Oh no, I'll respond. Apparently you didn't read my answer (or didn't understand it) so I'll help you out again.
Yeah, I lost on the under. You won on the over. Congratulations. It won't last long. You keep making picks because "something looks to low" and you're going to f**k yourself hard in the long run. Don't believe me please...most people like yourself have to learn by lesson, not by other given examples.
You'll lose. You'll lose bad. You will feel embarrassed and ask yourself questions like "why didn't I just study this pick instead of making a broad assumption?" You'll say "sheesh, I shouldn't have bet all of that money when there are more important things to worry about."
It'll happen. You can win battles, but wars cost a lot more time, mental strength, knowledge and studious minds. I doubt you have any of those common tools to prepare yourself for a long run.
Hopefully you pulled out after this win. If not, good luck throwing darts. Sometimes you'll hit a bull...most times you'll hit the wall. ![]()
Oh no, I'll respond. Apparently you didn't read my answer (or didn't understand it) so I'll help you out again.
Yeah, I lost on the under. You won on the over. Congratulations. It won't last long. You keep making picks because "something looks to low" and you're going to f**k yourself hard in the long run. Don't believe me please...most people like yourself have to learn by lesson, not by other given examples.
You'll lose. You'll lose bad. You will feel embarrassed and ask yourself questions like "why didn't I just study this pick instead of making a broad assumption?" You'll say "sheesh, I shouldn't have bet all of that money when there are more important things to worry about."
It'll happen. You can win battles, but wars cost a lot more time, mental strength, knowledge and studious minds. I doubt you have any of those common tools to prepare yourself for a long run.
Hopefully you pulled out after this win. If not, good luck throwing darts. Sometimes you'll hit a bull...most times you'll hit the wall. ![]()
Your luck is without a doubt questionable at best on this game.
In the long run, stupid, idiotic, dumba** plays like the one you made tonight will catch up to you. I had a friend that bet modest, turning 100 dollars into 1500 making stupid plays like yours. He lost everything in less than two days. You will be the next example.
Bettors like you poison the economy (I really hope you're a Canadian resident.) Stupid decisions like the play you made here is a parallel comparison to somebody who doesn't have money to bet, and I'm sure you fit that category as well.
You're dumb. You're dumb if it covers and if it doesn't. Start studying your picks better or quit.
Not sure what crawled up your butt bro, but I cant agree with you. I took the U116.5 for the game, but there is no way in hell I would take an U52.5 1st h. All it takes is for 1 team to get to 27, and with the world knowing GTown sucks it would be easy to assume a low scoring 1st h is coming, but this Pitt team is not the same Pitt team as the last few years.....
Your luck is without a doubt questionable at best on this game.
In the long run, stupid, idiotic, dumba** plays like the one you made tonight will catch up to you. I had a friend that bet modest, turning 100 dollars into 1500 making stupid plays like yours. He lost everything in less than two days. You will be the next example.
Bettors like you poison the economy (I really hope you're a Canadian resident.) Stupid decisions like the play you made here is a parallel comparison to somebody who doesn't have money to bet, and I'm sure you fit that category as well.
You're dumb. You're dumb if it covers and if it doesn't. Start studying your picks better or quit.
Not sure what crawled up your butt bro, but I cant agree with you. I took the U116.5 for the game, but there is no way in hell I would take an U52.5 1st h. All it takes is for 1 team to get to 27, and with the world knowing GTown sucks it would be easy to assume a low scoring 1st h is coming, but this Pitt team is not the same Pitt team as the last few years.....
Your luck is without a doubt questionable at best on this game.
In the long run, stupid, idiotic, dumba** plays like the one you made tonight will catch up to you. I had a friend that bet modest, turning 100 dollars into 1500 making stupid plays like yours. He lost everything in less than two days. You will be the next example.
Bettors like you poison the economy (I really hope you're a Canadian resident.) Stupid decisions like the play you made here is a parallel comparison to somebody who doesn't have money to bet, and I'm sure you fit that category as well.
You're dumb. You're dumb if it covers and if it doesn't. Start studying your picks better or quit.
Your luck is without a doubt questionable at best on this game.
In the long run, stupid, idiotic, dumba** plays like the one you made tonight will catch up to you. I had a friend that bet modest, turning 100 dollars into 1500 making stupid plays like yours. He lost everything in less than two days. You will be the next example.
Bettors like you poison the economy (I really hope you're a Canadian resident.) Stupid decisions like the play you made here is a parallel comparison to somebody who doesn't have money to bet, and I'm sure you fit that category as well.
You're dumb. You're dumb if it covers and if it doesn't. Start studying your picks better or quit.
And yes, I'm an a**hole. A synonym used for the term a**hole is realist, or opportunist.
I didn't insult your family, I insulted a handicapped way that you live your life. Because that is life. People that use expressions like "that is way too low" so I must bet it, are the ones with tendencies to gamble with money they don't have, or they are too young and immature to understand the concept of true "handicapping."
Now, if you're going to post logical reasoning behind why you played a play other than "it is too low" then I am all ears. You became a true asset to covers.com, a principal source for true "handicapping."
That's all I have to say. Utter your sentence fragments and lunacy towards me all you want, because NOW I'm not listening. I said what I have to say. Maybe outside of your winning rage you'll take that sound advice and study your picks. Or maybe you won't.
Either way, I don't give a f**k. You're not me, I'm not you. My efforts to try and help you at this point is less useful than beating someone in the face with a cuestick until they have detached retinaes.
Good luck.
And yes, I'm an a**hole. A synonym used for the term a**hole is realist, or opportunist.
I didn't insult your family, I insulted a handicapped way that you live your life. Because that is life. People that use expressions like "that is way too low" so I must bet it, are the ones with tendencies to gamble with money they don't have, or they are too young and immature to understand the concept of true "handicapping."
Now, if you're going to post logical reasoning behind why you played a play other than "it is too low" then I am all ears. You became a true asset to covers.com, a principal source for true "handicapping."
That's all I have to say. Utter your sentence fragments and lunacy towards me all you want, because NOW I'm not listening. I said what I have to say. Maybe outside of your winning rage you'll take that sound advice and study your picks. Or maybe you won't.
Either way, I don't give a f**k. You're not me, I'm not you. My efforts to try and help you at this point is less useful than beating someone in the face with a cuestick until they have detached retinaes.
Good luck.
Not sure what crawled up your butt bro, but I cant agree with you. I took the U116.5 for the game, but there is no way in hell I would take an U52.5 1st h. All it takes is for 1 team to get to 27, and with the world knowing GTown sucks it would be easy to assume a low scoring 1st h is coming, but this Pitt team is not the same Pitt team as the last few years.....
![]()
Not sure what crawled up your butt bro, but I cant agree with you. I took the U116.5 for the game, but there is no way in hell I would take an U52.5 1st h. All it takes is for 1 team to get to 27, and with the world knowing GTown sucks it would be easy to assume a low scoring 1st h is coming, but this Pitt team is not the same Pitt team as the last few years.....
![]()
And yes, I'm an a**hole. A synonym used for the term a**hole is realist, or opportunist.
I didn't insult your family, I insulted a handicapped way that you live your life. Because that is life. People that use expressions like "that is way too low" so I must bet it, are the ones with tendencies to gamble with money they don't have, or they are too young and immature to understand the concept of true "handicapping."
Now, if you're going to post logical reasoning behind why you played a play other than "it is too low" then I am all ears. You became a true asset to covers.com, a principal source for true "handicapping."
That's all I have to say. Utter your sentence fragments and lunacy towards me all you want, because NOW I'm not listening. I said what I have to say. Maybe outside of your winning rage you'll take that sound advice and study your picks. Or maybe you won't.
Either way, I don't give a f**k. You're not me, I'm not you. My efforts to try and help you at this point is less useful than beating someone in the face with a cuestick until they have detached retinaes.
Good luck.
And yes, I'm an a**hole. A synonym used for the term a**hole is realist, or opportunist.
I didn't insult your family, I insulted a handicapped way that you live your life. Because that is life. People that use expressions like "that is way too low" so I must bet it, are the ones with tendencies to gamble with money they don't have, or they are too young and immature to understand the concept of true "handicapping."
Now, if you're going to post logical reasoning behind why you played a play other than "it is too low" then I am all ears. You became a true asset to covers.com, a principal source for true "handicapping."
That's all I have to say. Utter your sentence fragments and lunacy towards me all you want, because NOW I'm not listening. I said what I have to say. Maybe outside of your winning rage you'll take that sound advice and study your picks. Or maybe you won't.
Either way, I don't give a f**k. You're not me, I'm not you. My efforts to try and help you at this point is less useful than beating someone in the face with a cuestick until they have detached retinaes.
Good luck.
Not sure what crawled up your butt bro, but I cant agree with you. I took the U116.5 for the game, but there is no way in hell I would take an U52.5 1st h. All it takes is for 1 team to get to 27, and with the world knowing GTown sucks it would be easy to assume a low scoring 1st h is coming, but this Pitt team is not the same Pitt team as the last few years.....
Right, Train, they are different. About 16% shooting difference from 2008 into present day. They don't have a consistent shooter on the team. Obviously tonight they leaked out of that funk (at least 1st half.)
But if you are following this team the entire year as me, it is too hard to ever think they will score even 37 points against a defensive-strategy team like Georgetown. This is a team that went a combined 8 of 36 from 3 point in last two games (Rutgers/Cincy). This is a team with its top 3 scorers (Woodall, Patterson and Robinson) shooting a combined 15 of 50 in last two games. 15 of 50, Train. That is ridiculous. I figured Dixon to come out and go defense first and sort of scrap the whole motion concept (WHICH DID HAPPEN) until the refs came into play. The refs easily scrapped up the tempo that was being set at that 17-7 point.
I lost that under, but it was the right play. Given Pitt's offensive numbers alone, and no established shooter, it was the right play.
Congrats to those who won that 1st half. I am on 2nd half under as well.
Not sure what crawled up your butt bro, but I cant agree with you. I took the U116.5 for the game, but there is no way in hell I would take an U52.5 1st h. All it takes is for 1 team to get to 27, and with the world knowing GTown sucks it would be easy to assume a low scoring 1st h is coming, but this Pitt team is not the same Pitt team as the last few years.....
Right, Train, they are different. About 16% shooting difference from 2008 into present day. They don't have a consistent shooter on the team. Obviously tonight they leaked out of that funk (at least 1st half.)
But if you are following this team the entire year as me, it is too hard to ever think they will score even 37 points against a defensive-strategy team like Georgetown. This is a team that went a combined 8 of 36 from 3 point in last two games (Rutgers/Cincy). This is a team with its top 3 scorers (Woodall, Patterson and Robinson) shooting a combined 15 of 50 in last two games. 15 of 50, Train. That is ridiculous. I figured Dixon to come out and go defense first and sort of scrap the whole motion concept (WHICH DID HAPPEN) until the refs came into play. The refs easily scrapped up the tempo that was being set at that 17-7 point.
I lost that under, but it was the right play. Given Pitt's offensive numbers alone, and no established shooter, it was the right play.
Congrats to those who won that 1st half. I am on 2nd half under as well.
Right, Train, they are different. About 16% shooting difference from 2008 into present day. They don't have a consistent shooter on the team. Obviously tonight they leaked out of that funk (at least 1st half.)
But if you are following this team the entire year as me, it is too hard to ever think they will score even 37 points against a defensive-strategy team like Georgetown. This is a team that went a combined 8 of 36 from 3 point in last two games (Rutgers/Cincy). This is a team with its top 3 scorers (Woodall, Patterson and Robinson) shooting a combined 15 of 50 in last two games. 15 of 50, Train. That is ridiculous. I figured Dixon to come out and go defense first and sort of scrap the whole motion concept (WHICH DID HAPPEN) until the refs came into play. The refs easily scrapped up the tempo that was being set at that 17-7 point.
I lost that under, but it was the right play. Given Pitt's offensive numbers alone, and no established shooter, it was the right play.
Congrats to those who won that 1st half. I am on 2nd half under as well.
Right, Train, they are different. About 16% shooting difference from 2008 into present day. They don't have a consistent shooter on the team. Obviously tonight they leaked out of that funk (at least 1st half.)
But if you are following this team the entire year as me, it is too hard to ever think they will score even 37 points against a defensive-strategy team like Georgetown. This is a team that went a combined 8 of 36 from 3 point in last two games (Rutgers/Cincy). This is a team with its top 3 scorers (Woodall, Patterson and Robinson) shooting a combined 15 of 50 in last two games. 15 of 50, Train. That is ridiculous. I figured Dixon to come out and go defense first and sort of scrap the whole motion concept (WHICH DID HAPPEN) until the refs came into play. The refs easily scrapped up the tempo that was being set at that 17-7 point.
I lost that under, but it was the right play. Given Pitt's offensive numbers alone, and no established shooter, it was the right play.
Congrats to those who won that 1st half. I am on 2nd half under as well.
Train, the wildcard with any Pitt team is ball screens.
They are absolutely destroying Georgetown in the half court with ball screens. Zanna, Adams are making a lethal combination getting these guards open off the dribble for wide-open looks.
So, I never took that into account tonight. Because in the past, Pitt has predominately attacked Georgetown's defense with solid screening from the top of the key.
That and the refs absolutely destroyed my under. Georgetown adapting somewhat better with a double team approach and a drop off of the big man from the top of the key to cover the cutters/corral rebounds. Also, the opening up to a full-court trap really slowing this Pitt team down.
I'm assuming that is JT3 surrendering to open looks and focusing on tired shots, giving them one look a possession.
It is a better chemistry for you to cover that full game under. Something I should have done to begin with. ![]()
Train, the wildcard with any Pitt team is ball screens.
They are absolutely destroying Georgetown in the half court with ball screens. Zanna, Adams are making a lethal combination getting these guards open off the dribble for wide-open looks.
So, I never took that into account tonight. Because in the past, Pitt has predominately attacked Georgetown's defense with solid screening from the top of the key.
That and the refs absolutely destroyed my under. Georgetown adapting somewhat better with a double team approach and a drop off of the big man from the top of the key to cover the cutters/corral rebounds. Also, the opening up to a full-court trap really slowing this Pitt team down.
I'm assuming that is JT3 surrendering to open looks and focusing on tired shots, giving them one look a possession.
It is a better chemistry for you to cover that full game under. Something I should have done to begin with. ![]()
Train, the wildcard with any Pitt team is ball screens.
They are absolutely destroying Georgetown in the half court with ball screens. Zanna, Adams are making a lethal combination getting these guards open off the dribble for wide-open looks.
So, I never took that into account tonight. Because in the past, Pitt has predominately attacked Georgetown's defense with solid screening from the top of the key.
That and the refs absolutely destroyed my under. Georgetown adapting somewhat better with a double team approach and a drop off of the big man from the top of the key to cover the cutters/corral rebounds. Also, the opening up to a full-court trap really slowing this Pitt team down.
I'm assuming that is JT3 surrendering to open looks and focusing on tired shots, giving them one look a possession.
It is a better chemistry for you to cover that full game under. Something I should have done to begin with. ![]()
I didnt play the 1st h under simply because there was no room for error at 52.5. A couple 3's or some early fouling with these 2 teams can mean free throws while the refs try to clean the game up. It was easy for me to leave alone at that number.
Just one game/bet. You'll bounce back tomorrow. ![]()
Train, the wildcard with any Pitt team is ball screens.
They are absolutely destroying Georgetown in the half court with ball screens. Zanna, Adams are making a lethal combination getting these guards open off the dribble for wide-open looks.
So, I never took that into account tonight. Because in the past, Pitt has predominately attacked Georgetown's defense with solid screening from the top of the key.
That and the refs absolutely destroyed my under. Georgetown adapting somewhat better with a double team approach and a drop off of the big man from the top of the key to cover the cutters/corral rebounds. Also, the opening up to a full-court trap really slowing this Pitt team down.
I'm assuming that is JT3 surrendering to open looks and focusing on tired shots, giving them one look a possession.
It is a better chemistry for you to cover that full game under. Something I should have done to begin with. ![]()
I didnt play the 1st h under simply because there was no room for error at 52.5. A couple 3's or some early fouling with these 2 teams can mean free throws while the refs try to clean the game up. It was easy for me to leave alone at that number.
Just one game/bet. You'll bounce back tomorrow. ![]()
They don't know how to comeback running a lousy half court Princeton look as that is. No Austin Freeman's coming off the bench for these guys to speed it up and make something happen.
Besides, how could you even want to keep playing when you got guys like Durand Johnson spinning right off ANOTHER ball screen and wide open at the top of the key for a 3? I mean f**k it at that point, right? Just accept that you can't stop these guys in the half court. Pretty pathetic. Looking forward to them not being ranked again this year.
They don't know how to comeback running a lousy half court Princeton look as that is. No Austin Freeman's coming off the bench for these guys to speed it up and make something happen.
Besides, how could you even want to keep playing when you got guys like Durand Johnson spinning right off ANOTHER ball screen and wide open at the top of the key for a 3? I mean f**k it at that point, right? Just accept that you can't stop these guys in the half court. Pretty pathetic. Looking forward to them not being ranked again this year.
Oh no, I'll respond. Apparently you didn't read my answer (or didn't understand it) so I'll help you out again.
Oh no, I'll respond. Apparently you didn't read my answer (or didn't understand it) so I'll help you out again.
My question is, norsemen, if you had so much "class," then why would you keep running your mouth. And fade-em-all, well his class in his posts speak for itself. I exposed how he truly acts.
Looks like a big boat of classless people here.
My question is, you shouldn't talk about being classless and "manning up" with such a classless post as the one you just made now.
Learn how to righteous before you pretend to be it. ![]()
My question is, norsemen, if you had so much "class," then why would you keep running your mouth. And fade-em-all, well his class in his posts speak for itself. I exposed how he truly acts.
Looks like a big boat of classless people here.
My question is, you shouldn't talk about being classless and "manning up" with such a classless post as the one you just made now.
Learn how to righteous before you pretend to be it. ![]()
I don't get it. What gives you the right to make posts like that, but the minute I am derogatory towards anybody you are up in arms?
It is contradicting and silly. Remarkable how incredibly stupid people like yourself are. You preach about being classless and manning up and you make fun and abuse others yourself.
Is it possible for you to even look in the mirror? Do you literally see another face when/if you do it? Pretty strange, man. Sounds like you got a lot of demons to exorcise.
I won't hold you up any longer. Go figure it out there norseman. You got time, dips**t. ![]()
I don't get it. What gives you the right to make posts like that, but the minute I am derogatory towards anybody you are up in arms?
It is contradicting and silly. Remarkable how incredibly stupid people like yourself are. You preach about being classless and manning up and you make fun and abuse others yourself.
Is it possible for you to even look in the mirror? Do you literally see another face when/if you do it? Pretty strange, man. Sounds like you got a lot of demons to exorcise.
I won't hold you up any longer. Go figure it out there norseman. You got time, dips**t. ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.