All Forums | College Football

We say it all the time in the NBA forum...Ya gotta beat the spread but you gotta beat the refs too

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3244
Posts: 76
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #1

My god...what a bogus shi**y call there on Notre Dame.

A crime...

ND has been on the wrong side of two of the worst calls against #1's in history...

The Leinart/Bush push play which decided the game.

This play which decided the game.

A total joke

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 5580
Posted: #2
Clearly pass interference. Did you have moneyline Notre dame?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #3

I actually had the FSU ML. But that play makes me sick.

That happens every other play.

To call it there is a crime.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2649
Posted: #4
I don't believe tugs was PI. They were blocking within 5 yards...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 231
Posted: #5
You have to attempt to run routes it' was clearly two picks not hard to figure out great call

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 12309
Posted: #6

You can't do that as a receiver, it's called a "Rub" aka a pick.  In crucial situations like that, the refs are gonna be looking very closely at what's going on.  It was the right call.

Glad you won your FSU bet though

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 4681
Posted: #7
Within 5 yards it is a war. That stuff happens on every play.  Its called jamming a guy. ACC officials,  what do you expect
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 1687
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

My god...what a bogus shi**y call there on Notre Dame.

A crime...

ND has been on the wrong side of two of the worst calls against #1's in history...

The Leinart/Bush push play which decided the game.

This play which decided the game.

A total joke


It's not even a joke ! it's a freaking unreal ! 

$4200 swing on my account ! dame it 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 4483
Posted: #9
Scal, why'll I will agree with you 99% of the time. Two years ago, when ND, fairy tailed their way to the National Championship, they were on the right side of about four ridiculously bad calls. Stanford, Pitt, and a few others really got screwed on some calls. Remember the Stanford RB twisting into the endzone, ruled down.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by mikej24:

You have to attempt to run routes it' was clearly two picks not hard to figure out great call


GREAT call???? You are a fool.

That was an absolute joke. 

ND won straight up. I could give a shi* if my fsu ML play went up in flames.

This has just transformed the landscape of college football. And the refs were the culprit.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by mbialowas:

Within 5 yards it is a war. That stuff happens on every play.  Its called jamming a guy. ACC officials,  what do you expect
exactlyexactly
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 2502
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by mikej24:

You have to attempt to run routes it' was clearly two picks not hard to figure out great call


Exactly
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by ATLGettinPaper:

You can't do that as a receiver, it's called a "Rub" aka a pick.  In crucial situations like that, the refs are gonna be looking very closely at what's going on.  It was the right call.

Glad you won your FSU bet though


That is not true.

There is holding on every play if the refs look for it. You don't look for it on a play like that if a guy has a bit of jersey.


Same here. This was standard receiver/defender bumping. 

That guy had NO CHANCE to get to the open receiver....none!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by thx4thecookies:

I don't believe tugs was PI. They were blocking within 5 yards...

It's outrageous...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 4681
Posted: #15
As a receiver you DO NOT have to run a route. Within 5 yards you are allowed to block a defender 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 3403
Posted: #16
Bro don't be salty.... that was BLATANT PI....... stop that shiit dude.....

did you see how WIDE OPEN HE WAS? lol.....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by Second2-Numbers:


It's not even a joke ! it's a freaking unreal ! 

$4200 swing on my account ! dame it 


Congrats on playing the nd ML.

It was the Right side and gutsy.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 4483
Posted: #18
My bad. I read it wrong. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 22710
Posted: #19
I won on that game. Had Notre Dame + 12.

I think Notre Dame was robbed. Why do the zebras want to be the decision makers in a HUGE game like that between #2 and #5?

They are out of control and I feel Notre Dame was completely robbed.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2992
Posted: #20
Every time they throw those passes out on the flats the front wrs always blocking just like that, how comes its a penalty now? Cause ball wasn't thrown yet?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by t6rider:

Scal, why'll I will agree with you 99% of the time. Two years ago, when ND, fairy tailed their way to the National Championship, they were on the right side of about four ridiculously bad calls. Stanford, Pitt, and a few others really got screwed on some calls. Remember the Stanford RB twisting into the endzone, ruled down.

I remember the Stanford play and the atrocious calls in the Pitt game.

But remember.

Nd has now legitimately beaten two GREAT #1's and the refs either: 1) didn't make a very necessary call or 2) made a bogus one.

That is far different than the shi tty calls vs stanford and Pitt.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 470
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

I actually had the FSU ML. But that play makes me sick.
That happens every other play.
To call it there is a crime.


Right......
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 25
Posted: #23
You guys are drunk if u think you can run that play like that. Kelly earns a living with receiver picks but that was too blatant. I could give a shit who won but scal u definitely were on ND.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 2
Posted: #24
As a receiver you DO NOT have to run a route. Within 5 yards you are allowed to block a defender.

That isn't true you can't block when the ball is in the air unless the pass is behind the line of scrimmage.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by mikeru3:

I won on that game. Had Notre Dame + 12.

I think Notre Dame was robbed. Why do the zebras want to be the decision makers in a HUGE game like that between #2 and #5?

They are out of control and I feel Notre Dame was completely robbed.



All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.