True. But some have made good money at it and you certainly can't beat the tax break.
But look at it. If you have $200K invested smartly, that should double in 8 years. How many people bought a house and had it double in value in 8 years. Not many. So investment-wise, it's not even close.
I bought my first place for $81.5K...sold it after 6 years for $145K. But I sold it at the absolute peak of the housing boom.
True, but how many people have the cash equivalnet to their house laying around? Smart investing is also a tricky business....Sounds good in theory, but your 200k could also evaporate in 2 years.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
True. But some have made good money at it and you certainly can't beat the tax break.
But look at it. If you have $200K invested smartly, that should double in 8 years. How many people bought a house and had it double in value in 8 years. Not many. So investment-wise, it's not even close.
I bought my first place for $81.5K...sold it after 6 years for $145K. But I sold it at the absolute peak of the housing boom.
True, but how many people have the cash equivalnet to their house laying around? Smart investing is also a tricky business....Sounds good in theory, but your 200k could also evaporate in 2 years.....
There is the initial construction costs, then maintenance and upkeep + property taxes
The land underneath the house is what appreciates in value
the box made of wood and concrete just rots in the weather/sun over time.
a house is a consumption item, not an investment
So every soul that buys a house and claims it is an investment, is just a land speculator.
For the past 80 years or so, it was hard to lose the surest bet out there, because land values have increased perpetually over time. It's important to remember
There is no perpetual motion machine which generates an ever-rising path for home prices
Hutch, where are these 8+% annual returns you speak of? Or better yet the 10-20% annual gains i think you mentioned. Please, do tell
0
Quote Originally Posted by be easy:
houses don't appreciate in value
There is the initial construction costs, then maintenance and upkeep + property taxes
The land underneath the house is what appreciates in value
the box made of wood and concrete just rots in the weather/sun over time.
a house is a consumption item, not an investment
So every soul that buys a house and claims it is an investment, is just a land speculator.
For the past 80 years or so, it was hard to lose the surest bet out there, because land values have increased perpetually over time. It's important to remember
There is no perpetual motion machine which generates an ever-rising path for home prices
Hutch, where are these 8+% annual returns you speak of? Or better yet the 10-20% annual gains i think you mentioned. Please, do tell
Bought my house 5 years ago when I was single for $140,000 and amazingly enough it appraised exactly at $140,000 (I wonder how it hit the exact dollar amount in our purchase price agreement!)
Now I am married and have a kid and the house is too small for my growing family. We are trying to sell it and have it under contract for a purchase price of $117,600 (we will have to pay about $25,000 to sell the place after realtor fees and closing costs). Anyways we got the appraisal back today and it appraised for $105,000. So I assume we are screwed and my realtor told me that appraisal will show up for the next 6 months and even if we got it under contract again we wouldn't be able to sell it for anything over 105,000.
Oh and also I HAD TO PAY THE APPRAISER $450 to SCREW ME!!!! What a fucked up system this is! Now I just need to convince my wife that we should rent the rest of our lives.
0
Bought my house 5 years ago when I was single for $140,000 and amazingly enough it appraised exactly at $140,000 (I wonder how it hit the exact dollar amount in our purchase price agreement!)
Now I am married and have a kid and the house is too small for my growing family. We are trying to sell it and have it under contract for a purchase price of $117,600 (we will have to pay about $25,000 to sell the place after realtor fees and closing costs). Anyways we got the appraisal back today and it appraised for $105,000. So I assume we are screwed and my realtor told me that appraisal will show up for the next 6 months and even if we got it under contract again we wouldn't be able to sell it for anything over 105,000.
Oh and also I HAD TO PAY THE APPRAISER $450 to SCREW ME!!!! What a fucked up system this is! Now I just need to convince my wife that we should rent the rest of our lives.
Besides the obvious tax breaks, buying a house always makes more sense than renting. Most people don't have discipline and paying a mortgage is forced savings. There are many people that only have a house and its equity to show for- if it wasn't for the decision to buy a home, they would only have the shirt off their back.
Even the fact that it's ignorant to have a big tax return at the end of year is only for disciplined people's thinking. Average person is better off paying more in taxes and getting a big chunk back at end of year. For one, they will be living below their means and two, they will have a nice tax return that they can either blow away or put into a savings.
Just because reading or doing something makes sense doesn't mean it's always practical to do. Many people are undisciplined and doing whatever it takes to help them save is better than worrying about a few dollars you are gonna lose getting there.
0
Besides the obvious tax breaks, buying a house always makes more sense than renting. Most people don't have discipline and paying a mortgage is forced savings. There are many people that only have a house and its equity to show for- if it wasn't for the decision to buy a home, they would only have the shirt off their back.
Even the fact that it's ignorant to have a big tax return at the end of year is only for disciplined people's thinking. Average person is better off paying more in taxes and getting a big chunk back at end of year. For one, they will be living below their means and two, they will have a nice tax return that they can either blow away or put into a savings.
Just because reading or doing something makes sense doesn't mean it's always practical to do. Many people are undisciplined and doing whatever it takes to help them save is better than worrying about a few dollars you are gonna lose getting there.
not sure why people think that buying a home @ 225 K and then paying $450k in payments on a house that after 30 years may have a vakue of $500k is a solid investment. You couldn't find a way to make 50k in 30 years?
Tell people who live in Vegas who bought their homes in the early 2000 or 2001's for 500 K and now their house is worth 145 K. Or they bought a smaller house for 200k and it is now worth 70K Tell them that buying a house is the american dream.
There are so many better ways to accrue Money rather than buying a home. Unless you are a prospector. Even in the example that was given on page 1, that person bought at the low end of the market or bought a fixer upper and sold it after a few years at just the right time.
Think of the interest payment on a mortgage as juice on a bet. If you pay it for too long(make too many losing bets) it eats up all your profits.
0
not sure why people think that buying a home @ 225 K and then paying $450k in payments on a house that after 30 years may have a vakue of $500k is a solid investment. You couldn't find a way to make 50k in 30 years?
Tell people who live in Vegas who bought their homes in the early 2000 or 2001's for 500 K and now their house is worth 145 K. Or they bought a smaller house for 200k and it is now worth 70K Tell them that buying a house is the american dream.
There are so many better ways to accrue Money rather than buying a home. Unless you are a prospector. Even in the example that was given on page 1, that person bought at the low end of the market or bought a fixer upper and sold it after a few years at just the right time.
Think of the interest payment on a mortgage as juice on a bet. If you pay it for too long(make too many losing bets) it eats up all your profits.
not sure why people think that buying a home @ 225 K and then paying $450k in payments on a house that after 30 years may have a vakue of $500k is a solid investment. You couldn't find a way to make 50k in 30 years?
Tell people who live in Vegas who bought their homes in the early 2000 or 2001's for 500 K and now their house is worth 145 K. Or they bought a smaller house for 200k and it is now worth 70K Tell them that buying a house is the american dream.
There are so many better ways to accrue Money rather than buying a home. Unless you are a prospector. Even in the example that was given on page 1, that person bought at the low end of the market or bought a fixer upper and sold it after a few years at just the right time.
Think of the interest payment on a mortgage as juice on a bet. If you pay it for too long(make too many losing bets) it eats up all your profits.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but maying rent is like betting a 50 team parlay....that money is lost before the bet is made...
0
Quote Originally Posted by lillefty:
not sure why people think that buying a home @ 225 K and then paying $450k in payments on a house that after 30 years may have a vakue of $500k is a solid investment. You couldn't find a way to make 50k in 30 years?
Tell people who live in Vegas who bought their homes in the early 2000 or 2001's for 500 K and now their house is worth 145 K. Or they bought a smaller house for 200k and it is now worth 70K Tell them that buying a house is the american dream.
There are so many better ways to accrue Money rather than buying a home. Unless you are a prospector. Even in the example that was given on page 1, that person bought at the low end of the market or bought a fixer upper and sold it after a few years at just the right time.
Think of the interest payment on a mortgage as juice on a bet. If you pay it for too long(make too many losing bets) it eats up all your profits.
I'm not saying you're wrong, but maying rent is like betting a 50 team parlay....that money is lost before the bet is made...
not sure why people think that buying a home @ 225 K and then paying $450k in payments on a house that after 30 years may have a vakue of $500k is a solid investment. You couldn't find a way to make 50k in 30 years?
Tell people who live in Vegas who bought their homes in the early 2000 or 2001's for 500 K and now their house is worth 145 K. Or they bought a smaller house for 200k and it is now worth 70K Tell them that buying a house is the american dream.
There are so many better ways to accrue Money rather than buying a home. Unless you are a prospector. Even in the example that was given on page 1, that person bought at the low end of the market or bought a fixer upper and sold it after a few years at just the right time.
Think of the interest payment on a mortgage as juice on a bet. If you pay it for too long(make too many losing bets) it eats up all your profits.
As long as Obama doesn't get his way and repeal the mortgage interest deduction, buying a home is a solid investment for PEOPLE WHO CAN AFFORD IT.
The problem we had was caused by millions of people who had no business buying a home. Even worse, most stretched for bigger, fancier, pricier homes that were never even remotely in their budget.
The market will bottom in a few years, and the smart liquid buyers will be there to profit just like they do in all boom/bust scenarios.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lillefty:
not sure why people think that buying a home @ 225 K and then paying $450k in payments on a house that after 30 years may have a vakue of $500k is a solid investment. You couldn't find a way to make 50k in 30 years?
Tell people who live in Vegas who bought their homes in the early 2000 or 2001's for 500 K and now their house is worth 145 K. Or they bought a smaller house for 200k and it is now worth 70K Tell them that buying a house is the american dream.
There are so many better ways to accrue Money rather than buying a home. Unless you are a prospector. Even in the example that was given on page 1, that person bought at the low end of the market or bought a fixer upper and sold it after a few years at just the right time.
Think of the interest payment on a mortgage as juice on a bet. If you pay it for too long(make too many losing bets) it eats up all your profits.
As long as Obama doesn't get his way and repeal the mortgage interest deduction, buying a home is a solid investment for PEOPLE WHO CAN AFFORD IT.
The problem we had was caused by millions of people who had no business buying a home. Even worse, most stretched for bigger, fancier, pricier homes that were never even remotely in their budget.
The market will bottom in a few years, and the smart liquid buyers will be there to profit just like they do in all boom/bust scenarios.
not sure why people think that buying a home @ 225 K and then paying $450k in payments on a house that after 30 years may have a vakue of $500k is a solid investment. You couldn't find a way to make 50k in 30 years?
Tell people who live in Vegas who bought their homes in the early 2000 or 2001's for 500 K and now their house is worth 145 K. Or they bought a smaller house for 200k and it is now worth 70K Tell them that buying a house is the american dream.
There are so many better ways to accrue Money rather than buying a home. Unless you are a prospector. Even in the example that was given on page 1, that person bought at the low end of the market or bought a fixer upper and sold it after a few years at just the right time.
Think of the interest payment on a mortgage as juice ona bet. If you pay it for too long(make too many losing bets) it eats up all your profits.
Unfortunately this is a difficult thing for many to conceptualize (I do not mean that to sound condescending). On a typical 30 year loan you will end up paying approximately twice as much for your home to get it paid off. And that does not even count the cost of AC repairs, replacing a roof, plumbing issues etc. that always show up.
Train -- you are also correct though that renting is not the best thing either. I think that the original point of the anti buyers, or at least what the point should be, is that home buying is not the American Dream that it is painted out to be.
If you want to buy for whatever reason (peace of mind, ability to do what you want etc...) that is fine but rarely should it be because it is this great investment.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lillefty:
not sure why people think that buying a home @ 225 K and then paying $450k in payments on a house that after 30 years may have a vakue of $500k is a solid investment. You couldn't find a way to make 50k in 30 years?
Tell people who live in Vegas who bought their homes in the early 2000 or 2001's for 500 K and now their house is worth 145 K. Or they bought a smaller house for 200k and it is now worth 70K Tell them that buying a house is the american dream.
There are so many better ways to accrue Money rather than buying a home. Unless you are a prospector. Even in the example that was given on page 1, that person bought at the low end of the market or bought a fixer upper and sold it after a few years at just the right time.
Think of the interest payment on a mortgage as juice ona bet. If you pay it for too long(make too many losing bets) it eats up all your profits.
Unfortunately this is a difficult thing for many to conceptualize (I do not mean that to sound condescending). On a typical 30 year loan you will end up paying approximately twice as much for your home to get it paid off. And that does not even count the cost of AC repairs, replacing a roof, plumbing issues etc. that always show up.
Train -- you are also correct though that renting is not the best thing either. I think that the original point of the anti buyers, or at least what the point should be, is that home buying is not the American Dream that it is painted out to be.
If you want to buy for whatever reason (peace of mind, ability to do what you want etc...) that is fine but rarely should it be because it is this great investment.
If you have the cash for it up front, than buying a house right now is a good investment. However with a mortgage you pay double what the house is valued at. There is almost no way to recoup those monies through the house's value.
The basic question to many people is this.... Do you want all your equity tied into your house, or in other investments??? How is your investment portfolio created???
Say you only have 500k in your investment portfolio, but 350k is in your mortgage/house. That's a bad ratio for the individual. Basically you only have 150k that is working for you to make you cash equity. The only way you use the house money is through selling your home. Unless you are thinking of home equity loans, but that's just not a good idea b/c of the interest rates you have to pay on those.
0
If you have the cash for it up front, than buying a house right now is a good investment. However with a mortgage you pay double what the house is valued at. There is almost no way to recoup those monies through the house's value.
The basic question to many people is this.... Do you want all your equity tied into your house, or in other investments??? How is your investment portfolio created???
Say you only have 500k in your investment portfolio, but 350k is in your mortgage/house. That's a bad ratio for the individual. Basically you only have 150k that is working for you to make you cash equity. The only way you use the house money is through selling your home. Unless you are thinking of home equity loans, but that's just not a good idea b/c of the interest rates you have to pay on those.
Buying a home is a good idea if you have enough cash equity built up already. You want your investment portfolio to be a majority of stocks/bonds/mutual funds/etc... 2/3's is a good ballpark figure. If you can't get a home and make mortgage payments totaling less than 1/3 of your total investment portfolio, than you should rent, not own.
0
Buying a home is a good idea if you have enough cash equity built up already. You want your investment portfolio to be a majority of stocks/bonds/mutual funds/etc... 2/3's is a good ballpark figure. If you can't get a home and make mortgage payments totaling less than 1/3 of your total investment portfolio, than you should rent, not own.
Now, in this housing market, it is a buyers market. A buddy of mine bought a foreclosed house for 160k for a house valued at 225k or more. They plan on staying for years probably, and by then the housing market should be much better. There is a decent shot the home will be back to it's pre-recession value (350k). Now, he made a down payment, and his mortgage is probably in the ballpark of 130k or so. His mortgage will end up being 250k or so. If the housing market improves he could break even with taxes, repairs, etc.. And to break even on a home is fine. He owns a home, has a place to raise a family, etc. There is something to that "American Dream".
0
Now, in this housing market, it is a buyers market. A buddy of mine bought a foreclosed house for 160k for a house valued at 225k or more. They plan on staying for years probably, and by then the housing market should be much better. There is a decent shot the home will be back to it's pre-recession value (350k). Now, he made a down payment, and his mortgage is probably in the ballpark of 130k or so. His mortgage will end up being 250k or so. If the housing market improves he could break even with taxes, repairs, etc.. And to break even on a home is fine. He owns a home, has a place to raise a family, etc. There is something to that "American Dream".
Unfortunately this is a difficult thing for many to conceptualize (I do not mean that to sound condescending). On a typical 30 year loan you will end up paying approximately twice as much for your home to get it paid off. And that does not even count the cost of AC repairs, replacing a roof, plumbing issues etc. that always show up.
Train -- you are also correct though that renting is not the best thing either. I think that the original point of the anti buyers, or at least what the point should be, is that home buying is not the American Dream that it is painted out to be.
If you want to buy for whatever reason (peace of mind, ability to do what you want etc...) that is fine but rarely should it be because it is this great investment.
If renting is not good and buying is not good, then what do you recommend? Being homeless or living with your parents?
Buying is not a sure thing, but it is a lot better than the alternatives.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mattbrot:
Unfortunately this is a difficult thing for many to conceptualize (I do not mean that to sound condescending). On a typical 30 year loan you will end up paying approximately twice as much for your home to get it paid off. And that does not even count the cost of AC repairs, replacing a roof, plumbing issues etc. that always show up.
Train -- you are also correct though that renting is not the best thing either. I think that the original point of the anti buyers, or at least what the point should be, is that home buying is not the American Dream that it is painted out to be.
If you want to buy for whatever reason (peace of mind, ability to do what you want etc...) that is fine but rarely should it be because it is this great investment.
If renting is not good and buying is not good, then what do you recommend? Being homeless or living with your parents?
Buying is not a sure thing, but it is a lot better than the alternatives.
If renting is not good and buying is not good, then what do you recommend? Being homeless or living with your parents?
Buying is not a sure thing, but it is a lot better than the alternatives.
Thorpe -- I am just saying that from an investment point of view buying is not the fantasy / great investment opportunity that it is made out to be. Obviously you need to do one or the other but to buy for the purposes of making an investment is really not what it is made out to be.
Particularly in this day and age where our lives and work situations are far more dynamic than they used to be -- rarely do people land a job and stay with that job and live in a same area for the extended periods of time that they used to.
0
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
If renting is not good and buying is not good, then what do you recommend? Being homeless or living with your parents?
Buying is not a sure thing, but it is a lot better than the alternatives.
Thorpe -- I am just saying that from an investment point of view buying is not the fantasy / great investment opportunity that it is made out to be. Obviously you need to do one or the other but to buy for the purposes of making an investment is really not what it is made out to be.
Particularly in this day and age where our lives and work situations are far more dynamic than they used to be -- rarely do people land a job and stay with that job and live in a same area for the extended periods of time that they used to.
Land has been valueable ever since they stopped making it.
Last year I purchased a 18 year old 5 bedroom raised bungalow with a lot just under an acre for 181k. It was appraised for 200k (good deals are out there if you search hard enough)
I now rent a two bedroom apartment in the basement to a buddy of mine. His rent is a bargain for him at 500 dollars a monthfor 800 square feet. which is just under half my mortgage payment. and myself and the lady have the 3 bedrooms upstairs to ourselves.
I have rebuilt a shed outside and I'm currently re landscaping the entire lawn (The lawn was a disaster when purcahsed). I am also looking at installing a metal roof. So I am quite confident if I do decide to sell this place it's value can only go up from what it was.If i DO infact decide to sell it. I'll let yas know how I made out.
0
Land has been valueable ever since they stopped making it.
Last year I purchased a 18 year old 5 bedroom raised bungalow with a lot just under an acre for 181k. It was appraised for 200k (good deals are out there if you search hard enough)
I now rent a two bedroom apartment in the basement to a buddy of mine. His rent is a bargain for him at 500 dollars a monthfor 800 square feet. which is just under half my mortgage payment. and myself and the lady have the 3 bedrooms upstairs to ourselves.
I have rebuilt a shed outside and I'm currently re landscaping the entire lawn (The lawn was a disaster when purcahsed). I am also looking at installing a metal roof. So I am quite confident if I do decide to sell this place it's value can only go up from what it was.If i DO infact decide to sell it. I'll let yas know how I made out.
True, but how many people have the cash equivalnet to their house laying around? Smart investing is also a tricky business....Sounds good in theory, but your 200k could also evaporate in 2 years.....
I guess that's probably true. I read somewhere that less than 50% of people who are OVER the age of 40 have saved more than $25K for retirement.
But nonetheless, you're much better off investing in anything other than a house these days.....if you're getting good advice. I have a gal I go to for massages. Her house is almost paid off. That's great, but now they have an asset that is worth 20% less than it was 5 years ago. If they had invested that same money in the market (wisely), it likely would have doubled. It's just the facts.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
True, but how many people have the cash equivalnet to their house laying around? Smart investing is also a tricky business....Sounds good in theory, but your 200k could also evaporate in 2 years.....
I guess that's probably true. I read somewhere that less than 50% of people who are OVER the age of 40 have saved more than $25K for retirement.
But nonetheless, you're much better off investing in anything other than a house these days.....if you're getting good advice. I have a gal I go to for massages. Her house is almost paid off. That's great, but now they have an asset that is worth 20% less than it was 5 years ago. If they had invested that same money in the market (wisely), it likely would have doubled. It's just the facts.
I guess that's probably true. I read somewhere that less than 50% of people who are OVER the age of 40 have saved more than $25K for retirement.
But nonetheless, you're much better off investing in anything other than a house these days.....if you're getting good advice. I have a gal I go to for massages. Her house is almost paid off. That's great, but now they have an asset that is worth 20% less than it was 5 years ago. If they had invested that same money in the market (wisely), it likely would have doubled. It's just the facts.
Doubling your money is great, but when do you stop? Nobody quits after they double.....they stick it out until the gains end and reverse and then hang on some more. Its gambling and most people cant win because A) they suck or B) cant quit while ahead.
So you doubled your money and are renting. What are you going to do with the money? My guess is you buy lots of "toys" big screen,atvs,new vehicles,vacations.....and you come back to a place that doesnt belong to you....
0
Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:
I guess that's probably true. I read somewhere that less than 50% of people who are OVER the age of 40 have saved more than $25K for retirement.
But nonetheless, you're much better off investing in anything other than a house these days.....if you're getting good advice. I have a gal I go to for massages. Her house is almost paid off. That's great, but now they have an asset that is worth 20% less than it was 5 years ago. If they had invested that same money in the market (wisely), it likely would have doubled. It's just the facts.
Doubling your money is great, but when do you stop? Nobody quits after they double.....they stick it out until the gains end and reverse and then hang on some more. Its gambling and most people cant win because A) they suck or B) cant quit while ahead.
So you doubled your money and are renting. What are you going to do with the money? My guess is you buy lots of "toys" big screen,atvs,new vehicles,vacations.....and you come back to a place that doesnt belong to you....
Doubling your money is great, but when do you stop? Nobody quits after they double.....they stick it out until the gains end and reverse and then hang on some more. Its gambling and most people cant win because A) they suck or B) cant quit while ahead.
So you doubled your money and are renting. What are you going to do with the money? My guess is you buy lots of "toys" big screen,atvs,new vehicles,vacations.....and you come back to a place that doesnt belong to you....
I actually own KP3. And I think it's a good idea to own (tax advantages and your house can certainly appreciate), but if you can make more money investing than you are paying in interest on your home loan (percentage-wise), it is insane to make extra payments on your house. I have talked to the guy who makes my investment calls and he knows that I'm ready to sell in a SECOND if the market starts going south. If that does happen, I'll go all to cash and invest again when I think the market hits bottom. I'm not in it for the action like a lot of gamblers are. It is all about expected value and I think there was HUGE expected value when the market tanked.
My money market does about 1.5%. Yippeee. I'll take a calculated risk in the market if it is warranted.
Like I said, I'm not against owning at all. I'm against paying down an asset that is a turd vs. investing (in an informed manner) in the market.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Doubling your money is great, but when do you stop? Nobody quits after they double.....they stick it out until the gains end and reverse and then hang on some more. Its gambling and most people cant win because A) they suck or B) cant quit while ahead.
So you doubled your money and are renting. What are you going to do with the money? My guess is you buy lots of "toys" big screen,atvs,new vehicles,vacations.....and you come back to a place that doesnt belong to you....
I actually own KP3. And I think it's a good idea to own (tax advantages and your house can certainly appreciate), but if you can make more money investing than you are paying in interest on your home loan (percentage-wise), it is insane to make extra payments on your house. I have talked to the guy who makes my investment calls and he knows that I'm ready to sell in a SECOND if the market starts going south. If that does happen, I'll go all to cash and invest again when I think the market hits bottom. I'm not in it for the action like a lot of gamblers are. It is all about expected value and I think there was HUGE expected value when the market tanked.
My money market does about 1.5%. Yippeee. I'll take a calculated risk in the market if it is warranted.
Like I said, I'm not against owning at all. I'm against paying down an asset that is a turd vs. investing (in an informed manner) in the market.
Doubling your money is great, but when do you stop? Nobody quits after they double.....they stick it out until the gains end and reverse and then hang on some more. Its gambling and most people cant win because A) they suck or B) cant quit while ahead.
So you doubled your money and are renting. What are you going to do with the money? My guess is you buy lots of "toys" big screen,atvs,new vehicles,vacations.....and you come back to a place that doesnt belong to you....
And my investment money is my investment money (retirement money)...period. I have not taken 1 dollar out of any of those accounts in 21 years. I could live for 2 years with my current obligations without 1 dollar of income from anywhere else.....and still not having to touch my retirement income.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Doubling your money is great, but when do you stop? Nobody quits after they double.....they stick it out until the gains end and reverse and then hang on some more. Its gambling and most people cant win because A) they suck or B) cant quit while ahead.
So you doubled your money and are renting. What are you going to do with the money? My guess is you buy lots of "toys" big screen,atvs,new vehicles,vacations.....and you come back to a place that doesnt belong to you....
And my investment money is my investment money (retirement money)...period. I have not taken 1 dollar out of any of those accounts in 21 years. I could live for 2 years with my current obligations without 1 dollar of income from anywhere else.....and still not having to touch my retirement income.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.