Michigan State and Wisconsin both profile as efficient half-court offenses, and 147.5 is light given their scoring ceilings. Michigan State’s pace has been higher in competitive games, and Wisconsin’s shot quality — especially from deep — is strong enough to punish soft closeouts. Neither defense consistently forces turnovers, which should keep possessions clean and efficient. In a tight Big Ten game, late fouls push this into the 150s.
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
380-300 +65.00
MSU @ WISC O147.5
Michigan State and Wisconsin both profile as efficient half-court offenses, and 147.5 is light given their scoring ceilings. Michigan State’s pace has been higher in competitive games, and Wisconsin’s shot quality — especially from deep — is strong enough to punish soft closeouts. Neither defense consistently forces turnovers, which should keep possessions clean and efficient. In a tight Big Ten game, late fouls push this into the 150s.
380-300 +65.00 MSU @ WISC O147.5 Michigan State and Wisconsin both profile as efficient half-court offenses, and 147.5 is light given their scoring ceilings. Michigan State’s pace has been higher in competitive games, and Wisconsin’s shot quality — especially from deep — is strong enough to punish soft closeouts. Neither defense consistently forces turnovers, which should keep possessions clean and efficient. In a tight Big Ten game, late fouls push this into the 150s.
Quote Originally Posted by F_T_K:
380-300 +65.00 MSU @ WISC O147.5 Michigan State and Wisconsin both profile as efficient half-court offenses, and 147.5 is light given their scoring ceilings. Michigan State’s pace has been higher in competitive games, and Wisconsin’s shot quality — especially from deep — is strong enough to punish soft closeouts. Neither defense consistently forces turnovers, which should keep possessions clean and efficient. In a tight Big Ten game, late fouls push this into the 150s.