Saying I want Sandusky to suffer the same way he made those children suffer means I like my tax dollars to pay for little boys to be raped by pedophiles? 
What the fuck is wrong with you?
Children are beaten, neglegted, abused and molested every day in this country. Penn State has now officially given those children the attention they hopefully will receive.
Where was everybody when the little 2 year old baby girl was raped at Disney in Orlando? Takes college fucking football to gather the attention and concern from our country for the thousands that don't have any voice. C'mon now...think about it.
Saying I want Sandusky to suffer the same way he made those children suffer means I like my tax dollars to pay for little boys to be raped by pedophiles?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
“No, but your paying for it anyways in court and administration costs alone. It seems like a bad use of money to me.”
It costs more to legally put someone to death than it does to keep them in prison for the rest of their life. Especially when you are talking about the high profile case of a 67 year old.
“And in the end you want to punish the rapist with more rape it seems like a bad idea. Well maybe I am missing something in your logic.”
Eye for an eye. Tooth for a tooth. Let the punishment fit the crime. Etc.
“I mean this seems like a 100 percent guilty case so I say get rid of them by any means necessary. I mean how many lifes has he ruined ?”
Because he has ruined so many lives is exactly why you DON’T allow him the easy way out.
“No, but your paying for it anyways in court and administration costs alone. It seems like a bad use of money to me.”
It costs more to legally put someone to death than it does to keep them in prison for the rest of their life. Especially when you are talking about the high profile case of a 67 year old.
This one here I totally disagree with you but it is what it is. The system is setup to feed this kind of thinking. And that is why these things keep happening.
“And in the end you want to punish the rapist with more rape it seems like a bad idea. Well maybe I am missing something in your logic.”
Eye for an eye. Tooth for a tooth. Let the punishment fit the crime. Etc.
Maybe your right on this one, especially since it deters people right ?
“I mean this seems like a 100 percent guilty case so I say get rid of them by any means necessary. I mean how many lifes has he ruined ?”
Because he has ruined so many lives is exactly why you DON’T allow him the easy way out.
I totally think they just need to exterminate these types of people, what kind of trash does this in the first place ?
Thanks for the input brother.
Are we rewritting the judicial process now for child molesters? If the discussion is going to move in the right direction then parole is the issue. Death penalty will never pass any legislation.
Murder one is reserved. Waste of serious tax money by a long shot across the board. System is is fine. Child molesters arrive in state prison as trophies anyway. 2-4 months and they are dead.
“This one here I totally disagree with you but it is what it is. The system is setup to feed this kind of thinking. And that is why these things keep happening.”
You are free to disagree with it, but that is a straight up fact.
“Maybe your right on this one, especially since it deters people right ?”
Personally I believe the majority of people that are serial killers, serial rapists, serial child sexual abusers, etc. rarely think about the consequences of their actions (at least not enough to make them stop) so they can’t be deterred by possible punishment.
“I totally think they just need to exterminate these types of people, what kind of trash does this in the first place ?
Thanks for the input brother.”
Again, I disagree. I think that allows him the easy way out and, IMO, a monster like him should not be afforded such luxuries.
Once he is found guilty I think the victims should be able to decide his punishment.
“This one here I totally disagree with you but it is what it is. The system is setup to feed this kind of thinking. And that is why these things keep happening.”
You are free to disagree with it, but that is a straight up fact.
“Maybe your right on this one, especially since it deters people right ?”
Personally I believe the majority of people that are serial killers, serial rapists, serial child sexual abusers, etc. rarely think about the consequences of their actions (at least not enough to make them stop) so they can’t be deterred by possible punishment.
“I totally think they just need to exterminate these types of people, what kind of trash does this in the first place ?
Thanks for the input brother.”
Again, I disagree. I think that allows him the easy way out and, IMO, a monster like him should not be afforded such luxuries.
Once he is found guilty I think the victims should be able to decide his punishment.
It might be because it’s 3:30 AM, but I don’t follow.
I have never heard the argument made that people that would rather a sick fuck NOT take the easy way out feel that way because they want to use them to profit off of “ratings” and “commercials.”
Probably because it sounds so fucking ridiculous.
Again: it costs more to legally put someone to death than it does to keep them in prison for the rest of their life. Especially when you are talking about the high profile case of a 67 year old. 
Well....how is this a case of a proof positive perv?
Would it be impossible for numeous people to have lied? There have been thousands of alleged molestation cases where multiple allegations were made by different children who 'piggybacked' on the other claims. What if the assistant coach heard about the allegation and threatened extortion or he would say he saw something? Could that explain why he didn't want to go to the police? What if he wanted him to get fired?
Do I think any of the above is true? No I do not. I think he's guilty. But there have been lots of innocent people accused under such circumstances. The moral of the story is that it is very hard to be 'proof positive' and when we talk about taking someone's life, I think that is necessary to be said 'proof positive.' 
Well....how is this a case of a proof positive perv?
Would it be impossible for numeous people to have lied? There have been thousands of alleged molestation cases where multiple allegations were made by different children who 'piggybacked' on the other claims. What if the assistant coach heard about the allegation and threatened extortion or he would say he saw something? Could that explain why he didn't want to go to the police? What if he wanted him to get fired?
Do I think any of the above is true? No I do not. I think he's guilty. But there have been lots of innocent people accused under such circumstances. The moral of the story is that it is very hard to be 'proof positive' and when we talk about taking someone's life, I think that is necessary to be said 'proof positive.'
Well said sir.
However, if my son came to me crying AND then the story blew up like this AND i read the grand jury report ....
But .... I like the process that we have.
Parade him around. Take away his shoelaces. Guilty. Go to jail. OOps. The inmates got him. 
I have never heard the argument made that people that would rather a sick fuck NOT take the easy way out feel that way because they want to use them to profit off of “ratings” and “commercials.”
Probably because it sounds so fucking ridiculous.
Again: it costs more to legally put someone to death than it does to keep them in prison for the rest of their life. Especially when you are talking about the high profile case of a 67 year old.
ok Nancy grace.
Well....how is this a case of a proof positive perv?
Would it be impossible for numeous people to have lied? There have been thousands of alleged molestation cases where multiple allegations were made by different children who 'piggybacked' on the other claims. What if the assistant coach heard about the allegation and threatened extortion or he would say he saw something? Could that explain why he didn't want to go to the police? What if he wanted him to get fired?
Do I think any of the above is true? No I do not. I think he's guilty. But there have been lots of innocent people accused under such circumstances. The moral of the story is that it is very hard to be 'proof positive' and when we talk about taking someone's life, I think that is necessary to be said 'proof positive.'
Good to 'see' you DSN. 
Sandusky has denied it. Others have just kept their mouths shut, as they probably should (and sadly did).
The only potential laws broken are those that may have violated the 'so-called' good samaritan laws for failure to report the commission of a crime.
I think this goes way deeper though. There was clearly a cover-up. The guy was a hot commodity, left his job, and was never hired by anyone else. Clearly, people knew, and yet, he was still getting access to kids.
Let's not forget the DA that investigated the matter disappeared and there are rumors of big name donors having access to these kids as well.
I'm afraid we are mearly on the tip of a very evil iceberg. 
Because Sandusky is so respected, as a man and as the dean of Linebacker U, there's the impression that it's just fine with him that he has never been a head coach. It's not. "I wouldn't call it devastating," says Sandusky, choosing his words carefully, "but I would call it a little disappointing. That was definitely a goal of mine when I started. If I hadn't had the other part of my life—my family and the Second Mile—I would've been a head coach."
Sandusky had already turned down Marshall and Temple before Maryland came knocking.
Established in 1995,
Live at the MGM .... the stoning of Jerry Sandunsky. 
Hot Forum Topics
