Perhaps he is dead. By his logic, your inquiry into his demise is somehow disrespectful so please refrain from asking any questions related to the matter.
Perhaps he is dead. By his logic, your inquiry into his demise is somehow disrespectful so please refrain from asking any questions related to the matter.
Sandman.... although I tend to agree with you on this issue as far as strong questions that need to be answered / shown to us instead of locked away I do not agree with snitching on BMA
gotta be able to roll with the punches snitching just gets people in trouble on here and in real life and the shit is getting old
Sandman.... although I tend to agree with you on this issue as far as strong questions that need to be answered / shown to us instead of locked away I do not agree with snitching on BMA
gotta be able to roll with the punches snitching just gets people in trouble on here and in real life and the shit is getting old
When I see these threads across various forums over the years I always start with a few questions that either never get answered, or Im told "just watch the video " ( which means Ive stumped the person who thinks it was a conspiracy )
1) if there was a controlled demolition of WTC 1 & 2, where were the explosives planted?
2) what kind of explosives were used?
3) we see the "detonation" (pancaking) in the video. All this occurred BELOW the impact area, why didn't anything detonate when the planes hit?
4) Why wait until video cameras were rolling and every TV news outlet had "eyes on" the scene, why not detonate the controlled demolition just as the planes hit ( making it look like the planes knocked over the towers )
1) Pentagon/ missile theory- Why make up a story about a plane hitting and not make sure there was a CGI film ready to show the plane hitting
2) Did a missile know over the lamp posts ?
3) why not just announce a Al Qmissile was shot into the Pentagon? I would think
When I see these threads across various forums over the years I always start with a few questions that either never get answered, or Im told "just watch the video " ( which means Ive stumped the person who thinks it was a conspiracy )
1) if there was a controlled demolition of WTC 1 & 2, where were the explosives planted?
2) what kind of explosives were used?
3) we see the "detonation" (pancaking) in the video. All this occurred BELOW the impact area, why didn't anything detonate when the planes hit?
4) Why wait until video cameras were rolling and every TV news outlet had "eyes on" the scene, why not detonate the controlled demolition just as the planes hit ( making it look like the planes knocked over the towers )
1) Pentagon/ missile theory- Why make up a story about a plane hitting and not make sure there was a CGI film ready to show the plane hitting
2) Did a missile know over the lamp posts ?
3) why not just announce a Al Qmissile was shot into the Pentagon? I would think
Sorry, early submit.. 3 ) why not announce Al Quada had acquired a missile and shot it into the Pentagon? after all, what are the chances of them hijacking more planes? I would be in fear of them always being able to get missiles and shooting them into any building
Sorry, early submit.. 3 ) why not announce Al Quada had acquired a missile and shot it into the Pentagon? after all, what are the chances of them hijacking more planes? I would be in fear of them always being able to get missiles and shooting them into any building
For 10 + years, involving many debates on the net and in person, I have asked these simple questions and the conspiracy theorists never seem to have answers.
For 10 + years, involving many debates on the net and in person, I have asked these simple questions and the conspiracy theorists never seem to have answers.
yet the people who question the official report have dozens of legit questions that dont get answered but fugggattboutthem we must answer Jgalts important questions
yet the people who question the official report have dozens of legit questions that dont get answered but fugggattboutthem we must answer Jgalts important questions
Here's an interesting article about the thermitic material found in the ruins of the towers. I'm not sure how it got there (however I assure someone knows) but I think we should probably find out...
Here's an interesting article about the thermitic material found in the ruins of the towers. I'm not sure how it got there (however I assure someone knows) but I think we should probably find out...
Sandman.... although I tend to agree with you on this issue as far as strong questions that need to be answered / shown to us instead of locked away I do not agree with snitching on BMA
gotta be able to roll with the punches snitching just gets people in trouble on here and in real life and the shit is getting old
I didn't want to snitch, but honestly I opened this thread and had 2 replies until bma came in. He spammed for 2 pages, completely turning the thread into a shit show. He never even talks he only copy and paste random shit. He can speak his mind one post at a time, there is no need to completely spam someone's thread for over a full page before anyone else can respond.
Sandman.... although I tend to agree with you on this issue as far as strong questions that need to be answered / shown to us instead of locked away I do not agree with snitching on BMA
gotta be able to roll with the punches snitching just gets people in trouble on here and in real life and the shit is getting old
I didn't want to snitch, but honestly I opened this thread and had 2 replies until bma came in. He spammed for 2 pages, completely turning the thread into a shit show. He never even talks he only copy and paste random shit. He can speak his mind one post at a time, there is no need to completely spam someone's thread for over a full page before anyone else can respond.
1) if there was a controlled demolition of WTC 1 & 2, where were the explosives planted?
Obviously I cannot say where they were planted. I can tell you how they didn't fall though, and Jet fuel did not completely destory these massive structures.The WTC ruins were quickly cleaned up and shipped to China to be melted down before a full investigation could take place with the steel and concrete. (even though multiple sources have found tons of thermite in the dust all around the area) Well before welders were in there so you can't say it was them.
I can tell you that there is no way in hell, fire could bring those buildings down. Let alone fall into their own footprint. They would fall through the least amount of resistance not the most amount of resistance.
These buildings were specifically built to withstand terrorist attacks, even major airliners hitting them. Do you honestly think that if anyone thought for a remote chance that these towers would fall that firefighters would be dispatched to go inside? It defys all logic. They would not fall into there own footprint, it is impossible to be done by fire alone and burning for such a SHORT period of time.
Fire from one of the upper floors does not crush through floor after floor at near free fall speeds of reinforced steel and concrete. It would never happen if we believe what we know about physics to be true. not to mention all the eyewitness reports of hearing multiple explosions, or the video evidence of black smoke from floors below as it collapsed.
Now you only mention tower 1&2, please tell me you are aware Building 7 fell into its own footprint as well? Watch video of #7 and tell me that building fell from fire and damage to one side of it. Things do not fall down that way unless they are supposed to. Natural laws have no business in the 9/11 commission report.
Multiple high rise buildings have burned, some for over 20 hours and never collasped. Yet we are to believe that these 3 buildings, that where engineered to withstand a much greater attack, fell into their own footprints. Concrete reinforced steel would not melt in such short amount of time, let alone pummel through floor after floor of perfectly fine concrete reinforced steel.
2) what kind of explosives were used?
I don't know but I'm sure Dick Cheney does, as well as Marvin Bush (Georgie's younger brother in charge of security of the towers) Everything points to the use of thermite though.
3) we see the "detonation" (pancaking) in the video. All this occurred BELOW the impact area, why didn't anything detonate when the planes hit?
Thermite "Most varieties are not explosive, but can create short bursts of
extremely high temperatures focused on a very small area for a short
period of time" -wikipedia
4) Why wait until video cameras were rolling and every TV news outlet had "eyes on" the scene, why not detonate the controlled demolition just as the planes hit ( making it look like the planes knocked over the towers )
Because that would make even less sense to anyone, let alone an educated background. The fire theory is all they have and it is complete bullshit.Also the public always has cameras rolling, you can't predict to do something in New York that big without it getting caught on film.
1) if there was a controlled demolition of WTC 1 & 2, where were the explosives planted?
Obviously I cannot say where they were planted. I can tell you how they didn't fall though, and Jet fuel did not completely destory these massive structures.The WTC ruins were quickly cleaned up and shipped to China to be melted down before a full investigation could take place with the steel and concrete. (even though multiple sources have found tons of thermite in the dust all around the area) Well before welders were in there so you can't say it was them.
I can tell you that there is no way in hell, fire could bring those buildings down. Let alone fall into their own footprint. They would fall through the least amount of resistance not the most amount of resistance.
These buildings were specifically built to withstand terrorist attacks, even major airliners hitting them. Do you honestly think that if anyone thought for a remote chance that these towers would fall that firefighters would be dispatched to go inside? It defys all logic. They would not fall into there own footprint, it is impossible to be done by fire alone and burning for such a SHORT period of time.
Fire from one of the upper floors does not crush through floor after floor at near free fall speeds of reinforced steel and concrete. It would never happen if we believe what we know about physics to be true. not to mention all the eyewitness reports of hearing multiple explosions, or the video evidence of black smoke from floors below as it collapsed.
Now you only mention tower 1&2, please tell me you are aware Building 7 fell into its own footprint as well? Watch video of #7 and tell me that building fell from fire and damage to one side of it. Things do not fall down that way unless they are supposed to. Natural laws have no business in the 9/11 commission report.
Multiple high rise buildings have burned, some for over 20 hours and never collasped. Yet we are to believe that these 3 buildings, that where engineered to withstand a much greater attack, fell into their own footprints. Concrete reinforced steel would not melt in such short amount of time, let alone pummel through floor after floor of perfectly fine concrete reinforced steel.
2) what kind of explosives were used?
I don't know but I'm sure Dick Cheney does, as well as Marvin Bush (Georgie's younger brother in charge of security of the towers) Everything points to the use of thermite though.
3) we see the "detonation" (pancaking) in the video. All this occurred BELOW the impact area, why didn't anything detonate when the planes hit?
Thermite "Most varieties are not explosive, but can create short bursts of
extremely high temperatures focused on a very small area for a short
period of time" -wikipedia
4) Why wait until video cameras were rolling and every TV news outlet had "eyes on" the scene, why not detonate the controlled demolition just as the planes hit ( making it look like the planes knocked over the towers )
Because that would make even less sense to anyone, let alone an educated background. The fire theory is all they have and it is complete bullshit.Also the public always has cameras rolling, you can't predict to do something in New York that big without it getting caught on film.
1) Pentagon/ missile theory- Why make
up a story about a plane hitting and not make sure there was a CGI film
ready to show the plane hitting
1. The pentagon has a massive amounts
of cameras. Why did they only release 5 frames from one camera, which
did not show any airplane. Why are they withholding the massive amount
of other footage? Why did they confiscate footage from cameras from a
local gas station and other business in the near area? If there is no
cover up then why wouldn't they show us the damn plane and put it to
rest?
2. How does the nose of a plane
(supposed to be lightweight and weak) go through Multiple layers of
concrete walls, and then leave an exit hole 310 feet away? The nose
would disintegrate upon impact! Why is there only one impact hole on the
outside of the pentagon? If the nose could go through that much
concrete than surely JET ENGINES would leave at least a scratch on the
outside walls?
3. Any pilot will tell you that the
manuever's these hijackers pulled off are impossible for any
inexperienced pilot, and near impossible for the most experienced pilot.
The hiijacker had limited experience flying tiny little planes, and
then we are supposed to believe he can fly a major airline into a 360
degree turn at top speeds, hover over the grass and land directly on
target?
Why was the "plane" caught on radar
going over 100knots over the airplanes top speed??? How is that even
possible? Let alone to pull a turn that sharp and that fast, with a
terrible pilot at the gears?
And why in the hell did Dick Cheney
tell NORAD to Stand down repeatedly! They had tons of time to shoot this
plane down! The biggest defence budget in the world and you let
hiijacked planes roam around the country after 2 terrorists attacks in
New York???
All flights were grounded, yet this one was not allowed to be intercepted???
4. It just so happens that where the
explosion happened is where all the records where of the 2.3 TRILLION
DOLLARS of Military Spending that Donald Rumsfeld announced his
government couldn't accound for. (In a press release on SEPTEMBER 10,
2001)
2) Did a missile know over the lamp posts ?
Know one will ever know until they release the footage.
3) why not just announce a Al Qmissile was shot into the Pentagon?
They have RPG's. Not laser guided missles. Would not be believeable at all.They would never get close to attack this building without being taked down.
The Entire Bush Administration should be charged and investigated for their actions that day.
Cheney tells Norad to stand down? Why?
Well he used to be the CEO of Halliburton didn't you know? He got a 20
million serverance package when he stepped down to be Georgie bushy's
little buddy. OF course theirs no conflict of interest here when
Halliburton is awarded the contract to rebuild IRAQ, in which no other
contractors where even aloud to bid on the job.
I could go on and on about the money
trail and that is where you catch these snakes in their greed and their
lies. I answered your questions to the best of my abilities at this
time.
Wake up America, Demand justice to be
served. It won't be an easy fight but you can't turn a blind eye to this
anymore, you rights and freedoms have been slowly been stripped away
from you since 9/11.Don't be afraid to stand up to them, we outnumber them and they better be scared of a full scale investigation.
1) Pentagon/ missile theory- Why make
up a story about a plane hitting and not make sure there was a CGI film
ready to show the plane hitting
1. The pentagon has a massive amounts
of cameras. Why did they only release 5 frames from one camera, which
did not show any airplane. Why are they withholding the massive amount
of other footage? Why did they confiscate footage from cameras from a
local gas station and other business in the near area? If there is no
cover up then why wouldn't they show us the damn plane and put it to
rest?
2. How does the nose of a plane
(supposed to be lightweight and weak) go through Multiple layers of
concrete walls, and then leave an exit hole 310 feet away? The nose
would disintegrate upon impact! Why is there only one impact hole on the
outside of the pentagon? If the nose could go through that much
concrete than surely JET ENGINES would leave at least a scratch on the
outside walls?
3. Any pilot will tell you that the
manuever's these hijackers pulled off are impossible for any
inexperienced pilot, and near impossible for the most experienced pilot.
The hiijacker had limited experience flying tiny little planes, and
then we are supposed to believe he can fly a major airline into a 360
degree turn at top speeds, hover over the grass and land directly on
target?
Why was the "plane" caught on radar
going over 100knots over the airplanes top speed??? How is that even
possible? Let alone to pull a turn that sharp and that fast, with a
terrible pilot at the gears?
And why in the hell did Dick Cheney
tell NORAD to Stand down repeatedly! They had tons of time to shoot this
plane down! The biggest defence budget in the world and you let
hiijacked planes roam around the country after 2 terrorists attacks in
New York???
All flights were grounded, yet this one was not allowed to be intercepted???
4. It just so happens that where the
explosion happened is where all the records where of the 2.3 TRILLION
DOLLARS of Military Spending that Donald Rumsfeld announced his
government couldn't accound for. (In a press release on SEPTEMBER 10,
2001)
2) Did a missile know over the lamp posts ?
Know one will ever know until they release the footage.
3) why not just announce a Al Qmissile was shot into the Pentagon?
They have RPG's. Not laser guided missles. Would not be believeable at all.They would never get close to attack this building without being taked down.
The Entire Bush Administration should be charged and investigated for their actions that day.
Cheney tells Norad to stand down? Why?
Well he used to be the CEO of Halliburton didn't you know? He got a 20
million serverance package when he stepped down to be Georgie bushy's
little buddy. OF course theirs no conflict of interest here when
Halliburton is awarded the contract to rebuild IRAQ, in which no other
contractors where even aloud to bid on the job.
I could go on and on about the money
trail and that is where you catch these snakes in their greed and their
lies. I answered your questions to the best of my abilities at this
time.
Wake up America, Demand justice to be
served. It won't be an easy fight but you can't turn a blind eye to this
anymore, you rights and freedoms have been slowly been stripped away
from you since 9/11.Don't be afraid to stand up to them, we outnumber them and they better be scared of a full scale investigation.
And notice how many of those accounts were documented by news outlets (Washington Post, USA Today, etc.). Like they don't appreciate a good conspiracy theory.
And notice how many of those accounts were documented by news outlets (Washington Post, USA Today, etc.). Like they don't appreciate a good conspiracy theory.
If it wasn't for all the plane wreckage in the pentagon, I'd believe you. Delusional.
Why don't you try doing some reading on those sites instead being an ignorant fool who's willing to accept some bullshit cover story like a typical brainwashed zombie popped full of meds.
If it wasn't for all the plane wreckage in the pentagon, I'd believe you. Delusional.
Why don't you try doing some reading on those sites instead being an ignorant fool who's willing to accept some bullshit cover story like a typical brainwashed zombie popped full of meds.
yup me and BMA of course do not see eye to eye on this specific subject ... but you cant fault someone for their beliefs and especially there passion of which they believe in ...
with that said.... it is scary the amount of coincidences that occurred that day and the days before and after the tragic event...
yup me and BMA of course do not see eye to eye on this specific subject ... but you cant fault someone for their beliefs and especially there passion of which they believe in ...
with that said.... it is scary the amount of coincidences that occurred that day and the days before and after the tragic event...
Ive always said regardless of how much damning info there already against the official report considerin the 2 main towers and the pentagon debacle.... building 7 is the key to it all... pure greed
Ive always said regardless of how much damning info there already against the official report considerin the 2 main towers and the pentagon debacle.... building 7 is the key to it all... pure greed
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.