Look no further than the Ohio State/Wisconsin game yesterday. "Gifts" like this get beat day after day...
I appreciate your explanations on the lines and all. I DON'T bet on 50/50 flip of the coins. I see NO reason why the "sharps" would put their money on K-State. That's all. The first thing I do when I analize a game is check what games they have in common and "predict" what the "margin of victory" would be. Nowhere in my calculations did it come up that Kansas only wins by 4, or even 8.
K-State won AT HOME against Baylor by 8 and Nebraska by 16.
Kansas beat both Baylor and Nebraska by 20 points AWAY ON THEIR COURTS.
If you do some math, and throw a variable in for K-state playing the common denominators of Baylor and Nebraska at home while Kansas played them away, it's nowhere near -4. And that's just from a two-team common-denomitor calc. I didn't go through their whole schedule yet.
Then you add in that Kansas already beat K-State 90-66, the number gets even bigger.
I DO understand what you were getting at about how they set the lines, BUT I still think that it wud be crazy to NOT to take the Sharp's gift here. I guess it's really not the almighty Vegas' gift, but from what you were saying,..and from what I got out of it,...the Sharps, the non-Squares, the Veterans of the betting world, and the people with deep pockets are going to be on K-State.
I DO appreciate your explanation of why the line is so low. Any other thoughts would be greatly appreciated too.
BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by daviddaman24:
Look no further than the Ohio State/Wisconsin game yesterday. "Gifts" like this get beat day after day...
I appreciate your explanations on the lines and all. I DON'T bet on 50/50 flip of the coins. I see NO reason why the "sharps" would put their money on K-State. That's all. The first thing I do when I analize a game is check what games they have in common and "predict" what the "margin of victory" would be. Nowhere in my calculations did it come up that Kansas only wins by 4, or even 8.
K-State won AT HOME against Baylor by 8 and Nebraska by 16.
Kansas beat both Baylor and Nebraska by 20 points AWAY ON THEIR COURTS.
If you do some math, and throw a variable in for K-state playing the common denominators of Baylor and Nebraska at home while Kansas played them away, it's nowhere near -4. And that's just from a two-team common-denomitor calc. I didn't go through their whole schedule yet.
Then you add in that Kansas already beat K-State 90-66, the number gets even bigger.
I DO understand what you were getting at about how they set the lines, BUT I still think that it wud be crazy to NOT to take the Sharp's gift here. I guess it's really not the almighty Vegas' gift, but from what you were saying,..and from what I got out of it,...the Sharps, the non-Squares, the Veterans of the betting world, and the people with deep pockets are going to be on K-State.
I DO appreciate your explanation of why the line is so low. Any other thoughts would be greatly appreciated too.
Most of what you said makes no sense at all, so i'll address a few of the things you brought up and leave the rest alone....
Vegas sets the line at 4 for a few reasons. 1 they want the line tasty enough for squares to jump on it (and many no doubt will do just that) however they still have to keep at a reasonable number to prevent sharps or smart money from coming in hard on Kansas State (which is exactly what sharps play in games like this) they could probably put this line at 6 and the public would still hit Kansas, but sharps/whales etc would hammer the hell out of K State. Vegas won't risk that. Hence the number 4 which has you riled up thinking it's some gift. Look no further than the Ohio State/Wisconsin game yesterday. "Gifts" like this get beat day after day...
Knowing that the spread is going to move from 3.5 to probably 5ish by game time, would a 'sharp bettor' take Kansas knowing this is going to happen? And who said Ohio state was a gift yesterday?? the public was at least 50% on Wisconsin.
0
Quote Originally Posted by daviddaman24:
Most of what you said makes no sense at all, so i'll address a few of the things you brought up and leave the rest alone....
Vegas sets the line at 4 for a few reasons. 1 they want the line tasty enough for squares to jump on it (and many no doubt will do just that) however they still have to keep at a reasonable number to prevent sharps or smart money from coming in hard on Kansas State (which is exactly what sharps play in games like this) they could probably put this line at 6 and the public would still hit Kansas, but sharps/whales etc would hammer the hell out of K State. Vegas won't risk that. Hence the number 4 which has you riled up thinking it's some gift. Look no further than the Ohio State/Wisconsin game yesterday. "Gifts" like this get beat day after day...
Knowing that the spread is going to move from 3.5 to probably 5ish by game time, would a 'sharp bettor' take Kansas knowing this is going to happen? And who said Ohio state was a gift yesterday?? the public was at least 50% on Wisconsin.
Knowing that the spread is going to move from 3.5 to probably 5ish by game time, would a 'sharp bettor' take Kansas knowing this is going to happen? And who said Ohio state was a gift yesterday?? the public was at least 50% on Wisconsin.
That's what I was gonna say, the whole Wisconsin thing. I quoted that wisconsin ohio st comment but went off on a tangent. Thanx for asking about that game. I DO NOT bet on two good teams. I DO NOT flip coins, if somebody twisted my arm, I would've bet Wisconsin and the "hype" of them being the best chance to beat Ohio St. Or was it becuz of Wisconsin's record at home?
I'm from Wisconsin actually, but I try not to bet on home teams. or against
Thanks for your input
0
Quote Originally Posted by KKemmis:
Knowing that the spread is going to move from 3.5 to probably 5ish by game time, would a 'sharp bettor' take Kansas knowing this is going to happen? And who said Ohio state was a gift yesterday?? the public was at least 50% on Wisconsin.
That's what I was gonna say, the whole Wisconsin thing. I quoted that wisconsin ohio st comment but went off on a tangent. Thanx for asking about that game. I DO NOT bet on two good teams. I DO NOT flip coins, if somebody twisted my arm, I would've bet Wisconsin and the "hype" of them being the best chance to beat Ohio St. Or was it becuz of Wisconsin's record at home?
I'm from Wisconsin actually, but I try not to bet on home teams. or against
"Vegas" had nothing to do with the OSU/Wisc game. OSU was up 15 and lost because of out of this world 3pt shooting. The outcome was in the balance right til the end. The line was right, it was a close game as expected.
Kansas will handle KSU by DD tomorrow. Maybe I'm a square, and I've lost on these types of lines before, but I sure as hell aint takin KSU getting only 4. Kansas is a much better squad with or without their injured guys.
0
"Vegas" had nothing to do with the OSU/Wisc game. OSU was up 15 and lost because of out of this world 3pt shooting. The outcome was in the balance right til the end. The line was right, it was a close game as expected.
Kansas will handle KSU by DD tomorrow. Maybe I'm a square, and I've lost on these types of lines before, but I sure as hell aint takin KSU getting only 4. Kansas is a much better squad with or without their injured guys.
im no genius but as a bettor i trust a couple things 1 vegas has THE CORRECT INFORMATION
2THEY DIDNT BUILD THE HOTELS AND BEAUTIFUL ATTRACTIONS OUTTA POCKET
3PLEASE DONT WSGER ALL YOUR BANKROLL YOUR TOO SMART IVE READ all your excellent info like ole boy said HENCE OHIO ST NUMBER 1 GETTING POINTS
I SMELL TRAP PLAY ALL OVER THIS BE SMART BROTHER YOULL GET IT RIGHT BY TIP OFF CHECK MY POST IF YOU EVER GET A CHANCE I HAVE NOT POSTED A LOSER YET OUT OF 20 BEST OF LUCK BROTHER AND YES I DO LOSE OFTEN ON OTHER PLAYZ I OMLY POST MY STONG ONES LIKE I SAID IM NO GENIUS
0
im no genius but as a bettor i trust a couple things 1 vegas has THE CORRECT INFORMATION
2THEY DIDNT BUILD THE HOTELS AND BEAUTIFUL ATTRACTIONS OUTTA POCKET
3PLEASE DONT WSGER ALL YOUR BANKROLL YOUR TOO SMART IVE READ all your excellent info like ole boy said HENCE OHIO ST NUMBER 1 GETTING POINTS
I SMELL TRAP PLAY ALL OVER THIS BE SMART BROTHER YOULL GET IT RIGHT BY TIP OFF CHECK MY POST IF YOU EVER GET A CHANCE I HAVE NOT POSTED A LOSER YET OUT OF 20 BEST OF LUCK BROTHER AND YES I DO LOSE OFTEN ON OTHER PLAYZ I OMLY POST MY STONG ONES LIKE I SAID IM NO GENIUS
Fella's, Bramlage is Ku's home away from home, 21-1 since the place has opened. Ku has won 42 out of the last 44. KU blows Kstate out at home year after year with kstate having better teams than they have this year. Kstate coming off a Colorado heartbreak and KU kicking ass since the Texas loss and the horrible loss of Robinson's mother. Teams ging in opposite directions.
This game smells like a dead fish that washed up on shore in the middle of summer, but I think they really missed this one. Shocked if KU doesn't win by DD.
0
Fella's, Bramlage is Ku's home away from home, 21-1 since the place has opened. Ku has won 42 out of the last 44. KU blows Kstate out at home year after year with kstate having better teams than they have this year. Kstate coming off a Colorado heartbreak and KU kicking ass since the Texas loss and the horrible loss of Robinson's mother. Teams ging in opposite directions.
This game smells like a dead fish that washed up on shore in the middle of summer, but I think they really missed this one. Shocked if KU doesn't win by DD.
That seems like a pretty good reason to me. That's the #3 scorer and the #5 scorer that this poster says are not playing. If this is true, this is why the line is down.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MBrooks04:
Robinson and Selby not playing...
That seems like a pretty good reason to me. That's the #3 scorer and the #5 scorer that this poster says are not playing. If this is true, this is why the line is down.
That seems like a pretty good reason to me. That's the #3 scorer and the #5 scorer that this poster says are not playing. If this is true, this is why the line is down.
KU is so deep it doesn't matter. Selby has been out 3 games and hadn't been doing much anyway. They will lock down Pullen and Kstate will have trouble scoring. They also have no answer for Morris twins. This game could get ugly early.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cropduster:
That seems like a pretty good reason to me. That's the #3 scorer and the #5 scorer that this poster says are not playing. If this is true, this is why the line is down.
KU is so deep it doesn't matter. Selby has been out 3 games and hadn't been doing much anyway. They will lock down Pullen and Kstate will have trouble scoring. They also have no answer for Morris twins. This game could get ugly early.
Lines are made to even out the betting...50/50 on both sides.
This line is perfect...
The sharps and "smart" bettors take K-State because the line looks like a trap.
The public and squares take Kansas because of the past game, #1 team in the country, K-State not a very good team.
This....everyone needs to remember that Vegas sets the line to get even money on both sides.
That being said and a big follower of Big 12 bball....I think KU will show up and cover. I'll bite and take KU just because they're legit. Undefeated on the road and they've covered ATS their last 5 games....playing very good ball right now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by db333:
Lines are made to even out the betting...50/50 on both sides.
This line is perfect...
The sharps and "smart" bettors take K-State because the line looks like a trap.
The public and squares take Kansas because of the past game, #1 team in the country, K-State not a very good team.
This....everyone needs to remember that Vegas sets the line to get even money on both sides.
That being said and a big follower of Big 12 bball....I think KU will show up and cover. I'll bite and take KU just because they're legit. Undefeated on the road and they've covered ATS their last 5 games....playing very good ball right now.
Ok, so Selby and Robinson is the answer. I'm still not convinced. Like I've said before, Selby's been out for 3 games and have won by 20+. And one was Nebraska away.
What's funny is that I haven't watched enough of Kansas to know what Robinson's role is on their team. On paper he looks like the Morris brothers' sub to give them a breather.
Anybody have any info on these guys?
Says Selby is Questionable for an ankle and Robinson is out for at least 2 weeks for surgery on a tear in his knee.
He also didn't play last game against Iowa St. Ok, I understand it was Iowa St. at home, but they did win by 23 points WITHOUT Selby or Robinson.
0
Ok, so Selby and Robinson is the answer. I'm still not convinced. Like I've said before, Selby's been out for 3 games and have won by 20+. And one was Nebraska away.
What's funny is that I haven't watched enough of Kansas to know what Robinson's role is on their team. On paper he looks like the Morris brothers' sub to give them a breather.
Anybody have any info on these guys?
Says Selby is Questionable for an ankle and Robinson is out for at least 2 weeks for surgery on a tear in his knee.
He also didn't play last game against Iowa St. Ok, I understand it was Iowa St. at home, but they did win by 23 points WITHOUT Selby or Robinson.
This....everyone needs to remember that Vegas sets the line to get even money on both sides.
That being said and a big follower of Big 12 bball....I think KU will show up and cover. I'll bite and take KU just because they're legit. Undefeated on the road and they've covered ATS their last 5 games....playing very good ball right now.
Agreed. I watch Texas a lot, as you can tell by my screen name. I've watched a lot of the teams in the Big 12. Just haven't focused my energy on Kansas, cuz I think people know Kansas as a good team, better than Texas. I believe Texas' lines haven't gotten out of control yet like sum of Kansas'. Put this line is out-of-control good. I've already put my bet in in KU, just not my balance. Although, it is very tempting not to go against money management and put all my eggs in one basket.
0
Quote Originally Posted by chazutx:
This....everyone needs to remember that Vegas sets the line to get even money on both sides.
That being said and a big follower of Big 12 bball....I think KU will show up and cover. I'll bite and take KU just because they're legit. Undefeated on the road and they've covered ATS their last 5 games....playing very good ball right now.
Agreed. I watch Texas a lot, as you can tell by my screen name. I've watched a lot of the teams in the Big 12. Just haven't focused my energy on Kansas, cuz I think people know Kansas as a good team, better than Texas. I believe Texas' lines haven't gotten out of control yet like sum of Kansas'. Put this line is out-of-control good. I've already put my bet in in KU, just not my balance. Although, it is very tempting not to go against money management and put all my eggs in one basket.
Agreed. I watch Texas a lot, as you can tell by my screen name. I've watched a lot of the teams in the Big 12. Just haven't focused my energy on Kansas, cuz I think people know Kansas as a good team, better than Texas. I believe Texas' lines haven't gotten out of control yet like sum of Kansas'. Put this line is out-of-control good. I've already put my bet in in KU, just not my balance. Although, it is very tempting not to go against money management and put all my eggs in one basket.
Have to always exercise the money management. When you don't is typically when you get slaughtered.
But yeah I've watched a few KU games including against Texas. Solid team and very deep. Hence why I don't think Selby/Robinson being out is a huge factor like most think. I think the line is where it's at because everyone thinks K-state is unstoppable at home. They're a MUCH better home team I agree...I just think for KU to lose K-state will have to play out of their minds while KU playing down. With the way KU has been playing I just don't see that happening. I could be wrong....but I'll bite! It's like they have something to prove after that loss to Texas.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TexasD:
Agreed. I watch Texas a lot, as you can tell by my screen name. I've watched a lot of the teams in the Big 12. Just haven't focused my energy on Kansas, cuz I think people know Kansas as a good team, better than Texas. I believe Texas' lines haven't gotten out of control yet like sum of Kansas'. Put this line is out-of-control good. I've already put my bet in in KU, just not my balance. Although, it is very tempting not to go against money management and put all my eggs in one basket.
Have to always exercise the money management. When you don't is typically when you get slaughtered.
But yeah I've watched a few KU games including against Texas. Solid team and very deep. Hence why I don't think Selby/Robinson being out is a huge factor like most think. I think the line is where it's at because everyone thinks K-state is unstoppable at home. They're a MUCH better home team I agree...I just think for KU to lose K-state will have to play out of their minds while KU playing down. With the way KU has been playing I just don't see that happening. I could be wrong....but I'll bite! It's like they have something to prove after that loss to Texas.
I think the line is where it's at because everyone thinks K-state is unstoppable at home. They're a MUCH better home team I agree
I don't see it. They ARE NOT GOOD AT HOME. I'm looking at their schedule right now. 4 games at home during conference.
Colorado - Lost by 8
Texas Tech - Won by 34 (as they should have, it's this year's Tech)
Baylor - Won by 8
Nebraska - Won by 16
One good game there. Beating Nebraska by 16 is a good win. otherwise I don't see them "playing so much better" like people would assume.
Their non-conference home games were junk. Savannah St., North florida, Missouri Kansas City, Alcorn St., Emporia St??, Texas Southern, Presbyterian and James Madison.
Emporia St.?? is that even Division I basketball??
ONE EARLY SEASON (2nd game of the year) HOME WIN: Virginia Tech by 16.
Good stuff, keep the info coming.
Ohhh, I am not one of the people who think Selby and Robinson being out is going to give K-State the keys to the car at home.
I'm all over this game.
I usually use a lot of my spare time to do long, well-informed write-ups on games that I believe in. I don't think I'll be doing that this time.
Kansas -4
BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by chazutx:
I think the line is where it's at because everyone thinks K-state is unstoppable at home. They're a MUCH better home team I agree
I don't see it. They ARE NOT GOOD AT HOME. I'm looking at their schedule right now. 4 games at home during conference.
Colorado - Lost by 8
Texas Tech - Won by 34 (as they should have, it's this year's Tech)
Baylor - Won by 8
Nebraska - Won by 16
One good game there. Beating Nebraska by 16 is a good win. otherwise I don't see them "playing so much better" like people would assume.
Their non-conference home games were junk. Savannah St., North florida, Missouri Kansas City, Alcorn St., Emporia St??, Texas Southern, Presbyterian and James Madison.
Emporia St.?? is that even Division I basketball??
ONE EARLY SEASON (2nd game of the year) HOME WIN: Virginia Tech by 16.
Good stuff, keep the info coming.
Ohhh, I am not one of the people who think Selby and Robinson being out is going to give K-State the keys to the car at home.
I'm all over this game.
I usually use a lot of my spare time to do long, well-informed write-ups on games that I believe in. I don't think I'll be doing that this time.
no offense man but it's people who think like you that are the reason sportsbooks make so much money. Your reaction to this line is exactly what vegas wants. You're a square. Think like the oddsmaker. What would be the reason oddsmakers put this line at 4?
Don't be so narrowed minded and take a look at the bigger picture.
Are you serious???Lines are set for equal value on both sides, something you dont realize bc if you did you maybe would have a better record on the yr. I realize you stopped posting your plays once you got deep into the negatives..Texas I wouldnt take this guy opinion seriously at all. I mean he's moved on to betting Tennis where hes -21 units on the yr
0
Quote Originally Posted by daviddaman24:
no offense man but it's people who think like you that are the reason sportsbooks make so much money. Your reaction to this line is exactly what vegas wants. You're a square. Think like the oddsmaker. What would be the reason oddsmakers put this line at 4?
Don't be so narrowed minded and take a look at the bigger picture.
Are you serious???Lines are set for equal value on both sides, something you dont realize bc if you did you maybe would have a better record on the yr. I realize you stopped posting your plays once you got deep into the negatives..Texas I wouldnt take this guy opinion seriously at all. I mean he's moved on to betting Tennis where hes -21 units on the yr
Are you serious???Lines are set for equal value on both sides, something you dont realize bc if you did you maybe would have a better record on the yr. I realize you stopped posting your plays once you got deep into the negatives..Texas I wouldnt take this guy opinion seriously at all. I mean he's moved on to betting Tennis where hes -21 units on the yr
Again, what record are you talking about?
and what do you mean moved on to betting Tennis? I've bet tennis all season....
What have you ever offered to this forum mister 200 posts? You're a nothing
0
Quote Originally Posted by stingercofc:
Are you serious???Lines are set for equal value on both sides, something you dont realize bc if you did you maybe would have a better record on the yr. I realize you stopped posting your plays once you got deep into the negatives..Texas I wouldnt take this guy opinion seriously at all. I mean he's moved on to betting Tennis where hes -21 units on the yr
Again, what record are you talking about?
and what do you mean moved on to betting Tennis? I've bet tennis all season....
What have you ever offered to this forum mister 200 posts? You're a nothing
Are you serious???Lines are set for equal value on both sides, something you dont realize bc if you did you maybe would have a better record on the yr. I realize you stopped posting your plays once you got deep into the negatives..Texas I wouldnt take this guy opinion seriously at all. I mean he's moved on to betting Tennis where hes -21 units on the yr
Going even further.... Have you ever even posted a play? Looking back at your posts it doesn't seem like it. Hell I don't think you've even started more then 2 or 3 threads since posting here. You'd be hard pressed to find a more worthless poster on the entire site. Congrats man. You contribute nothing, and mean nothing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by stingercofc:
Are you serious???Lines are set for equal value on both sides, something you dont realize bc if you did you maybe would have a better record on the yr. I realize you stopped posting your plays once you got deep into the negatives..Texas I wouldnt take this guy opinion seriously at all. I mean he's moved on to betting Tennis where hes -21 units on the yr
Going even further.... Have you ever even posted a play? Looking back at your posts it doesn't seem like it. Hell I don't think you've even started more then 2 or 3 threads since posting here. You'd be hard pressed to find a more worthless poster on the entire site. Congrats man. You contribute nothing, and mean nothing.
I'm just not a fan of people attacking people. I try (as hard as it may be sumtimes when you read some rants and raves and opinions and names that get called) but it's not worth it and it really doesn't matter.
I enjoy the info and the info I give backeth.
BOL, Thanks for posting everyone
0
Chill peeps, everybody's got opinions.
I'm just not a fan of people attacking people. I try (as hard as it may be sumtimes when you read some rants and raves and opinions and names that get called) but it's not worth it and it really doesn't matter.
I'm just not a fan of people attacking people. I try (as hard as it may be sumtimes when you read some rants and raves and opinions and names that get called) but it's not worth it and it really doesn't matter.
I enjoy the info and the info I give backeth.
BOL, Thanks for posting everyone
No worries man, I certainly wasn't looking to attack and apologize if it came off that way. I just shared my view on games like this and it is what is. Some will agree, others won't. Not everyone looks at things the same. GL to you tomorrow and the rest of the season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TexasD:
Chill peeps, everybody's got opinions.
I'm just not a fan of people attacking people. I try (as hard as it may be sumtimes when you read some rants and raves and opinions and names that get called) but it's not worth it and it really doesn't matter.
I enjoy the info and the info I give backeth.
BOL, Thanks for posting everyone
No worries man, I certainly wasn't looking to attack and apologize if it came off that way. I just shared my view on games like this and it is what is. Some will agree, others won't. Not everyone looks at things the same. GL to you tomorrow and the rest of the season.
I with you and probably 94% of the public tomorrow on this one. Let them say "I told you so", but I'm sick of leaving money on the table in fear of the trap.
0
I with you and probably 94% of the public tomorrow on this one. Let them say "I told you so", but I'm sick of leaving money on the table in fear of the trap.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.