All Forums | College Football

Rutgers (4-2) at Army (3-4)... I HAVE THE RIGHT SIDE ON THIS!!!!inside

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3242
Posts: 28
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1249
Posted: #1

Last night guys had the right side on FSu +2.5 +1 and said I had them winning it straight up... Well IM back at it again.. In what seems to be people thinking Rut is going to kill ARMY I think people well be SHOCKED!!!!!!!!!!!!

My projection

Rut 23

Arm 16

PLAY ARMY +10.5

MY LEAN IS UNDER AS THE LINE AS DROPPED FROM 41 TO 39 OR 38.5

 

BEST OF LUCK.....

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 171
Posted: #2
gl Head
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 265
Posted: #3
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5927
Posted: #4

I like it!

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37503
Posted: #5

I like it too!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 232
Posted: #6
good call, the under will be close tho. likely just playing the side. hope i can get 11 before kickoff.

GL Headhunter
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 6544
Posted: #7
I don't know about that play...
Army is playing into Rutgers strength here, they will be running the ball a lot and Rutgers specializes in stopping the run. On the other side of the ball I like Rutgers run game, and I see Savage open this game up with some shots down the field to Tim Brown. I like Rutgers to cover and the over here.

Final Score:

Rutgers 30

Army 13
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37503
Posted: #8
RKapper.... no offense I know you are a big Rutgers fan but it didn't seem like Rutgers strenth was stopping the run against PIT last week.  But that is why I like Army because they can run the ball and I am not sure Rutgers can stop it.  BOL!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 6544
Posted: #9
Are you kidding me jesron, Pitt is a WAY better team than Army. Pitt actually has a passing game, which opened up the their running game. Army is a running team, and the pass won't be a threat here. Rutgers ranks 2nd in rush defense on the road, but good luck to you. Rutgers Rolls!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1641
Posted: #10
Your predicted score is right at the total.  Can't play it, right?
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 20656
Posted: #11
RKapper
Pitt ran for 223 vs Rut
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 6544
Posted: #12
Again, Pitt is a way better team than Army, and Rutgers still ranks 2nd in rush defense on the ROAD.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 3498
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by RKapper:

Again, Pitt is a way better team than Army, and Rutgers still ranks 2nd in rush defense on the ROAD.
they played 1 road game vs the 100th ranked rushing game of maryland
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1916
Posted: #14
Im with RKapper, he is correct. Pitt is way better than Army but no matter, if youe going to use the Pitt/RU game as a basis for capping this one, go ahead. RU will play the run tough against Army, if you havent noticed Army's O is not near as decent ( and i said decent, not good) this year as they usually are and being one dimensional does play into RU strength. RU wins going away. BOL All.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1249
Posted: #15
its close to the total but i would lean under . i mean if u want to buy it back where it opened at then do that but too me its football. forget what teams can do. ARMY on TV will show up... MY money and cash flow is all over ARMY BOYS +10.5.. Will have all SAt plays done by late friday night . Every game will be done with plays for each game, leans and my projections....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 498
Posted: #16
temple could be able to kick army ass with 2 TDs...and you think rutgers cant beat army more than 2 TDs?????

Good luck on your play tomorrow nite!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1641
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by bkpham:

temple could be able to kick army ass with 2 TDs...and you think rutgers cant beat army more than 2 TDs?????

Good luck on your play tomorrow nite!!!!
Dynamic game.  How many points did UNC score on uconn and uva?  And how many tonight?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 498
Posted: #18
FSU defense is so bad ...that why UNC can get some points and kept running to get a 1st down.... when uconn and uva defenses are much better compare to FSU

Rutgers have better defense than temple and they can shut down the run...how many throw did army get in temple game?  3? and the rest were running games...
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #19
im leaning under here

a battle of field position all night long.. 21-10
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 37503
Posted: #20
I agree with you NBA, under seems like a good play too.  I might just pass on this game all together though.  Again no offense to Rutgers fans because I know there is a couple of you out there (NBA, RKapper, etc) but I am kinda disappointed that this was the best ESPN could do for a Friday night game.  Hell I am okay with Rutgers but Army.  Damn.  BOL!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 5935
Posted: #21
Go Army  
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 26899
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by jesron1269:

I agree with you NBA, under seems like a good play too.  I might just pass on this game all together though.  Again no offense to Rutgers fans because I know there is a couple of you out there (NBA, RKapper, etc) but I am kinda disappointed that this was the best ESPN could do for a Friday night game.  Hell I am okay with Rutgers but Army.  Damn.  BOL!


don't be surprised if army wins straight up.. rutgers is over rated.. we spent way too much money on our football program & stadium renovation (over $200 million)

maybe it will pay off in a few years but its doubtful IMO
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1722
Posted: #23

Army +10.5 here

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 771
Posted: #24
I think 6pt tease of Rutgers -4 1/2 and the over 32 1/2 is the wise play.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 6800
Posted: #25
good luck

like the play a lot, on the same side
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.