All Forums | College Basketball

KENTUCKY VS CHICAGO BULLS ????

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 4842
Posts: 128
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 129
Posted: #1

KENTUCKY                                                 CHICAGO BULLS

PG : JOHN WALL                                 PG: DERRICK ROSE

SG : ERIC BLEDSOE                           SG: KIRK HINRICH

SF. D. MILLER                                     SF: JAMES JOHNSON

PF: P. PATTERSON                              PF. BRAD MILLER

C :  D COUSINS                                   C :  TAJ GIBSON

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5818
Posted: #2
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 41530
Posted: #3
BULLS  WOULD KILL THEM
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: #4
I'm taking Kentucky all day in that matchup
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 694
Posted: #5
christ
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 129
Posted: #6
KENTUCKY ALL DAY
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: #7
love Rose, but the Bulls would have no answer for UK's front line
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #8
Bulls win that game by 20. Easily.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 16408
Posted: #9
i am pretty sure the bulls wouldn't have much trouble with south carolina either.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 6810
Posted: #10
The guards are far superior for the bulls, not even close, lightyears better and brad miller would kill patterson down low. he'd be in foul trouble the whole game.
SELECTIVENESS=SUCCESS
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 6810
Posted: #11
102-66 BULLS
SELECTIVENESS=SUCCESS
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 7698
Posted: #12
Line would be Chicago -40
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: #13
You think Heinrich and Rose are lightyears better than Wall and Bledsoe, are you serious?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: #14
Cousins will be a terror in the NBA.   Brad Miller?  hahaha
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 74
Posted: #15
the UK haters on Covers are about to disappear after tonight.  Should be pretty funny. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by Woall:

Cousins will be a terror in the NBA.   Brad Miller?  hahaha


Yes the keyword is a COUPLE YEARS. If the game was played RIGHT NOW, the Bulls would absolutely destroy Kentucky.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 129
Posted: #17

U GUYS MENTION BRAD MILLER A BUM LOL U SEE AFTER TONIGHT BULLS - 40 LMAO GUARDS LIGHT YEARS BETTER ???

WALL POTENTIAL FIRST PICK IN DRAFT BLEDSOE TOP TEN

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 17486
Posted: #18
Just plain Stupid!!  I think UCONN women have a better chance beating a small HS team!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 2963
Posted: #19
First, there are worst lineups than the Bulls, it certainly makes a difference with them missing Deng and Noah. The worst lineup in the league would dismantle Kentucky.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 129
Posted: #20
BULLS PLAYOFF TEAM LAST YEAR IMAGINE OTHER NBA TEAMS ???? KENTUCKY IS A NBA TEAM
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by illwill215:

U GUYS MENTION BRAD MILLER A BUM LOL U SEE AFTER TONIGHT BULLS - 40 LMAO GUARDS LIGHT YEARS BETTER ???

WALL POTENTIAL FIRST PICK IN DRAFT BLEDSOE TOP TEN



Once again, since you are a complete moron and can't understand a simple concept.

If the debate is which players will be better Nba players OVER TIME, then it' Kentucky 100%. But if they played this game RIGHT NOW, figure it out.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 675
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by Woall:

I'm taking Kentucky all day in that matchup


Tell me you are joking, please be joking!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 5365
Posted: #23
I don't know about that.........but I would take the Chicago Bulls over the Detroit Lions in a football game
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 16181
Posted: #24

Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:



Yes the keyword is a COUPLE YEARS. If the game was played RIGHT NOW, the Bulls would absolutely destroy Kentucky.

 

Im starting to realize that these guys are not kidding and are just that ignorant.

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 129
Posted: #25

Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:



Once again, since you are a complete moron and can't understand a simple concept.

If the debate is which players will be better Nba players OVER TIME, then it' Kentucky 100%. But if they played this game RIGHT NOW, figure it out.

MORON??? I GUESS U THINK RIGHT NOW BRAD MILLER IS A GOOD NBA PLAYER ??? HE IS TRASH P.PATTERSON WILL BUST HIS ASS ON THE POST AND HE CAN SHOOT . 100O TIMES MORE ATHLETIC

All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.