A profitable bunch was posted here last week (10-5, .667). Over thirteen; just four losing weeks. Albeit, the overall season-record is less impressive (89-78-1, .533). Examining every game, the box likes these: 1) Tennessee(-2)/Vanderbilt 2) ArizonaSt (+2.5)/Arizona 3) SouthCarolina(-1.5)/Clemson 4) Texas(+2.5)/TexasA&M 5) Stanford(+32.5)/NotreDame 6) MiamiOhio(-17.5)/BallState 7) LA-Lafayette(-11.5)/LA-Monroe 8) Oklahoma(-10)/LSU 9) WashingtonSt(-13.5)/OregonState 10) TexasSt(-9)/SoAlabama 11) Virginia(-11)/VirginiaTech 12) Tulsa(-8.5)/UAB 13) KansasState(-17)/Colorado 14) Kansas(+13.5)/Utah 15) Delaware(-4.5)/UTEP
The algorithm’s first pick continues to bring value (9-4, .692). The rest of the algorithm’s value comes with its systemic volume (lots of picks -- reasonable worth). The Human Administrator would rather see progressive rank, which would be a technical attribute. However, that level of rank performance has been lacking this season.
Of course, such performance fuels the need to build that “better mousetrap” in the coming off-season. Suffice to say, new trends/methods are never far from mind for 2026. Bottom line, prediction remains a tough game......maybe never tougher.
Last week we grew to a seasonal high with 60 on the board. No one can complain about opportunity this week – a whopping 67 games. Which means only two FBS teams are on the sidelines. So, pushing away from the table to place those worthy wagers – have yourself a great Thanksgiving! Good luck, TheKingfish
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
A profitable bunch was posted here last week (10-5, .667). Over thirteen; just four losing weeks. Albeit, the overall season-record is less impressive (89-78-1, .533). Examining every game, the box likes these: 1) Tennessee(-2)/Vanderbilt 2) ArizonaSt (+2.5)/Arizona 3) SouthCarolina(-1.5)/Clemson 4) Texas(+2.5)/TexasA&M 5) Stanford(+32.5)/NotreDame 6) MiamiOhio(-17.5)/BallState 7) LA-Lafayette(-11.5)/LA-Monroe 8) Oklahoma(-10)/LSU 9) WashingtonSt(-13.5)/OregonState 10) TexasSt(-9)/SoAlabama 11) Virginia(-11)/VirginiaTech 12) Tulsa(-8.5)/UAB 13) KansasState(-17)/Colorado 14) Kansas(+13.5)/Utah 15) Delaware(-4.5)/UTEP
The algorithm’s first pick continues to bring value (9-4, .692). The rest of the algorithm’s value comes with its systemic volume (lots of picks -- reasonable worth). The Human Administrator would rather see progressive rank, which would be a technical attribute. However, that level of rank performance has been lacking this season.
Of course, such performance fuels the need to build that “better mousetrap” in the coming off-season. Suffice to say, new trends/methods are never far from mind for 2026. Bottom line, prediction remains a tough game......maybe never tougher.
Last week we grew to a seasonal high with 60 on the board. No one can complain about opportunity this week – a whopping 67 games. Which means only two FBS teams are on the sidelines. So, pushing away from the table to place those worthy wagers – have yourself a great Thanksgiving! Good luck, TheKingfish
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
