All Forums | College Football

BOWL SEASON

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 94241
Posts: 465
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 2566
Posted: #76

how do u justify putting 250 on byu but 5 dimes on tex?  not talking abt the plays, rather the lack of $ mgmt.  1-1 u could go -52.5 units.  this is downright kelso-esque.

(kiddies, this is not the way u manage a bank.  gl)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #77
Quote Originally Posted by Faber_Guy:

how do u justify putting 250 on byu but 5 dimes on tex?  not talking abt the plays, rather the lack of $ mgmt.  1-1 u could go -52.5 units.  this is downright kelso-esque.

(kiddies, this is not the way u manage a bank.  gl)

 

Your seriously going to sit here and and try and lecture me abount money management?

 

Get lost and ride the Tide to the poor house...

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 61
Posted: #78
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

 

Your seriously going to sit here and and try and lecture me abount money management?

 

 

LOL hillarious, thx for all the hard work UNC, def with u on the Longhorns...

Get lost and ride the Tide to the poor house...

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 26036
Posted: #79
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 65
Posted: #80
did you not see the guys bankroll....   money management at its best IMO.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3037
Posted: #81

 Congrats on a profitable regular season.  Wish I could say the same  but hope to swing back up bowling .

 

 BOL UNC

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3037
Posted: #82

Love Zona, Air Force, Troy and Texas plays.

I'd tread lightly on the Buckeyes, motivation will be through the roof as an underdog in the Rose Bowl for the first time since '97, but I think the offense could still have issues.  If the Buckeyes get the running game going early they might be ok but we made Michigan's Defense look pretty good and that wasn't easy to do this year.

 BOL

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 38795
Posted: #83

GL this Bowl Season!!!!

T-9

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2002
Posts: 1285
Posted: #84
 we are on the same page so far
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #85

Change of plans buying off and playing SMU now and I bought it back up to 14. Hope this doesnt bite me in the ass...

 

Hawaii Bowl

SMU +14 (10U)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1641
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by lastsecondcover:


I mean its really not hard to read. The post right above yours he has bets on BYU and the under in that game and then you ask for his insight. 

I usually don't come in people's threads and defend them but when someone posts stuff like this I just really wonder if they even try to do any work on their own.
Dude, Texashunter chimed in as well.  Reasonable questions, imo.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 124
Posted: #87

You got a O State/BYU pick unc? after all youve done for me in cbb figure i might as well see your opinion on this one!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 124
Posted: #88
wow my bad buddy missed page 3
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 5414
Posted: #89
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

Change of plans buying off and playing SMU now and I bought it back up to 14. Hope this doesnt bite me in the ass...

 

Hawaii Bowl

SMU +14 (10U)



Hey bro, this line dropped to SMU +12.5, so could this be a "headfake" --  since it dropped 3 days before the actual game??
I'm leaning to Nevada -12.5 now, cause of this line movement.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 5414
Posted: #90
ok, this is probably not a "headfake".  The line dropped  cause Nevada's top RB won't play in this game due to academic reasons, but I still can see Nevada covering 12.5 pts, as the 2 RB's that will play in this game had pretty sweet numbers when they did play.  Plus, SMU won't have that much video on these backup RB guys, so they won't be able to scout these RB's too well.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 249
Posted: #91
BOL UNC!!!  GREAT SEASON! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2
Posted: #92
Nice work so far UNC. Keep it going
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 600
Posted: #93
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:

Change of plans buying off and playing SMU now and I bought it back up to 14. Hope this doesnt bite me in the ass...

 

Hawaii Bowl

SMU +14 (10U)

I hope you are right UNC. Go Ponies!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 359
Posted: #94
Top two runners are out...Lippincott and Taua are both out, one for academics and one from a surgery

UNC definitely got the best of the line which is all you can ask for.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 359
Posted: #95
Before I get called out on it I meant top two running backs, 2 of their top rushers as the QB Kaepernick is their second leading rusher
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 3654
Posted: #96
Quote Originally Posted by Faber_Guy:

how do u justify putting 250 on byu but 5 dimes on tex?  not talking abt the plays, rather the lack of $ mgmt.  1-1 u could go -52.5 units.  this is downright kelso-esque.

(kiddies, this is not the way u manage a bank.  gl)




I think if u knew how much bills this bruddah UNC is up, maybe u would sit back take his picks to the bank, and take notes on this guy that knows how to cap games and bet them. Maybe then you would know who a real gambler is.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 34
Posted: #97
I SUCK SO BAD NEED HELP FAST

This is my bowl season 1st week
** Fresno St. -12   & over 55           L  W
Central Florida +3  & over 46          L  W    
So Miss. -3.5                                L
Oregon St. -2.5                             L
Utah +3.5
** Nevada -14   over 73
???Ohio -3 vs. Marshall???
???North Carolina -2.5 vs. Pittsburgh???
***USC -8
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #98
Las Vegas Bowl

BYU +3 (2.5U)

BYU U 59 (2.5U)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #99

BOWL SEASON 3-2

NCAAF YTD: 144-131-5 (+116.79U)

 

Pending

Hawaii Bowl

SMU +14 (10U)

Meineke Car Care Bowl

UNC +3 (5U)

Emerald Bowl

BC/USC U 44.5 (2.5U)

Holiday Bowl

ZONA -1 (30U)

Armed Forces Bowl

AIR FORCE +4 (30U)

Fiesta Bowl

TCU -7 (30U)

GMAC BOWL

TROY +4 (30U)

NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP

TEX +5 (50U)

TEX ML +175 (20U)

 

Other 6 games I am looking at and will add anything else the day of...

PENN ST

OHIO ST

FSU

CIN

IOWA

OLE MISS

 

 

May have something on the CAL game close to kickoff...
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 62
Posted: #100

UNC ive been tailing you for a while now and you have made me a good amount of money. Being a bama fan, I hate seeing you take Texas. Im not so worried about you taking the points, but rather you believing they will win it outright. Care to give me any reasoning?

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.