It is funny that someone who can't respond to what is written, and is reduced to shouting "I know what you're inferring" would talk about someone being a fool.
That's comedy gold.![]()
Team Democrat is esentially responding with "look ma, squirrel!!!" because they don't like their own hypocrisy shoved in their face.
It is funny that someone who can't respond to what is written, and is reduced to shouting "I know what you're inferring" would talk about someone being a fool.
That's comedy gold.![]()
It is also rather instructive that people equate: "The Dems are strangely silent on this issue" to mean: "You're blaming Obama for a rape in New Mexico!!!"
Gee, I wonder why people would act like that?
![]()
It is also rather instructive that people equate: "The Dems are strangely silent on this issue" to mean: "You're blaming Obama for a rape in New Mexico!!!"
Gee, I wonder why people would act like that?
![]()
Alternatively,
Team Democrat is esentially responding with "look ma, squirrel!!!" because they don't like their own hypocrisy shoved in their face.
![]()
Alternatively,
Team Democrat is esentially responding with "look ma, squirrel!!!" because they don't like their own hypocrisy shoved in their face.
![]()
Thanks for the reminder that everything Democrats say about schools is political posturing and meanlingless.
Oh, and have a child, relative, or friend abused by a public school teacher?
Thank a union.
![]()
Thanks for the reminder that everything Democrats say about schools is political posturing and meanlingless.
Oh, and have a child, relative, or friend abused by a public school teacher?
Thank a union.
![]()
You can't seem to understand that Democrats do not equal Obama
You also can't seem to grasp that I already said: it certanly is a zing at Team Democrat.
Which does not equal = Obama's fault; or Democrats fault
Which part of that can't you understand?
You can't seem to understand that Democrats do not equal Obama
You also can't seem to grasp that I already said: it certanly is a zing at Team Democrat.
Which does not equal = Obama's fault; or Democrats fault
Which part of that can't you understand?

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.