Posted:
#1
Obviously, there is a lot of interest in cardio
training and how to do it right. Sadly, most people are still doing 2 things
terribly wrong and it’s killing their results.
As I thought about reviewing the newest scientific study from Australia this week, or explaining the post workout "after burn effect" (EPOC) that comes from intense forms of cardio, it dawned on me to backtrack, and ask…
"WHY are people still confused about fat burning cardio in the first place when the solution is drop dead simple, common sense and right in front of our noses?"
I thought to myself,
"If I could help remove the SOURCE of the confusion, then regardless of which cardio program you choose, every decision and action that emerges from your new understanding would be more productive right?"
RIGHT!
As best as I can figure, there are two major reasons why people are still mucking up their cardio programs for fat loss.
REASON #1 NOT ENOUGH FOCUS ON TOTAL CALORIES BURNED
Most people aren’t burning enough darn calories. Why? Well, I guess they are too busy worrying about the "proper" type of exercise (which machine or activity), the "optimal" mode (steady state or intervals), the "perfect" ratio of intervals, or the "best" duration. Some people coast along on the treadmill at 2.3 miles per hour or some similar sloth-like pace and they think that just by hitting a TIME goal, such as 45 or 60 minutes, that with "X" duration completed, they are assured to get the results they want. On the other extreme, we have folks who have found or created some mega-intense, super-duper short training protocol like the "4-minute wonder workout fromJapan ." Just because the
workout is high in intensity and it is performed in intervals, they too think
they are assured to get the results they want. What’s missing in both cases is
the realization that total fat loss is a function of total calories burned
(assuming you don’t blow your diet, of course). AND… Total calories burned is a
product of INTENSITY times DURATION, not intensity OR duration. Too much focus
on one variable at the exclusion of the other can lead to a less than optimal
total calorie burn and disappointing results. And remember, intensity and
duration are *variables* not absolutes! ("Variable" means you can
change them… even if your "guru" sez you can’t!) When you understand
the relationship and interplay between INTENSITY X DURATION you will find a
"SWEET SPOT" where the product of those variables produces the
maximal calorie burn and maximum fat loss, based on your current health
condition and your need for time efficiency.
As I thought about reviewing the newest scientific study from Australia this week, or explaining the post workout "after burn effect" (EPOC) that comes from intense forms of cardio, it dawned on me to backtrack, and ask…
"WHY are people still confused about fat burning cardio in the first place when the solution is drop dead simple, common sense and right in front of our noses?"
I thought to myself,
"If I could help remove the SOURCE of the confusion, then regardless of which cardio program you choose, every decision and action that emerges from your new understanding would be more productive right?"
RIGHT!
As best as I can figure, there are two major reasons why people are still mucking up their cardio programs for fat loss.
REASON #1 NOT ENOUGH FOCUS ON TOTAL CALORIES BURNED
Most people aren’t burning enough darn calories. Why? Well, I guess they are too busy worrying about the "proper" type of exercise (which machine or activity), the "optimal" mode (steady state or intervals), the "perfect" ratio of intervals, or the "best" duration. Some people coast along on the treadmill at 2.3 miles per hour or some similar sloth-like pace and they think that just by hitting a TIME goal, such as 45 or 60 minutes, that with "X" duration completed, they are assured to get the results they want. On the other extreme, we have folks who have found or created some mega-intense, super-duper short training protocol like the "4-minute wonder workout from
