Did you know your employer can make you work 80 consecutive hours WITHOUT having to pay overtime?
Most people think it is 40 before being forced to pay 1.5X normal rate, but because it must be over 40 in a WORKWEEK and an employer is given the freedom to make up whatever workweek they want (as long it is consecutive days) they can manipulate your schedule to split those 80 hours in half. For example, let us say you always work 8 hours a day for the sake of argument. Your employer makes the pay period Thursday to Wednesday. You could be made to work Saturday August 25th to Monday Sept. 3rd (10 straight days at 8 hours a day for a total of 80 hours) an NOT be legally entitled to overtime. They do this because THEIR WORKWEEK ends after Wednesday Aug. 29th and cuts that 80 into two 40s. So basically assuming you work 8 hours a day the only way to guarantee overtime pay (federally, at least) is to work at least 11 straight days.
Most people think it is 40 before being forced to pay 1.5X normal rate, but because it must be over 40 in a WORKWEEK and an employer is given the freedom to make up whatever workweek they want (as long it is consecutive days) they can manipulate your schedule to split those 80 hours in half. For example, let us say you always work 8 hours a day for the sake of argument. Your employer makes the pay period Thursday to Wednesday. You could be made to work Saturday August 25th to Monday Sept. 3rd (10 straight days at 8 hours a day for a total of 80 hours) an NOT be legally entitled to overtime. They do this because THEIR WORKWEEK ends after Wednesday Aug. 29th and cuts that 80 into two 40s. So basically assuming you work 8 hours a day the only way to guarantee overtime pay (federally, at least) is to work at least 11 straight days.
https://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs23.pdf
Most people think it is 40 before being forced to pay 1.5X normal rate, but because it must be over 40 in a WORKWEEK and an employer is given the freedom to make up whatever workweek they want (as long it is consecutive days) they can manipulate your schedule to split those 80 hours in half. For example, let us say you always work 8 hours a day for the sake of argument. Your employer makes the pay period Thursday to Wednesday. You could be made to work Saturday August 25th to Monday Sept. 3rd (10 straight days at 8 hours a day for a total of 80 hours) an NOT be legally entitled to overtime. They do this because THEIR WORKWEEK ends after Wednesday Aug. 29th and cuts that 80 into two 40s. So basically assuming you work 8 hours a day the only way to guarantee overtime pay (federally, at least) is to work at least 11 straight days.
https://www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs23.pdf
He never thought I was capable of reading laws and backing up what I said because he was the type of Guy who thinks he is smarter than everyone.
I can't click your link but I just do not see how your logic works cause in Arkansas, that would not fly.
He never thought I was capable of reading laws and backing up what I said because he was the type of Guy who thinks he is smarter than everyone.
I can't click your link but I just do not see how your logic works cause in Arkansas, that would not fly.
The employer can not randomly change the workweek though so it is known up front for the employee.
If you don't have a job that allows for regular weekends and would require you to work 10 days straight you either need a new job or work in a couple of "undesirable" sectors. I am not knocking it I am an employer in one of those sectors.
The employer can not randomly change the workweek though so it is known up front for the employee.
If you don't have a job that allows for regular weekends and would require you to work 10 days straight you either need a new job or work in a couple of "undesirable" sectors. I am not knocking it I am an employer in one of those sectors.
I have never heard of a job that does ten 8's and 4 off.
I have never heard of a job that does ten 8's and 4 off.
Just ask my former boss...LOL
His argument was I agreed to his conditions but the law won;)
Just ask my former boss...LOL
His argument was I agreed to his conditions but the law won;)
So get this clarified by an employer before you agree to work for them. Don't work for scumbags who pull shenanigans.
So get this clarified by an employer before you agree to work for them. Don't work for scumbags who pull shenanigans.
8ofcups, a verbal agreement beforehand will not fly with state law
Just ask my former boss...LOL
His argument was I agreed to his conditions but the law won;)
I hear you, bro. Fuck The Man, and I hope you let the air out of his tires after you quit.
8ofcups, a verbal agreement beforehand will not fly with state law
Just ask my former boss...LOL
His argument was I agreed to his conditions but the law won;)
I hear you, bro. Fuck The Man, and I hope you let the air out of his tires after you quit.
Having filed an overtime claim personally with the Arkansas labor board and won. Resulting in my boss/owner of company having to legally cut me an extra check for $1500 when he told me I would never get a dime originally.
He never thought I was capable of reading laws and backing up what I said because he was the type of Guy who thinks he is smarter than everyone.
I can't click your link but I just do not see how your logic works cause in Arkansas, that would not fly.
so copy and past the link
Having filed an overtime claim personally with the Arkansas labor board and won. Resulting in my boss/owner of company having to legally cut me an extra check for $1500 when he told me I would never get a dime originally.
He never thought I was capable of reading laws and backing up what I said because he was the type of Guy who thinks he is smarter than everyone.
I can't click your link but I just do not see how your logic works cause in Arkansas, that would not fly.
so copy and past the link
Well, you could always keep bitching. That's an option.
The first step in change is usually informing people and the second is getting support which is what I was trying to do. It is very difficult for a single person to change public policy by themselves.
Well, you could always keep bitching. That's an option.
The first step in change is usually informing people and the second is getting support which is what I was trying to do. It is very difficult for a single person to change public policy by themselves.
get a salary. then work 80 hours a week and you won't have the option for overtime. gets you over it quick-like
While I appreciate the the comments made by MaineRoad the comments by Gunners quoted above is another example along the line of the "if you don't like it leave" argument. His goes along the line of comparing something bad to something worse as a way to justify the bad thing. Both fail to address the issue and instead denigrate the presenter or go off topic. The question simply is to do you support employers who manipulate employee schedules to avoid the legal obligation to pay overtime rates?
get a salary. then work 80 hours a week and you won't have the option for overtime. gets you over it quick-like
While I appreciate the the comments made by MaineRoad the comments by Gunners quoted above is another example along the line of the "if you don't like it leave" argument. His goes along the line of comparing something bad to something worse as a way to justify the bad thing. Both fail to address the issue and instead denigrate the presenter or go off topic. The question simply is to do you support employers who manipulate employee schedules to avoid the legal obligation to pay overtime rates?
While I appreciate the the comments made by MaineRoad the comments by Gunners quoted above is another example along the line of the "if you don't like it leave" argument. His goes along the line of comparing something bad to something worse as a way to justify the bad thing. Both fail to address the issue and instead denigrate the presenter or go off topic. The question simply is to do you support employers who manipulate employee schedules to avoid the legal obligation to pay overtime rates?
While I appreciate the the comments made by MaineRoad the comments by Gunners quoted above is another example along the line of the "if you don't like it leave" argument. His goes along the line of comparing something bad to something worse as a way to justify the bad thing. Both fail to address the issue and instead denigrate the presenter or go off topic. The question simply is to do you support employers who manipulate employee schedules to avoid the legal obligation to pay overtime rates?
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,844
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
256,980
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,128
-
9/12 🔥🔥??????
4,298
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,654
-
Sunday 09/13/2026
575
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
96,657
-
Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System?
27,882
-
Buckeyes/Longhorns in game
1,037
-
Week One-Post Week One Plays Here
1,507
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
