yeah and they were soppossed to beat Ttech at home by more than 29 and they were supposed to destroy Kansas by 50+ also
OVERRATED
good points! the two worst defenses they've played against both covered the spread easily against Oklahoma... been saying all year they were highly overrated, and belonged nowhere near the NC game... but i got OU at (-13.5) when it opened... had to take it! just seems a bit too easy for OU to cover 2 TDs in this game...
hopefully they don't bite me in the ass... Baylor is capable of beating OU on one of their bad days...
0
Quote Originally Posted by shark_apreza:
yeah and they were soppossed to beat Ttech at home by more than 29 and they were supposed to destroy Kansas by 50+ also
OVERRATED
good points! the two worst defenses they've played against both covered the spread easily against Oklahoma... been saying all year they were highly overrated, and belonged nowhere near the NC game... but i got OU at (-13.5) when it opened... had to take it! just seems a bit too easy for OU to cover 2 TDs in this game...
hopefully they don't bite me in the ass... Baylor is capable of beating OU on one of their bad days...
Wow--I cannot even compose myself to type this in...
I LOVE IT!!! USC is in full upset mode. They're healthy, they rolling and Kiffin, as the face of that team, fears no one. He's a douchebag yes, but the kids LOVE him.
I LOVE the 15 and will take it now thank you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:
WOW.
Oregon is -15
Wow--I cannot even compose myself to type this in...
I LOVE IT!!! USC is in full upset mode. They're healthy, they rolling and Kiffin, as the face of that team, fears no one. He's a douchebag yes, but the kids LOVE him.
I think Oklahoma is overrated as well and i don't care much for Stoops but Baylor's defense is absolute garbage. If Oklahoma can't cover the 14 then they should drop out of the top 20!! Oklahoma St. will beat Oklahoma by 2 TD's
0
Shark- Ice
I think Oklahoma is overrated as well and i don't care much for Stoops but Baylor's defense is absolute garbage. If Oklahoma can't cover the 14 then they should drop out of the top 20!! Oklahoma St. will beat Oklahoma by 2 TD's
Because Monet Kiffin opens his mouth about Oregon's passing game which isnt a conventinal passing game to begin with...people give him prudence and think Oregon still wont run the ball down SC's throats and still pass at will! Like a poster said before SC runs alot of 2man coverage and 2 deep zones. That wont work against Oregon because USC will need the 8th man in the box to stop the run. If they dont bring that extra defender down then Oregon wont have to pass the ball at all.
0
Because Monet Kiffin opens his mouth about Oregon's passing game which isnt a conventinal passing game to begin with...people give him prudence and think Oregon still wont run the ball down SC's throats and still pass at will! Like a poster said before SC runs alot of 2man coverage and 2 deep zones. That wont work against Oregon because USC will need the 8th man in the box to stop the run. If they dont bring that extra defender down then Oregon wont have to pass the ball at all.
USC would be in the BCS mix were they eligible. They haven't beaten any highly respected team yet, something lacking on this year's resume.
If you look at the recruits you see Oregon has 53 Californians, and these players on both teams know eact other--the skill level is identical, but the players are within a scheme that works for them to score points.
USC has played excellent defense since the CAL game--they have amped up their intensity. CAL was dismantled; Stanford looked weakened the next game vs OSU; Wash could do nothing at all; ND was stymied all night long.
If Oregon comes out and scores early and often, then ok, they are for real, whatever. It doesn't look to unfold that way given USC's showings since the CAL game. The defense is creating turnovers. What has changed for USC since the CAL game upward trend? Injuries? Anything? No.
I for one would like to see a USC upset, since I do not want to see a rematch with LSU that is bantered about. I do not believe Oregon can do anything at all vs LSU or Alabama, and apart from the dazzling NIKE uniforms, the game will be a predictable finish. Maybe B. Weeden is the real deal--I mean, he is actually older than Aaron Rodgers, and the dude controls the entire offense. Oklahoma is the biggest test for them, but maybe they can provide "entertainment." Still looks like Alabama or LSU wins it all.
But as a non-fan, I have to like USC from what I've seen, from my knowledge of football, and analyzing this matchup. It is USC's to take if they want it.
0
USC would be in the BCS mix were they eligible. They haven't beaten any highly respected team yet, something lacking on this year's resume.
If you look at the recruits you see Oregon has 53 Californians, and these players on both teams know eact other--the skill level is identical, but the players are within a scheme that works for them to score points.
USC has played excellent defense since the CAL game--they have amped up their intensity. CAL was dismantled; Stanford looked weakened the next game vs OSU; Wash could do nothing at all; ND was stymied all night long.
If Oregon comes out and scores early and often, then ok, they are for real, whatever. It doesn't look to unfold that way given USC's showings since the CAL game. The defense is creating turnovers. What has changed for USC since the CAL game upward trend? Injuries? Anything? No.
I for one would like to see a USC upset, since I do not want to see a rematch with LSU that is bantered about. I do not believe Oregon can do anything at all vs LSU or Alabama, and apart from the dazzling NIKE uniforms, the game will be a predictable finish. Maybe B. Weeden is the real deal--I mean, he is actually older than Aaron Rodgers, and the dude controls the entire offense. Oklahoma is the biggest test for them, but maybe they can provide "entertainment." Still looks like Alabama or LSU wins it all.
But as a non-fan, I have to like USC from what I've seen, from my knowledge of football, and analyzing this matchup. It is USC's to take if they want it.
I've only seen one USC game so I don't know that team that well. Their defense didn't look too impressive to me against Stanford but their offense with Barkley and Woods should be able to put up some points against Oregon. If their defensive line can control the line of scrimmage then Oregon could be in trouble. Seems to me Oregon's speed might be a problem but USC has more speed than Stanford. I will be taking the 15 points and already have that one locked in.
0
I've only seen one USC game so I don't know that team that well. Their defense didn't look too impressive to me against Stanford but their offense with Barkley and Woods should be able to put up some points against Oregon. If their defensive line can control the line of scrimmage then Oregon could be in trouble. Seems to me Oregon's speed might be a problem but USC has more speed than Stanford. I will be taking the 15 points and already have that one locked in.
USC would NOT be in the BCS mix were they eligible. They haven't beaten any highly respected team yet, something lacking on this year's resume.
If you look at the recruits you see Oregon has 53 Californians, and these players on both teams know eact other--the skill level is identical, but the players are within a scheme that works for them to score points.
USC has played excellent defense since the CAL game--they have amped up their intensity. CAL was dismantled; Stanford looked weakened the next game vs OSU; Wash could do nothing at all; ND was stymied all night long.
If Oregon comes out and scores early and often, then ok, they are for real, whatever. It doesn't look to unfold that way given USC's showings since the CAL game. The defense is creating turnovers. What has changed for USC since the CAL game upward trend? Injuries? Anything? No.
I for one would like to see a USC upset, since I do not want to see a rematch with LSU that is bantered about. I do not believe Oregon can do anything at all vs LSU or Alabama, and apart from the dazzling NIKE uniforms, the game will be a predictable finish. Maybe B. Weeden is the real deal--I mean, he is actually older than Aaron Rodgers, and the dude controls the entire offense. Oklahoma is the biggest test for them, but maybe they can provide "entertainment." Still looks like Alabama or LSU wins it all.
But as a non-fan, I have to like USC from what I've seen, from my knowledge of football, and analyzing this matchup. It is USC's to take if they want it.
Fixed
0
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:
USC would NOT be in the BCS mix were they eligible. They haven't beaten any highly respected team yet, something lacking on this year's resume.
If you look at the recruits you see Oregon has 53 Californians, and these players on both teams know eact other--the skill level is identical, but the players are within a scheme that works for them to score points.
USC has played excellent defense since the CAL game--they have amped up their intensity. CAL was dismantled; Stanford looked weakened the next game vs OSU; Wash could do nothing at all; ND was stymied all night long.
If Oregon comes out and scores early and often, then ok, they are for real, whatever. It doesn't look to unfold that way given USC's showings since the CAL game. The defense is creating turnovers. What has changed for USC since the CAL game upward trend? Injuries? Anything? No.
I for one would like to see a USC upset, since I do not want to see a rematch with LSU that is bantered about. I do not believe Oregon can do anything at all vs LSU or Alabama, and apart from the dazzling NIKE uniforms, the game will be a predictable finish. Maybe B. Weeden is the real deal--I mean, he is actually older than Aaron Rodgers, and the dude controls the entire offense. Oklahoma is the biggest test for them, but maybe they can provide "entertainment." Still looks like Alabama or LSU wins it all.
But as a non-fan, I have to like USC from what I've seen, from my knowledge of football, and analyzing this matchup. It is USC's to take if they want it.
I think the general feeling (public) is that Oregon rolls here under the lights with all the drama.
I just have the itching feeling that Oregon will see that USC emblem across from them and will see some pride coming through, and they will respond well enough to make it a game.
Stanford fell behind early and became too predictable and one dimensional. Surely USC coaches have taken note.
I have no doubt they will be poised and ready (USC) for this fight and will take it to the Ducks early and often, and at least PRESS Oregon to beat them in the second half. I don't think Okie St can get past OU and SOoner Nation, but I'd kinda prefer to see them rather than Oregon in the NC, simply because of the QB centered offense--which I prefer more than this Oregon option attack. So, here goes, midweek pondering concluded, laying it on the line (thanks for replies everyone)
USC 1st H ML and +7.5
USC +15
USC 2nd H --- ?
0
I think the general feeling (public) is that Oregon rolls here under the lights with all the drama.
I just have the itching feeling that Oregon will see that USC emblem across from them and will see some pride coming through, and they will respond well enough to make it a game.
Stanford fell behind early and became too predictable and one dimensional. Surely USC coaches have taken note.
I have no doubt they will be poised and ready (USC) for this fight and will take it to the Ducks early and often, and at least PRESS Oregon to beat them in the second half. I don't think Okie St can get past OU and SOoner Nation, but I'd kinda prefer to see them rather than Oregon in the NC, simply because of the QB centered offense--which I prefer more than this Oregon option attack. So, here goes, midweek pondering concluded, laying it on the line (thanks for replies everyone)
Oregon is averaging 212 yards rushing per game. USC has not allowed any team over 200 yards this season. 134 yrds per game is good for 9th nationally. USC has shut down 3 1000 yd rushers (CAL, Wash and Utah) and La Michael James looks to be in a tough game where every yard counts, and he will have to run after contact w/o relying on a speed advantage. Meanwhile, USC's running game is looking like the kind of game they want to showcase. 3 of last 4 games they have gained over 200 yards, while the defense has shined.
Matt Barkley's stock is rising and I look for another error free, smartly played game with plenty of red zone opps, taking advantage of speed and big play makers.
Friends, this is the clearest play ATS that I have seen in awhile. This is most definitely the last major hurdle for Oregon, and USC will play to the final whistle. +15 is YOUR opportunity to raise the sports account ledger in your favor.
0
Oregon is averaging 212 yards rushing per game. USC has not allowed any team over 200 yards this season. 134 yrds per game is good for 9th nationally. USC has shut down 3 1000 yd rushers (CAL, Wash and Utah) and La Michael James looks to be in a tough game where every yard counts, and he will have to run after contact w/o relying on a speed advantage. Meanwhile, USC's running game is looking like the kind of game they want to showcase. 3 of last 4 games they have gained over 200 yards, while the defense has shined.
Matt Barkley's stock is rising and I look for another error free, smartly played game with plenty of red zone opps, taking advantage of speed and big play makers.
Friends, this is the clearest play ATS that I have seen in awhile. This is most definitely the last major hurdle for Oregon, and USC will play to the final whistle. +15 is YOUR opportunity to raise the sports account ledger in your favor.
USC would be in the BCS mix were they eligible. They haven't beaten any highly respected team yet, something lacking on this year's resume.
If you look at the recruits you see Oregon has 53 Californians, and these players on both teams know eact other--the skill level is identical, but the players are within a scheme that works for them to score points.
USC has played excellent defense since the CAL game--they have amped up their intensity. CAL was dismantled; Stanford looked weakened the next game vs OSU; Wash could do nothing at all; ND was stymied all night long.
If Oregon comes out and scores early and often, then ok, they are for real, whatever. It doesn't look to unfold that way given USC's showings since the CAL game. The defense is creating turnovers. What has changed for USC since the CAL game upward trend? Injuries? Anything? No.
I for one would like to see a USC upset, since I do not want to see a rematch with LSU that is bantered about. I do not believe Oregon can do anything at all vs LSU or Alabama, and apart from the dazzling NIKE uniforms, the game will be a predictable finish. Maybe B. Weeden is the real deal--I mean, he is actually older than Aaron Rodgers, and the dude controls the entire offense. Oklahoma is the biggest test for them, but maybe they can provide "entertainment." Still looks like Alabama or LSU wins it all.
But as a non-fan, I have to like USC from what I've seen, from my knowledge of football, and analyzing this matchup. It is USC's to take if they want it.
I laughed.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:
USC would be in the BCS mix were they eligible. They haven't beaten any highly respected team yet, something lacking on this year's resume.
If you look at the recruits you see Oregon has 53 Californians, and these players on both teams know eact other--the skill level is identical, but the players are within a scheme that works for them to score points.
USC has played excellent defense since the CAL game--they have amped up their intensity. CAL was dismantled; Stanford looked weakened the next game vs OSU; Wash could do nothing at all; ND was stymied all night long.
If Oregon comes out and scores early and often, then ok, they are for real, whatever. It doesn't look to unfold that way given USC's showings since the CAL game. The defense is creating turnovers. What has changed for USC since the CAL game upward trend? Injuries? Anything? No.
I for one would like to see a USC upset, since I do not want to see a rematch with LSU that is bantered about. I do not believe Oregon can do anything at all vs LSU or Alabama, and apart from the dazzling NIKE uniforms, the game will be a predictable finish. Maybe B. Weeden is the real deal--I mean, he is actually older than Aaron Rodgers, and the dude controls the entire offense. Oklahoma is the biggest test for them, but maybe they can provide "entertainment." Still looks like Alabama or LSU wins it all.
But as a non-fan, I have to like USC from what I've seen, from my knowledge of football, and analyzing this matchup. It is USC's to take if they want it.
they will not slow down Oregons running gm, i think they get the passing started early back up the safties and run all over them in 2nd half..Oregon is a lot better defense then stanford and will not be able to score 48+...barkley is good but so was luck and we saw how that went...score 51-31 O rollsss...gonna be a cold night to might snoww
0
they will not slow down Oregons running gm, i think they get the passing started early back up the safties and run all over them in 2nd half..Oregon is a lot better defense then stanford and will not be able to score 48+...barkley is good but so was luck and we saw how that went...score 51-31 O rollsss...gonna be a cold night to might snoww
i love seeing all these people inexplicably eager to bet against this Oregon team... that just makes me laugh!
I have EXPLAINED the recruits are the same--from the best high schools in California and the talent level is therefore a wash.
Matt Barkley (NFL 1st rounder) > D. Thomas
Oregon will not have 200+ yards rushing for the trends noted
USC could easily have bigger plays offensively for the trends noted. They played "under the lights" vs Notre Dame on tv as a +9.5 dog and were supposed to be blown out. So they are used to being disrescted and discounted.
Meanwhile you have NOTHING explicable except a blowout loss to LSU and some entitled right to play them again to "prove yourselves." You had your chance. Every game counts. It's over. Move on. We REALLY do not want to see Darron Thomas and girl beater James and you all embarrass yourselves with glow in the dark socks and duck wings that look like green falcon wings on your shoulder pads. Move on.
I am laughing, too
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
i love seeing all these people inexplicably eager to bet against this Oregon team... that just makes me laugh!
I have EXPLAINED the recruits are the same--from the best high schools in California and the talent level is therefore a wash.
Matt Barkley (NFL 1st rounder) > D. Thomas
Oregon will not have 200+ yards rushing for the trends noted
USC could easily have bigger plays offensively for the trends noted. They played "under the lights" vs Notre Dame on tv as a +9.5 dog and were supposed to be blown out. So they are used to being disrescted and discounted.
Meanwhile you have NOTHING explicable except a blowout loss to LSU and some entitled right to play them again to "prove yourselves." You had your chance. Every game counts. It's over. Move on. We REALLY do not want to see Darron Thomas and girl beater James and you all embarrass yourselves with glow in the dark socks and duck wings that look like green falcon wings on your shoulder pads. Move on.
ok so your saying that oregond eosnt have anything except a blowout loss? we just beat stanford pretty good...stanford > barkley...and who has USC played a overrated ND team?? and i love how just because they held shitty cal and utah to under 200 yrds that oregon wont run all over them haha pleasee how did stanford run against them???
0
ok so your saying that oregond eosnt have anything except a blowout loss? we just beat stanford pretty good...stanford > barkley...and who has USC played a overrated ND team?? and i love how just because they held shitty cal and utah to under 200 yrds that oregon wont run all over them haha pleasee how did stanford run against them???
I have EXPLAINED the recruits are the same--from the best high schools in California and the talent level is therefore a wash.
Matt Barkley (NFL 1st rounder) > D. Thomas
Oregon will not have 200+ yards rushing for the trends noted
USC could easily have bigger plays offensively for the trends noted. They played "under the lights" vs Notre Dame on tv as a +9.5 dog and were supposed to be blown out. So they are used to being disrescted and discounted.
Meanwhile you have NOTHING explicable except a blowout loss to LSU and some entitled right to play them again to "prove yourselves." You had your chance. Every game counts. It's over. Move on. We REALLY do not want to see Darron Thomas and girl beater James and you all embarrass yourselves with glow in the dark socks and duck wings that look like green falcon wings on your shoulder pads. Move on.
I am laughing, too
Weren't you the one that said CAL would go up and down the field against Oregon
Oh and also referenced that CAL must pressure "Dixon" as in Dennis from 2008
As far as that Notre Dame game under the lights you are comparing to this is !!! Notre Dame is flat out Garbabge!
They call Chip Kelly "Big Balls" for a reason. USC is walking into a Zoo Satuday Night and it's not going to pretty.
Oregon will have 200 rush yards in the 1st half
0
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:
I have EXPLAINED the recruits are the same--from the best high schools in California and the talent level is therefore a wash.
Matt Barkley (NFL 1st rounder) > D. Thomas
Oregon will not have 200+ yards rushing for the trends noted
USC could easily have bigger plays offensively for the trends noted. They played "under the lights" vs Notre Dame on tv as a +9.5 dog and were supposed to be blown out. So they are used to being disrescted and discounted.
Meanwhile you have NOTHING explicable except a blowout loss to LSU and some entitled right to play them again to "prove yourselves." You had your chance. Every game counts. It's over. Move on. We REALLY do not want to see Darron Thomas and girl beater James and you all embarrass yourselves with glow in the dark socks and duck wings that look like green falcon wings on your shoulder pads. Move on.
I am laughing, too
Weren't you the one that said CAL would go up and down the field against Oregon
Oh and also referenced that CAL must pressure "Dixon" as in Dennis from 2008
As far as that Notre Dame game under the lights you are comparing to this is !!! Notre Dame is flat out Garbabge!
They call Chip Kelly "Big Balls" for a reason. USC is walking into a Zoo Satuday Night and it's not going to pretty.
I have EXPLAINED the recruits are the same--from the best high schools in California and the talent level is therefore a wash.
Matt Barkley (NFL 1st rounder) > D. Thomas
Oregon will not have 200+ yards rushing for the trends noted
USC could easily have bigger plays offensively for the trends noted. They played "under the lights" vs Notre Dame on tv as a +9.5 dog and were supposed to be blown out. So they are used to being disrescted and discounted.
Meanwhile you have NOTHING explicable except a blowout loss to LSU and some entitled right to play them again to "prove yourselves." You had your chance. Every game counts. It's over. Move on. We REALLY do not want to see Darron Thomas and girl beater James and you all embarrass yourselves with glow in the dark socks and duck wings that look like green falcon wings on your shoulder pads. Move on.
I am laughing, too
How's Mark Sanchez doing. God USC and their terrible batch of QB's
0
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:
I have EXPLAINED the recruits are the same--from the best high schools in California and the talent level is therefore a wash.
Matt Barkley (NFL 1st rounder) > D. Thomas
Oregon will not have 200+ yards rushing for the trends noted
USC could easily have bigger plays offensively for the trends noted. They played "under the lights" vs Notre Dame on tv as a +9.5 dog and were supposed to be blown out. So they are used to being disrescted and discounted.
Meanwhile you have NOTHING explicable except a blowout loss to LSU and some entitled right to play them again to "prove yourselves." You had your chance. Every game counts. It's over. Move on. We REALLY do not want to see Darron Thomas and girl beater James and you all embarrass yourselves with glow in the dark socks and duck wings that look like green falcon wings on your shoulder pads. Move on.
I am laughing, too
How's Mark Sanchez doing. God USC and their terrible batch of QB's
Game is at Autzen. Kelly is a far superior x`s and o`s coach. SC does not have an SEC caliber D. Against any other team in the PAC 12, I could see a Duck letdown, but not against SC.
Monty has never stopped Oregon, and it won`t begin this week. Close first half, Ducks wear out SCs D and run away in the 2nd half, just like the previous two years.
0
Game is at Autzen. Kelly is a far superior x`s and o`s coach. SC does not have an SEC caliber D. Against any other team in the PAC 12, I could see a Duck letdown, but not against SC.
Monty has never stopped Oregon, and it won`t begin this week. Close first half, Ducks wear out SCs D and run away in the 2nd half, just like the previous two years.
Weren't you the one that said CAL would go up and down the field against Oregon
Oh and also referenced that CAL must pressure "Dixon" as in Dennis from 2008
As far as that Notre Dame game under the lights you are comparing to this is !!! Notre Dame is flat out Garbabge!
They call Chip Kelly "Big Balls" for a reason. USC is walking into a Zoo Satuday Night and it's not going to pretty.
Oregon will have 200 rush yards in the 1st half
Dixon or Darron, names have changed but the game's the same. And Wash starts "Joe Montana" this weekend.
It remains to be seen what you think of Chip Kelley's "big balls" after USC plays SEC style defense and "Dixon" throws 3 picks, and James the girl beater fumbles twice.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kraze:
Weren't you the one that said CAL would go up and down the field against Oregon
Oh and also referenced that CAL must pressure "Dixon" as in Dennis from 2008
As far as that Notre Dame game under the lights you are comparing to this is !!! Notre Dame is flat out Garbabge!
They call Chip Kelly "Big Balls" for a reason. USC is walking into a Zoo Satuday Night and it's not going to pretty.
Oregon will have 200 rush yards in the 1st half
Dixon or Darron, names have changed but the game's the same. And Wash starts "Joe Montana" this weekend.
It remains to be seen what you think of Chip Kelley's "big balls" after USC plays SEC style defense and "Dixon" throws 3 picks, and James the girl beater fumbles twice.
Dixon or Darron, names have changed but the game's the same. And Wash starts "Joe Montana" this weekend.
It remains to be seen what you think of Chip Kelley's "big balls" after USC plays SEC style defense and "Dixon" throws 3 picks, and James the girl beater fumbles twice.
Out of curiosity, what difference do you see between this year`s SC defense and last year`s??
0
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:
Dixon or Darron, names have changed but the game's the same. And Wash starts "Joe Montana" this weekend.
It remains to be seen what you think of Chip Kelley's "big balls" after USC plays SEC style defense and "Dixon" throws 3 picks, and James the girl beater fumbles twice.
Out of curiosity, what difference do you see between this year`s SC defense and last year`s??
Darron is an option QB and was recruited for that--for running threat and pass when open.
From what I've heard, Calif. HS is dominated by teams that follow the formula of protect the QB and throw to fleet receivers.
Texas is more of a run first approach. Two different h.s. cultures.
NO SECRET ANYMORE DUCKS-->Oregon is a running team. The offensive players use steel reinforced cleats (steel in the sole of the cleat) to prevent the foot from bending or "wasting time" in its natural arch, and to give their players an added boost of speed--courtesy of NIKE.
I think Oregon wins this late, but they do not cover 15. They win by 3-4 late by stopping USC late in the redzone--ie, they win with defense. I also like the under in this one.
USC and UNDER 68
USC +22 and UNDER 75 (7 pt TEASER)
0
Darron is an option QB and was recruited for that--for running threat and pass when open.
From what I've heard, Calif. HS is dominated by teams that follow the formula of protect the QB and throw to fleet receivers.
Texas is more of a run first approach. Two different h.s. cultures.
NO SECRET ANYMORE DUCKS-->Oregon is a running team. The offensive players use steel reinforced cleats (steel in the sole of the cleat) to prevent the foot from bending or "wasting time" in its natural arch, and to give their players an added boost of speed--courtesy of NIKE.
I think Oregon wins this late, but they do not cover 15. They win by 3-4 late by stopping USC late in the redzone--ie, they win with defense. I also like the under in this one.
Dixon or Darron, names have changed but the game's the same. And Wash starts "Joe Montana" this weekend.
It remains to be seen what you think of Chip Kelley's "big balls" after USC plays SEC style defense and "Dixon" throws 3 picks, and James the girl beater fumbles twice.
SEC style Defense
USC is ranked 98th against the pass. The first SEC team to come close to that is 49 spots ahead and that would be Ole Miss being the worst @ 49.
Yea USC is ranked pretty good at stopping the run, but so was Stanford
0
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:
Dixon or Darron, names have changed but the game's the same. And Wash starts "Joe Montana" this weekend.
It remains to be seen what you think of Chip Kelley's "big balls" after USC plays SEC style defense and "Dixon" throws 3 picks, and James the girl beater fumbles twice.
SEC style Defense
USC is ranked 98th against the pass. The first SEC team to come close to that is 49 spots ahead and that would be Ole Miss being the worst @ 49.
Yea USC is ranked pretty good at stopping the run, but so was Stanford
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
