Hello again freaks, sickos and degenerates.![]()
Time for NCAA football. Last year was a good one. Too bad that doesnt count for anything now. DOCUMENTED 0-0 as we type this. Let's get to work. ![]()
Intrepid staff member FREDDY will provide his CRACK PIPE SPECIALS - A Covers tradition - like the Masters on CBS - but without Jim Nance making you puke talking about the majesty of the false front on #14. Our very own HOT CARL will deal his HOT CARL ALERTS for those who like it steamy and a bit creepy. ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Let's have fun and dominate.
Louisiana Tech +7.5
LT has the continuity advantage at QB and are coming off a very successful season. This game clearly means more to LT (knock off a big name school) as opposed to T AM who has bigger fish to fry including Florida next week. Sure AM wants to win - no shit - but you cant be 100% jacked for every game. Can they just roll their helmets on the field and win by essentially double digits? Dont know. Maybe. LT has an experience offense, great special teams, a possible home field adv, and have a new JUCO NT that should help plug the middle. AM will score and should get better as the season goes on. Just not sure about week one.
FIRESIDE CHAT WITH MEGALOCKS
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
"Texas AM will cover because they have better athletes"
Ok - here is a list of teams that they covered against in the last 3 years that you could argue had "better athletes".
Boise (twice)
LSU
S Miss (twice)
Miss St
Ole Miss
Houston
Ironically - they have been destroyed by Navy twice and that would be a team in theory whose "athletes" would be worse.
So yes - AM may cover. They may win by 20+. The reality is that when handicapping any game - "athletes matter" - but you always have to consider the PRICE (pointspread). We have the fair line at 4. If it was a pick em - sure - we would grab AM and the better "athletes" all things being equal. But this is football - not a friggin decathalon.
MEGA







