Took a few days off but I'm still slumping. Lone win came on a second half total play and I badly whiffed on two of the three sides. Situational cappers like myself are struggling with these razor-sharp lines. Kudos to those who play the most "obvious" crap on the board.
January is around the corner...
Anyway...
Montana -3 (1 unit) Buying low here. Really, really low. Will Cherry made his long-awaited return last game in the 2OT loss to South Dakota State but was clearly not yet his Big Sky Player of the Year self. Now, in his second game back, he'll go up against a Northern Arizona team that has already equaled its Big Sky win total from last season (One). On paper, the normally-stifling Montana defense appears to have taken a precipitous fall. A portion of this is attributable to Cherry's absence, but it also is a consequence of playing the 11th best collection of offenses (per KenPom). Among its six Division 1 opponents, Montana has faced Colorado State (#30), BYU (#78), South Dakota State (#51), and Idaho (#98). Tinkle's group has also struggled in the rebounding department, but they'll face an NAU frontline that has no size outside of 6'8 Max Jacobsen. The Northern Arizona offense is summed up with one name: Gabe Rogers. He's taken 36% of NAU's shots (6th highest rate in the country) but has traditionally struggled against Tinkle's defense. In the last three meetings, he's shot 4/16, 7/19, and 2/6. Tinkle mentioned that they have had success shutting down his production. NAU is getting a surprising amount of mileage out of tiny 5'10 freshman Dewayne Russell, though I wonder how he will fare against the perimeter size of Montana.
In reality, with Cherry close to being fully back in the fold, Montana has three of the top six or seven players in the conference. They more than held their own in Cherry's absence, posting prolific three-point numbers (40.4%, #12) and free throws (75.0%, #34). Do they completely click here and run NAU off the court? I doubt it, but this number in the preseason would have been Montana -9/-10. Too much value to pass up.
Took a few days off but I'm still slumping. Lone win came on a second half total play and I badly whiffed on two of the three sides. Situational cappers like myself are struggling with these razor-sharp lines. Kudos to those who play the most "obvious" crap on the board.
January is around the corner...
Anyway...
Montana -3 (1 unit) Buying low here. Really, really low. Will Cherry made his long-awaited return last game in the 2OT loss to South Dakota State but was clearly not yet his Big Sky Player of the Year self. Now, in his second game back, he'll go up against a Northern Arizona team that has already equaled its Big Sky win total from last season (One). On paper, the normally-stifling Montana defense appears to have taken a precipitous fall. A portion of this is attributable to Cherry's absence, but it also is a consequence of playing the 11th best collection of offenses (per KenPom). Among its six Division 1 opponents, Montana has faced Colorado State (#30), BYU (#78), South Dakota State (#51), and Idaho (#98). Tinkle's group has also struggled in the rebounding department, but they'll face an NAU frontline that has no size outside of 6'8 Max Jacobsen. The Northern Arizona offense is summed up with one name: Gabe Rogers. He's taken 36% of NAU's shots (6th highest rate in the country) but has traditionally struggled against Tinkle's defense. In the last three meetings, he's shot 4/16, 7/19, and 2/6. Tinkle mentioned that they have had success shutting down his production. NAU is getting a surprising amount of mileage out of tiny 5'10 freshman Dewayne Russell, though I wonder how he will fare against the perimeter size of Montana.
In reality, with Cherry close to being fully back in the fold, Montana has three of the top six or seven players in the conference. They more than held their own in Cherry's absence, posting prolific three-point numbers (40.4%, #12) and free throws (75.0%, #34). Do they completely click here and run NAU off the court? I doubt it, but this number in the preseason would have been Montana -9/-10. Too much value to pass up.
West Virginia -11 (1 unit) I'll keep this simple. Read the two articles posted below. When you're done reading those, consider that Oakland has the worst (yes, #347) 2pt percentage defense in the country. If there's a game where WVU's inept perimeter shooting doesn't matter, this is it.
I'm more than happy to throw a few bucks at a furious Bob Huggins. Likely first half play, too.
West Virginia -11 (1 unit) I'll keep this simple. Read the two articles posted below. When you're done reading those, consider that Oakland has the worst (yes, #347) 2pt percentage defense in the country. If there's a game where WVU's inept perimeter shooting doesn't matter, this is it.
I'm more than happy to throw a few bucks at a furious Bob Huggins. Likely first half play, too.
Illinois St is +5 now. I have been eyeing this one for since it opened.
LMU is a lean for sure but Ole Miss should own the paint. If LMU knocks down their 3PT's they have a chance to win. Ole Miss schedule has been terrible.
Great stuff on Montana! That number is now -2.5.
Big night for you tonight!
0
Illinois St is +5 now. I have been eyeing this one for since it opened.
LMU is a lean for sure but Ole Miss should own the paint. If LMU knocks down their 3PT's they have a chance to win. Ole Miss schedule has been terrible.
Illinois St is +5 now. I have been eyeing this one for since it opened.
LMU is a lean for sure but Ole Miss should own the paint. If LMU knocks down their 3PT's they have a chance to win. Ole Miss schedule has been terrible.
Great stuff on Montana! That number is now -2.5.
Big night for you tonight!
LMU schedule hasnt been much better and defense isnt close to as good as Ole Miss. Ole miss rolls. GL though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by YACKER:
Illinois St is +5 now. I have been eyeing this one for since it opened.
LMU is a lean for sure but Ole Miss should own the paint. If LMU knocks down their 3PT's they have a chance to win. Ole Miss schedule has been terrible.
Great stuff on Montana! That number is now -2.5.
Big night for you tonight!
LMU schedule hasnt been much better and defense isnt close to as good as Ole Miss. Ole miss rolls. GL though.
LMU schedule hasnt been much better and defense isnt close to as good as Ole Miss. Ole miss rolls. GL though.
No doubt that LMU's SOS hasn't been much better. Ole Miss is playing away from home for only the second time this year and they lost at MTSU (pretty solid team). Taking LMU is banking on them knocking down jumpers. It is a situational spot more than anything but I don't see myself pulling the trigger unless the line continues to climb.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DjBillyr40:
LMU schedule hasnt been much better and defense isnt close to as good as Ole Miss. Ole miss rolls. GL though.
No doubt that LMU's SOS hasn't been much better. Ole Miss is playing away from home for only the second time this year and they lost at MTSU (pretty solid team). Taking LMU is banking on them knocking down jumpers. It is a situational spot more than anything but I don't see myself pulling the trigger unless the line continues to climb.
Illinois St is +5 now. I have been eyeing this one for since it opened.
LMU is a lean for sure but Ole Miss should own the paint. If LMU knocks down their 3PT's they have a chance to win. Ole Miss schedule has been terrible.
Great stuff on Montana! That number is now -2.5.
Big night for you tonight!
Yeah I'm close on ISU but may tease them up to DD's with someone else...
Marymount...tough call. Obviously it's a horrendous spot for Ole Miss and Coach Kennedy expressed some regret about scheduling the game in the first place. He wanted a "pit stop" game on the way to Hawaii but may have made a big blunder. As you said, though, LMU has nothing inside, and if the shots aren't falling, game is a rout. I've had enough of jump-shooting teams over the last few weeks.
It is worth nothing, though, that the game will be ending at 1:00 A.M. east coast time. LSU wasn't fazed by it last night. We'll see if it affects Ole Miss.
0
Quote Originally Posted by YACKER:
Illinois St is +5 now. I have been eyeing this one for since it opened.
LMU is a lean for sure but Ole Miss should own the paint. If LMU knocks down their 3PT's they have a chance to win. Ole Miss schedule has been terrible.
Great stuff on Montana! That number is now -2.5.
Big night for you tonight!
Yeah I'm close on ISU but may tease them up to DD's with someone else...
Marymount...tough call. Obviously it's a horrendous spot for Ole Miss and Coach Kennedy expressed some regret about scheduling the game in the first place. He wanted a "pit stop" game on the way to Hawaii but may have made a big blunder. As you said, though, LMU has nothing inside, and if the shots aren't falling, game is a rout. I've had enough of jump-shooting teams over the last few weeks.
It is worth nothing, though, that the game will be ending at 1:00 A.M. east coast time. LSU wasn't fazed by it last night. We'll see if it affects Ole Miss.
JFen is a situtional capper. Conference play tends to create many opportunities for that type of capping. Also history tends to repeat itself during conference play year after year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by hawk007:
Jen
U mention Jan is just around the corner.
Conference play, is that when u rake?
JFen is a situtional capper. Conference play tends to create many opportunities for that type of capping. Also history tends to repeat itself during conference play year after year.
JFen is a situtional capper. Conference play tends to create many opportunities for that type of capping. Also history tends to repeat itself during conference play year after year.
Yep, pretty much sums it up. Evaluating teams from different conferences has never been something at which I excel.
0
Quote Originally Posted by YACKER:
JFen is a situtional capper. Conference play tends to create many opportunities for that type of capping. Also history tends to repeat itself during conference play year after year.
Yep, pretty much sums it up. Evaluating teams from different conferences has never been something at which I excel.
LOOK INTO IOWA ST -16 .... NEW MEXICO ALSO,, IM AFREAID TO TOUCH THE DAYTON GAME , ILL ST CAN STRUGGLE AT TIMES... DAYTON IS GOOD
No shot in hell I lay 16 with Iowa State heading into a 13-day layoff and a few days before Christmas. This is the most notable opponent to play @ UMKC since Wichita in '09.
New Mexico is a horrible matchup for NMSU, especially with Nephawe sidelined with an injury. This kid Bhullar is an absolute mountain of a man at 7'5 but he's going to struggle (again) with the skill of the Lobos' frontline. The spot is awful, though, with it being an enormous rivalry and immediate revenge.
Tulsa-Creighton should sail over. Creighton is in a pretty solid letdown spot after a bunch of big wins in a row (St. Joe's, @ Nebraska, Akron, @ Cal) and with a 10-day break on-tap. Big snowfall expected in Omaha tonight, so CLink will be much quieter than usual. Creighton could score with the lights off but I think it's reasonable to expect the defense to be lacking. Manning's team plays its nuts off every game and will not be afraid to push the pace.
0
Quote Originally Posted by knasty007:
LOOK INTO IOWA ST -16 .... NEW MEXICO ALSO,, IM AFREAID TO TOUCH THE DAYTON GAME , ILL ST CAN STRUGGLE AT TIMES... DAYTON IS GOOD
No shot in hell I lay 16 with Iowa State heading into a 13-day layoff and a few days before Christmas. This is the most notable opponent to play @ UMKC since Wichita in '09.
New Mexico is a horrible matchup for NMSU, especially with Nephawe sidelined with an injury. This kid Bhullar is an absolute mountain of a man at 7'5 but he's going to struggle (again) with the skill of the Lobos' frontline. The spot is awful, though, with it being an enormous rivalry and immediate revenge.
Tulsa-Creighton should sail over. Creighton is in a pretty solid letdown spot after a bunch of big wins in a row (St. Joe's, @ Nebraska, Akron, @ Cal) and with a 10-day break on-tap. Big snowfall expected in Omaha tonight, so CLink will be much quieter than usual. Creighton could score with the lights off but I think it's reasonable to expect the defense to be lacking. Manning's team plays its nuts off every game and will not be afraid to push the pace.
Tulsa-Creighton should sail over. Creighton is in a pretty solid letdown spot after a bunch of big wins in a row (St. Joe's, @ Nebraska, Akron, @ Cal) and with a 10-day break on-tap. Big snowfall expected in Omaha tonight, so CLink will be much quieter than usual. Creighton could score with the lights off but I think it's reasonable to expect the defense to be lacking. Manning's team plays its nuts off every game and will not be afraid to push the pace.
On the flip side do you see Creighton coming strong and playing hard since they have the next 10-days off? end it on a reaalllll high note?
0
Quote Originally Posted by JFen31:
Tulsa-Creighton should sail over. Creighton is in a pretty solid letdown spot after a bunch of big wins in a row (St. Joe's, @ Nebraska, Akron, @ Cal) and with a 10-day break on-tap. Big snowfall expected in Omaha tonight, so CLink will be much quieter than usual. Creighton could score with the lights off but I think it's reasonable to expect the defense to be lacking. Manning's team plays its nuts off every game and will not be afraid to push the pace.
On the flip side do you see Creighton coming strong and playing hard since they have the next 10-days off? end it on a reaalllll high note?
12/19 Final West Virginia -11 (1 unit) West Virginia 1H -6 (1 unit) Green Bay +8 (1 unit) Northern Iowa +10 (1 unit) UNC/Texas Under 140.5 (1 unit) Montana -3 (1 unit) Bama -3.5/Illy State +9.5 -120 (1 unit)
0
12/19 Final West Virginia -11 (1 unit) West Virginia 1H -6 (1 unit) Green Bay +8 (1 unit) Northern Iowa +10 (1 unit) UNC/Texas Under 140.5 (1 unit) Montana -3 (1 unit) Bama -3.5/Illy State +9.5 -120 (1 unit)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.