I don't like very many of the top consensus plays either Tress
Like 'em or hate 'em, they are what they are. In general, I think that any consensus (aka the average) always drifts towards average results. Get a room full of twenty people making a business decision and they generally make the safe choice. Dynamic choices (right or wrong) generally come from individuals. That said, you cannot argue with the consensus picks from last season. I never played them. But they came through.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Whodeysb09:
I don't like very many of the top consensus plays either Tress
Like 'em or hate 'em, they are what they are. In general, I think that any consensus (aka the average) always drifts towards average results. Get a room full of twenty people making a business decision and they generally make the safe choice. Dynamic choices (right or wrong) generally come from individuals. That said, you cannot argue with the consensus picks from last season. I never played them. But they came through.
If you really want to bet on Greg Paulus, covering a college football game after not playing for 5 years, you sir have to be an idiot. I loved the game as soon as i saw Minny -6 ( before they announced he was starting), now that Paulus is starting i'd take it up to -14, its that simple. Paulus at bare minimum will throw 3 picks.
0
If you really want to bet on Greg Paulus, covering a college football game after not playing for 5 years, you sir have to be an idiot. I loved the game as soon as i saw Minny -6 ( before they announced he was starting), now that Paulus is starting i'd take it up to -14, its that simple. Paulus at bare minimum will throw 3 picks.
I can tell you I will be going against your top 3 consensus picks...and that LSU line is waaaaaaayyyy off.
Festo's back!! Much clown love festo!
Jim: Let me ask you this If florida was playing @ Wash what do you think the line would be? 27, 28, maybe 29 or more
My point is LSU has VASTLY superior athletes. Period. You could argue they're every bit as talented as florida (sans tebow). So why do you think -17 is bullshit? The game will be something like 42-17 only because the second teamers will be in for LSU by the start of the fourth and may give up a late TD.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jim_Tressel:
I can tell you I will be going against your top 3 consensus picks...and that LSU line is waaaaaaayyyy off.
Festo's back!! Much clown love festo!
Jim: Let me ask you this If florida was playing @ Wash what do you think the line would be? 27, 28, maybe 29 or more
My point is LSU has VASTLY superior athletes. Period. You could argue they're every bit as talented as florida (sans tebow). So why do you think -17 is bullshit? The game will be something like 42-17 only because the second teamers will be in for LSU by the start of the fourth and may give up a late TD.
keep firin festo - dont let anybody get you down, with ?'s of line movement and such - do like you did last year,,the forum is thankful for your work--as is--now,,lets get that cheddar
0
keep firin festo - dont let anybody get you down, with ?'s of line movement and such - do like you did last year,,the forum is thankful for your work--as is--now,,lets get that cheddar
Jim: Let me ask you this If florida was playing @ Wash what do you think the line would be? 27, 28, maybe 29 or more
My point is LSU has VASTLY superior athletes. Period. You could argue they're every bit as talented as florida (sans tebow). So why do you think -17 is bullshit? The game will be something like 42-17 only because the second teamers will be in for LSU by the start of the fourth and may give up a late TD.
I meant the line of them at -15 is off...not sure where people got that line.
I think LSU wins...just not by double digits.
I think the lines are VERY sharp this year for the first week and we will see a lot of dogs cover.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fortyTWO:
Festo's back!! Much clown love festo!
Jim: Let me ask you this If florida was playing @ Wash what do you think the line would be? 27, 28, maybe 29 or more
My point is LSU has VASTLY superior athletes. Period. You could argue they're every bit as talented as florida (sans tebow). So why do you think -17 is bullshit? The game will be something like 42-17 only because the second teamers will be in for LSU by the start of the fourth and may give up a late TD.
I meant the line of them at -15 is off...not sure where people got that line.
I think LSU wins...just not by double digits.
I think the lines are VERY sharp this year for the first week and we will see a lot of dogs cover.
Like 'em or hate 'em, they are what they are. In general, I think that any consensus (aka the average) always drifts towards average results. Get a room full of twenty people making a business decision and they generally make the safe choice. Dynamic choices (right or wrong) generally come from individuals. That said, you cannot argue with the consensus picks from last season. I never played them. But they came through.
I completely understand what your saying. Although I don't think any of those plays are safe plays. No play is safe no matter how you like it. Penn State is the only one I agree with. I'm one of the cappers on this list by the way
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skipster:
Like 'em or hate 'em, they are what they are. In general, I think that any consensus (aka the average) always drifts towards average results. Get a room full of twenty people making a business decision and they generally make the safe choice. Dynamic choices (right or wrong) generally come from individuals. That said, you cannot argue with the consensus picks from last season. I never played them. But they came through.
I completely understand what your saying. Although I don't think any of those plays are safe plays. No play is safe no matter how you like it. Penn State is the only one I agree with. I'm one of the cappers on this list by the way
Yeah, I got you Whodey. I don't much care for the list either, but that's not the point. the list is the list. Last year, it worked. I won't be playing them this year either. Maybe I'll be wrong again.
0
Yeah, I got you Whodey. I don't much care for the list either, but that's not the point. the list is the list. Last year, it worked. I won't be playing them this year either. Maybe I'll be wrong again.
Yeah, I got you Whodey. I don't much care for the list either, but that's not the point. the list is the list. Last year, it worked. I won't be playing them this year either. Maybe I'll be wrong again.
I'll never play this list
Ever...some of my plays might show up on the list, but as far as blindly tailing this list I won't do it. To much pride and a little bit of confidence in myself. To do your own work and when is much sweeter than taking someone elses..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skipster:
Yeah, I got you Whodey. I don't much care for the list either, but that's not the point. the list is the list. Last year, it worked. I won't be playing them this year either. Maybe I'll be wrong again.
I'll never play this list
Ever...some of my plays might show up on the list, but as far as blindly tailing this list I won't do it. To much pride and a little bit of confidence in myself. To do your own work and when is much sweeter than taking someone elses..
Personally, I'll steal stuff blatantly if the poster makes a great point about a game. A win is a win. The point is to steal the good ones and leave the crap behind.
0
I trust you're not above stealing ideas, though.
Personally, I'll steal stuff blatantly if the poster makes a great point about a game. A win is a win. The point is to steal the good ones and leave the crap behind.
Personally, I'll steal stuff blatantly if the poster makes a great point about a game. A win is a win. The point is to steal the good ones and leave the crap behind.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skipster:
I trust you're not above stealing ideas, though.
Personally, I'll steal stuff blatantly if the poster makes a great point about a game. A win is a win. The point is to steal the good ones and leave the crap behind.
I am going to post the lines as the current Covers line to avoid any confusion. Note that the cappers likely have locked in at different lines, sometimes dramatically different because so many games have been available for week 1 betting so early.
Consensus Picks (9/1/2009)
LSU -17 (4)
Minnesota -6.5 (5)
Oregon +4 (5)
Penn St. -27 (5)
Information Only:
Arizona -14 (3)
Colorado -10.5 (3)
Illinois -7 (3)
Kentucky -14 (3)
Michigan -10.5 (3)
NC St -4 (3)
Nebraska -21.5 (3)
Stanford -17 (3)
Texas -41 (3)
Troy -6.5 (3)
UAB -6 (3)
0
I am going to post the lines as the current Covers line to avoid any confusion. Note that the cappers likely have locked in at different lines, sometimes dramatically different because so many games have been available for week 1 betting so early.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.