I've been trying to tail mollydog picks (crushes the NCAAB King of Covers contest year after year). However, his or her lines are almost always significantly better for the side he or she wants than I can manage to get. Why is there such a large discrepancy? I thought you have to get the lines from covers.com?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I've been trying to tail mollydog picks (crushes the NCAAB King of Covers contest year after year). However, his or her lines are almost always significantly better for the side he or she wants than I can manage to get. Why is there such a large discrepancy? I thought you have to get the lines from covers.com?
I've been trying to tail mollydog picks (crushes the NCAAB King of Covers contest year after year). However, his or her lines are almost always significantly better for the side he or she wants than I can manage to get. Why is there such a large discrepancy? I thought you have to get the lines from covers.com?
I think you are allowed to bet these games earlier.
He doesn't crush it he hits about 54%
But that is good enough with the volume he plays. Unless you wanna follow every pick and risk much of your bankroll you might be better with someone with a bett win % but fewer games.
1
Quote Originally Posted by huskerfan5b:
I've been trying to tail mollydog picks (crushes the NCAAB King of Covers contest year after year). However, his or her lines are almost always significantly better for the side he or she wants than I can manage to get. Why is there such a large discrepancy? I thought you have to get the lines from covers.com?
I think you are allowed to bet these games earlier.
He doesn't crush it he hits about 54%
But that is good enough with the volume he plays. Unless you wanna follow every pick and risk much of your bankroll you might be better with someone with a bett win % but fewer games.
Hot Forum Topics
