A winner was had here last Saturday (10-8, .556). And thus far, this slot has seen six winning weeks out of eight. Albeit, something less compelling in the overall (57-50, .533). Given the technical ability to assess them all, the turned-crank on the box yields these for week number nine: 1) WestKentucky(+3.5)/LouisTech 2) UtahState(+3)/NewMexico 3) Oklahoma(-4.5)/Mississippi 4) BowlingGreen(-7.5)/KentState 5) Memphis(+5)/SouthFlorida 6) IowaState(-2.5)/ BrighamYoung 7) GeorgiaSt (+6.5)/SoAlabama 8) Tulsa(+6.5)/Temple 9) Washington(-4.5)/Illinois 10) LSU(+3)/TexasA&M 11) Vanderbilt(-2.5)/Missouri 12) VirginiaTech(-4.5)/California 13) Indiana(-24)/UCLA 14) MiamiFlorida(-30)/Stanford 15) WashingtonSt(-1)/Toledo
So, with the season over half gone, can anything be said regarding systemic rank-value? Well, the top pick has shown some value (6-2, .750). And since the mentioned tech adjustment was made in week #6, the algorithm has brought a reasonable combination of success & volume to the top eight selections (16-8, .667).
However, do we have genuine-worth at the core? And, moreover, is any of that performance sustainable? I suppose the last six weeks will tell the tale. We have 53 on the board this week; certainly a robust amount of opportunity for one and all. Good luck, TheKingfish
Note: Posting a bit early this week due to the travel calendar. So, would appreciate a humane bump if I fall into oblivion (and someone feels the KF is deserving).
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
A winner was had here last Saturday (10-8, .556). And thus far, this slot has seen six winning weeks out of eight. Albeit, something less compelling in the overall (57-50, .533). Given the technical ability to assess them all, the turned-crank on the box yields these for week number nine: 1) WestKentucky(+3.5)/LouisTech 2) UtahState(+3)/NewMexico 3) Oklahoma(-4.5)/Mississippi 4) BowlingGreen(-7.5)/KentState 5) Memphis(+5)/SouthFlorida 6) IowaState(-2.5)/ BrighamYoung 7) GeorgiaSt (+6.5)/SoAlabama 8) Tulsa(+6.5)/Temple 9) Washington(-4.5)/Illinois 10) LSU(+3)/TexasA&M 11) Vanderbilt(-2.5)/Missouri 12) VirginiaTech(-4.5)/California 13) Indiana(-24)/UCLA 14) MiamiFlorida(-30)/Stanford 15) WashingtonSt(-1)/Toledo
So, with the season over half gone, can anything be said regarding systemic rank-value? Well, the top pick has shown some value (6-2, .750). And since the mentioned tech adjustment was made in week #6, the algorithm has brought a reasonable combination of success & volume to the top eight selections (16-8, .667).
However, do we have genuine-worth at the core? And, moreover, is any of that performance sustainable? I suppose the last six weeks will tell the tale. We have 53 on the board this week; certainly a robust amount of opportunity for one and all. Good luck, TheKingfish
Note: Posting a bit early this week due to the travel calendar. So, would appreciate a humane bump if I fall into oblivion (and someone feels the KF is deserving).
For the record – adding two more. 1.5) ColoradoSt(+4.5)/Wyoming 9.5) Arkansas(-2.5)/Auburn
The algorithm also likes WesternMichigan, but only if they get to +3. The Broncos are currently at 1.5 -- and seemingly much-liked at that number. Good luck, TheKingfish
0
For the record – adding two more. 1.5) ColoradoSt(+4.5)/Wyoming 9.5) Arkansas(-2.5)/Auburn
The algorithm also likes WesternMichigan, but only if they get to +3. The Broncos are currently at 1.5 -- and seemingly much-liked at that number. Good luck, TheKingfish
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.