SMU was NEVER the sharp play.
Sharps lose "some games" yea right.
It's either a sharp play or it isn't. SMU was NOT the sharp play!!
There was a lot of heavy action on SMU in the last 24 hours prior to kickoff as the line at some books went from -10 to -7. Anyone that thinks that "sharp money" can't be ocassionally on the wrong side of a blowout, hasn't been doing this very long/well. Keep up the good work, I am sure that I am not the only one that appreciates your efforts.
One thing that I don't quite understand though is why someone would straight bet a game that they liked at +7 1/2 but lay off of it at +7. The odds of losing are exactly the same either way, sure you have a better chance to cover with the hook, but the risk involved doesn't change so why would you not take a shot at +7 just the same?
There was a lot of heavy action on SMU in the last 24 hours prior to kickoff as the line at some books went from -10 to -7. Anyone that thinks that "sharp money" can't be ocassionally on the wrong side of a blowout, hasn't been doing this very long/well. Keep up the good work, I am sure that I am not the only one that appreciates your efforts.
One thing that I don't quite understand though is why someone would straight bet a game that they liked at +7 1/2 but lay off of it at +7. The odds of losing are exactly the same either way, sure you have a better chance to cover with the hook, but the risk involved doesn't change so why would you not take a shot at +7 just the same?
There was a lot of heavy action on SMU in the last 24 hours prior to kickoff as the line at some books went from -10 to -7. Anyone that thinks that "sharp money" can't be ocassionally on the wrong side of a blowout, hasn't been doing this very long/well. Keep up the good work, I am sure that I am not the only one that appreciates your efforts.
One thing that I don't quite understand though is why someone would straight bet a game that they liked at +7 1/2 but lay off of it at +7. The odds of losing are exactly the same either way, sure you have a better chance to cover with the hook, but the risk involved doesn't change so why would you not take a shot at +7 just the same?
There was a lot of heavy action on SMU in the last 24 hours prior to kickoff as the line at some books went from -10 to -7. Anyone that thinks that "sharp money" can't be ocassionally on the wrong side of a blowout, hasn't been doing this very long/well. Keep up the good work, I am sure that I am not the only one that appreciates your efforts.
One thing that I don't quite understand though is why someone would straight bet a game that they liked at +7 1/2 but lay off of it at +7. The odds of losing are exactly the same either way, sure you have a better chance to cover with the hook, but the risk involved doesn't change so why would you not take a shot at +7 just the same?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.