Just curious, did the line movement on the game factor in at all? I've noticed that following the line movement has been pretty accurate so far this bowl season.
The line movement on UNC side would have gotten you a loss if you bet it late. The late movement also would have gotten you a loss on the LSU side. Nebraska was a big line movement & won easily & so was a few other games. Line movements can be tricky when you use them solely to bet a game.
Just curious, did the line movement on the game factor in at all? I've noticed that following the line movement has been pretty accurate so far this bowl season.
The line movement on UNC side would have gotten you a loss if you bet it late. The late movement also would have gotten you a loss on the LSU side. Nebraska was a big line movement & won easily & so was a few other games. Line movements can be tricky when you use them solely to bet a game.
The line movement on UNC side would have gotten you a loss if you bet it late. The late movement also would have gotten you a loss on the LSU side. Nebraska was a big line movement & won easily & so was a few other games. Line movements can be tricky when you use them solely to bet a game.
You can throw LSU/Nebraska in there as well. LSU was +2.5 for a couple of weeks. Then right before kickoff they dropped to as low as -1.5 in some places. Of course the +2.5 (or better) was a winner. Everything else, not so much.
The line movement on UNC side would have gotten you a loss if you bet it late. The late movement also would have gotten you a loss on the LSU side. Nebraska was a big line movement & won easily & so was a few other games. Line movements can be tricky when you use them solely to bet a game.
You can throw LSU/Nebraska in there as well. LSU was +2.5 for a couple of weeks. Then right before kickoff they dropped to as low as -1.5 in some places. Of course the +2.5 (or better) was a winner. Everything else, not so much.
The line movement on UNC side would have gotten you a loss if you bet it late. The late movement also would have gotten you a loss on the LSU side. Nebraska was a big line movement & won easily & so was a few other games. Line movements can be tricky when you use them solely to bet a game.
That's why i said was it a factor. Of course one should never make a wager based on movement alone, at least someone with some sense.
The line movement on UNC side would have gotten you a loss if you bet it late. The late movement also would have gotten you a loss on the LSU side. Nebraska was a big line movement & won easily & so was a few other games. Line movements can be tricky when you use them solely to bet a game.
That's why i said was it a factor. Of course one should never make a wager based on movement alone, at least someone with some sense.
The line movement on UNC side would have gotten you a loss if you bet it late. The late movement also would have gotten you a loss on the LSU side. Nebraska was a big line movement & won easily & so was a few other games. Line movements can be tricky when you use them solely to bet a game.
The line movement on UNC side would have gotten you a loss if you bet it late. The late movement also would have gotten you a loss on the LSU side. Nebraska was a big line movement & won easily & so was a few other games. Line movements can be tricky when you use them solely to bet a game.
That's why i said was it a factor. Of course one should never make a wager based on movement alone, at least someone with some sense.
I agree. I believe the movement on a dog is more important than a move on a favorite knowing the public likes to bet the favorites.
That's why i said was it a factor. Of course one should never make a wager based on movement alone, at least someone with some sense.
I agree. I believe the movement on a dog is more important than a move on a favorite knowing the public likes to bet the favorites.
Thats seems like a really logical statement.
Like G-Tech take the side and over, Iowa side and under.
Thats seems like a really logical statement.
Like G-Tech take the side and over, Iowa side and under.
Preparing to play an option team like GT is very problematic during the regular season when you have to, for an example, prepare for a spread offense one week, and then alter your entire defensive philosophy the following week to play a GT-style option attack, and then switch back again the following week.
However, when you have a team with a front-7 as good as Iowa, and give them a month to prepare for the option attack and the cut-blocking schemes, I think the advantage pendulum swings heavily in favor of the defense. That's exactly what happen last year when GT faced LSU after LSU's defense had almost a month to prepare.
For that reason I believe Iowa will be successful in slowing down the GT attack and, accordingly, will be low scoring affair.
Same things were said about the Navy and Air Force games and look what happened in those games.
Preparing to play an option team like GT is very problematic during the regular season when you have to, for an example, prepare for a spread offense one week, and then alter your entire defensive philosophy the following week to play a GT-style option attack, and then switch back again the following week.
However, when you have a team with a front-7 as good as Iowa, and give them a month to prepare for the option attack and the cut-blocking schemes, I think the advantage pendulum swings heavily in favor of the defense. That's exactly what happen last year when GT faced LSU after LSU's defense had almost a month to prepare.
For that reason I believe Iowa will be successful in slowing down the GT attack and, accordingly, will be low scoring affair.
Same things were said about the Navy and Air Force games and look what happened in those games.
Same things were said about the Navy and Air Force games and look what happened in those games.
Same things were said about the Navy and Air Force games and look what happened in those games.
Same things were said about the Navy and Air Force games and look what happened in those games.
The difference was that I bet ON Air Force and Navy. ![]()
No seriously I think the difference is that a) Missouri and Houston did not have a month to prepare, and b) Missouri and Houston are both weak in the trenches. I properly prefaced my comments by saying when you have a team with a [strong] front 7" which Iowa does.
I'm not sayin' I'll be right, but that's just how I see it.
![]()
Same things were said about the Navy and Air Force games and look what happened in those games.
The difference was that I bet ON Air Force and Navy. ![]()
No seriously I think the difference is that a) Missouri and Houston did not have a month to prepare, and b) Missouri and Houston are both weak in the trenches. I properly prefaced my comments by saying when you have a team with a [strong] front 7" which Iowa does.
I'm not sayin' I'll be right, but that's just how I see it.
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.