I grabbed the opening number for this over earlier this afternoon. There
already has been some line movement up since then so I wanted to make this post tonight. Obviously, some of the value has been negated, but I still like this over up to anything
under 140.
Play: Rhode Island / Fordham Over 133
There are some great statistical correlations and situations to like
about this match up. First, Rhode Island has played 8 opponents this
year that rank in the top 200 nationally with respect to adjusted pace.
Every one of those 8 games finished at 133+. Now we get URI facing a
Fordham team that will be the 2nd fastest team they have seen this
year. Fordham comes in averaging 68.8 possessions per game (#82). The
fastest team they've faced this year was actually in their last game vs
Duquesne. That game finished at 149 on 71 possessions--and the Dukes
pace is only +0.3 possessions faster than Fordham so I would expect a
similar tempo here.
Second, Fordham is coming of a 5 game stretch of playing opponents who
all rank in the top 80 with respect to adjusted defensive efficiency,
allowing less than .952 points per possession. Now they get to face a
URI team on the opposite end of the spectrum. Rhode Island is allowing
1.082 points per possession (#292) and a staggering 55.4% on 2PA (#333).
In the other four games this season that Fordham faced a defense ranked
#290 or lower like they will in this match up, three of them went over
133 and Fordham managed to score 64+ points in each.
This should be a relatively close game so an end game fouling scenario
could be in the cards. But more importantly, a total in the low 130's is
very low for a game that should approach 70 possessions per team.
KenPom predicts 69 possessions.
Now could this go under, of course it could. Admittedly, Fordham at
times has struggled shooting the ball this year, only scoring 0.92
points per possession with respect to adjusted offensive efficiency
(#293). But they have shown improvement recently and just as when I
backed them in an over vs UMass on 1/5, I think the combination of
playing at home and a porous Rhode Island defense is just the recipe to
breakout offensively.
Now if you have read my threads before, you will know that I typically limit
myself to one play per night. However, there is one current trend that
is very difficult to ignore
Bonus Play: Drake / Southern Illinois Over 139
The angle is this one is simple. The Salukis are on an unbelievable
(and quiet in my opinion) run of 11 straight overs. The over run
coincided with the return of Kendal Brown-Surles (discipline), who now
is the team's second leading scorer, as well as Davante Drinkard
(removed sophomore redshirt) and Dantiel Daniels (injury). In the 10
games since their trip to Hawaii to play in the Diamond Head Classic,
the team has only played to one total under 139 (and that was 138 vs
Evansville). Furthermore, their last four games have averaged 70.5
possessions--fairly significant when considered how "slow" teams in the
Missouri Valley Conference tend to play.
Best of luck if you decide to make either either play
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
YTD: 14-5 (0-1 last play on 1/16)
I grabbed the opening number for this over earlier this afternoon. There
already has been some line movement up since then so I wanted to make this post tonight. Obviously, some of the value has been negated, but I still like this over up to anything
under 140.
Play: Rhode Island / Fordham Over 133
There are some great statistical correlations and situations to like
about this match up. First, Rhode Island has played 8 opponents this
year that rank in the top 200 nationally with respect to adjusted pace.
Every one of those 8 games finished at 133+. Now we get URI facing a
Fordham team that will be the 2nd fastest team they have seen this
year. Fordham comes in averaging 68.8 possessions per game (#82). The
fastest team they've faced this year was actually in their last game vs
Duquesne. That game finished at 149 on 71 possessions--and the Dukes
pace is only +0.3 possessions faster than Fordham so I would expect a
similar tempo here.
Second, Fordham is coming of a 5 game stretch of playing opponents who
all rank in the top 80 with respect to adjusted defensive efficiency,
allowing less than .952 points per possession. Now they get to face a
URI team on the opposite end of the spectrum. Rhode Island is allowing
1.082 points per possession (#292) and a staggering 55.4% on 2PA (#333).
In the other four games this season that Fordham faced a defense ranked
#290 or lower like they will in this match up, three of them went over
133 and Fordham managed to score 64+ points in each.
This should be a relatively close game so an end game fouling scenario
could be in the cards. But more importantly, a total in the low 130's is
very low for a game that should approach 70 possessions per team.
KenPom predicts 69 possessions.
Now could this go under, of course it could. Admittedly, Fordham at
times has struggled shooting the ball this year, only scoring 0.92
points per possession with respect to adjusted offensive efficiency
(#293). But they have shown improvement recently and just as when I
backed them in an over vs UMass on 1/5, I think the combination of
playing at home and a porous Rhode Island defense is just the recipe to
breakout offensively.
Now if you have read my threads before, you will know that I typically limit
myself to one play per night. However, there is one current trend that
is very difficult to ignore
Bonus Play: Drake / Southern Illinois Over 139
The angle is this one is simple. The Salukis are on an unbelievable
(and quiet in my opinion) run of 11 straight overs. The over run
coincided with the return of Kendal Brown-Surles (discipline), who now
is the team's second leading scorer, as well as Davante Drinkard
(removed sophomore redshirt) and Dantiel Daniels (injury). In the 10
games since their trip to Hawaii to play in the Diamond Head Classic,
the team has only played to one total under 139 (and that was 138 vs
Evansville). Furthermore, their last four games have averaged 70.5
possessions--fairly significant when considered how "slow" teams in the
Missouri Valley Conference tend to play.
Best of luck if you decide to make either either play
That Southern total's on my radar, but Coach Lowery's been changing lineups like no other. How Drinkard's only got a few minutes the past few games blows my mind. He's tried to go a more defensive approach at Creighton by putting Early in the lineup and taking Setty out, but didn't see the results b/c Creighton's offense is pretty much unstoppable at this point. The key is though that they're a much faster team with that lineup, which is why I point this direction. Drake's been on fire, hope it continues.
GL
0
That Southern total's on my radar, but Coach Lowery's been changing lineups like no other. How Drinkard's only got a few minutes the past few games blows my mind. He's tried to go a more defensive approach at Creighton by putting Early in the lineup and taking Setty out, but didn't see the results b/c Creighton's offense is pretty much unstoppable at this point. The key is though that they're a much faster team with that lineup, which is why I point this direction. Drake's been on fire, hope it continues.
That Southern total's on my radar, but Coach Lowery's been changing lineups like no other. How Drinkard's only got a few minutes the past few games blows my mind. He's tried to go a more defensive approach at Creighton by putting Early in the lineup and taking Setty out, but didn't see the results b/c Creighton's offense is pretty much unstoppable at this point. The key is though that they're a much faster team with that lineup, which is why I point this direction. Drake's been on fire, hope it continues.
GL
Good to hear. Looking forward to today's post from you
0
Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:
That Southern total's on my radar, but Coach Lowery's been changing lineups like no other. How Drinkard's only got a few minutes the past few games blows my mind. He's tried to go a more defensive approach at Creighton by putting Early in the lineup and taking Setty out, but didn't see the results b/c Creighton's offense is pretty much unstoppable at this point. The key is though that they're a much faster team with that lineup, which is why I point this direction. Drake's been on fire, hope it continues.
GL
Good to hear. Looking forward to today's post from you
[Quote: Original ly Posted by cmancone10] dude you sure about that ri is just as bad as bc can't score but good luck from a fellow mass [/Quote] seems like a valid point.....
0
[Quote: Original ly Posted by cmancone10] dude you sure about that ri is just as bad as bc can't score but good luck from a fellow mass [/Quote] seems like a valid point.....
dude you sure about that ri is just as bad as bc can't score but good luck from a fellow mass
Valid concern. But with the possessions I expect in this game tonight, and URI averaging .993 pts per possession, I believe it will be enough to get this over
0
Quote Originally Posted by cmancone10:
dude you sure about that ri is just as bad as bc can't score but good luck from a fellow mass
Valid concern. But with the possessions I expect in this game tonight, and URI averaging .993 pts per possession, I believe it will be enough to get this over
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.