All Forums | College Football

*Thursday Night College Football*

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10625
Posts: 164
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 426
Posted: #26
the over 52 is the best play in this game which louisville shows up???
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 14715
Posted: #27
hey placin, I could see it going over, but i think its unlikely
rutgers is stingy at home
 
For me there is no value in a total play,  but if I were forced I would take an under in a squeeker
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3037
Posted: #28
Like Rutgers here.  I think Louisville will play pretty good defensively.  Leanin Under.
 
  Bib
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 14
Posted: #29
 bibendi
    thanks for the help,you have gave to this board
 
   A GREAT PRO who does not pound his chest.
    truly refreshing
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 14715
Posted: #30
It is going to hug the total and with possible rain in the forecast
 
Under is the Play
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 67925
Posted: #31
a blowout would be nice
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2761
Posted: #32
BOL Bendi
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 14715
Posted: #33
30% chance of rain and cold. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #34
under, under, under
 
keep that total under
 
under, under, under
 
UNDER
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #35
sorry I'm bored
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 6697
Posted: #36
GL today
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #37
Thanks pimp
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 482
Posted: #38

Bibendi,

I am on the other side tonight. I really don't have a good reason other than I have a system that I have played for about 5-7 seasons.

Always go with a team that has lost 4 straight ATS playing against a team that has won 4 straight ATS. I wish I had ben following this the past 5 years or so but it rarely lets me down.

You have don't a lot for tme the last weekend and I hate being on the other side this is just one of those "trends" I have always told myself to stick too becuase it really doesn't come up that much throughout a season.

On another note - The Oak - San Dieg game has the same thing going on over there except on the total.

Always play the over if both teams have had 4+ consecutive unders.

I really like both of these trends and are the only trends I really follow religiously.

BOL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 482
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by cyearian:

Bibendi,

I am on the other side tonight. I really don't have a good reason other than I have a system that I have played for about 5-7 seasons.

Always go with a team that has lost 4 straight ATS playing against a team that has won 4 straight ATS. I wish I had ben following this the past 5 years or so but it rarely lets me down.

You have don't a lot for tme the last weekend and I hate being on the other side this is just one of those "trends" I have always told myself to stick too becuase it really doesn't come up that much throughout a season.

On another note - The Oak - San Dieg game has the same thing going on over there except on the total.

Always play the over if both teams have had 4+ consecutive unders.

I really like both of these trends and are the only trends I really follow religiously.

BOL

I meant I wish I had been tracking this over the last 5 years...I have been following these rules, but I have not been tracking the winners. I may try to back track and see how it did.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 60
Posted: #40
How about that OVER?
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by cyearian:

Bibendi,

I am on the other side tonight. I really don't have a good reason other than I have a system that I have played for about 5-7 seasons.

Always go with a team that has lost 4 straight ATS playing against a team that has won 4 straight ATS. I wish I had ben following this the past 5 years or so but it rarely lets me down.

You have don't a lot for tme the last weekend and I hate being on the other side this is just one of those "trends" I have always told myself to stick too becuase it really doesn't come up that much throughout a season.

On another note - The Oak - San Dieg game has the same thing going on over there except on the total.

Always play the over if both teams have had 4+ consecutive unders.

I really like both of these trends and are the only trends I really follow religiously.

BOL

I saw in another post this theory. They considered it the equivalent of "market correction" and I agree. The part I disagree with in this case is that it will be the last game of the season for Louisville and they havent looked inspired at all. Ill lay the points in this one every time. If Louisville had time to turn their season around I might approach it differently

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 482
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by bibendi23:

under, under, under
 
keep that total under
 
under, under, under
 
UNDER

I will hope for the under tonight though - infact maybe even make a small play on it. Especially if there will be rain.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 557
Posted: #43
bibendi23:  Congrats on your LaLafayette play  
 
For tonight, a Rutgers win would be very nice. 
 
Lots of respect for you Sir.  You truly know your stuff.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1347
Posted: #44
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #45

Ok Ill take the Louivill side:  ""

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 482
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by bibendi23:

I saw in another post this theory. They considered it the equivalent of "market correction" and I agree. The part I disagree with in this case is that it will be the last game of the season for Louisville and they havent looked inspired at all. Ill lay the points in this one every time. If Louisville had time to turn their season around I might approach it differently

Understandable...I just can't go against it. I think Rutgers is obviously the better team but I don't think big wins over Army, S Florida, and Cuse warrant 9.5 point favs when just two weeks ago this same Louisville squad was only 4 point dogs Vs Cincinnati and 7.5 Vs W. Virginia. Now they didn't cover, but they were within this number vs Cincy.

You have been on fire - I am retarded to go on the other side but I just can't go against this trend. Get on the Oak over though!!

BOL

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 46
Posted: #47
Rutgers looking good!! Agreed!
 
 
Bibendi, you need to get back on the horse.
The race is close.
 
BOL everyone
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by baekboi:

Rutgers looking good!! Agreed!
 
 
Bibendi, you need to get back on the horse.
The race is close.
 
BOL everyone

Im choking hard man. Hopefully I dont stay in this rutt. I need a 4-0 day to steady the ship

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 90
Posted: #49
this is my first ever post on covers and i have to say bro, i have been following you for a while and i only signed up to tell you, KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. . . .  GO RUTGERS
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 2114
Posted: #50
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.