These team’s last 3 matchups have all gone under, including a total of 111 in their lone matchup last year. TCU has been running more in conference play, but has not had a tempo/defensive matchup remotely close to Houston. Houston’s D is top 10, Adj tempo 348/365, and defensive possession 342/365 and is going to greatly limit TCU in transition and their overall tempo.TCU has only faced one opponent under a 65 Adj Tempo (Houston is 63.3) - North Texas, and that game totaled 120.
I have one other game I am looking at and will post separately if I play it.
Embrace the Grind
4
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
41-25
+11.6 Units
Houston / TCU - UNDER 138.5 (-120) 1.2 Units
These team’s last 3 matchups have all gone under, including a total of 111 in their lone matchup last year. TCU has been running more in conference play, but has not had a tempo/defensive matchup remotely close to Houston. Houston’s D is top 10, Adj tempo 348/365, and defensive possession 342/365 and is going to greatly limit TCU in transition and their overall tempo.TCU has only faced one opponent under a 65 Adj Tempo (Houston is 63.3) - North Texas, and that game totaled 120.
I have one other game I am looking at and will post separately if I play it.
Ready to lock in my 2nd play sooner than I thought. Bovada currently offering a much better line than Hard Rock. This one could be bet up further slightly but I have the total in the low-mid 120’s.
Louisiana Tech / UTEP - UNDER 130 (-120) 1.2 Units
UTEP Adj Tempo of 64.5 (316/365) vs LA Tech 62.8 (358/365). These teams did play earlier this year, which went Over, with LA Tech having their best day from 3 Pt range of the season. UTEP coming off a similar matchup vs Missouri State (Under - 119 points). LA Tech had a similar matchup last week vs Jax State (Under - 124 points). As A Dog, LA Tech is 8-2 to the Under and on the road, the Under is 7-1
Embrace the Grind
2
Ready to lock in my 2nd play sooner than I thought. Bovada currently offering a much better line than Hard Rock. This one could be bet up further slightly but I have the total in the low-mid 120’s.
Louisiana Tech / UTEP - UNDER 130 (-120) 1.2 Units
UTEP Adj Tempo of 64.5 (316/365) vs LA Tech 62.8 (358/365). These teams did play earlier this year, which went Over, with LA Tech having their best day from 3 Pt range of the season. UTEP coming off a similar matchup vs Missouri State (Under - 119 points). LA Tech had a similar matchup last week vs Jax State (Under - 124 points). As A Dog, LA Tech is 8-2 to the Under and on the road, the Under is 7-1
Analysis: California Golden Bears - Florida State Seminoles (Wednesday, Jan 28) The Stakes:A non-conference clash with contrasting trajectories. The California Golden Bears (15-5, 3-4 ACC) are finding their stride in ACC play, coming off a huge road win at Stanford to snap a five-game skid in the rivalry. They are a potent offensive team looking to build momentum. The Florida State Seminoles (8-12, 1-6 ACC) are struggling mightily, having lost 9 of their last 12. Their lone ACC win was a scrappy road victory at Miami, but defensive consistency is a major issue. This game presents a classic "offense vs. defense" matchup, but the "defense" in question is one of the nation's worst. California Golden Bears: Biggest Strength: Elite, Efficient Offense. They are a fantastic shooting team: 45.0% FG, 36.5% 3PT, 79.2% FT. They have four players averaging 12+ PPG, led by Dai Dai Ames (17.1 PPG, 42.4% 3PT). They move the ball well (14.3 APG) and can score in bunches from inside and out. Fatal Flaw: Atrocious Defense. Ranked 339th in scoring defense, they offer little resistance. They are especially vulnerable on the perimeter (331st in 3PT% defense). They don't force many turnovers (6.3 SPG) and allow opponents to shoot a high percentage. Identity: A high-flying, skilled offensive team that wins shootouts. They are comfortable in high-scoring games because they trust their offense to outscore opponents. Defense is an afterthought. Florida State Seminoles: Identity: A long, athletic team built on Leonard Hamilton's traditional style—fast pace, pressure, and depth. This season, the defense hasn't held up, making them a team that often gets into shootouts they can't win. Game Flow & X-Factors The Pace War: Florida State will want to run at every opportunity. California, with its efficient half-court offense, will happily take open shots in transition or against a scrambled defense. This game will have a very high number of possessions. California's Shooting vs. FSU's Closeouts: Cal has four shooters (Ames, Camden, Bell, Pippen) hitting over 33% from three. FSU's defense, which can be scrambling, will be tested to close out on shooters. If Cal gets hot from deep, they can score 85+ alone. Home Court Desperation: Florida State is at home and desperately needs a win to salvage season morale. This could lead to a high-energy, frenetic game, or pressing too hard and making mistakes. Both scenarios favor a high score. You'll find the full analysis and many other interesting things on my website: victorypicks.eu and ... great bonus for today: a free NCAAB lock for anyone interested. Here's all you gotta do: 1. Just send me a message [ contact@victorypicks.eu ] 2. Please type "FIX" in the subject line of your message. *Heads up, some email services automatically filter my messages into the spam folder, so I recommend checking there.
yo mods, why are you letting these touts in here?
1
Quote Originally Posted by Jornell:
Analysis: California Golden Bears - Florida State Seminoles (Wednesday, Jan 28) The Stakes:A non-conference clash with contrasting trajectories. The California Golden Bears (15-5, 3-4 ACC) are finding their stride in ACC play, coming off a huge road win at Stanford to snap a five-game skid in the rivalry. They are a potent offensive team looking to build momentum. The Florida State Seminoles (8-12, 1-6 ACC) are struggling mightily, having lost 9 of their last 12. Their lone ACC win was a scrappy road victory at Miami, but defensive consistency is a major issue. This game presents a classic "offense vs. defense" matchup, but the "defense" in question is one of the nation's worst. California Golden Bears: Biggest Strength: Elite, Efficient Offense. They are a fantastic shooting team: 45.0% FG, 36.5% 3PT, 79.2% FT. They have four players averaging 12+ PPG, led by Dai Dai Ames (17.1 PPG, 42.4% 3PT). They move the ball well (14.3 APG) and can score in bunches from inside and out. Fatal Flaw: Atrocious Defense. Ranked 339th in scoring defense, they offer little resistance. They are especially vulnerable on the perimeter (331st in 3PT% defense). They don't force many turnovers (6.3 SPG) and allow opponents to shoot a high percentage. Identity: A high-flying, skilled offensive team that wins shootouts. They are comfortable in high-scoring games because they trust their offense to outscore opponents. Defense is an afterthought. Florida State Seminoles: Identity: A long, athletic team built on Leonard Hamilton's traditional style—fast pace, pressure, and depth. This season, the defense hasn't held up, making them a team that often gets into shootouts they can't win. Game Flow & X-Factors The Pace War: Florida State will want to run at every opportunity. California, with its efficient half-court offense, will happily take open shots in transition or against a scrambled defense. This game will have a very high number of possessions. California's Shooting vs. FSU's Closeouts: Cal has four shooters (Ames, Camden, Bell, Pippen) hitting over 33% from three. FSU's defense, which can be scrambling, will be tested to close out on shooters. If Cal gets hot from deep, they can score 85+ alone. Home Court Desperation: Florida State is at home and desperately needs a win to salvage season morale. This could lead to a high-energy, frenetic game, or pressing too hard and making mistakes. Both scenarios favor a high score. You'll find the full analysis and many other interesting things on my website: victorypicks.eu and ... great bonus for today: a free NCAAB lock for anyone interested. Here's all you gotta do: 1. Just send me a message [ contact@victorypicks.eu ] 2. Please type "FIX" in the subject line of your message. *Heads up, some email services automatically filter my messages into the spam folder, so I recommend checking there.
Hey man, appreciate your input and see that you have a good read on over/unders. Just wondering....if you ever get an inclining on a side would you share it in a post? Or just stick to your bread and butter, so to speak. Thanks.
good luck.
0
@Floridaman
Hey man, appreciate your input and see that you have a good read on over/unders. Just wondering....if you ever get an inclining on a side would you share it in a post? Or just stick to your bread and butter, so to speak. Thanks.
Definitely. I do make occasional plays on sides (smaller wagers than my posted plays on totals) but haven’t been posting them this season. I will probably begin posting and playing larger units on them around conference tourney time.
Embrace the Grind
0
@Parlay_pal
Definitely. I do make occasional plays on sides (smaller wagers than my posted plays on totals) but haven’t been posting them this season. I will probably begin posting and playing larger units on them around conference tourney time.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.