They murder 2,200 military. Terrible to say the least. Our response? VAPORIZE 200,000+ , virtually all non-military, completely decimate entire swaths of land for half a century, have innumerable children affected by birth defects for decades afterwards...
And this prospective presidential nominee tells the current president to mention Pearl Harbor to a citizen who was a survivor of the bomb in 2016!!!
Trump, GTFO(ff) of our nominee process stage you illiterate ne'er-do-well!
They murder 2,200 military. Terrible to say the least. Our response? VAPORIZE 200,000+ , virtually all non-military, completely decimate entire swaths of land for half a century, have innumerable children affected by birth defects for decades afterwards...
And this prospective presidential nominee tells the current president to mention Pearl Harbor to a citizen who was a survivor of the bomb in 2016!!!
Trump, GTFO(ff) of our nominee process stage you illiterate ne'er-do-well!
interesting article, especially coming from London's 'Daily Mail'
American media see's it from a different point of view. many feel President Obama sold out the many Americans who lost their lives in the south pacific during WWII by visiting Hiroshima, and sympathising with the enemy 71 years later, and to think, there are people who truly believe Obama should have apologized for America droping the A-bomb, and subsequently ending the war. Did Japan ever apologize for 'starting' the war by bombing Pearl Harbor? NO NEVER
Enjoy Hillary in the Whitehouse, should be interesting, her and that old person dog Billy boy at her side. Just thinking about it makes you want to protest vote for Trump..I know I'm going to...and no, I'm not a Republican
interesting article, especially coming from London's 'Daily Mail'
American media see's it from a different point of view. many feel President Obama sold out the many Americans who lost their lives in the south pacific during WWII by visiting Hiroshima, and sympathising with the enemy 71 years later, and to think, there are people who truly believe Obama should have apologized for America droping the A-bomb, and subsequently ending the war. Did Japan ever apologize for 'starting' the war by bombing Pearl Harbor? NO NEVER
Enjoy Hillary in the Whitehouse, should be interesting, her and that old person dog Billy boy at her side. Just thinking about it makes you want to protest vote for Trump..I know I'm going to...and no, I'm not a Republican
interesting article, especially coming from London's 'Daily Mail'
American media see's it from a different point of view. many feel President Obama sold out the many Americans who lost their lives in the south pacific during WWII by visiting Hiroshima, and sympathising with the enemy 71 years later, and to think, there are people who truly believe Obama should have apologized for America droping the A-bomb, and subsequently ending the war. Did Japan ever apologize for 'starting' the war by bombing Pearl Harbor? NO NEVER
Enjoy Hillary in the Whitehouse, should be interesting, her and that old person dog Billy boy at her side. Just thinking about it makes you want to protest vote for Trump..I know I'm going to...and no, I'm not a Republican
I love how people try to take away from the entire point of an article because of the publisher.Like that matter (if anything the daily mail is far right leaning and that goes completely over your head).
And the point is, a potential president is going after Obama for not mentioning the Pearl Harbor bombing to a Hiroshima survivor. What a disgrace. What does that man as an innocent civilian have to do with that or that comment?
And if you support such a tweet, you can classify yourself the same as the title of this thread. But that's just one person's opinion, but not one that is completely illegitimate.
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
interesting article, especially coming from London's 'Daily Mail'
American media see's it from a different point of view. many feel President Obama sold out the many Americans who lost their lives in the south pacific during WWII by visiting Hiroshima, and sympathising with the enemy 71 years later, and to think, there are people who truly believe Obama should have apologized for America droping the A-bomb, and subsequently ending the war. Did Japan ever apologize for 'starting' the war by bombing Pearl Harbor? NO NEVER
Enjoy Hillary in the Whitehouse, should be interesting, her and that old person dog Billy boy at her side. Just thinking about it makes you want to protest vote for Trump..I know I'm going to...and no, I'm not a Republican
I love how people try to take away from the entire point of an article because of the publisher.Like that matter (if anything the daily mail is far right leaning and that goes completely over your head).
And the point is, a potential president is going after Obama for not mentioning the Pearl Harbor bombing to a Hiroshima survivor. What a disgrace. What does that man as an innocent civilian have to do with that or that comment?
And if you support such a tweet, you can classify yourself the same as the title of this thread. But that's just one person's opinion, but not one that is completely illegitimate.
I love how people try to take away from the entire point of an article because of the publisher.Like that matter (if anything the daily mail is far right leaning and that goes completely over your head).
And the point is, a potential president is going after Obama for not mentioning the Pearl Harbor bombing to a Hiroshima survivor. What a disgrace. What does that man as an innocent civilian have to do with that or that comment?
And if you support such a tweet, you can classify yourself the same as the title of this thread. But that's just one person's opinion, but not one that is completely illegitimate.
I see; so if someone challenges your commentary (or god forbid disagree's with you), or has another opinion, or debate, they're a 'tweet' as you have so diligently described? the Daily Mail is the National Esquire of the U.K. I don't find one U.S. media outlet that ran the story that you brought to the forefront of discussion (because it didn't fit your criteria) but it went " completely over my head" you sir, are politically "full of shitt" this is an open forum, to each his own..maybe it would work out better for yourself if no one responded to any of your threads..other than the scalabrine 'regular' azz kissers who you nourish, and thrive on....
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I love how people try to take away from the entire point of an article because of the publisher.Like that matter (if anything the daily mail is far right leaning and that goes completely over your head).
And the point is, a potential president is going after Obama for not mentioning the Pearl Harbor bombing to a Hiroshima survivor. What a disgrace. What does that man as an innocent civilian have to do with that or that comment?
And if you support such a tweet, you can classify yourself the same as the title of this thread. But that's just one person's opinion, but not one that is completely illegitimate.
I see; so if someone challenges your commentary (or god forbid disagree's with you), or has another opinion, or debate, they're a 'tweet' as you have so diligently described? the Daily Mail is the National Esquire of the U.K. I don't find one U.S. media outlet that ran the story that you brought to the forefront of discussion (because it didn't fit your criteria) but it went " completely over my head" you sir, are politically "full of shitt" this is an open forum, to each his own..maybe it would work out better for yourself if no one responded to any of your threads..other than the scalabrine 'regular' azz kissers who you nourish, and thrive on....
What continues to amaze me is these people who hate him so much and claim to be so smart keep giving him exactly what he wants. Every bad article, every attack adds fuel to the Trump fire.
Do I think he'd be a good president? No. Do I think Hillary would be good? Absolutely no. I haven't decided who I'll vote for yet.
But if people really don't want Trump elected stop attacking him; it just adds to his appeal as an outsider. From my observations one thing he murders Hillary in is appeal; people who love him love him people who are for Hillary don't seem to love her.
People want him gone? Don't give him pres for a month. Amazes me no one figures this out.
What continues to amaze me is these people who hate him so much and claim to be so smart keep giving him exactly what he wants. Every bad article, every attack adds fuel to the Trump fire.
Do I think he'd be a good president? No. Do I think Hillary would be good? Absolutely no. I haven't decided who I'll vote for yet.
But if people really don't want Trump elected stop attacking him; it just adds to his appeal as an outsider. From my observations one thing he murders Hillary in is appeal; people who love him love him people who are for Hillary don't seem to love her.
People want him gone? Don't give him pres for a month. Amazes me no one figures this out.
I see; so if someone challenges your commentary (or god forbid disagree's with you), or has another opinion, or debate, they're a 'tweet' as you have so diligently described? the Daily Mail is the National Esquire of the U.K. I don't find one U.S. media outlet that ran the story that you brought to the forefront of discussion (because it didn't fit your criteria) but it went " completely over my head" you sir, are politically "full of shitt" this is an open forum, to each his own..maybe it would work out better for yourself if no one responded to any of your threads..other than the scalabrine 'regular' azz kissers who you nourish, and thrive on....
Uh, "they" (those who disagree with me or challenge me) are not a 'tweet'. I was referring to Trump's disgusting tweet in the article, which you likely didn't even read in full, or in part.
The Daily Mail could be printed on used toilet paper and it doesn't take away from what Trump tweeted after Obama embraced the Hiroshima surivivor, which is the point of the discussion here.
Or maybe it's not the point of the discussion here. Because you are apparently having a different one with someone else.
So you questioning the journalistic integrity of any publication, online or otherwise, when you barely have comprehended the OP, or have even read the article of the publisher who is in disrepute according to you, is high comedy.
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
I see; so if someone challenges your commentary (or god forbid disagree's with you), or has another opinion, or debate, they're a 'tweet' as you have so diligently described? the Daily Mail is the National Esquire of the U.K. I don't find one U.S. media outlet that ran the story that you brought to the forefront of discussion (because it didn't fit your criteria) but it went " completely over my head" you sir, are politically "full of shitt" this is an open forum, to each his own..maybe it would work out better for yourself if no one responded to any of your threads..other than the scalabrine 'regular' azz kissers who you nourish, and thrive on....
Uh, "they" (those who disagree with me or challenge me) are not a 'tweet'. I was referring to Trump's disgusting tweet in the article, which you likely didn't even read in full, or in part.
The Daily Mail could be printed on used toilet paper and it doesn't take away from what Trump tweeted after Obama embraced the Hiroshima surivivor, which is the point of the discussion here.
Or maybe it's not the point of the discussion here. Because you are apparently having a different one with someone else.
So you questioning the journalistic integrity of any publication, online or otherwise, when you barely have comprehended the OP, or have even read the article of the publisher who is in disrepute according to you, is high comedy.
What continues to amaze me is these people who hate him so much and claim to be so smart keep giving him exactly what he wants. Every bad article, every attack adds fuel to the Trump fire.
Do I think he'd be a good president? No. Do I think Hillary would be good? Absolutely no. I haven't decided who I'll vote for yet.
But if people really don't want Trump elected stop attacking him; it just adds to his appeal as an outsider. From my observations one thing he murders Hillary in is appeal; people who love him love him people who are for Hillary don't seem to love her.
People want him gone? Don't give him pres for a month. Amazes me no one figures this out.
So when he says profile all Muslims before entering the country, and build walls Mexico will pay for to keep out the rapists, and when he makes countless misgynistic comments, and when he says he'll pay the legal fees of a redneck who sucker punches a black man who couldn't defend himself, and when he insinuates violence by his supporters if he doesn't get his way at the convention, or when he is literally on the record, one of the most untruthful candidates of all time with his constant flip-flopping (even doing so mid-sentence), and when (need I go on? I've only scratched the surface), your solution, as this buffoon is rising in the polls, is to just sit here with our arms crossed and mouths closed.
Yes, this is a prudent course of action. And who in the world controls what the media will say or print? They will say and do anything for ratings in a for-profit world?? Why even suggest what they should or could do?
Quote Originally Posted by mightiestmojo:
What continues to amaze me is these people who hate him so much and claim to be so smart keep giving him exactly what he wants. Every bad article, every attack adds fuel to the Trump fire.
Do I think he'd be a good president? No. Do I think Hillary would be good? Absolutely no. I haven't decided who I'll vote for yet.
But if people really don't want Trump elected stop attacking him; it just adds to his appeal as an outsider. From my observations one thing he murders Hillary in is appeal; people who love him love him people who are for Hillary don't seem to love her.
People want him gone? Don't give him pres for a month. Amazes me no one figures this out.
So when he says profile all Muslims before entering the country, and build walls Mexico will pay for to keep out the rapists, and when he makes countless misgynistic comments, and when he says he'll pay the legal fees of a redneck who sucker punches a black man who couldn't defend himself, and when he insinuates violence by his supporters if he doesn't get his way at the convention, or when he is literally on the record, one of the most untruthful candidates of all time with his constant flip-flopping (even doing so mid-sentence), and when (need I go on? I've only scratched the surface), your solution, as this buffoon is rising in the polls, is to just sit here with our arms crossed and mouths closed.
Yes, this is a prudent course of action. And who in the world controls what the media will say or print? They will say and do anything for ratings in a for-profit world?? Why even suggest what they should or could do?
Uh, "they" (those who disagree with me or challenge me) are not a 'tweet'. I was referring to Trump's disgusting tweet in the article, which you likely didn't even read in full, or in part.
The Daily Mail could be printed on used toilet paper and it doesn't take away from what Trump tweeted after Obama embraced the Hiroshima surivivor, which is the point of the discussion here.
Or maybe it's not the point of the discussion here. Because you are apparently having a different one with someone else.
So you questioning the journalistic integrity of any publication, online or otherwise, when you barely have comprehended the OP, or have even read the article of the publisher who is in disrepute according to you, is high comedy.
thank you , enjoy the skit
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Uh, "they" (those who disagree with me or challenge me) are not a 'tweet'. I was referring to Trump's disgusting tweet in the article, which you likely didn't even read in full, or in part.
The Daily Mail could be printed on used toilet paper and it doesn't take away from what Trump tweeted after Obama embraced the Hiroshima surivivor, which is the point of the discussion here.
Or maybe it's not the point of the discussion here. Because you are apparently having a different one with someone else.
So you questioning the journalistic integrity of any publication, online or otherwise, when you barely have comprehended the OP, or have even read the article of the publisher who is in disrepute according to you, is high comedy.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3615084/Donald-Trump-says-Barack-Obama-brought-Pearl-Harbor-Japan.htmlThey murder 2,200 military. Terrible to say the least. Our response? VAPORIZE 200,000+ , virtually all non-military, completely decimate entire swaths of land for half a century, have innumerable children affected by birth defects for decades afterwards...And this prospective presidential nominee tells the current president to mention Pearl Harbor to a citizen who was a survivor of the bomb in 2016!!!Trump, GTFO(ff) of our nominee process stage you illiterate ne'er-do-well!
If you don't like it you can always move to Japan! I'll pay your airfare!
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3615084/Donald-Trump-says-Barack-Obama-brought-Pearl-Harbor-Japan.htmlThey murder 2,200 military. Terrible to say the least. Our response? VAPORIZE 200,000+ , virtually all non-military, completely decimate entire swaths of land for half a century, have innumerable children affected by birth defects for decades afterwards...And this prospective presidential nominee tells the current president to mention Pearl Harbor to a citizen who was a survivor of the bomb in 2016!!!Trump, GTFO(ff) of our nominee process stage you illiterate ne'er-do-well!
If you don't like it you can always move to Japan! I'll pay your airfare!
Hey Scal, if he made a statement supporting happy marriage, especially interracial happy marriage, would you forgive all and soften your stance against him? No chance at a straight answer from you, it was just for the other posters reading.
The irony of this thread is that it's a microcosm of the whole Trump phenomenon. It's not so much people love Trump, it's that they know they hate everything you and others like you in the leftopathic universe stand for, therefore, you know, the enemy of my enemy is my friend?
So you and other Obama loving socialist welfare statist progresstards being outraged by him only strengthens peoples' resolve to support him. Keep up the good work
Hey Scal, if he made a statement supporting happy marriage, especially interracial happy marriage, would you forgive all and soften your stance against him? No chance at a straight answer from you, it was just for the other posters reading.
The irony of this thread is that it's a microcosm of the whole Trump phenomenon. It's not so much people love Trump, it's that they know they hate everything you and others like you in the leftopathic universe stand for, therefore, you know, the enemy of my enemy is my friend?
So you and other Obama loving socialist welfare statist progresstards being outraged by him only strengthens peoples' resolve to support him. Keep up the good work
the best has yet to surface...
Like that matter (if anything the daily mail is far right leaning and that goes completely over your head).
Hot Forum Topics
