Wow Eddie The Winslow off the bench... I figure you are making an appearance because of all the Rumors. Dont Sweat SB bro, he just has his runs ya know, y get bent and now Lobbing picks again.Damn bro good luck man, this game been posted all over as the play O the Day.Nice
Lol, interesting post
Banging since 1983
1
Quote Originally Posted by Unclebenelli:
Wow Eddie The Winslow off the bench... I figure you are making an appearance because of all the Rumors. Dont Sweat SB bro, he just has his runs ya know, y get bent and now Lobbing picks again.Damn bro good luck man, this game been posted all over as the play O the Day.Nice
Wow Eddie The Winslow off the bench... I figure you are making an appearance because of all the Rumors. Dont Sweat SB bro, he just has his runs ya know, y get bent and now Lobbing picks again.Damn bro good luck man, this game been posted all over as the play O the Day.Nice
oh no not SB!
Can’t cook if the grease ain’t hot
0
Quote Originally Posted by Unclebenelli:
Wow Eddie The Winslow off the bench... I figure you are making an appearance because of all the Rumors. Dont Sweat SB bro, he just has his runs ya know, y get bent and now Lobbing picks again.Damn bro good luck man, this game been posted all over as the play O the Day.Nice
YOU are definiteley worth the wait! thank you! snowstorm winner for me, up here coming saturday ,in my BOSTON!! THX EDDY _WINSLOW!!! i am in at -2 purdue....
1
@Eddy_Winslow
YOU are definiteley worth the wait! thank you! snowstorm winner for me, up here coming saturday ,in my BOSTON!! THX EDDY _WINSLOW!!! i am in at -2 purdue....
Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Dundee: Ed. Took Purdue wins by 1-10 pts @ +166 odds. This should be a pretty close game. We'll see..... Sorry EW not to ask this in your thread but wanted to ask Mick who does this type of bet because I saw a forum member post one a few days ago. Was it FanDuel? And out of curiosity what was the odds if Iowa won from 1-10? Good luck EW
Hi mate. No it's with Sportsbet (Aussie book).
It's called "Big Win / Little Win".
Pretty much all Aussie books have this type of bet for both football and basketball. It's not as good as it sounds though it's hard to win them because there are four possibke outcomes. It's annoying when you're on the right side but get the margin wrong.
FOR EXAMPLE: in football the margin is 13 points (your chosen team wins by 1 to 13 pts, or 14+ points). In the NFL wildcard round I picked Buffalo Bills to beat New England by 1 to 13 pts. The spread was Bills -4.5 and I fully thought Belichik would keep it tight within a field goal with good Pats defense so wanted to avoid the chalk. Odds were +140 for the Bills win by 1 to 13 bet.
Well you know the outcome on that game
Bills never punted or kicked a field goal and beat the Pats 47 - 17. Right side, way wrong margin.
I don't do these bets much I like two possible outcomes, not four. That's why I hate soccer ML betting having that third outcome is brutal.
1
Quote Originally Posted by notaprojust4fun:
Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Dundee: Ed. Took Purdue wins by 1-10 pts @ +166 odds. This should be a pretty close game. We'll see..... Sorry EW not to ask this in your thread but wanted to ask Mick who does this type of bet because I saw a forum member post one a few days ago. Was it FanDuel? And out of curiosity what was the odds if Iowa won from 1-10? Good luck EW
Hi mate. No it's with Sportsbet (Aussie book).
It's called "Big Win / Little Win".
Pretty much all Aussie books have this type of bet for both football and basketball. It's not as good as it sounds though it's hard to win them because there are four possibke outcomes. It's annoying when you're on the right side but get the margin wrong.
FOR EXAMPLE: in football the margin is 13 points (your chosen team wins by 1 to 13 pts, or 14+ points). In the NFL wildcard round I picked Buffalo Bills to beat New England by 1 to 13 pts. The spread was Bills -4.5 and I fully thought Belichik would keep it tight within a field goal with good Pats defense so wanted to avoid the chalk. Odds were +140 for the Bills win by 1 to 13 bet.
Well you know the outcome on that game
Bills never punted or kicked a field goal and beat the Pats 47 - 17. Right side, way wrong margin.
I don't do these bets much I like two possible outcomes, not four. That's why I hate soccer ML betting having that third outcome is brutal.
Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Dundee: Ed. Took Purdue wins by 1-10 pts @ +166 odds. This should be a pretty close game. We'll see..... Sorry EW not to ask this in your thread but wanted to ask Mick who does this type of bet because I saw a forum member post one a few days ago. Was it FanDuel? And out of curiosity what was the odds if Iowa won from 1-10? Good luck EW
Sorry I missed your last question. The odds for Iowa 1-10 is +183.
Purdue is down to +153 so it's shifted a bit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by notaprojust4fun:
Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Dundee: Ed. Took Purdue wins by 1-10 pts @ +166 odds. This should be a pretty close game. We'll see..... Sorry EW not to ask this in your thread but wanted to ask Mick who does this type of bet because I saw a forum member post one a few days ago. Was it FanDuel? And out of curiosity what was the odds if Iowa won from 1-10? Good luck EW
Sorry I missed your last question. The odds for Iowa 1-10 is +183.
When Eddy bets the road team the game is crazy? Put down the angry orchards youngster and pickup a dictionary and encyclopedia. The grammatical errors you produce are off the charts. Even my elementary school kids know the differences between then, than, to and too. It’s become an embarrassment similar to your records for all sports Todd. You can do better.
3
@ToddC
When Eddy bets the road team the game is crazy? Put down the angry orchards youngster and pickup a dictionary and encyclopedia. The grammatical errors you produce are off the charts. Even my elementary school kids know the differences between then, than, to and too. It’s become an embarrassment similar to your records for all sports Todd. You can do better.
…. I was starting to respect you 
Hot Forum Topics
