I am going to try to keep both NCAAF and NCAAB threads going...tall task but I think I can do it. Only work can get in the way occasionally.
1U = $80
HALF = $40
Lost my online Spreadsheets in a purge of Google Drive docs etc.... BUT, I did keep some of my sweet stats for quickly changing rank matchups that happen every day. I use DR Rankings and the stats I have compared the past two seasons were were working between ranking groups and spreads, but not every matchup.
And after inputting the first 5 rank matchups, I already have a play based on past data that works at a high degree of success. I will probably have some more plays by the evenings end.
Play #1 - Murray St -10.5 (N) x 1U
-when teams ranked 91-120th are 5 - 0 ATS vs teams ranked 191 - 230th past year
-when teams ranked 91-120th have a spread of -6 to -10.5, they are 6 - 2 ATS
**DOUBLE combo so I like it
Proving is hard. Talk is easy.
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
So happy, its started! Good to be back!
I am going to try to keep both NCAAF and NCAAB threads going...tall task but I think I can do it. Only work can get in the way occasionally.
1U = $80
HALF = $40
Lost my online Spreadsheets in a purge of Google Drive docs etc.... BUT, I did keep some of my sweet stats for quickly changing rank matchups that happen every day. I use DR Rankings and the stats I have compared the past two seasons were were working between ranking groups and spreads, but not every matchup.
And after inputting the first 5 rank matchups, I already have a play based on past data that works at a high degree of success. I will probably have some more plays by the evenings end.
Play #1 - Murray St -10.5 (N) x 1U
-when teams ranked 91-120th are 5 - 0 ATS vs teams ranked 191 - 230th past year
-when teams ranked 91-120th have a spread of -6 to -10.5, they are 6 - 2 ATS