All Forums | College Football

Forum Consensus Picks Week 13

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 17309
Posts: 132
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 196
Posted: #101

Manifesto, thanks for all your hard work again.  Keep it up.

Buffalo winner !!!!!

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 713
Posted: #102
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 713
Posted: #103
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

should add train 69...hes awesome
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3823
Posted: #104
bump
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2984
Posted: #105
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 5914
Posted: #106
BOL today...On whoever you bet.......Dogg
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 763
Posted: #107
Final Week 13 Consensus Picks:
 
Boise St -6
Mississippi +5  
Rutgers -17
Clemson -2.5
 
** Information Only:
 
Tulsa -28 (3 cappers)
Pittsburgh +5 (3 cappers)
Purdue -10 (3 cappers)
UNLV (3 cappers)
Oklahoma -6.5 (6 cappers, 1 on Tech)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 2619
Posted: #108
Already have Boise St -7 and Miss. +5. Jumping on Rutgers. Also have Vandy... Thanks for all your effort manifesto. It is appreciated...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 196
Posted: #109
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 3960
Posted: #110
nice work manifesto
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 3379
Posted: #111
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #112
I'm pretty sure if 6 cappers are on a game it should be a play regardless if 1 isnt. 6-1 is better than 4-0 in my opinion
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 763
Posted: #113
Quote Originally Posted by bibendi23:

I'm pretty sure if 6 cappers are on a game it should be a play regardless if 1 isnt. 6-1 is better than 4-0 in my opinion

bendi, I agree with you.   but, I have used the same system for 5 weeks now so I am hesitant to change it...and personally, I like Tech in this game....small ML bet....anything could happen in this game.   I did hear an interesting stat yesterday though.  Stoops is 55 - 2 at home, but they have only played a team ranked in the top 10 twice in that time, although they did win both those games...I just think OUs performance in big national TV games has been spotty the last four years, and Tech is battle tested after the last two games even though they played them at home....

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 16886
Posted: #114
Much respect for all of these cappers, how do you determine who is on your list?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2332
Posted: #115
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 763
Posted: #116
Final Week 13 Consensus Picks:
 
Boise St -6
Mississippi +5  
Rutgers -17 
Clemson -2.5
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 763
Posted: #117
Final Week 13 Consensus Picks:
 
Boise St -6
Mississippi +5  
Rutgers -17 
Clemson -2.5
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 88
Posted: #118
One bad thing with tech is that those two big wins where in lubbock, be interested to see if they can get it done away from home in a tough enviroment
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 188
Posted: #119
Manifesto.  Appreciate your work and the work of the cappers.  While I don't pull verbatim from this list I definitely use it as a sounding board.  Of course the several games I didn't take I sure wish I would have after the fact...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 53
Posted: #120
great job so far.
 
we gotta start doing this for NCAA BB when football is over
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 33
Posted: #121
Quote Originally Posted by Yanicus:

great job so far.
 
we gotta start doing this for NCAA BB when football is over

i have to tell you its damn near impossible. i tried to start doing it with NBA, but its a big difference in games every week and every day. i in NO WAY am "belittling" what manifesto has done, as it is awesome and much appreciated. But i know very few people who have time to sit and refresh the forum all day, every day, and put together this consensus.

again, thanks so much to manifesto

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 88
Posted: #122
4-0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 baby
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 2748
Posted: #123
Damnit I rode UNLV and UNC too.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 527
Posted: #124
 how did i let anyone talk me into laying DD with UNLV on the road without their QB???  but the other picks were pretty solid... Manifesto you have put together a nice little "system" here... props to the cappers... i almost never tail, so i can only blame myself for the godawful UNLV pick...
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4417
Posted: #125
I did the same thing, LOBOS -
Had a great day going, and laid the wood with UNLV-
oh well, it was a helluva ride.

GREAT WORK  MANIFESTO!
You're $$$
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.