Posted:
#301
hang tough Redsox0
WEEK 5 ***OVERALL 63-27-1......71%***
Posted:
#302
Quote Originally Posted by sage1957:
Sox, I'm a NYY Huge fan..(LOL) but I even think you do a great job.. Thank you for your time, your effort and your write-ups... D O U C H E B A G SAUL has 14 whole posts... wow....
Sox, I'm a NYY Huge fan..(LOL) but I even think you do a great job.. Thank you for your time, your effort and your write-ups... D O U C H E B A G SAUL has 14 whole posts... wow....
Hey Sage I got 15 posts now. I am new here and have no clue who Red Soxxx is and see him post a line that is not available anywhere as a play and made a joke about him playing 3 point teasers and he and all of you get your panties in a wad. If you don't want anyone to ask where you got a line 3 to 3.5 points better than anyone can get this late in the week tell them how you got it. That simple.
0
Posted:
#305
Quote Originally Posted by Gumbajohnny:
Big weather moving into the Northwest this weekend.
Im of the Oregon total.
However I believe it helps Stanford and the running game.
Arizona State at -3.5
Good Luck
Big weather moving into the Northwest this weekend.
Im of the Oregon total.
However I believe it helps Stanford and the running game.
Arizona State at -3.5
Good Luck
Yeah, I just took Under 83.5 and taking a loss on the vig. I agree with getting off the total now since it will slow the Ducks down
0
Posted:
#307
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
Yeah, I just took Under 83.5 and taking a loss on the vig. I agree with getting off the total now since it will slow the Ducks down
Please don't take this the wrong way or as me being a so called "hater" but you are now taking the under on the Oregon game? So, you posted the over and now are changing the play?
I don't know man. I've been on the forums for a long time and when you post a play, you post a play and hang onto it.
0
Posted:
#309
Why does he have to stick to a play he put in on Tuesday or Weds when a very important factor changed. Calling for awful rain in the northwest Saturday. So bc of that he's taking the under. It's not like he just changed his mind. His hand was forced. So bc he told this forum over (and bet it himself) he's not allowed to change his bet? I mean it is HIS money! Not ours! And at least he posted his change for us to see just like the rest of his bets! He didn't have to do that! I can't understand why bc of what he posted mid week you'd think he HAS to keep those bets! Idiot!
0
Posted:
#310
Quote Originally Posted by EKUD:
Please don't take this the wrong way or as me being a so called "hater" but you are now taking the under on the Oregon game? So, you posted the over and now are changing the play?
I don't know man. I've been on the forums for a long time and when you post a play, you post a play and hang onto it.
Please don't take this the wrong way or as me being a so called "hater" but you are now taking the under on the Oregon game? So, you posted the over and now are changing the play?
I don't know man. I've been on the forums for a long time and when you post a play, you post a play and hang onto it.
That is precisly how you become a big loser....By hanging on to it. I have a very high profit because I am willing to take a loss on the vig if I see a late line move and already have a play in. That's your prerogative. That's how I roll. If I hit 40 units for example with my larger plays and see something that makes me lose confidence in my 1-3 unit play.... Do the math.....Last night I had a no play on Iowa St and then saw a sharp move 30 minutes prior to kick off so I decided to make the Cyclones a play. Should I have just kept them as a no play? I hedge from time to time. That is one of my components I use and that is why I have a very high unit percentage. Good luck
0
Posted:
#311
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
That is precisly how you become a big loser....By hanging on to it. I have a very high profit because I am willing to take a loss on the vig if I see a late line move and already have a play in. That's your prerogative. That's how I roll. If I hit 40 units for example with my larger plays and see something that makes me lose confidence in my 1-3 unit play.... Do the math.....Last night I had a no play on Iowa St and then saw a sharp move 30 minutes prior to kick off so I decided to make the Cyclones a play. Should I have just kept them as a no play? I hedge from time to time. That is one of my components I use and that is why I have a very high unit percentage. Good luck
Respectable answer. Can I ask you a question though? When originally capping the game, did you not factor in the weather? Washington and Oregon are not the nicest places come October.
Not bashing you at all Red Sox and please don't take it that way at all. Just curious.
0
Posted:
#312
Quote Originally Posted by dannyd09:
Why does he have to stick to a play he put in on Tuesday or Weds when a very important factor changed. Calling for awful rain in the northwest Saturday. So bc of that he's taking the under. It's not like he just changed his mind. His hand was forced. So bc he told this forum over (and bet it himself) he's not allowed to change his bet? I mean it is HIS money! Not ours! And at least he posted his change for us to see just like the rest of his bets! He didn't have to do that! I can't understand why bc of what he posted mid week you'd think he HAS to keep those bets! Idiot!
Why does he have to stick to a play he put in on Tuesday or Weds when a very important factor changed. Calling for awful rain in the northwest Saturday. So bc of that he's taking the under. It's not like he just changed his mind. His hand was forced. So bc he told this forum over (and bet it himself) he's not allowed to change his bet? I mean it is HIS money! Not ours! And at least he posted his change for us to see just like the rest of his bets! He didn't have to do that! I can't understand why bc of what he posted mid week you'd think he HAS to keep those bets! Idiot!
Why are you using exclamation marks and calling me an idiot? Relax a bit junior. It's all good.
0
Posted:
#314
Quote Originally Posted by EKUD:
Respectable answer. Can I ask you a question though? When originally capping the game, did you not factor in the weather? Washington and Oregon are not the nicest places come October.
Not bashing you at all Red Sox and please don't take it that way at all. Just curious.
Respectable answer. Can I ask you a question though? When originally capping the game, did you not factor in the weather? Washington and Oregon are not the nicest places come October.
Not bashing you at all Red Sox and please don't take it that way at all. Just curious.
Weather is a factor but when you make an early play, sometimes that ends up a problem because of it being almost a week out. I didn't see this so I take the loss on the vig and move on to the next. Good luck
0
Awesome job Soxxxxxxxx!!! .... U on Twitter?
Posted:
#318
Quote Originally Posted by chad77:
Man I hate to be "that guy". But Wisky has the perfect team to give OSU problems. Also Miller coming back, rusty ? Sharp ? Tentative ? This is where Buckeyes lose their season. Wisky controls the ball, clock, and LOS .. OSU 24 Wisky 27!!! Vegas will get richer on this game after the OSU blowout last week.. Hope I'm wrong !! Good news is I usually am :)) good luck guys..
Man I hate to be "that guy". But Wisky has the perfect team to give OSU problems. Also Miller coming back, rusty ? Sharp ? Tentative ? This is where Buckeyes lose their season. Wisky controls the ball, clock, and LOS .. OSU 24 Wisky 27!!! Vegas will get richer on this game after the OSU blowout last week.. Hope I'm wrong !! Good news is I usually am :)) good luck guys..
If Tressel was still the coach I might agree with you, but Urban will have them ready to go and focused on pouring on the points. Ohio St. plays a bunch of highschool football teams mostly and they for sure need to shine against the stronger teams that they do play
0
Posted:
#321
[Quote: Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx]
No. I have been doing this for almost 35 years and followed this forum for the last 3 so I decided to get on here and try to offer some advice and provide winners.
Well that you are doing for sure! Was just looking for an easy way to follow you while on the run! Thanks much for the insight!
0
Posted:
#322
Quote Originally Posted by PopMiaBrewskies:
this. twitter would be nice.
Great job, Soxxxxx!
Quote Originally Posted by Red_Soxxxxxxxx:
No. I have been doing this for almost 35 years and followed this forum for the last 3 so I decided to get on here and try to offer some advice and provide winners.
Well that you are doing for sure! Was just looking for an easy way to follow you while on the run! Thanks much for the insight!
this. twitter would be nice.
Great job, Soxxxxx!
0
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.