First off, I respect you -Chase-, BUT I think you are somewhat mistaken on a few things.
Books don't care how many people bet on each team, they just want the money to be even.
This is not necessarily true. Sometimes (by design) they do not.
As for the smart money being on UNC, that's completely wrong. Smart money would never be on a big name program laying 8 points in a neutral site game.
This again is not necessarily true. Although typically rare, it does and can happen.
Nonetheless, keep up the solid work. My foolish, worthless opinion on this game (as of Wednesday night): I like the under the most, and I like Washington State + the points a little bit less.
First off, I respect you -Chase-, BUT I think you are somewhat mistaken on a few things.
Books don't care how many people bet on each team, they just want the money to be even.
This is not necessarily true. Sometimes (by design) they do not.
As for the smart money being on UNC, that's completely wrong. Smart money would never be on a big name program laying 8 points in a neutral site game.
This again is not necessarily true. Although typically rare, it does and can happen.
Nonetheless, keep up the solid work. My foolish, worthless opinion on this game (as of Wednesday night): I like the under the most, and I like Washington State + the points a little bit less.