Posted:
#26
Lol rangerz, coin flip haha this thread just made my day.
5DIMES SCREWING ME HELP
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by Alien-1:
Just so you know......youre speaking to a professional gambler here son.......here is some free insight:
For example:....If you think ANY book is gonna pay out +145 on M. Richards if he scores over 3 total(goals +assists) for a potential 7 game series, you my friend, are EXTREMELY inexperienced and have very little knowledge of gambling.
All of those props were for a single game, It's obvious !!
Welcome to the gambling school of hard knocks
You ignorance has cost you money and ya know what........I'm 100% positive it won't be the last time you're inexperience will cost you money !!
Wow for a professional gambler you are pretty stupid if you think these were single game props. 
Do you know anything about hockey? Obviously not.....
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
Posted:
#30
Quote Originally Posted by seanjohn007:
its obviously for a series, but i think you'll have a tough time getting your money. don't waster your time talking to anyone but tony, the rest just listen to him and are to scared to do anything without his approval.
its obviously for a series, but i think you'll have a tough time getting your money. don't waster your time talking to anyone but tony, the rest just listen to him and are to scared to do anything without his approval.
I have been told by 3 people who I don't think have ever watched hockey that they were one game wagers, I have layed out the facts as well as each players avg ppg stating it makes no sense for them to be one game wagers. I have yet to speak to Tony, still waiting. ive had 3 different 1 hr live chats and nobody seems to know what is going on, like really these people aren't that educated on sports, theyre just looking at a customer service script lol
not a savior
Posted:
#32
Alien and examine are absolutely clueless. You are 100% right. There has never in the history of the game been 1 game prop bets with that high of a points line for any player. Those are series lines, and if you don't get it resolved I def would never wager with that joke of a company again. "I am a professional gamber" LMFAO. He obviously is from another planet. Good luck man, keep bugging them, it is graded wrong. Let us know what happens
Posted:
#33
Quote Originally Posted by St2ee:
Alien and examine are absolutely clueless. You are 100% right. There has never in the history of the game been 1 game prop bets with that high of a points line for any player. Those are series lines, and if you don't get it resolved I def would never wager with that joke of a company again. "I am a professional gamber" LMFAO. He obviously is from another planet. Good luck man, keep bugging them, it is graded wrong. Let us know what happens
Alien and examine are absolutely clueless. You are 100% right. There has never in the history of the game been 1 game prop bets with that high of a points line for any player. Those are series lines, and if you don't get it resolved I def would never wager with that joke of a company again. "I am a professional gamber" LMFAO. He obviously is from another planet. Good luck man, keep bugging them, it is graded wrong. Let us know what happens
no problem, ill keep you posted, still waiting for tony to contact me
not a savior
Posted:
#36
Quote Originally Posted by rlovsin17:
im not asking for money back I want them back in play. tell me how 3 pts in a game for mike Richards makes sense. the guy has 9 pts in 21 games
im not asking for money back I want them back in play. tell me how 3 pts in a game for mike Richards makes sense. the guy has 9 pts in 21 games
With the way the Kings offense has been playing, and the line being +130 I don't see how it couldn't be for 1 game. 2 assists and a goal is not impossible
Posted:
#40
Quote Originally Posted by Sherms:
Don't even bother asking for your money back, if you didn't know it is your fault. Those lines look normal for a single game anyway not too crazy. 3 points at + money for an entire series? Idk about that.
Yea, leading scorers average 1 pt per game, yet 3-4 per game seems normal to you.
Where do you guys come from?
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by Sherms:
Don't even bother asking for your money back, if you didn't know it is your fault. Those lines look normal for a single game anyway not too crazy. 3 points at + money for an entire series? Idk about that.
i am personally embarrassed that you are a kings fan. kill yourself immediately
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by rlovsin17:
Tony had them all Voided and refunded. they are not losses or back in play. he said they were supposed to be for the series but have been refunded as they were unclearly posted.
Tony had them all Voided and refunded. they are not losses or back in play. he said they were supposed to be for the series but have been refunded as they were unclearly posted.
That seems about right, should ask him to post new lines though for the series as I'm sure everyones player props were cancelled.
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by seanjohn007:
That seems about right, should ask him to post new lines though for the series as I'm sure everyones player props were cancelled.
These kind of props are only offered before the series, they never update between games. Really not worth it for them to bother, even if they made the mistake here.
Posted:
#48
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :
Lol and btw, how did ANYBODY who has ever made a hockey wager before think those were 1 game lines??!! This is definitely not directed at the op as his initial thinking was right. But some of you, wtf were you thinking??
Lol and btw, how did ANYBODY who has ever made a hockey wager before think those were 1 game lines??!! This is definitely not directed at the op as his initial thinking was right. But some of you, wtf were you thinking??
C'mon theyre pro gamblers they know it all 
not a savior
Posted:
#49
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
These kind of props are only offered before the series, they never update between games. Really not worth it for them to bother, even if they made the mistake here.
of course i know its before the series. I'm sure there is something they can come up with. and it is the stanley cup, they want as much money on this series as possible.
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
Alien, what the hell are you talking about? You think they offer 3.5-4 pt props for a single game when the Rangers tt was 2.5 juiced way down?
Lol you might wanna take a step back and realize there is some ignorance here, and it's coming from you. Richards and Nash have both averaged about 0.5 pts per game so if you factor that into a 7 game series (with 7 obviously being the max) then 3.5/4 do make absolute perfect sense.
These bets are CLEARLY for game 1. Next time you speak in certainties, you better be 100% sure you know what you are talking about. You have a pretty good nba forum reputation, better off keeping it there. You are 100% dead wrong here.
Hot Forum Topics
