All Forums | College Basketball

'pre' system week 2

...

Participants:

Posts: 297

ryno23

Veteran

Joined: Dec, 2006

Posts: 3020

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 7:03 AM ET #126

good morning guys- well...I should not even complain, but montana st fell short and ran out of gas 2nd half for our lone loss. but omg, we are rolling in money bags.

full game 2-1

first halfs 3-0 money lines-0-3

another profitable night and system has yet to start. be back in a few to update. gl ryno

ryno23

Veteran

Joined: Dec, 2006

Posts: 3020

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 7:08 AM ET #127

updated record: 14-4

first halfs - 14-4

moneyline winners-7-11 ( these moneylines are always +240 or more)

ok guys, there is a whole lotta loot in those above records for the pre system. I see one play tonight=

siena +8 as always first halfs and full game and moneyline.

gl ryno

mp5070

Captain

Joined: Jan, 2010

Posts: 5612

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 7:14 AM ET #128

ryno23

Veteran

Joined: Dec, 2006

Posts: 3020

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 7:19 AM ET #129

guys, im off to casino for the day with a bud, ill be around later....gl tonight and keep the winners coming. tomorrow there should be a good amount of plays...ryno

Lucrative

Rookie

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 915

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 7:53 AM ET #130

NickyZ5er

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2013

Posts: 104

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 9:34 AM ET #131

Ryno23.. read the thread and followed the picks last night and just gotta say AWESOME !!! Would've been 3-0, but Sac St made a pretty good run to close that game out. I'm on the follow train now and thank you for posting the "system" bets... What is it tho? haha..
All favorites rated +180 on the KPom rankings get faded ?

trainwreck66

Legend

Joined: Feb, 2013

Posts: 32543

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 9:39 AM ET #132

nice work....bol bud

NickyZ5er

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2013

Posts: 104

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 9:48 AM ET #133

I've got to be outta the loop on something...

or would Western Illinois +2.5 be a play against IUPUI as they are #241 on the KPom rankings..

jayjordan21

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2010

Posts: 51

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 9:57 AM ET #134

Quote Originally Posted by NickyZ5er:

I've got to be outta the loop on something...

or would Western Illinois +2.5 be a play against IUPUI as they are #241 on the KPom rankings..

Not as +2.5

HoD

Prospect

Joined: Jan, 2015

Posts: 53

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:06 AM ET #135

Nice

ryno23

Veteran

Joined: Dec, 2006

Posts: 3020

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:17 AM ET #136

Quote Originally Posted by NickyZ5er:

I've got to be outta the loop on something...or would Western Illinois +2.5 be a play against IUPUI as they are #241 on the KPom rankings..

Nick, no offense, but please let us post the plays!, me or Norcal if I've missed something he usually finds it. Guys, this system is going to pick up steam and get a lot of people looking from here on out let's not list the parameters in the thread.

ryno23

Veteran

Joined: Dec, 2006

Posts: 3020

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:20 AM ET #137

Guys, I do hope you understand, there are going to be unwanted eyes on this thread from now on. Follow the place. Do not mention parameters. Message me your Norcal with any questions, but a lot of you know this will come into play soon. I hope you understand

NickyZ5er

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2013

Posts: 104

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:28 AM ET #138

Quote Originally Posted by ryno23:

Guys, I do hope you understand, there are going to be unwanted eyes on this thread from now on. Follow the place. Do not mention parameters. Message me your Norcal with any questions, but a lot of you know this will come into play soon. I hope you understand

My bad, Ryno, my bad.

redtagboys

Rookie

Joined: Jun, 2014

Posts: 502

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:35 AM ET #139

I have a quick question, maybe it was already answered in the previous posts. If so, apologies. Siena is expected to lose 79-71.. I have the spread at +7.5.. How does this make It a worthy play to take?

thanks

thegetaway

Prospect

Joined: Mar, 2006

Posts: 90

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:41 AM ET #140

Quote Originally Posted by redtagboys:

thanks

Where did you see that Siena is expected to lose 79-71?

smacksmiter

Banned

Joined: Dec, 2004

Posts: 14064

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:46 AM ET #141

Quote Originally Posted by redtagboys:

thanks

Some of you guys are amazing. Do you even read anything in the thread? Ryno specifically is stating clearly that he does NOT want to discuss the parameters of the system in this thread out in the open. What exactly do you not understand about that concept?

Do you have a problem with the English language?

If you want to play the selection..play it.

If you do not want to play the selection...do not play it.

PM for the skinny on the down low

redtagboys

Rookie

Joined: Jun, 2014

Posts: 502

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:49 AM ET #142

290 Siena at 215 Manhattan

Manhattan 79-71 (78%)

thegetaway

Prospect

Joined: Mar, 2006

Posts: 90

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:53 AM ET #143

Quote Originally Posted by redtagboys:

290 Siena at 215 Manhattan

Manhattan 79-71 (78%)

I hope I don't come off sounding rude, I'm honestly trying to save you thousands of dollars over the next few years. Stop betting on sports.

redtagboys

Rookie

Joined: Jun, 2014

Posts: 502

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 10:54 AM ET #144

LOL

nygjmap

Banned

Joined: Jan, 2014

Posts: 1404

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 11:06 AM ET #145

Quote Originally Posted by redtagboys:

LOL

PM Ryno with a question if you have one about the sytem you brain-dead chimp.

thegetaway

Prospect

Joined: Mar, 2006

Posts: 90

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 11:15 AM ET #146

I'm just saying, you shouldn't believe what some web site tells you they expect to happen in a game. How in the heck could they predict this? Some computer program?? And, if they are that good at expectations. Why aren't you just playing all of their "expectations", especially if they claim there is a 75% of it happening?

I will tell you this. The line has nothing to with what is expected to happen in a game and everything to do with how bettors are expected to behave.

You should spend less time reading stats, expectations, %'s, etc. and more time looking at lines that don't make sense i.e. unranked teams giving points, teams with bad losing records giving points, etc. (Ohio St -8 last night).

You will be better off in the future and maybe even up a little $.

nygjmap

Banned

Joined: Jan, 2014

Posts: 1404

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 11:21 AM ET #147

Quote Originally Posted by thegetaway:

I'm just saying, you shouldn't believe what some web site tells you they expect to happen in a game. How in the heck could they predict this? Some computer program?? And, if they are that good at expectations. Why aren't you just playing all of their "expectations", especially if they claim there is a 75% of it happening?

I will tell you this. The line has nothing to with what is expected to happen in a game and everything to do with how bettors are expected to behave.

You should spend less time reading stats, expectations, %'s, etc. and more time looking at lines that don't make sense i.e. unranked teams giving points, teams with bad losing records giving points, etc. (Ohio St -8 last night).

You will be better off in the future and maybe even up a little $.

Don't want to sound rude but this thread won't become a debate about the system.

If you don't like it or feel it won make money your free not to tail it. Thanks

thegetaway

Prospect

Joined: Mar, 2006

Posts: 90

Posted: Jan. 30, 2015 - 11:28 AM ET #148

Quote Originally Posted by nygjmap:

Don't want to sound rude but this thread won't become a debate about the system.

If you don't like it or feel it won make money your free not to tail it. Thanks

You didn't sound rude, you sounded like you didn't understand. And that's ok. I get the system and I follow it. It makes a lot of sense.

I was letting this person know that they should not take web sites that claim there is a 75% chance of a certain score in a game seriously. It was NOT a debate of Kineprofessor's System.