All Forums | College Football

I come in here once a year to post THE BIG 1 for Rutgers.Well, THE BIG 1 is HERE!Michigan@Rutgers

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 17971
Posts: 152
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 662
Posted: #76
On Rutgers as well
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 5418
Posted: #77
Played your Rutgers pick.Better hit or I'm pulling out a can.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 326
Posted: #78
 We need some luck.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 3008
Posted: #79
Damn  



When I saw so many others in the forum posting this play I had a bad feeling.  Bounce back dude.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 59
Posted: #80
missed xp doing us in
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 3008
Posted: #81
WILL THEY KICK A FIELD GOAL OR RUN OUT THE CLOCK????
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 11316
Posted: #82
not sure how that wasn't overturned that was clearly a catch, took two steps and then hit the ground ball came out out of bounds....plus michigan had to call a time out and then lost the challenge losing the last timeout.   that was fuking awful, horrible horrible call
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 164
Posted: #83
^^^^u won person
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 11316
Posted: #84
another error...false start/penalty on offense stops the clock
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 3008
Posted: #85
Wow they won't score, we are still going to lose
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1406
Posted: #86
bad luck
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 9041
Posted: #87
Very bad beat. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 279
Posted: #88
What a friggin joke
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2010
Posts: 326
Posted: #89
What pisses me off the line was -2 and I waited thinking it would go lower 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 12653
Posted: #90
Quote Originally Posted by 714cuzzin:

sorry brother.   michigan take care of business this week..

wow. sorry brother. Great Write up though
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 26913
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by KingRGIII:

Very bad beat. 


cover in doubt for michigan backers for maybe 8 minutes all game and complaining of a bad beat for rutgers

only on covers
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #92
Guys, 

I can't tell you how livid I am. When they missed that extra point early, I knew, with the teams this evenly matched, I was in big trouble.

I only hope some of you guys jumped on this at 2 when it hit that number on Friday and pushed.

They are tearing down the fu**** goalposts in Piscataway with Rutgers first big ten win ever as I saw all week happening, and I lost...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 11316
Posted: #93
Quote Originally Posted by KingRGIII:

Very bad beat. 

not covering rutgers -2.5/3 is far from a bad beat
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 297
Posted: #94
I was going to take Rutgers -2.5 until I seen this thread and seen everybody and their mother thinking it was a "lock"....there's no such thing as a sure thing.
MICHIGAN +2.5 sooo sweeeet.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 19420
Posted: #95
keep up the good work scalabrine much rather read a thoughtful analysis than a handful of darts, right play missed outcome it happens...look forward to NBA season, keep your head up
undertaker
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2001
Posts: 85256
Posted: #96
WHAT A ROYAL FUKKING!!! two failed extra points DROWNS the Rutgers -2 1/2!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 297
Posted: #97
The "right play" is the play that hits, that's why its graded that way.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 2341
Posted: #98
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:

Guys, 

I can't tell you how livid I am. When they missed that extra point early, I knew, with the teams this evenly matched, I was in big trouble.

I only hope some of you guys jumped on this at 2 when it hit that number on Friday and pushed.

They are tearing down the fu**** goalposts in Piscataway with Rutgers first big ten win ever as I saw all week happening, and I lost...

?you thought the game would be so close that a missed extra point might be the difference, but made this a big play anyway?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #99
Quote Originally Posted by VegasVandal:



cover in doubt for michigan backers for maybe 8 minutes all game and complaining of a bad beat for rutgers

only on covers

Lol. As though a .5 lead on the spread is not 'in doubt'.

Michigan trailed for all but about 5 minutes in this game and Rutgers had a 9 pt lead with 5 minutes. 

You are a fool if you think this wasn't a bad beat and sat there with your feet up and a .5 cover which shouldn't of even existed since missed extra pts giving MICH. a cover in the end are about as rare as a Sasquatch sighting.

Bottom line: I waited till this line got under 3 for a reason and a missed extra pt was the difference. Rutgers won as I saw it and I had to swallow the 2.5. Had no choice.

I'd love to see your definition of a bad beat if that isn't one.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by smarterthanyou:

?you thought the game would be so close that a missed extra point might be the difference, but made this a big play anyway?


Yes, I knew it would be close. 

A line move from 3 to 2.5 is GIGANTIC. The overwhelming majority of all games if close, land on the FG spread. 
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.