• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 1
      NFL Week 1
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | General Discussion

    Joe Paterno Is Catching Too Much Heat.

    «First Previous 123 ... 131415 Next Last»
    darkhorse12
    StraightShooter
    Wake2002
    Jon11
    jasonwhitesknee
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 12969
    Posts: 355
    «First Previous 123 ... 131415 Next Last»
     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 4:07 PM ET #326

    Quote Originally Posted by cave0707:

    You think he's getting too much heat?!  So he told his boss that one of his coordinators is banging helpless little boys and thats it?  If that was my child getting raped by some old man, I'd kill him right then and there.  There's no waiting around for the police homie.  His D coordinator used his college program as bait so he could lure little boys in for his pleasure.  This has got to be the most disgusting thing that has happened to a college football program PERIOD.  If Joe Pa being terminated for not doing more is the only thing that happens to him, he should consider himself extremely lucky.  I personally think Paterno deserves some jail time.  That's just me.

    Get your facts straight. Sandusky was not on the coaching staff in 2002.He was given an office in the football building by the university not Paterno. In 1998 he was an assistant coach when the first incident happened and that incident was investigated by the university and I believe Centre County Child Welfare. It was basically deemed nfounded and no charges were filed.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by cave0707:

    You think he's getting too much heat?!  So he told his boss that one of his coordinators is banging helpless little boys and thats it?  If that was my child getting raped by some old man, I'd kill him right then and there.  There's no waiting around for the police homie.  His D coordinator used his college program as bait so he could lure little boys in for his pleasure.  This has got to be the most disgusting thing that has happened to a college football program PERIOD.  If Joe Pa being terminated for not doing more is the only thing that happens to him, he should consider himself extremely lucky.  I personally think Paterno deserves some jail time.  That's just me.

    Get your facts straight. Sandusky was not on the coaching staff in 2002.He was given an office in the football building by the university not Paterno. In 1998 he was an assistant coach when the first incident happened and that incident was investigated by the university and I believe Centre County Child Welfare. It was basically deemed nfounded and no charges were filed.

     
    StraightShooter
    StraightShooter
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 23227
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 4:08 PM ET #327

    I think most decent people here would agree that anyone who claims a random adult placing a $100 bet on a football game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him has some serious issues and a broken moral compass.

    Get some help, darkhorse12. 

    Also you should stay the hell away from children because with a broken moral compass no good can come of it.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I think most decent people here would agree that anyone who claims a random adult placing a $100 bet on a football game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him has some serious issues and a broken moral compass.

    Get some help, darkhorse12. 

    Also you should stay the hell away from children because with a broken moral compass no good can come of it.

     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 4:22 PM ET #328

    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    I think most decent people here would agree that anyone who claims a random adult placing a $100 bet on a football game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him has some serious issues and a broken moral compass.

    Get some help, darkhorse12. 

    Also you should stay the hell away from children because with a broken moral compass no good can come of it.

    Since you deem yourself to be so intelligent how about you rebutting me with facts. Maybe if you look into your crystal ball you can come up with something.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    I think most decent people here would agree that anyone who claims a random adult placing a $100 bet on a football game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him has some serious issues and a broken moral compass.

    Get some help, darkhorse12. 

    Also you should stay the hell away from children because with a broken moral compass no good can come of it.

    Since you deem yourself to be so intelligent how about you rebutting me with facts. Maybe if you look into your crystal ball you can come up with something.

     
    darkhorse12
    darkhorse12
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 10739
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 4:24 PM ET #329

    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    I think most decent people here would agree that anyone who claims a random adult placing a $100 bet on a football game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him has some serious issues and a broken moral compass.

    Get some help, darkhorse12. 

    Also you should stay the hell away from children because with a broken moral compass no good can come of it.

    How about some facts from you?Isn't that your moral obligation?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    I think most decent people here would agree that anyone who claims a random adult placing a $100 bet on a football game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him has some serious issues and a broken moral compass.

    Get some help, darkhorse12. 

    Also you should stay the hell away from children because with a broken moral compass no good can come of it.

    How about some facts from you?Isn't that your moral obligation?

     
    StraightShooter
    StraightShooter
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 23227
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 6:14 PM ET #330

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    Since you deem yourself to be so intelligent how about you rebutting me with facts. Maybe if you look into your crystal ball you can come up with something.

    Some random adult placing a small bet on a football game does NOT have the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him.

    It’s pretty sad that you are actually arguing against that.

    I guess according to you everyone on this site is no better than Sandusky.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    Since you deem yourself to be so intelligent how about you rebutting me with facts. Maybe if you look into your crystal ball you can come up with something.

    Some random adult placing a small bet on a football game does NOT have the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him.

    It’s pretty sad that you are actually arguing against that.

    I guess according to you everyone on this site is no better than Sandusky.

     

     
    StraightShooter
    StraightShooter
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 23227
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 6:19 PM ET #331

    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    How about some facts from you?Isn't that your moral obligation?

    The same dumbass claiming that a random adult placing a small bet on a football game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him is now demanding facts from other people.

    If you truly think that you obviously have a broken moral compass.   It would be better for everyone if you just stayed the hell away from children.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

    How about some facts from you?Isn't that your moral obligation?

    The same dumbass claiming that a random adult placing a small bet on a football game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them and forcing them to perform oral sex on him is now demanding facts from other people.

    If you truly think that you obviously have a broken moral compass.   It would be better for everyone if you just stayed the hell away from children.

     

     
    Wake2002
    Wake2002
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 747
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 6:56 PM ET #332

    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    Scratch that last question.  I just noticed your location.

    It seems the only people defending these pieces of shit are people in Pennsylvania and pedophile enthusiasts.   

     

    Sorry, I meant to respond to some of these posts last night in connection with my other post, but it was way past my bedtime and I ran out of steam.

    Very, very, very poor generalization above. For someone who loves to put down other posters' intelligence levels, I'd be willing to guess that the majority on this site could figure out where my illegiances lie.  A simple glance at my user name and avatar should have made that extremely obvious.

    Pennsylvania is a very large state, and alot of people here don't give two $hits about Penn State, myself included.

    I could have quoted any number of your posts on this thread, or other threads in the forum, to provide evidence that your favorite tactic is to try and attack the character of anyone who disagrees with you.  It is extremely childish, and from a debate standpoint, extremely ineffective.  Your points and views lose any sort of credibility when you are more interested in belittling those who have a different opinion.

    Contrary to your beliefs, not everyone who disagrees with you on this issue is a pedophile enthusiast, or has an IQ of 75 or lower, or whatever other random $hit you like to throw out. 

    And personally, I don't have any issues with your opinions.  In fact, I'd say I usually tend to agree with you more times than disagree, especially in regards to alot of your posts in the politics forum, but you come across so abrasive and angry that it is very hard to take any of your points seriously 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    Scratch that last question.  I just noticed your location.

    It seems the only people defending these pieces of shit are people in Pennsylvania and pedophile enthusiasts.   

     

    Sorry, I meant to respond to some of these posts last night in connection with my other post, but it was way past my bedtime and I ran out of steam.

    Very, very, very poor generalization above. For someone who loves to put down other posters' intelligence levels, I'd be willing to guess that the majority on this site could figure out where my illegiances lie.  A simple glance at my user name and avatar should have made that extremely obvious.

    Pennsylvania is a very large state, and alot of people here don't give two $hits about Penn State, myself included.

    I could have quoted any number of your posts on this thread, or other threads in the forum, to provide evidence that your favorite tactic is to try and attack the character of anyone who disagrees with you.  It is extremely childish, and from a debate standpoint, extremely ineffective.  Your points and views lose any sort of credibility when you are more interested in belittling those who have a different opinion.

    Contrary to your beliefs, not everyone who disagrees with you on this issue is a pedophile enthusiast, or has an IQ of 75 or lower, or whatever other random $hit you like to throw out. 

    And personally, I don't have any issues with your opinions.  In fact, I'd say I usually tend to agree with you more times than disagree, especially in regards to alot of your posts in the politics forum, but you come across so abrasive and angry that it is very hard to take any of your points seriously 

     
    Wake2002
    Wake2002
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 747
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 7:02 PM ET #333

    Quote Originally Posted by TILTOLOGIC:

    Joe Paterno's own words    "I wish I would of done more" 

    Joe Paterno will forever be known as a Coward...

    I can't wait to walk into Beaver Stadium on Saturday, Home of pedophiles and their protectors...And I plan on letting everyone know about it
     
     



    Making statements like that remove any sort of potential credibility your posts may have had.  

    A Nebraska fan (I'm assuming)?  With your attitude, I hope you say the wrong thing to the wrong person on Saturday and get what you deserve.   

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TILTOLOGIC:

    Joe Paterno's own words    "I wish I would of done more" 

    Joe Paterno will forever be known as a Coward...

    I can't wait to walk into Beaver Stadium on Saturday, Home of pedophiles and their protectors...And I plan on letting everyone know about it
     
     



    Making statements like that remove any sort of potential credibility your posts may have had.  

    A Nebraska fan (I'm assuming)?  With your attitude, I hope you say the wrong thing to the wrong person on Saturday and get what you deserve.   

     
    Wake2002
    Wake2002
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 747
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 7:06 PM ET #334

    Quote Originally Posted by marnypoly:

    Wake, they had to fire him. How disgusting would the sight of 110,000 Nittany Lions fans giving this guy a standing ovation for his last home game on Sat look? There was a 99.99% chance he would've received one.

    And what purpose would finishing out the season be? So he can leave with dignity? He's way passed that point. So there can be a media circus there for the next 3 weeks?

    It had to be done. 

    I can see their point of view. However, I think the courageous from their perspective would have been to not cave to public perception.  This is not as black and white as the media is making it, and after all that the man did for the school, I think letting him finish out the season would have been appropriate.  His legacy is already tarnished, give the man who gave Penn State so much a shred of dignity.

    Assuming they don't see things that way, fine, they made the decision to fire him.  That decision should have immediately been followed up by a decision to either give back to Paterno all the money he has donated to the school (we are talking millions and millions of dollars), or donate it to a charity or something. 

    I'm still waiting for that announcement

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by marnypoly:

    Wake, they had to fire him. How disgusting would the sight of 110,000 Nittany Lions fans giving this guy a standing ovation for his last home game on Sat look? There was a 99.99% chance he would've received one.

    And what purpose would finishing out the season be? So he can leave with dignity? He's way passed that point. So there can be a media circus there for the next 3 weeks?

    It had to be done. 

    I can see their point of view. However, I think the courageous from their perspective would have been to not cave to public perception.  This is not as black and white as the media is making it, and after all that the man did for the school, I think letting him finish out the season would have been appropriate.  His legacy is already tarnished, give the man who gave Penn State so much a shred of dignity.

    Assuming they don't see things that way, fine, they made the decision to fire him.  That decision should have immediately been followed up by a decision to either give back to Paterno all the money he has donated to the school (we are talking millions and millions of dollars), or donate it to a charity or something. 

    I'm still waiting for that announcement

     
    StraightShooter
    StraightShooter
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 23227
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 7:14 PM ET #335

    Quote Originally Posted by Wake2002:

    Sorry, I meant to respond to some of these posts last night in connection with my other post, but it was way past my bedtime and I ran out of steam.

    Very, very, very poor generalization above. For someone who loves to put down other posters' intelligence levels, I'd be willing to guess that the majority on this site could figure out where my illegiances lie.  A simple glance at my user name and avatar should have made that extremely obvious.

    Pennsylvania is a very large state, and alot of people here don't give two $hits about Penn State, myself included.

    I could have quoted any number of your posts on this thread, or other threads in the forum, to provide evidence that your favorite tactic is to try and attack the character of anyone who disagrees with you.  It is extremely childish, and from a debate standpoint, extremely ineffective.  Your points and views lose any sort of credibility when you are more interested in belittling those who have a different opinion.

    Contrary to your beliefs, not everyone who disagrees with you on this issue is a pedophile enthusiast, or has an IQ of 75 or lower, or whatever other random $hit you like to throw out. 

    And personally, I don't have any issues with your opinions.  In fact, I'd say I usually tend to agree with you more times than disagree, especially in regards to alot of your posts in the politics forum, but you come across so abrasive and angry that it is very hard to take any of your points seriously 

    Post where I claimed everyone who disagrees with me is a pedophile enthusiast or has an IQ under 75.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake2002:

    Sorry, I meant to respond to some of these posts last night in connection with my other post, but it was way past my bedtime and I ran out of steam.

    Very, very, very poor generalization above. For someone who loves to put down other posters' intelligence levels, I'd be willing to guess that the majority on this site could figure out where my illegiances lie.  A simple glance at my user name and avatar should have made that extremely obvious.

    Pennsylvania is a very large state, and alot of people here don't give two $hits about Penn State, myself included.

    I could have quoted any number of your posts on this thread, or other threads in the forum, to provide evidence that your favorite tactic is to try and attack the character of anyone who disagrees with you.  It is extremely childish, and from a debate standpoint, extremely ineffective.  Your points and views lose any sort of credibility when you are more interested in belittling those who have a different opinion.

    Contrary to your beliefs, not everyone who disagrees with you on this issue is a pedophile enthusiast, or has an IQ of 75 or lower, or whatever other random $hit you like to throw out. 

    And personally, I don't have any issues with your opinions.  In fact, I'd say I usually tend to agree with you more times than disagree, especially in regards to alot of your posts in the politics forum, but you come across so abrasive and angry that it is very hard to take any of your points seriously 

    Post where I claimed everyone who disagrees with me is a pedophile enthusiast or has an IQ under 75.

     
    Wake2002
    Wake2002
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 747
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 7:19 PM ET #336

    Quote Originally Posted by Gunners:

    I only have two comments to your post.  The first bolded type means that you don't believe that people can feel a shred of empathy.  even though you start off by saying that you don't even know what you would do if it was your son.  empathy is a strong emotion and people are entitled to feel the rage of others through empathy. "Empathy is the capacity to recognize and, to some extent, share feelings (such as sadness or happiness) that are being experienced by another sapient or semi-sapient being"

    and secondly, you call it a mistake but it was much more than that.  from the grand jury document, the failure to report suspected child abuse is a violation of Pennsylvania law.  there are two laws mentioned, one where the head official of the school was required within 48 hours to report it to the department of public welfare.  there is a second law mentioned that doesn't mention whether that just falls on the head official or on anyone that knows about it.  either way, there are people here conspiring to break the law.  not make a mistake. 

    Empathy is a good thing.  I have no problems with feeling the sadness and betrayal that the victims and their families are without question feeling.  What I have a problem with is taking that supposed "empathy," but allowing it to mutate into rage and venom and spout it across a message board as if you were the one who had been wronged.  To me, empathy is an inward feeling of sympathy, or putting yourself in someone elses shoes, but it stops there.  I have a hard time justifying the use of it as a rationale to further an opinion of yours in a debate with strangers on an internet forum.  Maybe I just have a different view on things.  To each their own.

    Are we talking about legal culpability or moral culpability with Paterno?  If you are going down the legal path, you have already lost any sort of argument you are trying to make as based on what has been exposed in the grand jury document, Paterno is not being charged with a crime, so to me, that tells me the state of Pennsylvania does not believe he broke a law.  If the state of Pennsylvania is telling me that, I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt over how Gunners from New York chooses to attempt to interpret Pennsylvania state law.

    Now, I'm not saying there is no chance the man will never be charged with something here.  But based on what has come out at this point, he did not break any law.

    And going back to the whole breaking a law vs. morale issue, I'm assuming at some point along the way you have driven 1 mile over some speed limit, even if just for 5 seconds.  Great news for you, you broke the law.  However, I'm willing to guess you'd say that what Paterno did was worse, (eventhough it was just from a morale standpoint) than driving over the speed limit.  Hell, even I am willing to make that argument.  I agree he made a mistake and deserved to be punished.  I just think it got to the point where it is too much.

    The fact that these were your only two comments to my post makes me think I did a good job expressing my opinions, so thank you.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Gunners:

    I only have two comments to your post.  The first bolded type means that you don't believe that people can feel a shred of empathy.  even though you start off by saying that you don't even know what you would do if it was your son.  empathy is a strong emotion and people are entitled to feel the rage of others through empathy. "Empathy is the capacity to recognize and, to some extent, share feelings (such as sadness or happiness) that are being experienced by another sapient or semi-sapient being"

    and secondly, you call it a mistake but it was much more than that.  from the grand jury document, the failure to report suspected child abuse is a violation of Pennsylvania law.  there are two laws mentioned, one where the head official of the school was required within 48 hours to report it to the department of public welfare.  there is a second law mentioned that doesn't mention whether that just falls on the head official or on anyone that knows about it.  either way, there are people here conspiring to break the law.  not make a mistake. 

    Empathy is a good thing.  I have no problems with feeling the sadness and betrayal that the victims and their families are without question feeling.  What I have a problem with is taking that supposed "empathy," but allowing it to mutate into rage and venom and spout it across a message board as if you were the one who had been wronged.  To me, empathy is an inward feeling of sympathy, or putting yourself in someone elses shoes, but it stops there.  I have a hard time justifying the use of it as a rationale to further an opinion of yours in a debate with strangers on an internet forum.  Maybe I just have a different view on things.  To each their own.

    Are we talking about legal culpability or moral culpability with Paterno?  If you are going down the legal path, you have already lost any sort of argument you are trying to make as based on what has been exposed in the grand jury document, Paterno is not being charged with a crime, so to me, that tells me the state of Pennsylvania does not believe he broke a law.  If the state of Pennsylvania is telling me that, I am going to give them the benefit of the doubt over how Gunners from New York chooses to attempt to interpret Pennsylvania state law.

    Now, I'm not saying there is no chance the man will never be charged with something here.  But based on what has come out at this point, he did not break any law.

    And going back to the whole breaking a law vs. morale issue, I'm assuming at some point along the way you have driven 1 mile over some speed limit, even if just for 5 seconds.  Great news for you, you broke the law.  However, I'm willing to guess you'd say that what Paterno did was worse, (eventhough it was just from a morale standpoint) than driving over the speed limit.  Hell, even I am willing to make that argument.  I agree he made a mistake and deserved to be punished.  I just think it got to the point where it is too much.

    The fact that these were your only two comments to my post makes me think I did a good job expressing my opinions, so thank you.

     
    Wake2002
    Wake2002
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 747
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 7:26 PM ET #337

    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    Scratch that last question.  I just noticed your location.

    It seems the only people defending these pieces of shit are people in Pennsylvania and pedophile enthusiasts.   

     

    Your position is to attack Paterno and that he deserves everything he is getting.  The opposite position (i.e., the act of disagreement) is to support Paterno.  Based on the above, you feel that if someone disagrees with you on the issue, they either live in Pennsylvania or are pedophile enthusiasts.  Your words, not mine buddy.

    The 75 IQ is a claim I have seen you throw out multiple times in this thread.  Not sure how to quote two different previous posts in a new post, and not worth my time or effort to make another post.  You also have on numerous occasions used the "pedophile enthusiast line" to attack posters who have disagreed with you on this thread.

    Not really sure I understand what point you were trying to make in your post above

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    Scratch that last question.  I just noticed your location.

    It seems the only people defending these pieces of shit are people in Pennsylvania and pedophile enthusiasts.   

     

    Your position is to attack Paterno and that he deserves everything he is getting.  The opposite position (i.e., the act of disagreement) is to support Paterno.  Based on the above, you feel that if someone disagrees with you on the issue, they either live in Pennsylvania or are pedophile enthusiasts.  Your words, not mine buddy.

    The 75 IQ is a claim I have seen you throw out multiple times in this thread.  Not sure how to quote two different previous posts in a new post, and not worth my time or effort to make another post.  You also have on numerous occasions used the "pedophile enthusiast line" to attack posters who have disagreed with you on this thread.

    Not really sure I understand what point you were trying to make in your post above

     
    StraightShooter
    StraightShooter
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 23227
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 7:53 PM ET #338

    Posting where I said it SEEMS the only people defending these scumbags are people in Pennsylvania and pedophile enthusiasts (note that’s NOT “people in Pennsylvania who are pedophile enthusiasts”) doesn’t cut it.

    Again; I challenge you to show where I claimed everyone who disagrees with me is a pedophile enthusiast or has an IQ under 75.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Posting where I said it SEEMS the only people defending these scumbags are people in Pennsylvania and pedophile enthusiasts (note that’s NOT “people in Pennsylvania who are pedophile enthusiasts”) doesn’t cut it.

    Again; I challenge you to show where I claimed everyone who disagrees with me is a pedophile enthusiast or has an IQ under 75.

     
    Wake2002
    Wake2002
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 747
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 8:03 PM ET #339

    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    Posting where I said it SEEMS the only people defending these scumbags are people in Pennsylvania and pedophile enthusiasts (note that’s NOT “people in Pennsylvania who are pedophile enthusiasts”) doesn’t cut it.

    Again; I challenge you to show where I claimed everyone who disagrees with me is a pedophile enthusiast or has an IQ under 75.

    Not going to get roped into this nonsense with you.  I feel I proved my point, you are harping on the way you are interpreting how it was phrased.  Gonna just agree to disagree here. I have much better things to do with my time.  I made an observation about how I view your posting style, albeit unsolicited, but I felt like responding to how I feel you have represented yourself in this thread and on this forum in general.  How about you forget I said anything and you just go about posting the way you like to.  Does that make you feel better.  I'll even let you say "win" here. Enjoy.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:

    Posting where I said it SEEMS the only people defending these scumbags are people in Pennsylvania and pedophile enthusiasts (note that’s NOT “people in Pennsylvania who are pedophile enthusiasts”) doesn’t cut it.

    Again; I challenge you to show where I claimed everyone who disagrees with me is a pedophile enthusiast or has an IQ under 75.

    Not going to get roped into this nonsense with you.  I feel I proved my point, you are harping on the way you are interpreting how it was phrased.  Gonna just agree to disagree here. I have much better things to do with my time.  I made an observation about how I view your posting style, albeit unsolicited, but I felt like responding to how I feel you have represented yourself in this thread and on this forum in general.  How about you forget I said anything and you just go about posting the way you like to.  Does that make you feel better.  I'll even let you say "win" here. Enjoy.

     
    StraightShooter
    StraightShooter
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 23227
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 8:24 PM ET #340

    Quote Originally Posted by Wake2002:

    Not going to get roped into this nonsense with you.  I feel I proved my point, you are harping on the way you are interpreting how it was phrased.  Gonna just agree to disagree here. I have much better things to do with my time.  I made an observation about how I view your posting style, albeit unsolicited, but I felt like responding to how I feel you have represented yourself in this thread and on this forum in general.  How about you forget I said anything and you just go about posting the way you like to.  Does that make you feel better.  I'll even let you say "win" here. Enjoy.

    You made an accusation that was untrue. Then when you were challenged to back up your accusation you couldn’t do it and instead bowed out claiming you had better things to do.

    I have no idea how you could possibly think that proved whatever point you were trying to make, but if believing that makes you feel better about yourself, then have at it.

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake2002:

    Not going to get roped into this nonsense with you.  I feel I proved my point, you are harping on the way you are interpreting how it was phrased.  Gonna just agree to disagree here. I have much better things to do with my time.  I made an observation about how I view your posting style, albeit unsolicited, but I felt like responding to how I feel you have represented yourself in this thread and on this forum in general.  How about you forget I said anything and you just go about posting the way you like to.  Does that make you feel better.  I'll even let you say "win" here. Enjoy.

    You made an accusation that was untrue. Then when you were challenged to back up your accusation you couldn’t do it and instead bowed out claiming you had better things to do.

    I have no idea how you could possibly think that proved whatever point you were trying to make, but if believing that makes you feel better about yourself, then have at it.

     

     
    Jon11
    Jon11
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2011
    Posts: 359
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 8:47 PM ET #341

    Looks like Sadusky set up the "Second-Mile" charity as a prostitution ring, calling it a "charity" as a cover.




    In April, Pittsburgh radio host Mark Madden wrote a story revealing Penn State for much of the cover-up of Jerry Sandusky's alleged child rape that has been exposed in the past week. While it didn't raise many eyebrows back then, six months later it looks to be incredibly accurate.

    On Thursday morning, just hours after legendary head coach Joe Paterno and university president Graham Spanier were fired by the school's board of trustees, Madden was asked on The Dennis and Callahan Show what he believes the next piece of news will be.

    What he said was twice as shocking as anything that's been released thus far.

    "I can give you a rumor and I can give you something I think might happen," Madden told John Dennis and Gerry Callahan. "I hear there's a rumor that there will be a more shocking development from the Second Mile Foundation -- and hold on to your stomachs, boys, this is gross, I will use the only language I can -- that Jerry Sandusky and Second Mile were pimping out young boys to rich donors. That was being investigated by two prominent columnists even as I speak."

    After the news spread, Madden later explained via Twitter why he went public with the rumors.

    "I normally abhor giving RUMORS credence," Madden wrote. "But whole Sandusky scandal started out as a RUMOR. It gets deeper and more disgusting all the time. One of state's top columnists investigating. That adds credence. I am NOT rumor's original source. [Why does] Sandusky deserve benefit of doubt?"

    Madden also spoke more definitively on Dennis and Callahan to the cover-up efforts at the school and beyond that he expects will be made public soon.

    "The other thing I think that may eventually become uncovered, and I talked about this in my original article back in April, is that I think they'll find out that Jerry Sandusky was told that he had to retire in exchange for a cover-up," Madden said. "If you look at the timeline, that makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

    "My opinion is when Sandusky quit, everybody knew -- not just at Penn State," Madden added. "I think it was a very poorly kept secret about college football in general, and that is why he never coached in college football again and retired at the relatively young age of 55. [That's] young for a coach, certainly."

    if you read the bottom, you'll see that good ol moral Joe Pa knew in San Antonio what Sandusky was doing,  and said nothing when Sandusky took a little kid with him on a trip.  This is sickening

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Looks like Sadusky set up the "Second-Mile" charity as a prostitution ring, calling it a "charity" as a cover.




    In April, Pittsburgh radio host Mark Madden wrote a story revealing Penn State for much of the cover-up of Jerry Sandusky's alleged child rape that has been exposed in the past week. While it didn't raise many eyebrows back then, six months later it looks to be incredibly accurate.

    On Thursday morning, just hours after legendary head coach Joe Paterno and university president Graham Spanier were fired by the school's board of trustees, Madden was asked on The Dennis and Callahan Show what he believes the next piece of news will be.

    What he said was twice as shocking as anything that's been released thus far.

    "I can give you a rumor and I can give you something I think might happen," Madden told John Dennis and Gerry Callahan. "I hear there's a rumor that there will be a more shocking development from the Second Mile Foundation -- and hold on to your stomachs, boys, this is gross, I will use the only language I can -- that Jerry Sandusky and Second Mile were pimping out young boys to rich donors. That was being investigated by two prominent columnists even as I speak."

    After the news spread, Madden later explained via Twitter why he went public with the rumors.

    "I normally abhor giving RUMORS credence," Madden wrote. "But whole Sandusky scandal started out as a RUMOR. It gets deeper and more disgusting all the time. One of state's top columnists investigating. That adds credence. I am NOT rumor's original source. [Why does] Sandusky deserve benefit of doubt?"

    Madden also spoke more definitively on Dennis and Callahan to the cover-up efforts at the school and beyond that he expects will be made public soon.

    "The other thing I think that may eventually become uncovered, and I talked about this in my original article back in April, is that I think they'll find out that Jerry Sandusky was told that he had to retire in exchange for a cover-up," Madden said. "If you look at the timeline, that makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

    "My opinion is when Sandusky quit, everybody knew -- not just at Penn State," Madden added. "I think it was a very poorly kept secret about college football in general, and that is why he never coached in college football again and retired at the relatively young age of 55. [That's] young for a coach, certainly."

    if you read the bottom, you'll see that good ol moral Joe Pa knew in San Antonio what Sandusky was doing,  and said nothing when Sandusky took a little kid with him on a trip.  This is sickening

     
    jasonwhitesknee
    jasonwhitesknee
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2004
    Posts: 9425
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 9:22 PM ET #342

    New to this thread and I'm not going to bother reading all the BS.  All you need to know = ANYONE STICKING UP FOR PATERNO = COMPLETE FUCKING TOOL/SMALL PICTURE DOUCHEBAG.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    New to this thread and I'm not going to bother reading all the BS.  All you need to know = ANYONE STICKING UP FOR PATERNO = COMPLETE FUCKING TOOL/SMALL PICTURE DOUCHEBAG.

     
    The Hawk
    The Hawk
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2006
    Posts: 19693
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 10:13 PM ET #343

    JoePa just lawyered up, not that he's guilty of anything........
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    JoePa just lawyered up, not that he's guilty of anything........
     
    TILTOLOGIC
    TILTOLOGIC
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 5527
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 10:46 PM ET #344

    Quote Originally Posted by Wake2002:

    Making statements like that remove any sort of potential credibility your posts may have had.  

    A Nebraska fan (I'm assuming)?  With your attitude, I hope you say the wrong thing to the wrong person on Saturday and get what you deserve.   


    that comment was made in anger and frustration, and trying to get a rise out of Paterno apologists...most on here realize I do this often.

    I guess I can't expect you to read the 20-30 comments I've made in multiple threads regarding this.   you can get all reactionary if you want, its a free country

    That being said, I've always enjoyed your contributions on here, especially in the investments forum. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake2002:

    Making statements like that remove any sort of potential credibility your posts may have had.  

    A Nebraska fan (I'm assuming)?  With your attitude, I hope you say the wrong thing to the wrong person on Saturday and get what you deserve.   


    that comment was made in anger and frustration, and trying to get a rise out of Paterno apologists...most on here realize I do this often.

    I guess I can't expect you to read the 20-30 comments I've made in multiple threads regarding this.   you can get all reactionary if you want, its a free country

    That being said, I've always enjoyed your contributions on here, especially in the investments forum. 
     
    Wake2002
    Wake2002
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2007
    Posts: 747
    Posted: Nov. 10, 2011 - 11:23 PM ET #345

    Quote Originally Posted by TILTOLOGIC:


    that comment was made in anger and frustration, and trying to get a rise out of Paterno apologists...most on here realize I do this often.

    I guess I can't expect you to read the 20-30 comments I've made in multiple threads regarding this.   you can get all reactionary if you want, its a free country

    That being said, I've always enjoyed your contributions on here, especially in the investments forum. 

    You were successful.  You are correct, I did not read your comments in other threads, so I apologize if I missed something in those posts.

    I just get frustrated with the entire mob mentality about the situation.  There is so much speculation that people are just assuming as fact.  If the speculation turns into reality, I reserve my right to change my opinion on the matter, but right now, with the evidence that is actually out there, (not all of the heresay), I think the backlash against Paterno has been a bit too much. 

    And it is just frustrating that the tone of so many posters who are not supportive of Paterno is so unneccessarily condescending and harsh against those who don't share the same opinion at this point.  For having a currently contrarian viewpoint, we've been labeled as, "pedophile enthusiasts" "complete fucking tool/small picture douchebags" "moronic" "dumbasses" just to highlight a few generalizations made by various posters.

    To be honest, I was reading through and just pulling individual posts to respond to.  I know my response probably came across a bit too reactionary towards you, so I apologize for that.  I definitely did not take into account the poster behind the post, and just was responding to the words of the post themselves and responding out of anger and frustration myself.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TILTOLOGIC:


    that comment was made in anger and frustration, and trying to get a rise out of Paterno apologists...most on here realize I do this often.

    I guess I can't expect you to read the 20-30 comments I've made in multiple threads regarding this.   you can get all reactionary if you want, its a free country

    That being said, I've always enjoyed your contributions on here, especially in the investments forum. 

    You were successful.  You are correct, I did not read your comments in other threads, so I apologize if I missed something in those posts.

    I just get frustrated with the entire mob mentality about the situation.  There is so much speculation that people are just assuming as fact.  If the speculation turns into reality, I reserve my right to change my opinion on the matter, but right now, with the evidence that is actually out there, (not all of the heresay), I think the backlash against Paterno has been a bit too much. 

    And it is just frustrating that the tone of so many posters who are not supportive of Paterno is so unneccessarily condescending and harsh against those who don't share the same opinion at this point.  For having a currently contrarian viewpoint, we've been labeled as, "pedophile enthusiasts" "complete fucking tool/small picture douchebags" "moronic" "dumbasses" just to highlight a few generalizations made by various posters.

    To be honest, I was reading through and just pulling individual posts to respond to.  I know my response probably came across a bit too reactionary towards you, so I apologize for that.  I definitely did not take into account the poster behind the post, and just was responding to the words of the post themselves and responding out of anger and frustration myself.

     
    StraightShooter
    StraightShooter
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 23227
    Posted: Nov. 11, 2011 - 12:48 AM ET #346

    If people say things like “it’s ok to rape 12 year olds because 12 is the new 18,” “adults who rape preteens should not only receive no jail time, but they shouldn’t even be put on a sexual predators list,” and “a random adult placing a bet on a game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them” then I’m inclined to think they are “pedophile enthusiasts” and/or “dumbasses.”

    YMMV

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    If people say things like “it’s ok to rape 12 year olds because 12 is the new 18,” “adults who rape preteens should not only receive no jail time, but they shouldn’t even be put on a sexual predators list,” and “a random adult placing a bet on a game has the same effect on a child as a pedophile sodomizing them” then I’m inclined to think they are “pedophile enthusiasts” and/or “dumbasses.”

    YMMV

     
    VegasVeteran
    VegasVeteran
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 1755
    Posted: Nov. 11, 2011 - 12:51 AM ET #347

    Who the fuck said that StraightShooter?????
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Who the fuck said that StraightShooter?????
     
    StraightShooter
    StraightShooter
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 23227
    Posted: Nov. 11, 2011 - 1:40 AM ET #348

    EricLinny made the “12 is the new 18 comment.”  Sportsgamester made the “adults who have sex with preteens shouldn’t receive jail time or even be put on a sexual predators list” (or something to that effect).  Shortly after that he was boxed for all the sick shit he was saying.  And darkhorse12 was the one ranting about how placing a bet on a sporting event has the same effect on a child as what happened to that child in the penn state showers.  At least half a dozen people called him out on it and he got pretty upset that we didn't understand his fucked up logic.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    EricLinny made the “12 is the new 18 comment.”  Sportsgamester made the “adults who have sex with preteens shouldn’t receive jail time or even be put on a sexual predators list” (or something to that effect).  Shortly after that he was boxed for all the sick shit he was saying.  And darkhorse12 was the one ranting about how placing a bet on a sporting event has the same effect on a child as what happened to that child in the penn state showers.  At least half a dozen people called him out on it and he got pretty upset that we didn't understand his fucked up logic.

     
    VegasVeteran
    VegasVeteran
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 1755
    Posted: Nov. 11, 2011 - 1:53 AM ET #349




    I didn't see any of that and don't agree with ANY of that.

    We have our differences but goddamn at least it isn't about that.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User



    I didn't see any of that and don't agree with ANY of that.

    We have our differences but goddamn at least it isn't about that.
     
     
    vegasdennis
    vegasdennis
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 21934
    Posted: Nov. 11, 2011 - 1:57 AM ET #350

    By far one of most assinine comments was by Mr Win in box today where he said parents feeding kids fast food and causing obesity was on par or worse than child molesters
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    By far one of most assinine comments was by Mr Win in box today where he said parents feeding kids fast food and causing obesity was on par or worse than child molesters
    All Forums | General Discussion
    «First Previous 123 ... 131415 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 446,200 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 302,015 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/10/2026 1,000 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,796 Covers arrow
    • 9/10 Fast Cash Five 💰??🔥 5,176 Covers arrow
    • 49ers vs Rams in-game live from down under 1,646 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 4,741 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 95,571 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,315 Covers arrow
    • ALL IN 401K Bet Rams -4.5 1,423 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.