day!=Tuesday and day!=Saturday and day!=Wednesday and AF and rank<26 and rest!=6 and o:rank=None and p:line>-19 and rest<11 and season>2019 and month<3 and line<=-3 and ats streak!=-1 and ats streak<4 and o:ats streak<3 and op:points<74
plays:
Kansas St +11.5
Maryland +14.5
actually the above is guidance to fade Iowa Stats and Purdue
these away favorites are 10-35
one more thing about Maryland is they are on 7 days rest and teams on 7 days rest are 1-1 ATS using the above query. Maryland could be avoided
I will advise playing both because the win % is already at 77.8%.
my purpose when I search games is to squeeze out highs and lows from a teams past performances. For example if a team is off a huge scoring game that could continue they are rolling. If a team is trending strongly ATS their lines are not yet volatile. I have certain categories and specific parameters that are my goto and then I start looking for more eliminators.
The best queries are in the middle or have broken off after bad trends or extreme high previous trends.
Today in Purdue’s case they are trending poorly but still over valued in this case because Maryland is off a 40 point output game. Teams off less than 50 point games do well enough to consider them in every situation.
As far as the query
! exclamation point is not so excluding these conditions
day!=Tuesday is an exclusion
AF us away fav
o: is opponents , so the original focus is on the favorite. Using o: then turns it to what happened to the dog recently.
I have gone over this query and the other parts of this should be easily understood.
if you have more questions about definitions ask and I’ll respond when I have time.
It just occurred to me also the insane lines could be more points because in a lot of cases these big type of lines dogs don’t come out and dominate early.
I do approach these pregame bets with the mentality that a bigger line will show at some point, if my max investment is 1 unit I will in most cases not play a pregame 2 unit play. In some games this costs me money but in other cases I get a better line and better ROI.
Maryland being on 7 days rest could create a volatile start to the game. Of course any game could be volatile I’m not suggesting all 7 day rest teams are volatile just something I consider.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
day!=Tuesday and day!=Saturday and day!=Wednesday and AF and rank<26 and rest!=6 and o:rank=None and p:line>-19 and rest<11 and season>2019 and month<3 and line<=-3 and ats streak!=-1 and ats streak<4 and o:ats streak<3 and op:points<74
plays:
Kansas St +11.5
Maryland +14.5
actually the above is guidance to fade Iowa Stats and Purdue
these away favorites are 10-35
one more thing about Maryland is they are on 7 days rest and teams on 7 days rest are 1-1 ATS using the above query. Maryland could be avoided
I will advise playing both because the win % is already at 77.8%.
my purpose when I search games is to squeeze out highs and lows from a teams past performances. For example if a team is off a huge scoring game that could continue they are rolling. If a team is trending strongly ATS their lines are not yet volatile. I have certain categories and specific parameters that are my goto and then I start looking for more eliminators.
The best queries are in the middle or have broken off after bad trends or extreme high previous trends.
Today in Purdue’s case they are trending poorly but still over valued in this case because Maryland is off a 40 point output game. Teams off less than 50 point games do well enough to consider them in every situation.
As far as the query
! exclamation point is not so excluding these conditions
day!=Tuesday is an exclusion
AF us away fav
o: is opponents , so the original focus is on the favorite. Using o: then turns it to what happened to the dog recently.
I have gone over this query and the other parts of this should be easily understood.
if you have more questions about definitions ask and I’ll respond when I have time.
It just occurred to me also the insane lines could be more points because in a lot of cases these big type of lines dogs don’t come out and dominate early.
I do approach these pregame bets with the mentality that a bigger line will show at some point, if my max investment is 1 unit I will in most cases not play a pregame 2 unit play. In some games this costs me money but in other cases I get a better line and better ROI.
Maryland being on 7 days rest could create a volatile start to the game. Of course any game could be volatile I’m not suggesting all 7 day rest teams are volatile just something I consider.
JowChoo I know you’re dying to tear down my threads. People don’t care about your sensitivity, they just are here to gather info. I won’t respond to anything you post. If you go outside the guidelines I’ll let covers help decide your fate.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
JowChoo I know you’re dying to tear down my threads. People don’t care about your sensitivity, they just are here to gather info. I won’t respond to anything you post. If you go outside the guidelines I’ll let covers help decide your fate.
Addressing another popular game, Nebraska and Illinois
p:ATSW and p:L and p:line>7 and rank<11 and p:rank<11 and H and t:losses<8 and month<3 and season>2012 and o:rank>8 or o:rank=None
Like teams in Nebraska’s situation today are 4-13 ATS, so a small sample side play against Nebraska but since the size is so limited I’m not playing the game. Besides much like Indiana in football these teams that elevate to this level could be currently still strong.
my point is I’m looking at in game opportunities that an inflated line could provide an opportunity,
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Addressing another popular game, Nebraska and Illinois
p:ATSW and p:L and p:line>7 and rank<11 and p:rank<11 and H and t:losses<8 and month<3 and season>2012 and o:rank>8 or o:rank=None
Like teams in Nebraska’s situation today are 4-13 ATS, so a small sample side play against Nebraska but since the size is so limited I’m not playing the game. Besides much like Indiana in football these teams that elevate to this level could be currently still strong.
my point is I’m looking at in game opportunities that an inflated line could provide an opportunity,
Additionally Illinois were -9.5 at home earlier this season vs. Nebraska so again the line evaluation has completely changed. To cover Nebraska needs a better performance tgat their last +9.5 game.
Personally now it’s February and certainly believe some of the lack of Nebraska credibly is all gone. They can certainly climb lines still but I think their new valuations will be closer to 50/50
I think they will still elevate past some lesser teams and those lines but facing ranked teams not getting points could potentially be an issue.
we will see.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
Additionally Illinois were -9.5 at home earlier this season vs. Nebraska so again the line evaluation has completely changed. To cover Nebraska needs a better performance tgat their last +9.5 game.
Personally now it’s February and certainly believe some of the lack of Nebraska credibly is all gone. They can certainly climb lines still but I think their new valuations will be closer to 50/50
I think they will still elevate past some lesser teams and those lines but facing ranked teams not getting points could potentially be an issue.
@spottie2935 Great post. At what level will you look to buy N live? Thanks
it depend on swings and long runs it’s hard to be so exact but I get a feel of it then it’s luck. As long as the line is greater it’s more worthy of more investment.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
1
Quote Originally Posted by TBLbolts:
@spottie2935 Great post. At what level will you look to buy N live? Thanks
it depend on swings and long runs it’s hard to be so exact but I get a feel of it then it’s luck. As long as the line is greater it’s more worthy of more investment.
season>2017 and p:points<56 and p:points>46 and F and line<-4.5 and line>=-10 and day!=Monday and day!=Thursday and rest!=None and game number>17 and site!=neutral and t:losses<12 and o:losses>4 and ou streak>-3
Coastal Carolina -9
All games =57-24 70.4%ATS
And below I will improve upon the 70.4% output ==========
Just away teams =
season>2017 and p:points<56 and p:points>46 and F and line<-4.5 and line>=-10 and day!=Monday and day!=Thursday and rest!=None and game number>17 and site!=neutral and t:losses<12 and o:losses>4 and ou streak>-3
19-5 ats
=================
season>2021 and p:points<56 and p:points>46 and F and line<-4.5 and line>=-10 and day!=Monday and day!=Thursday and rest!=None and game number>17 and site!=neutral and t:losses<12 and o:losses>4 and ou streak>-3
30-10 ATS
=============
and total>136
Adding this brings it to 16-3 ATS
============
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
season>2017 and p:points<56 and p:points>46 and F and line<-4.5 and line>=-10 and day!=Monday and day!=Thursday and rest!=None and game number>17 and site!=neutral and t:losses<12 and o:losses>4 and ou streak>-3
Coastal Carolina -9
All games =57-24 70.4%ATS
And below I will improve upon the 70.4% output ==========
Just away teams =
season>2017 and p:points<56 and p:points>46 and F and line<-4.5 and line>=-10 and day!=Monday and day!=Thursday and rest!=None and game number>17 and site!=neutral and t:losses<12 and o:losses>4 and ou streak>-3
19-5 ats
=================
season>2021 and p:points<56 and p:points>46 and F and line<-4.5 and line>=-10 and day!=Monday and day!=Thursday and rest!=None and game number>17 and site!=neutral and t:losses<12 and o:losses>4 and ou streak>-3
I feel no guilt posting in game lines when I posted pregame this was a potential possible play. It was heads up and with Purdue cleaning up Alabama should stay closer. It may not happen but if it doesn’t that’s 3 early blowouts ? That would be rare
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
0
I feel no guilt posting in game lines when I posted pregame this was a potential possible play. It was heads up and with Purdue cleaning up Alabama should stay closer. It may not happen but if it doesn’t that’s 3 early blowouts ? That would be rare
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.