All Forums | College Football

Week 2

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4978
Posts: 70
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 44
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by Jim_Tressel:






The big difference is that there was no love for Maryland last year, this year there is no love for Stanford...

AMD is one of the only cappers in this forum picking Stanford in this game. 


So what does that mean?? How many people on covers were on MN and Illinois last week?? Stanford is the better team, the only thing going against them is the travel across the country, in which I believe their talent and coaching will make up for it.

If you are going to base your opinions strictly off the posts you read in these forums, you might as well just bet all the public favs.

Stanford wins this game handily outright and moves to 2-0.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #27
sativa... if i'm not mistaken, he is suggesting that Stanford is the correct play...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 2897
Posted: #28
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 12442
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:

sativa... if i'm not mistaken, he is suggesting that Stanford is the correct play...





shhhhhhh...it's funny to watch.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33105
Posted: #30
....adding LSU -14.5
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 586
Posted: #31
been looking at that LSU pick, myself... i don't think they are as bad as they looked last week, and betting Vandy isn't as good as they were last year...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 25135
Posted: #32
gl buddy
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 6421
Posted: #33
Like this card, friend.  On stanford and western mich with you.  let's get well in a hurry
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33105
Posted: #34
....adding Tulsa -17 (hook)
 
Final Card
Georgia Tech -5 
Colorado over 53.5
Northwestern -19.5
Ohio -3
Stanford +3
Ohio State +7
Bowling Green +19
Western Michigan +1
Iowa -6.5
BYU -17
LSU -14.5
Tulsa -17
 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #35
Stanford????
 
 
 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6672
Posted: #36
OH ST & IRISH
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 259
Posted: #37
BOL AMD  
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33105
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by WussieMan:

Stanford????
 
 
 
 

Everyone in this forum is on Wake for obvious reasons. Skinner could have a huge day against a young and inexperienced Cardinal secondary. Luck is also young and is facing a talented group in Wake's secondary. Stanford is playing at 9 am PST....I realize the challenges that Stanford faces. However, I'm taking Stanford because I think Stanford's offensive line is good enough to control the line of scrimmage thus keeping Boo Robinson in check. Toby Gerhart is a productive, hard nose runner and I like Stanford to control the clock by running the ball. Luck won't be asked to win the game as he just needs to keep from making crucial mistakes. He has a great receiver in Chris Owusu who can spread the field. And remember, Baylor did run the ball well against Wake. If Stanford can keep Wake's receivers in front of them and limit Wake's big plays, I believe Stanford has a great chance to win the game so why not take the points? The line has stayed steady at 3 all week...why is that?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 2793
Posted: #39
amd, what are your thoughts on iowa-ISU. The series has traditionally been unpredictable, so taking the points seems like a nice proposition.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3875
Posted: #40
gl today buddy
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 2110
Posted: #41
GL today Bud
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 4035
Posted: #42
Good luck buddy
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 7850
Posted: #43
BOL today, bud!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 729
Posted: #44
GL AMD.......
 
Good to see u again......hope the big green comes your way....
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 5754
Posted: #45
AMD my Hawkeyes
 
BOL on your plays today
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 22824
Posted: #46
...gl today amd
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 2114
Posted: #47
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 7520
Posted: #48
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33105
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by MDnightFlight:

amd, what are your thoughts on iowa-ISU. The series has traditionally been unpredictable, so taking the points seems like a nice proposition.

Hey buddy, thanks for the post. I took Iowa because it's a mismatch on the line of scrimmage. Iowa's offensive line should handle ISU's defensive line allowing a suspect Iowa running game to be successful today. Iowa State will certainly test Iowa's D with their spread offense but I'm fading QB Arnaud and his receiving tandem...they are average at best.

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 2093
Posted: #50
gl amd
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.