Miami (Ohio) -9.5 for 10 units... Lets take a look at the Redhawks losses this season which are @FLA, @MISOU, @CIN & OHIO. Those 4 teams combined sport a record of 23-15 this season. Within the MAC conference this season the Redhawks have taken care of business going 5-1su and 4-2ats (very important numbers IMO). So why and/or how has the Redhawk team been able to win 6 games this year while putting up an average of 26.3 points per game on the board in those wins. Simple (to me at least), they are sporting a solid bunch of wr's that have made Zac Dysert's job easier than expected this season. The 2 top wr's this season are Armand Robinson & Nick Harwell who have combined stats of 110catches, 1311yards & 8td's. Those 2 wr's have opened up many things for the Redhawks passing game and are the main reason they are averaging 255yards per game in the air this season. And thats exactly what the Zips can not stop as they are allowing 268yards per game in the air. Also the Zips run defense does'nt get much better as they are also allowing 168ypg in that department. But wait theirs more as if that isn't enough to convince you lets take a look at that Zips offense averaging a miniscule 257 total yards per game ( Ranked 120th) and a QB that has only completed 48% of his passes all season. When you are allowing 39ppg and sport an offense such as the Zips do, that is how 0-10su records are produced. As for records this is nothing new for the Zips as they are only 3-19su & 7-15ats these last 2 seasons. I like this game with or without Zac Dysert as the Redhawks should be able to stack that box and contain the one and only weapon that the Zips have in rb Alex Allen as their should be no fear of the Zips passing all over the field in this one. This one opened up currently at -13 at most books but has since been widdled down to just -9.5 ( @ bookmaker), and I feel that this move is nothing more than a headfake by the books...POD
I have the Redhawks putting up 34 or more in this one. I don't see the Zips putting up more than 17 at best IMO...
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Wednesdays action:
Miami (Ohio) -9.5 for 10 units... Lets take a look at the Redhawks losses this season which are @FLA, @MISOU, @CIN & OHIO. Those 4 teams combined sport a record of 23-15 this season. Within the MAC conference this season the Redhawks have taken care of business going 5-1su and 4-2ats (very important numbers IMO). So why and/or how has the Redhawk team been able to win 6 games this year while putting up an average of 26.3 points per game on the board in those wins. Simple (to me at least), they are sporting a solid bunch of wr's that have made Zac Dysert's job easier than expected this season. The 2 top wr's this season are Armand Robinson & Nick Harwell who have combined stats of 110catches, 1311yards & 8td's. Those 2 wr's have opened up many things for the Redhawks passing game and are the main reason they are averaging 255yards per game in the air this season. And thats exactly what the Zips can not stop as they are allowing 268yards per game in the air. Also the Zips run defense does'nt get much better as they are also allowing 168ypg in that department. But wait theirs more as if that isn't enough to convince you lets take a look at that Zips offense averaging a miniscule 257 total yards per game ( Ranked 120th) and a QB that has only completed 48% of his passes all season. When you are allowing 39ppg and sport an offense such as the Zips do, that is how 0-10su records are produced. As for records this is nothing new for the Zips as they are only 3-19su & 7-15ats these last 2 seasons. I like this game with or without Zac Dysert as the Redhawks should be able to stack that box and contain the one and only weapon that the Zips have in rb Alex Allen as their should be no fear of the Zips passing all over the field in this one. This one opened up currently at -13 at most books but has since been widdled down to just -9.5 ( @ bookmaker), and I feel that this move is nothing more than a headfake by the books...POD
I have the Redhawks putting up 34 or more in this one. I don't see the Zips putting up more than 17 at best IMO...
Akron has been my "go against" team all year. I have played them every week and they have treated me to a 7-3 record since they have only covered ATS 3 out of their 10 contests. After the game tonight, I am hoping that will be 3 out of their last 11 contests. Good Luck to ya ODDS
0
Akron has been my "go against" team all year. I have played them every week and they have treated me to a 7-3 record since they have only covered ATS 3 out of their 10 contests. After the game tonight, I am hoping that will be 3 out of their last 11 contests. Good Luck to ya ODDS
Akron has been my "go against" team all year. I have played them every week and they have treated me to a 7-3 record since they have only covered ATS 3 out of their 10 contests. After the game tonight, I am hoping that will be 3 out of their last 11 contests. Good Luck to ya ODDS
0
Quote Originally Posted by locknload2010:
Akron has been my "go against" team all year. I have played them every week and they have treated me to a 7-3 record since they have only covered ATS 3 out of their 10 contests. After the game tonight, I am hoping that will be 3 out of their last 11 contests. Good Luck to ya ODDS
You are aware that Zac Dysert is out 4-6 weeks, right?
I am now if what you say is true. I stated this below in my weekly thread...
Some updated news on Zac Dysert status for the game from someone would be excellent all i know right now is he took a big hit last game that surely injured his ribs. However if he cant go the freshman Austin Boucher will be ready to go as i know his stats are breif but still promissing as he's 11 for 14 on the season for 130yards and 1 td. That looks like a arm that can get these young talented recievers the ball against that horrible pass defense. I really dont expect a true update on Dysert until some time before the game though....
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoosedAgain:
You are aware that Zac Dysert is out 4-6 weeks, right?
I am now if what you say is true. I stated this below in my weekly thread...
Some updated news on Zac Dysert status for the game from someone would be excellent all i know right now is he took a big hit last game that surely injured his ribs. However if he cant go the freshman Austin Boucher will be ready to go as i know his stats are breif but still promissing as he's 11 for 14 on the season for 130yards and 1 td. That looks like a arm that can get these young talented recievers the ball against that horrible pass defense. I really dont expect a true update on Dysert until some time before the game though....
You are aware that Zac Dysert is out 4-6 weeks, right?
Just now reading that he is out for the game through some updates on the net. Just woke up to hear some conformation's of this. No worries for me the as that seems to be one of main reasons for the line movement as this was expected...
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoosedAgain:
You are aware that Zac Dysert is out 4-6 weeks, right?
Just now reading that he is out for the game through some updates on the net. Just woke up to hear some conformation's of this. No worries for me the as that seems to be one of main reasons for the line movement as this was expected...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.