Posted:
#26
Quote Originally Posted by Capodecina:
The Ravens part I am not too sold on.....If that ref throws a flag (it was a penalty) on 4th down, SF has first and goal at the 1 and more than likely punches it in with Frank Gore
The Ravens part I am not too sold on.....If that ref throws a flag (it was a penalty) on 4th down, SF has first and goal at the 1 and more than likely punches it in with Frank Gore
We can talk about "What if's" about that game all night long
Yeah the ref throws a flag.and SF punches it in with Frank Gore. ...and I still cover Ravens +4.5. You always bet more on the spread..than ML. Besides there were 3 plays the math model produced.1 Spread 2. ML and 3. Teaser Baltimore +11.5 over 40
We can talk about what if's all night long about that game.
What if ...after Frank Gore more than likely punches it in and then Baltimore with 1:50 left in the game ..more than likely drives the field and scores a FG with their all-pro kicker? Then that penalty doesn't mean a thing. Baltimore still wins.The way Baltimore was torching SF secondary... they could have easily drove down and accomplished that in less than a minute.
The fact of the matter is what the math model said about the game. Baltimore not only covered the game they won SU.
- The storms will come, the storms will pass -
0
......what seizes to amaze me is that people think that if it ( penalty) was called, SF scores the TD and wins the game? Bull Sh*t. What makes them think that Balty doesnt run a TD back or drive the field and their all pro FG kicker puts it between the uprights ie Vinatari. Baltimore owned SF that night and the SF backers will whine all year about the "What if's"
Hot Forum Topics
