Don’t get me wrong, she’s a good looking woman. I just think she’s overrated.
When Kate Upton was 18 and first burst onto the scene I posted a couple of threads about her when most guys didn’t even know her name.
Now everyone and their mother knows who she is and it seems the perception is she’s one of the (if not THE) hottest women on the planet.
Personally I think the only thing she has that’s great is her tits (which are spectacular). However, I think if a women is even going to be in the conversation of “one of the hottest women on the planet” she needs to have great everything (or pretty damn close). Not just a spectacular pair of tits.
But hey, that’s just my opinion.
Well said!
That a lot of these women many guys worship as being the hottest woman on the planet are no hotter than hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of other women given airbrushing, professionals doing their hair/makeup, and a society in which perception is reality.
Personally I don’t think that’s hard to understand at all.
Indeed they do.
They take this:
https://static.thehollywoodgossip.com/images/gallery/katy-perry-without-makeup_425x315.jpg
And turn it into this:
If only every woman was so lucky. The majority of 17-35 year olds in the US that weren’t fat would be 7’s or better.
That’s exactly my point. These women that many guys hail as “the hottest woman on the planet” are no hotter than hundreds of thousands of other women when you take away the airbrushing and professionals doing their hair and makeup.
The OP contained the following phrases:
“I just think…”
“Personally I think…”
“I think if…”
“That’s just my opinion.”
Post #37. 
While everyone is obviously entitled to their own opinion I will say I think there is a reason why almost every picture of her focuses on her tits and NOT her behind or her legs.
I mean if she really did have the best body on the planet I would think there would be at least half as many pictures focusing on her behind as on her tits.
As I said earlier she has spectacular tits. However, I think her behind and legs are a dime a dozen on non-overweight 18-20 year old American girls.
While everyone is obviously entitled to their own opinion I will say I think there is a reason why almost every picture of her focuses on her tits and NOT her behind or her legs.
I mean if she really did have the best body on the planet I would think there would be at least half as many pictures focusing on her behind as on her tits.
As I said earlier she has spectacular tits. However, I think her behind and legs are a dime a dozen on non-overweight 18-20 year old American girls.
Well put. We all have different taste in women
Established in 1995,
For real, man!
Hot Forum Topics
