All Forums | College Football

Mississippi at Texas Tech (01/02/2009)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13715
Posts: 420
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8485
Posted: #201
anyone know if this can been watched online free anywhere?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #202
Let's Do It!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 216
Posted: #203
try channelsurfing.net.  i use it watch xmen games bc i know longet live in the market.   you can get all kinds of sports on this site.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2780
Posted: #204
Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

I posted this in the Missouri/Northwestern thread and the same applies to this game. You can actually replace Mizzou with Tech and 31 points with 35.

"Mizzou will not cover this game because their DEF blows and give up nearly 28 points a game...and I point to one team when making my final descision in making this play. Baylor...who held Mizzou to 31 pts this year while being allowed to score 28 points themselves. This game will have a similiar final score."

Baylor was actually beating Texas Tech till two 4th Qtr TD's and Tech ended up winning by 7. This game was played at Texas Tech so I don't want to hear about Graham Harrell playing in Dallas and that's going to make a difference.

This game will play UNDER the TOTAL and Tech may not even win. The BIG 12 does not do well in situations where a team has a good DEF.

Good Luck!

Fpronk.....just wanted to let you know that Harrell smashed/fractured 3 fingers in 9 places during Baylor game....At half had them taped together and went out to bring Tech back against a dangerous Bayler offense with Robt Griffith.....I can only imagine how painful that injury was......If you're gonna judge Tech by the Baylor game then you have to admit it was a gutzy as hell performance by Harrell.....Plus Tech dominated Texas....Yes dominated...It wasn't just a last second victory...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 216
Posted: #205
HATE JEANNIE ZELASKO...SHE LOOKS LIKE A CARTOON CHARACTER
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #206
Sure that was great...I must admit you really sound like a TECH fan...best of luck!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 286
Posted: #207
Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

Let's Do It!!!
  We are together on this one.  Here we go.  I also have the under 67.5.  It's been so long since I have seen a football game!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2780
Posted: #208
Big Okla fan......I actually dislike Tech and think Harrell's a bit of a prick.....Just like Leach and Tech's ability to execute....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 8634
Posted: #209
TT jumps out with say 2 TD lead, how will Ole Miss catch them.
Who shows, who don't.
There are better dets out there CCB/CAL -4
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1892
Posted: #210
After seeing the weather went 2 more units over 67
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #211
He just said Tech DEF is underrated...lol any team that gives up 30 pts a game doesnt have a underrated D.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 602
Posted: #212
ole miss and the over.... gonna happen
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2780
Posted: #213
So a team that scores 7-8 TDs a game and scores quickly doesn't give their opponent more scoring opportunities and probably more minutes with the ball so they couldn't have an underrated D???
 
Really???
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 286
Posted: #214
Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

He just said Tech DEF is underrated...lol any team that gives up 30 pts a game doesnt have a underrated D.
Well you must admit those two first hits were big time.  But I agree, any team that gives up 30 per game???  Maybe he meant an underated defense that gives up 30.  At any rate, a good start for the under as 4 minutes with no score is a good things for those of us on the under!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 349
Posted: #215
Quote Originally Posted by gococks17:

ole miss and the over.... gonna happen


Looks Like A Double Loser to me.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 286
Posted: #216
First serve goes to Mississippi.  Field position looking good.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #217
Quote Originally Posted by joewashington:

So a team that scores 7-8 TDs a game and scores quickly doesn't give their opponent more scoring opportunities and probably more minutes with the ball so they couldn't have an underrated D???
 
Really???

Yes, really....so youre saying a team that scores 7-8 times a games scores in a hurry?  Look to Florida or USC if you want to talk about a team with an explosive offense and an excellent DEF. I'm sure you're all over OKLAHOMA vs FLORIDA too.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2780
Posted: #218
USC's "explosive" offense couldn't even score 30 against a pathetic UCLA....Couldn't even score 40 against a pathetic Notre Dame......
 
Give me a break........
 
BTW....I'm picking Florida to cover.....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #219
You probably think that Ole Miss fumble was caused by TECH's great DEF too...think he ran into his own man but TECH gets the credit.
 
Announcer says they have a running attack too...lol he's an idiot.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2780
Posted: #220
Sure.....OK.....and you're a genius too.....
 
Keep telling us all about it Ace......
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 6791
Posted: #221
Quote Originally Posted by blu_pitt:

call me a fool for going with the public but i gotta roll with the

RED RAIDERS -4

The winning side bro!!! Oh, what was that in the background, Red Raider TD!!! 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 177
Posted: #222
Quote Originally Posted by Fpronk:

You probably think that Ole Miss fumble was caused by TECH's great DEF too...think he ran into his own man but TECH gets the credit.
 
Announcer says they have a running attack too...lol he's an idiot.

That's Pat Summerall...He's about 107 years old...and yes he is a moron
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 286
Posted: #223
Quote Originally Posted by joewashington:

Sure.....OK.....and you're a genius too.....
 
Keep telling us all about it Ace......

I don't know if Fpronk is a genius but I have gotten a lot of good information about him and I thnk he truly is trying to help people win money as I am sure you are as well.  We will be on different sides at times but I like reading both of your threads so let's allow each other some breathing room.

 

By the way, two turnovers for Miss does not look good!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 19
Posted: #224
Yaaaaaaaaaaa Texas Tech!!!!!!!
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 2780
Posted: #225
TD Tech.....Defense intercepts.....Cmon Ace.......tell us all about it.......tell us how many posts you got.....
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.