If I were to make a bet, I bet you own a Bible. Maybe it would need some dusting off. Maybe not. No matter. See Proverbs 26:19 which directly addresses the "Lighten up!" stance, from the God of the Bible himself!
I probably have a bible somewhere in my house. Outside of weddings and funerals, I ironically haven't been to a mass since I received my confirmation.
Apache, the majority of us enjoy your jokes so keep them coming.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
If I were to make a bet, I bet you own a Bible. Maybe it would need some dusting off. Maybe not. No matter. See Proverbs 26:19 which directly addresses the "Lighten up!" stance, from the God of the Bible himself!
I probably have a bible somewhere in my house. Outside of weddings and funerals, I ironically haven't been to a mass since I received my confirmation.
Apache, the majority of us enjoy your jokes so keep them coming.
You know not of what you speak. You are babbling. Its a sad attempt at rational thought.
I know more about "the catholic church" and the bible than you or most people in this world, so you can spare me the "nut it says in scripture" bullshit.
Wonder why God left out "Thou shall not tell off color jokes" from the 10 commandments.....maybe Moses dropped that stone.....
And yes, it is ok to make Sandusky jokes. Why not? If you cant make fun of a pedophile then whats this world coming to. By the way, how was his summer camp you attended all those years?
Chalk up another win over Scal for Train. Its kinda crazy you have never got the best of me with as many times as I post.....then again, you are always the wrong one. Guess I just solved my own riddle......
Ok, you know more about the Bible than most of us. Sure thing.
And in the same post, you offer one of the most feeble arguments for the justification of a certain action in that if it wasn't included in the 10 Commandments, God must have 'left it out'.
The Bible must not only be a book a good book of prophecy then. I'm sure XXX pornography in every kindergarten classroom is a green light under that line of thinking (which the Bible should have foretold of through...cave paintings?)
Train, you need to go on Amazon and get a good book on critical argumentation as virtually everything you post leaves you open to admonishment because of your, often unnoticed, illogical extremes. I'll even pay for it!
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
You know not of what you speak. You are babbling. Its a sad attempt at rational thought.
I know more about "the catholic church" and the bible than you or most people in this world, so you can spare me the "nut it says in scripture" bullshit.
Wonder why God left out "Thou shall not tell off color jokes" from the 10 commandments.....maybe Moses dropped that stone.....
And yes, it is ok to make Sandusky jokes. Why not? If you cant make fun of a pedophile then whats this world coming to. By the way, how was his summer camp you attended all those years?
Chalk up another win over Scal for Train. Its kinda crazy you have never got the best of me with as many times as I post.....then again, you are always the wrong one. Guess I just solved my own riddle......
Ok, you know more about the Bible than most of us. Sure thing.
And in the same post, you offer one of the most feeble arguments for the justification of a certain action in that if it wasn't included in the 10 Commandments, God must have 'left it out'.
The Bible must not only be a book a good book of prophecy then. I'm sure XXX pornography in every kindergarten classroom is a green light under that line of thinking (which the Bible should have foretold of through...cave paintings?)
Train, you need to go on Amazon and get a good book on critical argumentation as virtually everything you post leaves you open to admonishment because of your, often unnoticed, illogical extremes. I'll even pay for it!
Geeezus scal, give it a rest. Apache thread is not a good place to start trouble bud.
It's not starting trouble. I'm actually trying to make a legitimate point.
Coincidentally, Jerry Sandusky apparently was an Irish Catholic (his mother was which likely makes him one) and any hint of sexual perversion or impropriety, even in a 'joke', pedaled by an Irish Catholic himself (which Apache must be or why would he tell an Irish Catholic joke), within the Church walls by Church clergy and worse, pre-teen alter boys makes my toes curl.
You could tell a billion different jokes and if I disagree with one, especially one as distasteful as this, he will be hearing about it in a public forum which he makes public by posting for a bunch of and in my case, unexpected condemnation.
0
Quote Originally Posted by searchwarrant:
Sent that to my Irish buddies.
Geeezus scal, give it a rest. Apache thread is not a good place to start trouble bud.
It's not starting trouble. I'm actually trying to make a legitimate point.
Coincidentally, Jerry Sandusky apparently was an Irish Catholic (his mother was which likely makes him one) and any hint of sexual perversion or impropriety, even in a 'joke', pedaled by an Irish Catholic himself (which Apache must be or why would he tell an Irish Catholic joke), within the Church walls by Church clergy and worse, pre-teen alter boys makes my toes curl.
You could tell a billion different jokes and if I disagree with one, especially one as distasteful as this, he will be hearing about it in a public forum which he makes public by posting for a bunch of and in my case, unexpected condemnation.
has this guy ever left the bomb shelter? I swear to christ he is a real life brendan frasiers character from blast from the past
racial tensions? what is this, 1967?
anyone with any grasp on reality knows that the biggest obstacle facing poor black folk, does not discriminate against poor white folk, nor hispanics. It is the fact that they are all poor, and regardless of skin color, TPTB/aristocracy hates them all equally, and will allow them to suffer equally as plebs. open your eyes, join the 21st century
More selling of the 'class war' and only the 'class war' by the guy who lives with cobwebs over his eyes and probably wears a toga in his spare time. Class wars, in strictest historical terms, are much older than race wars and you like to sell it like it is the shiniest new car on the lot. I would say nice try but that would only embolden your gullibility.
I could cite HUNDREDS of pages of literature contracting your statement about racial inequity in the modern day but I'll just cite a SINGLE ONE and see what you have to say about it:
Link
A white name was 50% more likely to receive a callback from an employer after resume submission than a black name all with equal credentials.
Before that study human resource managers anticipated, you guessed it, REVERSE discrimination in FAVOR of Blacks only to look pretty ignorant at the end of the day, giving them something in common with yourself.
So Be Easy, tell us how in 2003, when you apply for a job and have the same credentials as a white person, you do not receive a callback simply because the difference in each resume is a black-sounding name change? Tell us what the employers were thinking, outside of race, when everything on the resume was equal. Did they not like the spelling for a prospective nameplate?
Enlighten the forum and tell us how that is a 'class war' and has nothing to do with race.
Mind you, this is just ONE STUDY. I could type for days on end citing others...I won't. It will do little for a pea brain like yours.
0
Quote Originally Posted by be easy:
scab
what an epic jackass
has this guy ever left the bomb shelter? I swear to christ he is a real life brendan frasiers character from blast from the past
racial tensions? what is this, 1967?
anyone with any grasp on reality knows that the biggest obstacle facing poor black folk, does not discriminate against poor white folk, nor hispanics. It is the fact that they are all poor, and regardless of skin color, TPTB/aristocracy hates them all equally, and will allow them to suffer equally as plebs. open your eyes, join the 21st century
More selling of the 'class war' and only the 'class war' by the guy who lives with cobwebs over his eyes and probably wears a toga in his spare time. Class wars, in strictest historical terms, are much older than race wars and you like to sell it like it is the shiniest new car on the lot. I would say nice try but that would only embolden your gullibility.
I could cite HUNDREDS of pages of literature contracting your statement about racial inequity in the modern day but I'll just cite a SINGLE ONE and see what you have to say about it:
Link
A white name was 50% more likely to receive a callback from an employer after resume submission than a black name all with equal credentials.
Before that study human resource managers anticipated, you guessed it, REVERSE discrimination in FAVOR of Blacks only to look pretty ignorant at the end of the day, giving them something in common with yourself.
So Be Easy, tell us how in 2003, when you apply for a job and have the same credentials as a white person, you do not receive a callback simply because the difference in each resume is a black-sounding name change? Tell us what the employers were thinking, outside of race, when everything on the resume was equal. Did they not like the spelling for a prospective nameplate?
Enlighten the forum and tell us how that is a 'class war' and has nothing to do with race.
Mind you, this is just ONE STUDY. I could type for days on end citing others...I won't. It will do little for a pea brain like yours.
Ok, you know more about the Bible than most of us. Sure thing.
And in the same post, you offer one of the most feeble arguments for the justification of a certain action in that if it wasn't included in the 10 Commandments, God must have 'left it out'.
The Bible must not only be a book a good book of prophecy then. I'm sure XXX pornography in every kindergarten classroom is a green light under that line of thinking (which the Bible should have foretold of through...cave paintings?)
Train, you need to go on Amazon and get a good book on critical argumentation as virtually everything you post leaves you open to admonishment because of your, often unnoticed, illogical extremes. I'll even pay for it!
Its hard to argue with a moron because they bring you down to their level. You have no argument, you have an opinion based on a work of fiction (the Bible). How solid could your point really be? Seriously?
Mull that over on your high horse.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Ok, you know more about the Bible than most of us. Sure thing.
And in the same post, you offer one of the most feeble arguments for the justification of a certain action in that if it wasn't included in the 10 Commandments, God must have 'left it out'.
The Bible must not only be a book a good book of prophecy then. I'm sure XXX pornography in every kindergarten classroom is a green light under that line of thinking (which the Bible should have foretold of through...cave paintings?)
Train, you need to go on Amazon and get a good book on critical argumentation as virtually everything you post leaves you open to admonishment because of your, often unnoticed, illogical extremes. I'll even pay for it!
Its hard to argue with a moron because they bring you down to their level. You have no argument, you have an opinion based on a work of fiction (the Bible). How solid could your point really be? Seriously?
Its hard to argue with a moron because they bring you down to their level. You have no argument, you have an opinion based on a work of fiction (the Bible). How solid could your point really be? Seriously?
Mull that over on your high horse.
Everything you type has logical disjunctions galore...
First you type:
I know more about "the catholic church" and the bible than you
or most people in this world...
It is the same as saying, "You can't tell me about the Bible because you
don't know it like I do." (of course you'll say you didn't mean this you meant something entirely different which leads me to question how you have conversations with people at all).
I then say I do know the Bible quite well in return and you effectively end any rational thought process by defaming the Bible as a work of fiction and telling me any point I have is essentially worthless because of its said fictional basis.
You are a bizarre individual to say the least.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Its hard to argue with a moron because they bring you down to their level. You have no argument, you have an opinion based on a work of fiction (the Bible). How solid could your point really be? Seriously?
Mull that over on your high horse.
Everything you type has logical disjunctions galore...
First you type:
I know more about "the catholic church" and the bible than you
or most people in this world...
It is the same as saying, "You can't tell me about the Bible because you
don't know it like I do." (of course you'll say you didn't mean this you meant something entirely different which leads me to question how you have conversations with people at all).
I then say I do know the Bible quite well in return and you effectively end any rational thought process by defaming the Bible as a work of fiction and telling me any point I have is essentially worthless because of its said fictional basis.
Everything you type has logical disjunctions galore...
First you type:
I know more about "the catholic church" and the bible than you
or most people in this world...
It is the same as saying, "You can't tell me about the Bible because you
don't know it like I do." (of course you'll say you didn't mean this you meant something entirely different which leads me to question how you have conversations with people at all).
I then say I do know the Bible quite well in return and you effectively end any rational thought process by defaming the Bible as a work of fiction and telling me any point I have is essentially worthless because of its said fictional basis.
You are a bizarre individual to say the least.
You need some reading comprehension courses. I said I know the Bible very well, I didnt say anything about my beliefs in it, I stated that you are choosing to judge others based on what you believe to be true from what you have read. Thats called blind faith, or simple foolishness. Thus, if the Bible is indeed not entirely accurate, the foundation for your beliefs is on a fault line.
If you think a JOKE, in poor taste or not, is nearing someone to damnation, you truly do not understand the Bible or what Jesus envisioned the world to be.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Everything you type has logical disjunctions galore...
First you type:
I know more about "the catholic church" and the bible than you
or most people in this world...
It is the same as saying, "You can't tell me about the Bible because you
don't know it like I do." (of course you'll say you didn't mean this you meant something entirely different which leads me to question how you have conversations with people at all).
I then say I do know the Bible quite well in return and you effectively end any rational thought process by defaming the Bible as a work of fiction and telling me any point I have is essentially worthless because of its said fictional basis.
You are a bizarre individual to say the least.
You need some reading comprehension courses. I said I know the Bible very well, I didnt say anything about my beliefs in it, I stated that you are choosing to judge others based on what you believe to be true from what you have read. Thats called blind faith, or simple foolishness. Thus, if the Bible is indeed not entirely accurate, the foundation for your beliefs is on a fault line.
If you think a JOKE, in poor taste or not, is nearing someone to damnation, you truly do not understand the Bible or what Jesus envisioned the world to be.
More selling of the 'class war' and only the 'class war' by the guy who lives with cobwebs over his eyes and probably wears a toga in his spare time. Class wars, in strictest historical terms, are much older than race wars and you like to sell it like it is the shiniest new car on the lot. I would say nice try but that would only embolden your gullibility.
I could cite HUNDREDS of pages of literature contracting your statement about racial inequity in the modern day but I'll just cite a SINGLE ONE and see what you have to say about it:
Link
A white name was 50% more likely to receive a callback from an employer after resume submission than a black name all with equal credentials.
Before that study human resource managers anticipated, you guessed it, REVERSE discrimination in FAVOR of Blacks only to look pretty ignorant at the end of the day, giving them something in common with yourself.
So Be Easy, tell us how in 2003, when you apply for a job and have the same credentials as a white person, you do not receive a callback simply because the difference in each resume is a black-sounding name change? Tell us what the employers were thinking, outside of race, when everything on the resume was equal. Did they not like the spelling for a prospective nameplate?
Enlighten the forum and tell us how that is a 'class war' and has nothing to do with race.
Mind you, this is just ONE STUDY. I could type for days on end citing others...I won't. It will do little for a pea brain like yours.
Is that anythin g like "embiggins?"
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
More selling of the 'class war' and only the 'class war' by the guy who lives with cobwebs over his eyes and probably wears a toga in his spare time. Class wars, in strictest historical terms, are much older than race wars and you like to sell it like it is the shiniest new car on the lot. I would say nice try but that would only embolden your gullibility.
I could cite HUNDREDS of pages of literature contracting your statement about racial inequity in the modern day but I'll just cite a SINGLE ONE and see what you have to say about it:
Link
A white name was 50% more likely to receive a callback from an employer after resume submission than a black name all with equal credentials.
Before that study human resource managers anticipated, you guessed it, REVERSE discrimination in FAVOR of Blacks only to look pretty ignorant at the end of the day, giving them something in common with yourself.
So Be Easy, tell us how in 2003, when you apply for a job and have the same credentials as a white person, you do not receive a callback simply because the difference in each resume is a black-sounding name change? Tell us what the employers were thinking, outside of race, when everything on the resume was equal. Did they not like the spelling for a prospective nameplate?
Enlighten the forum and tell us how that is a 'class war' and has nothing to do with race.
Mind you, this is just ONE STUDY. I could type for days on end citing others...I won't. It will do little for a pea brain like yours.
You need some reading comprehension courses. I said I know the Bible very well, I didnt say anything about my beliefs in it, I stated that you are choosing to judge others based on what you believe to be true from what you have read. Thats called blind faith, or simple foolishness. Thus, if the Bible is indeed not entirely accurate, the foundation for your beliefs is on a fault line.
If you think a JOKE, in poor taste or not, is nearing someone to damnation, you truly do not understand the Bible or what Jesus envisioned the world to be.
Ok Train. You know the Bible and the Church but don't believe any of it, just the sort of ambassador and defender Apache needs in this case as you crawl to his side.
And I never said anything about Apache being damned to an eternity in Hell, like I'd even care about his alleged 'final judgement'. But a 'joke' is a revelation of character, so much so that the Bible directly referenced it in Proverbs and your character is a result of faith so it all must come into question with jokes like "nookie green."
So please keep the "What Jesus envisioned the world to be" comments to yourself because every single person who thinks they know Jesus in their heart has their own interpretation of that world based on their own preconceived biases and indoctrinated worldview only to incorporate Jesus at the tail end of that.
It's truly laughable and this thread is a starter for that conversation.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
You need some reading comprehension courses. I said I know the Bible very well, I didnt say anything about my beliefs in it, I stated that you are choosing to judge others based on what you believe to be true from what you have read. Thats called blind faith, or simple foolishness. Thus, if the Bible is indeed not entirely accurate, the foundation for your beliefs is on a fault line.
If you think a JOKE, in poor taste or not, is nearing someone to damnation, you truly do not understand the Bible or what Jesus envisioned the world to be.
Ok Train. You know the Bible and the Church but don't believe any of it, just the sort of ambassador and defender Apache needs in this case as you crawl to his side.
And I never said anything about Apache being damned to an eternity in Hell, like I'd even care about his alleged 'final judgement'. But a 'joke' is a revelation of character, so much so that the Bible directly referenced it in Proverbs and your character is a result of faith so it all must come into question with jokes like "nookie green."
So please keep the "What Jesus envisioned the world to be" comments to yourself because every single person who thinks they know Jesus in their heart has their own interpretation of that world based on their own preconceived biases and indoctrinated worldview only to incorporate Jesus at the tail end of that.
It's truly laughable and this thread is a starter for that conversation.
Everyone's going crazy over a joke, statement, comment whatever it was, when everyone can be posting there picks for Tonight & Tomorrow and helping me win some $ back.
0
Everyone's going crazy over a joke, statement, comment whatever it was, when everyone can be posting there picks for Tonight & Tomorrow and helping me win some $ back.
Sooooo weak! It is hilarious to watch when you reach beyond your grasp. You are such an idiot...
What's really idiotic is that you are still grammar trolling after trolling pathetically in the past to call me out for using the word 'eviscerated' while not even understanding what it meant, after which I had to explain it to you while the entire site watched. Made for a good laugh though so thanks for that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CountNo_Account:
Sooooo weak! It is hilarious to watch when you reach beyond your grasp. You are such an idiot...
What's really idiotic is that you are still grammar trolling after trolling pathetically in the past to call me out for using the word 'eviscerated' while not even understanding what it meant, after which I had to explain it to you while the entire site watched. Made for a good laugh though so thanks for that.
You didn't explain to me what the word meant you moron! I printed a definition for the word for your benefit.You fancy yourself a writer or some sort of deep thinker and your attempts to appear clever are hilarious to watch. Your puffed up self-image is both laughable and pathetic at the same time.You are truly delusional and in desperate need of professional counseling...get help idiot...
0
You didn't explain to me what the word meant you moron! I printed a definition for the word for your benefit.You fancy yourself a writer or some sort of deep thinker and your attempts to appear clever are hilarious to watch. Your puffed up self-image is both laughable and pathetic at the same time.You are truly delusional and in desperate need of professional counseling...get help idiot...
Ok Train. You know the Bible and the Church but don't believe any of it, just the sort of ambassador and defender Apache needs in this case as you crawl to his side.
And I never said anything about Apache being damned to an eternity in Hell, like I'd even care about his alleged 'final judgement'. But a 'joke' is a revelation of character, so much so that the Bible directly referenced it in Proverbs and your character is a result of faith so it all must come into question with jokes like "nookie green."
So please keep the "What Jesus envisioned the world to be" comments to yourself because every single person who thinks they know Jesus in their heart has their own interpretation of that world based on their own preconceived biases and indoctrinated worldview only to incorporate Jesus at the tail end of that.
It's truly laughable and this thread is a starter for that conversation.
Where did I say I didnt believe? I said the Bible is a work of fiction, which is true. It is the retelling of stories by many people and has be rewritten many times. Embelishments and things lost in translation galore.
Please stop with your pseudo intellect. You cant beat me at this game. Its not even fair for you to try really. You think a persons character can be judged by a joke? You cant be serious......sadly though, you are.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Ok Train. You know the Bible and the Church but don't believe any of it, just the sort of ambassador and defender Apache needs in this case as you crawl to his side.
And I never said anything about Apache being damned to an eternity in Hell, like I'd even care about his alleged 'final judgement'. But a 'joke' is a revelation of character, so much so that the Bible directly referenced it in Proverbs and your character is a result of faith so it all must come into question with jokes like "nookie green."
So please keep the "What Jesus envisioned the world to be" comments to yourself because every single person who thinks they know Jesus in their heart has their own interpretation of that world based on their own preconceived biases and indoctrinated worldview only to incorporate Jesus at the tail end of that.
It's truly laughable and this thread is a starter for that conversation.
Where did I say I didnt believe? I said the Bible is a work of fiction, which is true. It is the retelling of stories by many people and has be rewritten many times. Embelishments and things lost in translation galore.
Please stop with your pseudo intellect. You cant beat me at this game. Its not even fair for you to try really. You think a persons character can be judged by a joke? You cant be serious......sadly though, you are.
I thought the joke was funny and I'm "Cops & Wops" (Irish-Italian heritage).
scalbrine, it was a joke, lighten up man.
Here's another one, just for you........
A gay guy walks into a church and the priest is walking through the aisles swingin an incense burner. The gay guy says, Say Sweetie, I love your dress but do you know that your purse is on fire?"
0
I thought the joke was funny and I'm "Cops & Wops" (Irish-Italian heritage).
scalbrine, it was a joke, lighten up man.
Here's another one, just for you........
A gay guy walks into a church and the priest is walking through the aisles swingin an incense burner. The gay guy says, Say Sweetie, I love your dress but do you know that your purse is on fire?"
Scal... are you this lonely, and starving for attention, that you must ruin every thread with your hate spewing rants? You have become the Covers empty pinata... everyone beats on you, and the only thing that ever comes out of you is hot air.
0
Apache -
Scal... are you this lonely, and starving for attention, that you must ruin every thread with your hate spewing rants? You have become the Covers empty pinata... everyone beats on you, and the only thing that ever comes out of you is hot air.
This 'joke' makes a total mockery of the Catholic Church
I think the Catholic Church has made enough of a mockery of itself over the past 3 decades that a simple joke would be impossible to damage it's good name any further.
scalabrine, do have a thing for Apache? I can't help but notice that you love to post your nonsense and unneeded comments in his joke threads while he appears to be the most harmless poster here with no foul intentions.
There is most definitely something wrong with you and need some serious counseling, or perhaps take a trip down to the local ghetto around 1 a.m. and see how many friends that you actually have made outside of the internet with your Mumbo-Jumbo. Chance are we'll never see you post here again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
This 'joke' makes a total mockery of the Catholic Church
I think the Catholic Church has made enough of a mockery of itself over the past 3 decades that a simple joke would be impossible to damage it's good name any further.
scalabrine, do have a thing for Apache? I can't help but notice that you love to post your nonsense and unneeded comments in his joke threads while he appears to be the most harmless poster here with no foul intentions.
There is most definitely something wrong with you and need some serious counseling, or perhaps take a trip down to the local ghetto around 1 a.m. and see how many friends that you actually have made outside of the internet with your Mumbo-Jumbo. Chance are we'll never see you post here again.
You didn't explain to me what the word meant you moron! I printed a definition for the word for your benefit.You fancy yourself a writer or some sort of deep thinker and your attempts to appear clever are hilarious to watch. Your puffed up self-image is both laughable and pathetic at the same time.You are truly delusional and in desperate need of professional counseling...get help idiot...
I did actually, several times...to no avail. And stopped when the benefit of educating you failed to exceed my annoyance in dealing with the situation.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CountNo_Account:
You didn't explain to me what the word meant you moron! I printed a definition for the word for your benefit.You fancy yourself a writer or some sort of deep thinker and your attempts to appear clever are hilarious to watch. Your puffed up self-image is both laughable and pathetic at the same time.You are truly delusional and in desperate need of professional counseling...get help idiot...
I did actually, several times...to no avail. And stopped when the benefit of educating you failed to exceed my annoyance in dealing with the situation.
I think the Catholic Church has made enough of a mockery of itself over the past 3 decades that a simple joke would be impossible to damage it's good name any further.
scalabrine, do have a thing for Apache? I can't help but notice that you love to post your nonsense and unneeded comments in his joke threads while he appears to be the most harmless poster here with no foul intentions.
The problem is that he is PART of the Catholic Church. He is not poking fun of it as an outsider. And sexual impropriety within the Church, as the world now knows, has gone beyond a 'joking matter' for anyone with scruples as a congregation member. I was pointing that out to him.
0
Quote Originally Posted by crod1980:
I think the Catholic Church has made enough of a mockery of itself over the past 3 decades that a simple joke would be impossible to damage it's good name any further.
scalabrine, do have a thing for Apache? I can't help but notice that you love to post your nonsense and unneeded comments in his joke threads while he appears to be the most harmless poster here with no foul intentions.
The problem is that he is PART of the Catholic Church. He is not poking fun of it as an outsider. And sexual impropriety within the Church, as the world now knows, has gone beyond a 'joking matter' for anyone with scruples as a congregation member. I was pointing that out to him.
Sent that to my Irish buddies.
scab
, after which I had to explain it to you while the entire site watched. Made for a good laugh though so thanks for that.
Hot Forum Topics
