I am just not sure why any team would accidently play tight in the NIT its an Alfred E Newman special event.
The point is that this program (and these seniors) have never played in post-season play (and any post-season feels like the Big Dance to these schools).
So NINE seniors are playing in their first ever post-season game, AT a Power 6 Conference school three time zones away, and it could be the last game they play as college athletes (playing against a team of "giants" who run a defense that they haven't ever played against mind you).
So their four years of blood, sweat, and tears have earned them the right to play in this game - how could anyone NOT be tight in this situation. We are not talking about Louisville or Texas A&M, this is Boston University.
Of all the things I wrote in my write-up, I am most confident in my assessment that these 9 seniors will be tight to start this game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Nickcage:
Follow your threads
I am just not sure why any team would accidently play tight in the NIT its an Alfred E Newman special event.
The point is that this program (and these seniors) have never played in post-season play (and any post-season feels like the Big Dance to these schools).
So NINE seniors are playing in their first ever post-season game, AT a Power 6 Conference school three time zones away, and it could be the last game they play as college athletes (playing against a team of "giants" who run a defense that they haven't ever played against mind you).
So their four years of blood, sweat, and tears have earned them the right to play in this game - how could anyone NOT be tight in this situation. We are not talking about Louisville or Texas A&M, this is Boston University.
Of all the things I wrote in my write-up, I am most confident in my assessment that these 9 seniors will be tight to start this game.
GO BEARS! (Should be a fun game to watch. Not only do I think the Bears match up well against this team, the effort and intensity of the Bears will be too much).
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
Thank brother, you say jump and I say "How high"
Ha Ha...whatever bro, you are the El Professor!!!
Gonna roll on that Under with ya
GO BEARS! (Should be a fun game to watch. Not only do I think the Bears match up well against this team, the effort and intensity of the Bears will be too much).
Hey Kine, gonna throw this in your thread (hope you don't mind), instead of making my own. A little reasoning on why I like this play....
The goal this year for UNC was to win the Big Sky regular season; their
hopes and dreams were crushed when Devon Bietzel broke his foot in the
Weber St game. They were beating Weber ST by 8 and then he went out and
they lost, which was basically for the Big Sky title.
Their
next goal when the season ended was to play well in the Big Sky tourney
so they could make any type of post season (Big Dance, NIT, CIT). It
didn't matter, as long as the team got to play in the post season.
UNC
is a young team, so Coach Boyle just wanted the team to gain some post
season experience. Since UNC moved to D1 a few years ago, they have
been the doormat of the Big Sky, so this post season opportunity is
huge, especially for seniors Will Figures and Yonnish Bonner (they were
there in the dark days).
They have been saying in the student
newspaper that they are so excited they get to play for a
"championship", no matter what tourney it is, they wanted to put a
stamp on this season, and want to be remembered as the BEST team UNC
has ever had.
Portland is a team that really wanted and
thought they might get a chance to play in the NCAA Tourney, and at
least they REALLY thought they were a shoe in for the NIT. They got
neither. That was a HUGE disappointment for Portland.
Portland's
team is mostly seniors, and they really wanted a shot at the NIT. All
week they have been quoted saying how disappointed they are and "it's
just not in the cards for us this year".
1) Motivation factor goes to UNC big time.
Home
Court advantage. UNC is a really small, YMCA type gym. The seats sit
right on the floor, and the shooting background is difficult to get
used to. Really nice home court advantage for UNC.
This will
be a fun game to watch; 2 teams that can shoot and two teams that play
good defense. UNC runs a full court press, a lot of trapping, and a
various types of zone defenses. They try to force teams to shoot
perimeter jump shots, due to their lack of size inside. With Bieztel
out, senior guard Yonnish Bonner has stepped in played pretty good. He
doesn't have the offense as Bietzel, but he is the Big Sky defensive
player of the year, and can shut players down.
Haven't heard
for sure if Nik Raivio is back and gonna play, but even if he does, not
sure how effective he will be. An injured acillies takes a LONG time to
really get back from. I know some athletes that never fully recover.
However, that Stohl kid looked really nice in the WCC tourney.
Portland
is going to want to get this game into the high 50's/low 60's
processions,and UNC will want pace at around 69-74. I think being at
home, UNC will be able to dictate pace, and we will get 67-68
processions.
The match up between the 2 teams is pretty equal (skill set, athleticism, length, etc).
I usually like to give stats and others things that might help people make decisions, but running out of time.
In these types of games, motivation is a big factor. Two pretty evenly matched teams, with the home team by far more motivated.
UNC 70 and Portland 65. Locking in UNC +1
0
Hey Kine, gonna throw this in your thread (hope you don't mind), instead of making my own. A little reasoning on why I like this play....
The goal this year for UNC was to win the Big Sky regular season; their
hopes and dreams were crushed when Devon Bietzel broke his foot in the
Weber St game. They were beating Weber ST by 8 and then he went out and
they lost, which was basically for the Big Sky title.
Their
next goal when the season ended was to play well in the Big Sky tourney
so they could make any type of post season (Big Dance, NIT, CIT). It
didn't matter, as long as the team got to play in the post season.
UNC
is a young team, so Coach Boyle just wanted the team to gain some post
season experience. Since UNC moved to D1 a few years ago, they have
been the doormat of the Big Sky, so this post season opportunity is
huge, especially for seniors Will Figures and Yonnish Bonner (they were
there in the dark days).
They have been saying in the student
newspaper that they are so excited they get to play for a
"championship", no matter what tourney it is, they wanted to put a
stamp on this season, and want to be remembered as the BEST team UNC
has ever had.
Portland is a team that really wanted and
thought they might get a chance to play in the NCAA Tourney, and at
least they REALLY thought they were a shoe in for the NIT. They got
neither. That was a HUGE disappointment for Portland.
Portland's
team is mostly seniors, and they really wanted a shot at the NIT. All
week they have been quoted saying how disappointed they are and "it's
just not in the cards for us this year".
1) Motivation factor goes to UNC big time.
Home
Court advantage. UNC is a really small, YMCA type gym. The seats sit
right on the floor, and the shooting background is difficult to get
used to. Really nice home court advantage for UNC.
This will
be a fun game to watch; 2 teams that can shoot and two teams that play
good defense. UNC runs a full court press, a lot of trapping, and a
various types of zone defenses. They try to force teams to shoot
perimeter jump shots, due to their lack of size inside. With Bieztel
out, senior guard Yonnish Bonner has stepped in played pretty good. He
doesn't have the offense as Bietzel, but he is the Big Sky defensive
player of the year, and can shut players down.
Haven't heard
for sure if Nik Raivio is back and gonna play, but even if he does, not
sure how effective he will be. An injured acillies takes a LONG time to
really get back from. I know some athletes that never fully recover.
However, that Stohl kid looked really nice in the WCC tourney.
Portland
is going to want to get this game into the high 50's/low 60's
processions,and UNC will want pace at around 69-74. I think being at
home, UNC will be able to dictate pace, and we will get 67-68
processions.
The match up between the 2 teams is pretty equal (skill set, athleticism, length, etc).
I usually like to give stats and others things that might help people make decisions, but running out of time.
In these types of games, motivation is a big factor. Two pretty evenly matched teams, with the home team by far more motivated.
Hey Kine, gonna throw this in your thread (hope you don't mind), instead of making my own. A little reasoning on why I like this play....
The goal this year for UNC was to win the Big Sky regular season; their
hopes and dreams were crushed when Devon Bietzel broke his foot in the
Weber St game. They were beating Weber ST by 8 and then he went out and
they lost, which was basically for the Big Sky title.
Their
next goal when the season ended was to play well in the Big Sky tourney
so they could make any type of post season (Big Dance, NIT, CIT). It
didn't matter, as long as the team got to play in the post season.
UNC
is a young team, so Coach Boyle just wanted the team to gain some post
season experience. Since UNC moved to D1 a few years ago, they have
been the doormat of the Big Sky, so this post season opportunity is
huge, especially for seniors Will Figures and Yonnish Bonner (they were
there in the dark days).
They have been saying in the student
newspaper that they are so excited they get to play for a
"championship", no matter what tourney it is, they wanted to put a
stamp on this season, and want to be remembered as the BEST team UNC
has ever had.
Portland is a team that really wanted and
thought they might get a chance to play in the NCAA Tourney, and at
least they REALLY thought they were a shoe in for the NIT. They got
neither. That was a HUGE disappointment for Portland.
Portland's
team is mostly seniors, and they really wanted a shot at the NIT. All
week they have been quoted saying how disappointed they are and "it's
just not in the cards for us this year".
1) Motivation factor goes to UNC big time.
Home
Court advantage. UNC is a really small, YMCA type gym. The seats sit
right on the floor, and the shooting background is difficult to get
used to. Really nice home court advantage for UNC.
This will
be a fun game to watch; 2 teams that can shoot and two teams that play
good defense. UNC runs a full court press, a lot of trapping, and a
various types of zone defenses. They try to force teams to shoot
perimeter jump shots, due to their lack of size inside. With Bieztel
out, senior guard Yonnish Bonner has stepped in played pretty good. He
doesn't have the offense as Bietzel, but he is the Big Sky defensive
player of the year, and can shut players down.
Haven't heard
for sure if Nik Raivio is back and gonna play, but even if he does, not
sure how effective he will be. An injured acillies takes a LONG time to
really get back from. I know some athletes that never fully recover.
However, that Stohl kid looked really nice in the WCC tourney.
Portland
is going to want to get this game into the high 50's/low 60's
processions,and UNC will want pace at around 69-74. I think being at
home, UNC will be able to dictate pace, and we will get 67-68
processions.
The match up between the 2 teams is pretty equal (skill set, athleticism, length, etc).
I usually like to give stats and others things that might help people make decisions, but running out of time.
In these types of games, motivation is a big factor. Two pretty evenly matched teams, with the home team by far more motivated.
UNC 70 and Portland 65. Locking in UNC +1
Looks awesome to me and I am on it! Drive safe and we will talk later
0
Quote Originally Posted by cgonzo84:
Hey Kine, gonna throw this in your thread (hope you don't mind), instead of making my own. A little reasoning on why I like this play....
The goal this year for UNC was to win the Big Sky regular season; their
hopes and dreams were crushed when Devon Bietzel broke his foot in the
Weber St game. They were beating Weber ST by 8 and then he went out and
they lost, which was basically for the Big Sky title.
Their
next goal when the season ended was to play well in the Big Sky tourney
so they could make any type of post season (Big Dance, NIT, CIT). It
didn't matter, as long as the team got to play in the post season.
UNC
is a young team, so Coach Boyle just wanted the team to gain some post
season experience. Since UNC moved to D1 a few years ago, they have
been the doormat of the Big Sky, so this post season opportunity is
huge, especially for seniors Will Figures and Yonnish Bonner (they were
there in the dark days).
They have been saying in the student
newspaper that they are so excited they get to play for a
"championship", no matter what tourney it is, they wanted to put a
stamp on this season, and want to be remembered as the BEST team UNC
has ever had.
Portland is a team that really wanted and
thought they might get a chance to play in the NCAA Tourney, and at
least they REALLY thought they were a shoe in for the NIT. They got
neither. That was a HUGE disappointment for Portland.
Portland's
team is mostly seniors, and they really wanted a shot at the NIT. All
week they have been quoted saying how disappointed they are and "it's
just not in the cards for us this year".
1) Motivation factor goes to UNC big time.
Home
Court advantage. UNC is a really small, YMCA type gym. The seats sit
right on the floor, and the shooting background is difficult to get
used to. Really nice home court advantage for UNC.
This will
be a fun game to watch; 2 teams that can shoot and two teams that play
good defense. UNC runs a full court press, a lot of trapping, and a
various types of zone defenses. They try to force teams to shoot
perimeter jump shots, due to their lack of size inside. With Bieztel
out, senior guard Yonnish Bonner has stepped in played pretty good. He
doesn't have the offense as Bietzel, but he is the Big Sky defensive
player of the year, and can shut players down.
Haven't heard
for sure if Nik Raivio is back and gonna play, but even if he does, not
sure how effective he will be. An injured acillies takes a LONG time to
really get back from. I know some athletes that never fully recover.
However, that Stohl kid looked really nice in the WCC tourney.
Portland
is going to want to get this game into the high 50's/low 60's
processions,and UNC will want pace at around 69-74. I think being at
home, UNC will be able to dictate pace, and we will get 67-68
processions.
The match up between the 2 teams is pretty equal (skill set, athleticism, length, etc).
I usually like to give stats and others things that might help people make decisions, but running out of time.
In these types of games, motivation is a big factor. Two pretty evenly matched teams, with the home team by far more motivated.
UNC 70 and Portland 65. Locking in UNC +1
Looks awesome to me and I am on it! Drive safe and we will talk later
Regular Season: YTD 48-29 1-0 (3-unit plays) +22 units (Doubled my bankroll!) System Plays: 37-10 (from Feb 13th to March 7th)
Conference Tourney: 4-10 - 6.5 units
Post-season: 1-1 0 units
Hey Guys, Easy hit with Tech, but should have faded both Conference USA teams as I knew both Marshall and UAB couldn't cover DD spreads, just picked the wrong one - errrrr.
Let me first say that there is A TON of articles and information on the internet about all of these post-season college game and you really should be doing your homework. There is no excuse in not reading what is almost an endless amount of information available for these games.
It's super late and I have a ton to do tomorrow so I might not be around as much as usual, I have already locked this play in: UNDER 123.5 Oregon St vs Boston U
Here's the cliff's note version of why I bet this game: 1. Boston U had to travel ALL DAY cross-country for this game and had one real practice to prepare for Oregon St. 2. This one practice is important as they have not seen ANYTHING like Oregon St's extended 1-3-1 half court trapping defense 3. Boston has a ton of seniors (9) and they have never tasted post-season - in my experience this leads to "tight, tight, tight" play 4. Boston's is a guard heavy team that relies on outside shooting and employs a dribble penetrate and kick offense. 5 of their top 6 scores are guards and 4 of those 5 guards are 6'3 or under - while the wing players of Oregon St are GIANTS. 5. Oregon St has had three days to prepare for Boston and have had no travel at all. Oregon St has one of the top 3-point defenses in the country (and they shoot 3's at one of the worst percentages as well) and Boston jacks up over 23 3-pointers a game!!!!!!!!!! 6. Oregon St is FIRED UP to defend their CBI title (sad but true) and I expect them to be uber-motivated to continue their season. 7. Oregon St is 214th in the country in Offensive Efficiency and plays one of the slowest tempos in the country. They are also a below-average free-throw shooting team as well. 8. Oregon St is playing slower than ever as they held the 10th fast team in the country Washington to a 55 possession game in their last game out. I have seen Oregon St play more than I care to admit and when a team hasn't faced them or hasn't had time to prepare for them, they literally take forever to get shots off. There will be numerous shot clock violations, forced 3's, and turnovers as Boston tries to figure this team out.
I have half a mind to bet Oregon St as well as I feel they matchup awesome in this game, but I would never lay 8ish points to a team that is this bad on offense and shoots free-throws this poorly.
This is also one of those games that I wish I would let myself bet bigger, but I am going to stay disciplined and keep my flat 1-unit betting approach. Although it wouldn't surprise me if either team in this matchup had less than 20 points at halftime (contrastly I wouldn't be completely shocked if Boston shoots the lights out and this game flys over too - such is gambling)
There are so many angles I love about this game staying under, it almost like a perfect storm which actually has me worried a bit! I can only see one or two ways this game goes over while I can count half a dozen or more ways it stays under. I think this game stays under this number 8 out of 10 times they play it and I am feel like if we bet this types of games we will come out on top more often then not. Good luck with whatever you choose
1-unit on UNDER 123.5 on Matchbook
HI KINE, I NOTICED POST SEASON RECORD OF 1-1 YOU HAVE 0 OR UNITS WHEN IT SHOULD BE -.1 UNITS, UNLESS YOU AREN'T PAYING JUICE.
THEN ON YOUR YTD REC= 48-29 WITH 1, 3 UNIT PLAY.THAT SHOULD MAKE YOUR RECORD 50-29 MINUS JUICE OF -2.9= 50-31.9= 18.1 UNITS. ARE PAYING JUICE ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
Regular Season: YTD 48-29 1-0 (3-unit plays) +22 units (Doubled my bankroll!) System Plays: 37-10 (from Feb 13th to March 7th)
Conference Tourney: 4-10 - 6.5 units
Post-season: 1-1 0 units
Hey Guys, Easy hit with Tech, but should have faded both Conference USA teams as I knew both Marshall and UAB couldn't cover DD spreads, just picked the wrong one - errrrr.
Let me first say that there is A TON of articles and information on the internet about all of these post-season college game and you really should be doing your homework. There is no excuse in not reading what is almost an endless amount of information available for these games.
It's super late and I have a ton to do tomorrow so I might not be around as much as usual, I have already locked this play in: UNDER 123.5 Oregon St vs Boston U
Here's the cliff's note version of why I bet this game: 1. Boston U had to travel ALL DAY cross-country for this game and had one real practice to prepare for Oregon St. 2. This one practice is important as they have not seen ANYTHING like Oregon St's extended 1-3-1 half court trapping defense 3. Boston has a ton of seniors (9) and they have never tasted post-season - in my experience this leads to "tight, tight, tight" play 4. Boston's is a guard heavy team that relies on outside shooting and employs a dribble penetrate and kick offense. 5 of their top 6 scores are guards and 4 of those 5 guards are 6'3 or under - while the wing players of Oregon St are GIANTS. 5. Oregon St has had three days to prepare for Boston and have had no travel at all. Oregon St has one of the top 3-point defenses in the country (and they shoot 3's at one of the worst percentages as well) and Boston jacks up over 23 3-pointers a game!!!!!!!!!! 6. Oregon St is FIRED UP to defend their CBI title (sad but true) and I expect them to be uber-motivated to continue their season. 7. Oregon St is 214th in the country in Offensive Efficiency and plays one of the slowest tempos in the country. They are also a below-average free-throw shooting team as well. 8. Oregon St is playing slower than ever as they held the 10th fast team in the country Washington to a 55 possession game in their last game out. I have seen Oregon St play more than I care to admit and when a team hasn't faced them or hasn't had time to prepare for them, they literally take forever to get shots off. There will be numerous shot clock violations, forced 3's, and turnovers as Boston tries to figure this team out.
I have half a mind to bet Oregon St as well as I feel they matchup awesome in this game, but I would never lay 8ish points to a team that is this bad on offense and shoots free-throws this poorly.
This is also one of those games that I wish I would let myself bet bigger, but I am going to stay disciplined and keep my flat 1-unit betting approach. Although it wouldn't surprise me if either team in this matchup had less than 20 points at halftime (contrastly I wouldn't be completely shocked if Boston shoots the lights out and this game flys over too - such is gambling)
There are so many angles I love about this game staying under, it almost like a perfect storm which actually has me worried a bit! I can only see one or two ways this game goes over while I can count half a dozen or more ways it stays under. I think this game stays under this number 8 out of 10 times they play it and I am feel like if we bet this types of games we will come out on top more often then not. Good luck with whatever you choose
1-unit on UNDER 123.5 on Matchbook
HI KINE, I NOTICED POST SEASON RECORD OF 1-1 YOU HAVE 0 OR UNITS WHEN IT SHOULD BE -.1 UNITS, UNLESS YOU AREN'T PAYING JUICE.
THEN ON YOUR YTD REC= 48-29 WITH 1, 3 UNIT PLAY.THAT SHOULD MAKE YOUR RECORD 50-29 MINUS JUICE OF -2.9= 50-31.9= 18.1 UNITS. ARE PAYING JUICE ?
HI KINE, I NOTICED POST SEASON RECORD OF 1-1 YOU HAVE 0 OR UNITS WHEN IT SHOULD BE -.1 UNITS, UNLESS YOU AREN'T PAYING JUICE.
THEN ON YOUR YTD REC= 48-29 WITH 1, 3 UNIT PLAY.THAT SHOULD MAKE YOUR RECORD 50-29 MINUS JUICE OF -2.9= 50-31.9= 18.1 UNITS. ARE PAYING JUICE ?
I play Matchbook, there are many times where I am getting +money or even money and some where I get -110 to -120, all is taken into account when units are posted
I have had several 1.5 and 2 unit plays mixed into the overall record, all units tracked are correct
0
Quote Originally Posted by tomkarw:
HI KINE, I NOTICED POST SEASON RECORD OF 1-1 YOU HAVE 0 OR UNITS WHEN IT SHOULD BE -.1 UNITS, UNLESS YOU AREN'T PAYING JUICE.
THEN ON YOUR YTD REC= 48-29 WITH 1, 3 UNIT PLAY.THAT SHOULD MAKE YOUR RECORD 50-29 MINUS JUICE OF -2.9= 50-31.9= 18.1 UNITS. ARE PAYING JUICE ?
I play Matchbook, there are many times where I am getting +money or even money and some where I get -110 to -120, all is taken into account when units are posted
I have had several 1.5 and 2 unit plays mixed into the overall record, all units tracked are correct
Forgot to list my other leans just in case your interested:
Nevada/Wichita St under 144 (was my favorite play of the day, but decided to sleep on it and think about it more, not worried about Nevada scoring here, worried about Nevada giving up and just getting destroyed) Northern Colorado +1.5 (Cgonzo84 is the boss!) St John's +7.5 AND under 134 (50/50 on this play but like the under slightly more)
I like NV in this one as Utah St. smacked WSU around and NV played UTU pretty tough this year. Just my 2 cents.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
Forgot to list my other leans just in case your interested:
Nevada/Wichita St under 144 (was my favorite play of the day, but decided to sleep on it and think about it more, not worried about Nevada scoring here, worried about Nevada giving up and just getting destroyed) Northern Colorado +1.5 (Cgonzo84 is the boss!) St John's +7.5 AND under 134 (50/50 on this play but like the under slightly more)
I like NV in this one as Utah St. smacked WSU around and NV played UTU pretty tough this year. Just my 2 cents.
Although it wouldn't surprise me if either team in this matchup had less than 20 points at halftime (contrastly I wouldn't be completely shocked if Boston shoots the lights out and this game flys over too - such is gambling)
Boston with 40 points and there's still 5 minutes left
Looks like they are shooting lights out. Nothing we can do. Let's get this back tomorrow, KP.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KineProfessor:
Although it wouldn't surprise me if either team in this matchup had less than 20 points at halftime (contrastly I wouldn't be completely shocked if Boston shoots the lights out and this game flys over too - such is gambling)
Boston with 40 points and there's still 5 minutes left
Looks like they are shooting lights out. Nothing we can do. Let's get this back tomorrow, KP.
Looks like the game was played right at UNC pace! I couldn't find a place to watch on-line, but my buddy said UNC came out very flat and anxious, but their defense kept them in it early. They were able to get everyone involved throughout and played a hard core 3-2 zone the entire game, to forced Portland to shoot from the outside. Portland shot 55% from 3 pony land (12-22) , but UNC was able to drive and get a lot of easy shots. My buddy said after the 2nd half, this was the best he has seen them play.
0
UNC 81 and Portland 73
Looks like the game was played right at UNC pace! I couldn't find a place to watch on-line, but my buddy said UNC came out very flat and anxious, but their defense kept them in it early. They were able to get everyone involved throughout and played a hard core 3-2 zone the entire game, to forced Portland to shoot from the outside. Portland shot 55% from 3 pony land (12-22) , but UNC was able to drive and get a lot of easy shots. My buddy said after the 2nd half, this was the best he has seen them play.
Seems like your totals are a little chilly lately. Not trying to complain, but after tailing Tennessee's over, Butler's over, and tonights under, I am officially a spectator. Keep up the good insight and GL getting back on track
0
Seems like your totals are a little chilly lately. Not trying to complain, but after tailing Tennessee's over, Butler's over, and tonights under, I am officially a spectator. Keep up the good insight and GL getting back on track
Looks like the game was played right at UNC pace! I couldn't find a place to watch on-line, but my buddy said UNC came out very flat and anxious, but their defense kept them in it early. They were able to get everyone involved throughout and played a hard core 3-2 zone the entire game, to forced Portland to shoot from the outside. Portland shot 55% from 3 pony land (12-22) , but UNC was able to drive and get a lot of easy shots. My buddy said after the 2nd half, this was the best he has seen them play.
It looks like it was played, just as you laid it out!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by cgonzo84:
UNC 81 and Portland 73
Looks like the game was played right at UNC pace! I couldn't find a place to watch on-line, but my buddy said UNC came out very flat and anxious, but their defense kept them in it early. They were able to get everyone involved throughout and played a hard core 3-2 zone the entire game, to forced Portland to shoot from the outside. Portland shot 55% from 3 pony land (12-22) , but UNC was able to drive and get a lot of easy shots. My buddy said after the 2nd half, this was the best he has seen them play.
It looks like it was played, just as you laid it out!!!!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.