All Forums | College Football

TTU @ OKLAHOMA...Am I the only who feels this way?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1807
Posts: 34
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #26
An article on Vegasinsider, the very same site most of you get your stats from, says books are reporting 70% of the action on the Sooners.
 
I would not be so quick in assuming everyone is on Tech. The articles I have read indicate the opposite. Judging from posts on this board it is 50/50 at best. If this is a trap line then no one is falling for it....
 
I would bet on the better team myself, not overthink based on what line they put out. GL.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 223
Posted: #27
now u see how fuckup TTU now
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 223
Posted: #28
u got trap dude
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 144
Posted: #29
HUGE Win Fpronk.  Good job.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 4731
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by BurningPlanet26:

An article on Vegasinsider, the very same site most of you get your stats from, says books are reporting 70% of the action on the Sooners.
 
I would not be so quick in assuming everyone is on Tech. The articles I have read indicate the opposite. Judging from posts on this board it is 50/50 at best. If this is a trap line then no one is falling for it....
 
I would bet on the better team myself, not overthink based on what line they put out. GL.
 

 

most I have seen have had TTECH action at about 65% even 2 locals also.So i am not sure where they are getting the Okla action.Everything i have seen is TECH

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 4731
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by cyearian:

Fpronk - I think you are 100% right on this game. I think Oklahoma spoils Tech this weekend. However I don't think that is the play in this game.
 
If you remember I had a trend that I used for the Arizona Vs San Fran game a few weeks back. The total in this game fits the same situation this weekend.
 
Always take the Under if both teams have gone over in >= 4 consecutive games.
 
For this both teams have gone over the total the last 6 games. This means the total is completely inflated. Yes they both have really strong Offenses but both had good Defenses as well. The other thing we have going for us is both teams are coming off of 2 weeks of rest which favors the defenses of both teams.
 
LOAD UP ON THE UNDER HERE!!!

 

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 482
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by MJ2345:

 

 

Had there been decent coaching here it goes under. less than a minute left in the first half down 35-7 - get out and go to the 2nd half. Then you start out 42-7 in the 2nd half and you kick an onside kick. Give up you lose Tech. Stoops wanted nothing more than to bring in the 2nd team but Tech insisted on getting torched.

Bad beat - glad I had Oklahoma also.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2352
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by cyearian:

Had there been decent coaching here it goes under. less than a minute left in the first half down 35-7 - get out and go to the 2nd half. Then you start out 42-7 in the 2nd half and you kick an onside kick. Give up you lose Tech. Stoops wanted nothing more than to bring in the 2nd team but Tech insisted on getting torched.

Bad beat - glad I had Oklahoma also.

I was leaning on the UNDER too, how can anyone envision OK putting up over 60 by themselves. As I mentioned in the game thread I didnt think Tech was going to get anywhere near 40 points and saw the total more around 68. Had Tech not played so poorly and given up 35 in the 3rd the total goes under. Oh, well, I played ATS and won so I am happy.

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 167
Posted: #34
Yea how can anyone see OU the number 1 scoring offense in the nation playing at home scoring 60 themselves; oops it turned out to be 65 and thats with OU not even pouring it on in the 4th. It could have been 80 easily.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.