There was a system issue in regarding one of my previous CFL picks where there were 500 units missing; that was rectified. Now I check my rank from lest night, and there are 500 units missing again, so I did the math on all of my unit scores I should have 5,550 not 5,050, why does the system keep screwing up my rank. It was just fixed and now I am 500 units behind again.
DO THE MATH;
17 X 1,000 +17,000
1 X 500 +500
11 X -1,100 -11,000
17 X -50 -850
1 X -100
17,500 - 11,850 = +5,550 this is my actual unit score. it shows this currently 5,050
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
There was a system issue in regarding one of my previous CFL picks where there were 500 units missing; that was rectified. Now I check my rank from lest night, and there are 500 units missing again, so I did the math on all of my unit scores I should have 5,550 not 5,050, why does the system keep screwing up my rank. It was just fixed and now I am 500 units behind again.
DO THE MATH;
17 X 1,000 +17,000
1 X 500 +500
11 X -1,100 -11,000
17 X -50 -850
1 X -100
17,500 - 11,850 = +5,550 this is my actual unit score. it shows this currently 5,050
17,500 - 11,850 - 100 = +5,550 this is my actual unit score. it shows this currently 5,050I am getting sick and tried this is done intentionally to screw up my rank position that 500 it means 3rd or nothing. I am keeping track, get your head out of the rabbit hole.
DO THE MATH;
17 X 1,000 +17,000
1 X 500 +500
11 X -1,100 -11,000
17 X -50 -850
1 X -100
17,500 - 11,850 - 100 = +5,550 this is my actual unit score. it shows this currently 5,050I am getting sick and tried this is done intentionally to screw up my rank position that 500 it means 3rd or nothing. I am keeping track, get your head out of the rabbit hole.
Hi Cyg - I understand you are upset, that is super frustrating! But I promise it's not intentional. :) I've forwarded this thread link on to Colin, and he will be able to look at this for you in the morning.
@CygXanadu
Hi Cyg - I understand you are upset, that is super frustrating! But I promise it's not intentional. :) I've forwarded this thread link on to Colin, and he will be able to look at this for you in the morning.