• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • NFL Prediction Prices
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
      • Politics
        • Back
        • Politics
        • Politics Home
        • Presidential Election Odds
        • Midterm Election Odds
        • House Midterm Odds
        • Senate Midterm Odds
        • Texas Midterm Odds
        • Michigan Midterm Odds
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 8
      NFL Week 8
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Football

    Week 4: Power ratings, picks, and write-ups

    123 Next Last»
    McGuire87
    mws
    steelcity15
    soonboomer
    Lionmonster
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 14724
    Posts: 70
    123 Next Last»
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 1:32 AM ET #1

    Week 1: 80% (8/10), +3 units
    Week 2: 46% (6/13), -5.5 units
    Week 3: 57% (8/14) +1.8 units
    Season: 59% -0.7 units

    Week 4 Power ratings: Instead of me taking 30 minutes to type out all 128 teams, I am just going to link it here. Copy/paste and view for yourself. I use these to project spreads. If you have Excel you can use make your own powers and adjust accordingly: 

    https://s29.postimg.org/ghfg183l3/powers.png

    Week 3 notes: 
    A) USC loss in Week 3 was bad. Just bought into the USC hype about their defense and what can I say - made a bad pick. You know it is bad in Southern Cal when Stanford scored 16 vs. Northwestern and 31 vs. UCF...and scores 41 versus you. Pathetic. I mean, as a capper, don't you have to project Stanford scores 24 or less (probably less) vs. SC? Stanford with nearly 40:00 of possession and SC still manages to score 31 points. Unbelievable. It's all on the SC defense for me - and hey my fault for believing in them...but the offensive efficiency for SC was outstanding.

    B)  I'm a big believer in Notre Dame's defense. Legit NFL players on that unit. They are no joke...and it looks like they have a solid backup QB in Kizer who should get better. Really like ND's defense they didn't get enough credit leading up to the GT game and I blew the pick. Should have backed them - leaned them - and didn't follow through. 

    C) I'm really really really looking forward to the Missouri - Kentucky spread tomorrow. Love that Kentucky didn't cover because we have the potential to get a great #. If Kentucky is a slight favorite (3 or less) or an underdog this will be my pick of the month. 

    D) Love Northwestern as a capper just wish they weren't an AP Top 25 team so nobody else knew. Very reliable as an ATS team because they have limited offensive capability but a lockdown defense. 

    E) Miami Ohio is awful. So how Gunner Kiel throws for only 145 yards passing is beyond me. He threw for over 3200 yards last year + 8.3 ypa but vs. Miami 5.6 ypa????? Cincinnati also with 4 turnovers that killed them. I still stand by my -20 pick for Cincy. There was absolutely no reason to take Miami in this game sometimes teams just play like crap...but maybe Cincy is just turnover prone - I don't know.

    F) Side football fan note: Spurrier is done at South Carolina. I said it after their loss at Kentucky - but I think he is just gonna mail it in and think about golf all season. Expected a bounce back performance but that defense is atrocious. Gonna be hard for me to take South Carolina again this year unless the markets get out of control in fading them. 

    G) Same for Bielema at Arkansas. I can think of about 20 great football coaches at mid-majors that deserve jobs. Lots of coaches are getting paid in this offseason. 

    H) NC State becoming one of my favorite teams to back. Not an AP Top 25 team yet...comfortably covered ODU on the road. Love QB Brissett. Gonna watch their value like a hawk. 

    I) Pissed at myself for not even considering the South Alabama money line vs. SDSU. Loved the +17.5 (but only for one unit...arrgg). Knew they had a better QB. So disappointed in myself here. Blew a potentially epic ML play that could have made my weekend. 

    J) TCU's defense not the same this year. Dropped them in my powers. This team is not playoff material I will be looking to fade them + play overs with them from here on out. 

    Projected spreads coming next. 
    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    Week 1: 80% (8/10), +3 units
    Week 2: 46% (6/13), -5.5 units
    Week 3: 57% (8/14) +1.8 units
    Season: 59% -0.7 units

    Week 4 Power ratings: Instead of me taking 30 minutes to type out all 128 teams, I am just going to link it here. Copy/paste and view for yourself. I use these to project spreads. If you have Excel you can use make your own powers and adjust accordingly: 

    https://s29.postimg.org/ghfg183l3/powers.png

    Week 3 notes: 
    A) USC loss in Week 3 was bad. Just bought into the USC hype about their defense and what can I say - made a bad pick. You know it is bad in Southern Cal when Stanford scored 16 vs. Northwestern and 31 vs. UCF...and scores 41 versus you. Pathetic. I mean, as a capper, don't you have to project Stanford scores 24 or less (probably less) vs. SC? Stanford with nearly 40:00 of possession and SC still manages to score 31 points. Unbelievable. It's all on the SC defense for me - and hey my fault for believing in them...but the offensive efficiency for SC was outstanding.

    B)  I'm a big believer in Notre Dame's defense. Legit NFL players on that unit. They are no joke...and it looks like they have a solid backup QB in Kizer who should get better. Really like ND's defense they didn't get enough credit leading up to the GT game and I blew the pick. Should have backed them - leaned them - and didn't follow through. 

    C) I'm really really really looking forward to the Missouri - Kentucky spread tomorrow. Love that Kentucky didn't cover because we have the potential to get a great #. If Kentucky is a slight favorite (3 or less) or an underdog this will be my pick of the month. 

    D) Love Northwestern as a capper just wish they weren't an AP Top 25 team so nobody else knew. Very reliable as an ATS team because they have limited offensive capability but a lockdown defense. 

    E) Miami Ohio is awful. So how Gunner Kiel throws for only 145 yards passing is beyond me. He threw for over 3200 yards last year + 8.3 ypa but vs. Miami 5.6 ypa????? Cincinnati also with 4 turnovers that killed them. I still stand by my -20 pick for Cincy. There was absolutely no reason to take Miami in this game sometimes teams just play like crap...but maybe Cincy is just turnover prone - I don't know.

    F) Side football fan note: Spurrier is done at South Carolina. I said it after their loss at Kentucky - but I think he is just gonna mail it in and think about golf all season. Expected a bounce back performance but that defense is atrocious. Gonna be hard for me to take South Carolina again this year unless the markets get out of control in fading them. 

    G) Same for Bielema at Arkansas. I can think of about 20 great football coaches at mid-majors that deserve jobs. Lots of coaches are getting paid in this offseason. 

    H) NC State becoming one of my favorite teams to back. Not an AP Top 25 team yet...comfortably covered ODU on the road. Love QB Brissett. Gonna watch their value like a hawk. 

    I) Pissed at myself for not even considering the South Alabama money line vs. SDSU. Loved the +17.5 (but only for one unit...arrgg). Knew they had a better QB. So disappointed in myself here. Blew a potentially epic ML play that could have made my weekend. 

    J) TCU's defense not the same this year. Dropped them in my powers. This team is not playoff material I will be looking to fade them + play overs with them from here on out. 

    Projected spreads coming next. 
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 3:31 AM ET #2

    Cincinnati (-1) at Memphis
    Boise State (-2.5) at Virginia
    Stanford (-12.5) at Oregon State
    UCLA at Arizona (-2.5)
    USC (-1) at Arizona State
    Utah at Oregon (-7.5)
    Virginia Tech (-7) at East Carolina
    Navy (-4) at UCONN
    Bowling Green at Purdue (-2)
    UCF at South Carolina (-16)
    LSU (-23) at Syracuse
    Georgia Tech (-10.5) at Duke
    Kansas at Rutgers (-16)
    BYU at Michigan (-8)
    Central Michigan at Michigan State (-30)
    Southern Miss at Nebraska (-19)
    Indiana at Wake Forest (pick)
    Northern Illinois at Boston College (-3.5)
    FIU at Louisiana Tech (-14.5)
    Maryland at West Virginia (-10)
    New Mexico (-2.5) at Wyoming
    Rice at Baylor (-19)
    San Diego State at Penn State (-13.5)
    Ohio at Minnesota (-12.5) ... honestly I think Minnesota is too high at 31...should be more like 45-50
    North Texas at Iowa (-22)
    Western Michigan at Ohio State (-25)
    Reply
    Cincinnati (-1) at Memphis
    Boise State (-2.5) at Virginia
    Stanford (-12.5) at Oregon State
    UCLA at Arizona (-2.5)
    USC (-1) at Arizona State
    Utah at Oregon (-7.5)
    Virginia Tech (-7) at East Carolina
    Navy (-4) at UCONN
    Bowling Green at Purdue (-2)
    UCF at South Carolina (-16)
    LSU (-23) at Syracuse
    Georgia Tech (-10.5) at Duke
    Kansas at Rutgers (-16)
    BYU at Michigan (-8)
    Central Michigan at Michigan State (-30)
    Southern Miss at Nebraska (-19)
    Indiana at Wake Forest (pick)
    Northern Illinois at Boston College (-3.5)
    FIU at Louisiana Tech (-14.5)
    Maryland at West Virginia (-10)
    New Mexico (-2.5) at Wyoming
    Rice at Baylor (-19)
    San Diego State at Penn State (-13.5)
    Ohio at Minnesota (-12.5) ... honestly I think Minnesota is too high at 31...should be more like 45-50
    North Texas at Iowa (-22)
    Western Michigan at Ohio State (-25)
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 3:42 AM ET #3

    Oklahoma State at Texas (-3)
    Tennessee (-2.5) at Florida
    Miami (OH) at WKU (-14)
    Nevada (-6) at Buffalo
    App State (-8) at Old Dominion
    Marshall (-4) at Kent State
    UMASS at Notre Dame (-31)
    LA Monroe at Alabama (-34)
    MTSU at Illinois (-8)
    TCU (-5) at Texas Tech
    California at Washington (pick)
    Army at Eastern Michigan (-6)
    Texas A&M (-11) at Arkansas
    Vanderbilt at Ole Miss (-23)

    Reply
    Oklahoma State at Texas (-3)
    Tennessee (-2.5) at Florida
    Miami (OH) at WKU (-14)
    Nevada (-6) at Buffalo
    App State (-8) at Old Dominion
    Marshall (-4) at Kent State
    UMASS at Notre Dame (-31)
    LA Monroe at Alabama (-34)
    MTSU at Illinois (-8)
    TCU (-5) at Texas Tech
    California at Washington (pick)
    Army at Eastern Michigan (-6)
    Texas A&M (-11) at Arkansas
    Vanderbilt at Ole Miss (-23)

     
    mws
    mws
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 7191
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 9:50 AM ET #4

    You really like Tennessee.
    Reply
    You really like Tennessee.
     
    steelcity15
    steelcity15
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 1
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 1:02 PM ET #5

    Kiel got concussed yesterday which is why the numbers were so poor. I doubt he goes on Thursday with a quick turnaround.  I have Memphis -9 in that game.
    Reply
    Kiel got concussed yesterday which is why the numbers were so poor. I doubt he goes on Thursday with a quick turnaround.  I have Memphis -9 in that game.
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 1:56 PM ET #6

    Akron at UL Lafayette (-4.5)
    Arkansas State at Toledo (-8)
    Florida Atlantic (-4) at Charlotte
    Mississsippi State (-7.5) at Auburn
    Missouri at Kentucky (-6)
    UCLA at Arizona (-2.5)
    NC State (-16) at South Alabama
    Ball State at Northwestern (-20)
    Texas State at Houston (-13)
    Hawaii at Wisconsin (-20)
    Georgia Southern (-2) at UNLV
    Fresno State at San Jose State (-4.5)
    USC (-1) at Arizona State

    Reply
    Akron at UL Lafayette (-4.5)
    Arkansas State at Toledo (-8)
    Florida Atlantic (-4) at Charlotte
    Mississsippi State (-7.5) at Auburn
    Missouri at Kentucky (-6)
    UCLA at Arizona (-2.5)
    NC State (-16) at South Alabama
    Ball State at Northwestern (-20)
    Texas State at Houston (-13)
    Hawaii at Wisconsin (-20)
    Georgia Southern (-2) at UNLV
    Fresno State at San Jose State (-4.5)
    USC (-1) at Arizona State

     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 1:57 PM ET #7

    Quote Originally Posted by steelcity15:

    Kiel got concussed yesterday which is why the numbers were so poor. I doubt he goes on Thursday with a quick turnaround.  I have Memphis -9 in that game.

    I don't adjust for injuries unless a key player is out for a month or more usually - that way I can make personal adjustments in my game analysis. 

    Do you know when he got concussed in that game? Big difference between 1st and 3rd-4th quarter. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by steelcity15:

    Kiel got concussed yesterday which is why the numbers were so poor. I doubt he goes on Thursday with a quick turnaround.  I have Memphis -9 in that game.

    I don't adjust for injuries unless a key player is out for a month or more usually - that way I can make personal adjustments in my game analysis. 

    Do you know when he got concussed in that game? Big difference between 1st and 3rd-4th quarter. 
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 2:00 PM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by mws:

    You really like Tennessee.

    They have played a tough schedule so far. Bowling Green and Oklahoma are really good teams. Held Oklahoma to 3 points for 3 quarters of football. Was a big fan of them preseason - outstanding talent. Disappointed in defensive performance vs. BG. 

    Also, you have to remember some teams move up only because I have no choice - my teams rated higher have moved down (USC, TCU, UCLA, Auburn, Stanford). So a team can start out at like 16 and move up to 12 by default if I have no reason to downgrade them. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mws:

    You really like Tennessee.

    They have played a tough schedule so far. Bowling Green and Oklahoma are really good teams. Held Oklahoma to 3 points for 3 quarters of football. Was a big fan of them preseason - outstanding talent. Disappointed in defensive performance vs. BG. 

    Also, you have to remember some teams move up only because I have no choice - my teams rated higher have moved down (USC, TCU, UCLA, Auburn, Stanford). So a team can start out at like 16 and move up to 12 by default if I have no reason to downgrade them. 
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 2:38 PM ET #9

    Opening lines being posted. Boise at -4 (powers off by 1.5...looking like a no-play) and Stanford -16.5 (powers off by 4...also looking like a no-play)
    Reply
    Opening lines being posted. Boise at -4 (powers off by 1.5...looking like a no-play) and Stanford -16.5 (powers off by 4...also looking like a no-play)
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 3:21 PM ET #10

    First pick: Kentucky -2.5 ... 8 unit pick of the month. Write-Up tonight
    Reply
    First pick: Kentucky -2.5 ... 8 unit pick of the month. Write-Up tonight
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 3:25 PM ET #11

    Penn State -12 .... 1 unit write-up tonight
    Reply
    Penn State -12 .... 1 unit write-up tonight
     
    soonboomer
    soonboomer
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 1164
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 3:25 PM ET #12

    Not an Oklahoma State fan, but I'd love some +3 vs Texas.

    Reply
    Not an Oklahoma State fan, but I'd love some +3 vs Texas.

     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 3:27 PM ET #13

    Rice +33 ... 2 units
    Reply
    Rice +33 ... 2 units
     
    Lionmonster
    Lionmonster
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 2363
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 7:21 PM ET #14

    Keep up the great work McGuire!
    Reply
    Keep up the great work McGuire!
     
    BWS77
    BWS77
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 35351
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 7:54 PM ET #15

    Reply
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 20, 2015 - 10:56 PM ET #16

    Write-Up #1

    Missouri at Kentucky (-2.5)...8 unit Pick of the Month

    Power ratings: Missouri (47th) at Kentucky (35th) = projected spread of -6

    Loooovvvveeeeee Kentucky here for several reasons. Unfortunately, I didn't
    fade Missouri LW because UCONN's offense scared me, but let's get to the analysis: 

    1. Kentucky is in a great spot after losing SU and not covering LW for Missouri. Kentucky is a young team (like Missouri) so we don't have to worry about them getting big-headed if they had beaten Florida. Just prefer betting teams off a loss or non-cover and this is a good spot. So why can't we say the same for Missouri? We can - but they have been mediocre all year with mediocre results. Failed to cover vs. SE Missouri State. Beat Ark State by 7. Beat UCONN by 3. They haven't gotten better or showe class. Which brings us to our next point...

    2. Kentucky has more talent at nearly every position on the field. Has Kentucky showed inconsistency offensively? Yes they have - but when they are on they are as explosive as any team in the country. Kentucky is not facing Florida's elite DL + DBs this week. It's a very inexperienced DL and average DBs. Kentucky has explosive, talented WRs and RBs that can make teams pay for mistakes. They couldn't exploit this vs. Florida but Missouri is not Florida. Positional analysis says Kentucky is better at QB, RB (Hansbrough is still questionable btw), WR, OL, DL, and DB. Too much class. 

    3. Missouri's cupcake schedule hasn't prepared them for a road SEC game against a quality opponent. Playing SE Missouri State, Arkansas State, and UCONN does not make you a better football team - it just gives the other team's coaching staff material. You don't learn anything about your team except negatives. Missouri hasn't faced the size or speed they will see against Kentucky. Playing against Arkansas State on the road isn't the same as playing Kentucky on the road. Not that A+B always = C, but Missouri managed 9 points against UCONN. Army scored 17, Villanova scored 15. Says a lot about Missouri's level of talent - they aren't an AP Top 25 team. More like AP Top 50-75 team. 

    4. Kentucky has an inconsistent offense, but their defense has proven to get stops. Kentucky has a great red zone defense. Managed to hold South Carolina to 3 field goals. Took Florida to 4th and goal before their QB barely made it to the pylon for a score. They have talent on the defensive side. Missouri's offense just isn't there and they were exposed to the world against UCONN. I've been harping on about how overrated Maty Mauk is (look up his mediocre game logs vs. SEC last year). This season he is a 53% passer for 5.9 ypa, 5 TDs, and 4 INTs...against Villanova + Army + UCONN. What will he do in the SEC this year?

    5. Kentucky's defense held Missouri to 320 yards, 4.7 ypa, and 3.5 yards/clip last year on the road. With better play from DL + DB this season for Kentucky I expect more turnovers and simlar defensive production with better 3rd down defense (10/20 LY). 

    6. Kentucky's offense did struggle against Missouri last year, but Missouri lost their elite DL (top 5 DL gone from LY) including a 1st and 2nd round picks at DE. On the other hand, Kentucky is getting better production from the WR and RB positions this season. Edge Kentucky. Missouri's DL was the heart and soul of their team, not ESPN's Maty Mauk. 

    7. Kentucky's edge in special teams. Austin MacGinnis is rated as one of the best soph kickers in the country by NFLDraftScout.com. However, senior Andrew Baggett for Missour is spotty at best. Career 80% kicker from 30-39 and career 62% kicker from 40-49. On the other hand, MacGinnis is 90% from 30-39, 70% from 40-49, and 60% (3/5) from 50+ with a career long of 54. Huge edge Kentucky. So if Kentucky can get keep stops and keep Missouri's kicker in the 35-49 FG yardage area, they have a great chance of limiting Missouri to zero points. 

    8. So why is Missouri struggling so much you ask? I killed them in my ATS fade teams before the season (they are 0-3 ATS this season). They lost their entire WR corps. They lost RB Murphy. They lost LT Mitch Morse (2nd rd pick). They lost their entire DL that I already mentioned. You can't lose that much and be the same team. And Mauk didn't light up scoreboards last year as it was - so when he loses all of his WRs and his top OL he isn't going to be as good. 

    Kentucky in a blowout. UK 34 Missouri 10. 8 unit pick of the week. -3 is still a good spread to pound but you only push if Kentucky wins by 3. Still, I think you are safe to unlead. I'd take Kentucky up to -6 before slowing down according to power ratings...and I probably am overrating Missouri in my powers as it is. 
    Reply
    Write-Up #1

    Missouri at Kentucky (-2.5)...8 unit Pick of the Month

    Power ratings: Missouri (47th) at Kentucky (35th) = projected spread of -6

    Loooovvvveeeeee Kentucky here for several reasons. Unfortunately, I didn't
    fade Missouri LW because UCONN's offense scared me, but let's get to the analysis: 

    1. Kentucky is in a great spot after losing SU and not covering LW for Missouri. Kentucky is a young team (like Missouri) so we don't have to worry about them getting big-headed if they had beaten Florida. Just prefer betting teams off a loss or non-cover and this is a good spot. So why can't we say the same for Missouri? We can - but they have been mediocre all year with mediocre results. Failed to cover vs. SE Missouri State. Beat Ark State by 7. Beat UCONN by 3. They haven't gotten better or showe class. Which brings us to our next point...

    2. Kentucky has more talent at nearly every position on the field. Has Kentucky showed inconsistency offensively? Yes they have - but when they are on they are as explosive as any team in the country. Kentucky is not facing Florida's elite DL + DBs this week. It's a very inexperienced DL and average DBs. Kentucky has explosive, talented WRs and RBs that can make teams pay for mistakes. They couldn't exploit this vs. Florida but Missouri is not Florida. Positional analysis says Kentucky is better at QB, RB (Hansbrough is still questionable btw), WR, OL, DL, and DB. Too much class. 

    3. Missouri's cupcake schedule hasn't prepared them for a road SEC game against a quality opponent. Playing SE Missouri State, Arkansas State, and UCONN does not make you a better football team - it just gives the other team's coaching staff material. You don't learn anything about your team except negatives. Missouri hasn't faced the size or speed they will see against Kentucky. Playing against Arkansas State on the road isn't the same as playing Kentucky on the road. Not that A+B always = C, but Missouri managed 9 points against UCONN. Army scored 17, Villanova scored 15. Says a lot about Missouri's level of talent - they aren't an AP Top 25 team. More like AP Top 50-75 team. 

    4. Kentucky has an inconsistent offense, but their defense has proven to get stops. Kentucky has a great red zone defense. Managed to hold South Carolina to 3 field goals. Took Florida to 4th and goal before their QB barely made it to the pylon for a score. They have talent on the defensive side. Missouri's offense just isn't there and they were exposed to the world against UCONN. I've been harping on about how overrated Maty Mauk is (look up his mediocre game logs vs. SEC last year). This season he is a 53% passer for 5.9 ypa, 5 TDs, and 4 INTs...against Villanova + Army + UCONN. What will he do in the SEC this year?

    5. Kentucky's defense held Missouri to 320 yards, 4.7 ypa, and 3.5 yards/clip last year on the road. With better play from DL + DB this season for Kentucky I expect more turnovers and simlar defensive production with better 3rd down defense (10/20 LY). 

    6. Kentucky's offense did struggle against Missouri last year, but Missouri lost their elite DL (top 5 DL gone from LY) including a 1st and 2nd round picks at DE. On the other hand, Kentucky is getting better production from the WR and RB positions this season. Edge Kentucky. Missouri's DL was the heart and soul of their team, not ESPN's Maty Mauk. 

    7. Kentucky's edge in special teams. Austin MacGinnis is rated as one of the best soph kickers in the country by NFLDraftScout.com. However, senior Andrew Baggett for Missour is spotty at best. Career 80% kicker from 30-39 and career 62% kicker from 40-49. On the other hand, MacGinnis is 90% from 30-39, 70% from 40-49, and 60% (3/5) from 50+ with a career long of 54. Huge edge Kentucky. So if Kentucky can get keep stops and keep Missouri's kicker in the 35-49 FG yardage area, they have a great chance of limiting Missouri to zero points. 

    8. So why is Missouri struggling so much you ask? I killed them in my ATS fade teams before the season (they are 0-3 ATS this season). They lost their entire WR corps. They lost RB Murphy. They lost LT Mitch Morse (2nd rd pick). They lost their entire DL that I already mentioned. You can't lose that much and be the same team. And Mauk didn't light up scoreboards last year as it was - so when he loses all of his WRs and his top OL he isn't going to be as good. 

    Kentucky in a blowout. UK 34 Missouri 10. 8 unit pick of the week. -3 is still a good spread to pound but you only push if Kentucky wins by 3. Still, I think you are safe to unlead. I'd take Kentucky up to -6 before slowing down according to power ratings...and I probably am overrating Missouri in my powers as it is. 
     
    DoubleUp4Life
    DoubleUp4Life
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 66896
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 12:33 AM ET #17

    great Read ...Love seeing someone put their numbers out there ... much respect 

    take a look at Bowling green and A&M
    BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
    Reply
    great Read ...Love seeing someone put their numbers out there ... much respect 

    take a look at Bowling green and A&M
     
    shiek
    shiek
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2005
    Posts: 1404
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 1:37 AM ET #18

    Not that this relates directly to your above play but it is troubling that a major school, w a major coach, is absolutely clueless about running a 2 minute offense.   SMH w respect to clock management in the last few minutes of Florida game.
    Reply
    Not that this relates directly to your above play but it is troubling that a major school, w a major coach, is absolutely clueless about running a 2 minute offense.   SMH w respect to clock management in the last few minutes of Florida game.
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 1:56 AM ET #19

    Quote Originally Posted by shiek:

    Not that this relates directly to your above play but it is troubling that a major school, w a major coach, is absolutely clueless about running a 2 minute offense.   SMH w respect to clock management in the last few minutes of Florida game.

    I disagreed with the commentators on that one. 2-3 minutes is plenty of time in the college game for a long TD drive with 3 timeouts. Also problematic - what if your team scores quickly and you leave 2 minutes on the clock for the opponent to drive for a FG and win the game? 

    I would rather take my chances with 3 timeouts (since you are going to be throwing for first downs anyway to eat up yardage which stops the clock...as well as throwing to WRs going out of bounds to stop clock) and not give my opponent much time on the clock if you get a TD - limiting chances of a comeback. 

    I think that's the logic - but I don't think either decision is bad honestly. 
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by shiek:

    Not that this relates directly to your above play but it is troubling that a major school, w a major coach, is absolutely clueless about running a 2 minute offense.   SMH w respect to clock management in the last few minutes of Florida game.

    I disagreed with the commentators on that one. 2-3 minutes is plenty of time in the college game for a long TD drive with 3 timeouts. Also problematic - what if your team scores quickly and you leave 2 minutes on the clock for the opponent to drive for a FG and win the game? 

    I would rather take my chances with 3 timeouts (since you are going to be throwing for first downs anyway to eat up yardage which stops the clock...as well as throwing to WRs going out of bounds to stop clock) and not give my opponent much time on the clock if you get a TD - limiting chances of a comeback. 

    I think that's the logic - but I don't think either decision is bad honestly. 
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 1:57 AM ET #20

    Write-Up #2: 

    Cincinnati at Memphis (-7) ... 0 units

    Power ratings: Cincinnati (49th) at Memphis (56th) = projected spread of Cincy -1

    QB Gunner Kiel suffered a concussion on first drive in 3rd quarter vs. Miami OH last week and left. His status is currently questionable - hence the line movement up to -7. Cincinnati scored 13 poins in 2H without him. Coach Tuberville, “I’m not going to count him out, but with a five-day turnaround it’s going to be awfully hard." (Cincinnati.com)

    Scored 24 points in first half with him. Cincinnati has had problems with turnovers - #106 nationally in lost fumbles. Cincy's D also way too soft vs. a bad Miami team. Gave up 448 yards of offense. 6.7 ypa, 5.4 yards per rush. Miami with 466 yards of offense vs. Presbyterian - just to put things in perspective. 

    The reality is Cincy's defense is probably just what it is we saw vs. Miami - and unfortunately I didn't get to do this research overnight to adjust in my power ratings accordingly. Knowing what I know now I'd probably put Cincinnati around 65 in my powers if their defense is this potentially bad - because they did lose nearly their entire Front 7 from last year. 

    So let's just assume Cincy's defense is bad and Memphis will score - because that's what they do best. 

    On the other side of the ball Memphis also has questions defensively. #1 RB for Kansas 16 carries 113 yards (7/clip). Gave up 5 play 73 yard TD drive to KU and a 10 play 75 yard TD drive to KU...so their defense is capable of getting broken. 

    FWIW Memphis also lost 3 fumbles last week - so if there is any fumbling issues between these two teams it is a wash as a capper. 

    Memphis covering this spread all comes down to if Kiel is healthy or not for me. 7 is a manageable line to cover...but if Kiel plays and is 100% you could be in for a "Why did I do that" type of bet. 

    Gonna pass for right now. 

    Verdict: Pass, but official lean on Memphis -7. 0 units
    Reply
    Write-Up #2: 

    Cincinnati at Memphis (-7) ... 0 units

    Power ratings: Cincinnati (49th) at Memphis (56th) = projected spread of Cincy -1

    QB Gunner Kiel suffered a concussion on first drive in 3rd quarter vs. Miami OH last week and left. His status is currently questionable - hence the line movement up to -7. Cincinnati scored 13 poins in 2H without him. Coach Tuberville, “I’m not going to count him out, but with a five-day turnaround it’s going to be awfully hard." (Cincinnati.com)

    Scored 24 points in first half with him. Cincinnati has had problems with turnovers - #106 nationally in lost fumbles. Cincy's D also way too soft vs. a bad Miami team. Gave up 448 yards of offense. 6.7 ypa, 5.4 yards per rush. Miami with 466 yards of offense vs. Presbyterian - just to put things in perspective. 

    The reality is Cincy's defense is probably just what it is we saw vs. Miami - and unfortunately I didn't get to do this research overnight to adjust in my power ratings accordingly. Knowing what I know now I'd probably put Cincinnati around 65 in my powers if their defense is this potentially bad - because they did lose nearly their entire Front 7 from last year. 

    So let's just assume Cincy's defense is bad and Memphis will score - because that's what they do best. 

    On the other side of the ball Memphis also has questions defensively. #1 RB for Kansas 16 carries 113 yards (7/clip). Gave up 5 play 73 yard TD drive to KU and a 10 play 75 yard TD drive to KU...so their defense is capable of getting broken. 

    FWIW Memphis also lost 3 fumbles last week - so if there is any fumbling issues between these two teams it is a wash as a capper. 

    Memphis covering this spread all comes down to if Kiel is healthy or not for me. 7 is a manageable line to cover...but if Kiel plays and is 100% you could be in for a "Why did I do that" type of bet. 

    Gonna pass for right now. 

    Verdict: Pass, but official lean on Memphis -7. 0 units
     
    McGuire87
    McGuire87
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2014
    Posts: 557
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 2:25 AM ET #21

    Write-Up #3: 

    Boise State (-2.5) at Virginia ... 0 units

    Power ratings: Boise State (28th) at Virginia (50th) = projected spread of -2.5

    Power ratings say absolutely no value or edge in this # here. But let's analyze it just in case. 

    Injury news: QB Ryan Finley out 8 weeks for Boise. True fresh QB blue chip stud son of former Super Bowl MVP (damn that's a mouthful) Brett Rypien 8/9 for 126 yards vs Idaho State LW. QB battle now in Boise b/w Rypien and soph 5'11 QB Thomas Stuart. I think the coaching staff goes with the upside and talent in Rypien...and he might just be an upgrade over Finley...but we can't assume that and we don't know he'll start ... just a hunch. 

    Boise has an outstanding rush defense but questionable pass defense because they lack speed and talent in the back end. Held BYU RBs to 3.8/clip. However #1 RB Adam Hine 4.9/clip 93 yards total. Held BYU to 14 pts through 3 quarters. BYU 3rd/7 in 4th QTR pass incomplete. 4th/7 35 yard TD pass given up by Boise. Gave up 70 yard pass on 3rd and 19 on BYU's own 7. 

    Outside a couple of those big plays I thought the Boise defense was great vs. BYU. Upon looking at that play by play I think Boise has some value. Defense more consistent  than anticipated. Don't see Virginia with same kind of luck. 

    Virginia outgained William & Mary by 2 yards last week. W&M 7/19 on 3rd. Virginia also threw 2 INTs. Interestingly enough, W&M with an 18 play, 75 yard drive lasting 9:00. Went for it on 4th/G on the 1 and didn't convert. Virginia potentially loses this game if W&M gets a TD there. 

    QB Matt Johns has played well this year for Virginia. 60%, 6.8 ypa, only 1 INT vs. UCLA. 68%, 7.6 ypa, 2 TDs, 0 INTs vs. a great Notre Dame defense. 74% passing vs. W&M but those 2 first half INTs stick out. I think Boise is up for the task - limited athleticism for UVA at skill positions and OL. Highly recruited RB Taquan Mizzell (5 star) has failed to produce - only received 5 carries vs. W&M. This positions lacks speed for UVA and Boise State should shut them down putting Johns in 3rd/long spots. 

    I want to take Boise here, but it's a stupid bet until we know who the QB is even though I think it will be Rypien. Have to respect Virginia's performance vs. ND even though ND was in a sandwich spot. 

    Verdict. Pass. Official lean on Boise -2.5. 0 units
    Reply
    Write-Up #3: 

    Boise State (-2.5) at Virginia ... 0 units

    Power ratings: Boise State (28th) at Virginia (50th) = projected spread of -2.5

    Power ratings say absolutely no value or edge in this # here. But let's analyze it just in case. 

    Injury news: QB Ryan Finley out 8 weeks for Boise. True fresh QB blue chip stud son of former Super Bowl MVP (damn that's a mouthful) Brett Rypien 8/9 for 126 yards vs Idaho State LW. QB battle now in Boise b/w Rypien and soph 5'11 QB Thomas Stuart. I think the coaching staff goes with the upside and talent in Rypien...and he might just be an upgrade over Finley...but we can't assume that and we don't know he'll start ... just a hunch. 

    Boise has an outstanding rush defense but questionable pass defense because they lack speed and talent in the back end. Held BYU RBs to 3.8/clip. However #1 RB Adam Hine 4.9/clip 93 yards total. Held BYU to 14 pts through 3 quarters. BYU 3rd/7 in 4th QTR pass incomplete. 4th/7 35 yard TD pass given up by Boise. Gave up 70 yard pass on 3rd and 19 on BYU's own 7. 

    Outside a couple of those big plays I thought the Boise defense was great vs. BYU. Upon looking at that play by play I think Boise has some value. Defense more consistent  than anticipated. Don't see Virginia with same kind of luck. 

    Virginia outgained William & Mary by 2 yards last week. W&M 7/19 on 3rd. Virginia also threw 2 INTs. Interestingly enough, W&M with an 18 play, 75 yard drive lasting 9:00. Went for it on 4th/G on the 1 and didn't convert. Virginia potentially loses this game if W&M gets a TD there. 

    QB Matt Johns has played well this year for Virginia. 60%, 6.8 ypa, only 1 INT vs. UCLA. 68%, 7.6 ypa, 2 TDs, 0 INTs vs. a great Notre Dame defense. 74% passing vs. W&M but those 2 first half INTs stick out. I think Boise is up for the task - limited athleticism for UVA at skill positions and OL. Highly recruited RB Taquan Mizzell (5 star) has failed to produce - only received 5 carries vs. W&M. This positions lacks speed for UVA and Boise State should shut them down putting Johns in 3rd/long spots. 

    I want to take Boise here, but it's a stupid bet until we know who the QB is even though I think it will be Rypien. Have to respect Virginia's performance vs. ND even though ND was in a sandwich spot. 

    Verdict. Pass. Official lean on Boise -2.5. 0 units
     
    gwjtf
    gwjtf
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 613
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 11:08 AM ET #22

    Excellent write ups - I, too, like the spot for the Wildcats.  Have you looked at/do you have opinion on Cal/Washington.  UDub was a dark horse team for me this year (undervalued by the books) and has been a covering machine early in the season .... GL

    GW
    Reply
    Excellent write ups - I, too, like the spot for the Wildcats.  Have you looked at/do you have opinion on Cal/Washington.  UDub was a dark horse team for me this year (undervalued by the books) and has been a covering machine early in the season .... GL

    GW
     
    topkaiki
    topkaiki
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 436
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 12:03 PM ET #23

    Great spot for Kentucky at home to get a win vs. a conference opponent. Good luck man!
    Reply
    Great spot for Kentucky at home to get a win vs. a conference opponent. Good luck man!
     
    TheSaltyPickle
    TheSaltyPickle
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 20
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 12:04 PM ET #24

    Right there on Kentucky with you McGuire 

    Mizzou is garbage, took Uconn last week against them and I expect a blowout in this one 
    Reply
    Right there on Kentucky with you McGuire 

    Mizzou is garbage, took Uconn last week against them and I expect a blowout in this one 
     
     
    wiseguy1911
    wiseguy1911
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 65
    Posted: Sep. 21, 2015 - 12:47 PM ET #25

    I'm rolling it with Kentucky!! McGuire your write ups are on points!! 
    Reply
    I'm rolling it with Kentucky!! McGuire your write ups are on points!! 
    All Forums | College Football
    123 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,134
    • BEAT Your book 126,199
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,591
    • PART DEUX 151
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 112,232
    • Sunday 11/01/2026 619
    • KC/DENVER live in game COMMENTS 883
    • $$$ MAX MAX MAX $$$ Play 7,744
    • I’m on the Brewers to defeat the Rays in the World Series 6,554
    • Week 9 Money 16,193

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
    Covers Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.