so did UCF... against less than decent teams... they don't have a single respectable win to their credit... SMU is the best, and i watched the game... it wasn't an impressive win, and it was basically a home game...
why does beating smu have to be impressive? it was a championship game. like i said before... neither team has a great quality win, period. so i just don't see how you can judge georgia as a team that is way just cause they played an sec schedule. take away the teams they lost too and it looks a whole lot like a c-usa or big east schedule. take away the teams ucf lost to and it isn't that much different than georgia's. there should obviously be more talent on georgia, but they haven't used it effectively.