2.30* Eastern Illinois +4.5 .20* Eastern Illnois ML +175
1.90* Loyola CHI +6 .10* Loyola Chi ML +230
1.90* Clemson +5.5 .10* Clemson ML +210 2* Wisconsin -9 2* Georgia St -11 1.75* St. Joseph's +2.5 .25* St. Joseph's ML +130 2* Seton Hall -12.5 2* Michigan -6.5 1.50* LSU under 142.5 1* Montana ML -125
.21* North Dakota State +3.5 .04* North Dakota State ML +155
.22* : Portland +4.5 .03* Portland ML +175
.25* : Gonzaga -3
.25* Long Beach State +16.5
.25* TCU -1 .25* Northern Illinois/UIC Over 131
.25* Princeton/Drexel Under 112
.25* Troy/Mississippi State Under 151
.25*: Missouri State/Arky LR Under 129
0
2.30* Eastern Illinois +4.5 .20* Eastern Illnois ML +175
1.90* Loyola CHI +6 .10* Loyola Chi ML +230
1.90* Clemson +5.5 .10* Clemson ML +210 2* Wisconsin -9 2* Georgia St -11 1.75* St. Joseph's +2.5 .25* St. Joseph's ML +130 2* Seton Hall -12.5 2* Michigan -6.5 1.50* LSU under 142.5 1* Montana ML -125
2.30* Eastern Illinois +4.5 .20* Eastern Illnois ML +175
1.90* Loyola CHI +6 .10* Loyola Chi ML +230
1.90* Clemson +5.5 .10* Clemson ML +210 2* Wisconsin -9 2* Georgia St -11 1.75* St. Joseph's +2.5 .25* St. Joseph's ML +130 2* Seton Hall -12.5 2* Michigan -6.5 1.50* LSU under 142.5 1* Montana ML -125
.21* North Dakota State +3.5 .04* North Dakota State ML +155
.22* : Portland +4.5 .03* Portland ML +175
.25* : Gonzaga -3
.25* Long Beach State +16.5
.25* TCU -1 .25* Northern Illinois/UIC Over 131
.25* Princeton/Drexel Under 112
.25* Troy/Mississippi State Under 151
.25*: Missouri State/Arky LR Under 129
Tailer - You arent staying true to your name...The only ML you are supposed to tail is Montana - 125. You are putting your own spin on the ML underdogs...Stay away from wasting $20-$200 on an ML underdog play and STAY TRUE to your NAME. THE TAILER..you arent the CAPPER. GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by ultimatetailer1:
2.30* Eastern Illinois +4.5 .20* Eastern Illnois ML +175
1.90* Loyola CHI +6 .10* Loyola Chi ML +230
1.90* Clemson +5.5 .10* Clemson ML +210 2* Wisconsin -9 2* Georgia St -11 1.75* St. Joseph's +2.5 .25* St. Joseph's ML +130 2* Seton Hall -12.5 2* Michigan -6.5 1.50* LSU under 142.5 1* Montana ML -125
.21* North Dakota State +3.5 .04* North Dakota State ML +155
.22* : Portland +4.5 .03* Portland ML +175
.25* : Gonzaga -3
.25* Long Beach State +16.5
.25* TCU -1 .25* Northern Illinois/UIC Over 131
.25* Princeton/Drexel Under 112
.25* Troy/Mississippi State Under 151
.25*: Missouri State/Arky LR Under 129
Tailer - You arent staying true to your name...The only ML you are supposed to tail is Montana - 125. You are putting your own spin on the ML underdogs...Stay away from wasting $20-$200 on an ML underdog play and STAY TRUE to your NAME. THE TAILER..you arent the CAPPER. GL
Tailer - You arent staying true to your name...The only ML you are supposed to tail is Montana - 125. You are putting your own spin on the ML underdogs...Stay away from wasting $20-$200 on an ML underdog play and STAY TRUE to your NAME. THE TAILER..you arent the CAPPER. GL
I've been doing this for years, the other experts have influenced me to this conclusion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Liquorinfront:
Tailer - You arent staying true to your name...The only ML you are supposed to tail is Montana - 125. You are putting your own spin on the ML underdogs...Stay away from wasting $20-$200 on an ML underdog play and STAY TRUE to your NAME. THE TAILER..you arent the CAPPER. GL
I've been doing this for years, the other experts have influenced me to this conclusion.
a 5 team parlay for 2000, yeah okay, thats believable
honestly Covers should charge membership fees to get rid of clowns like this
Bugs like you with short bankrolls who just can't imagine there's anyone in this world with means greater than your own, gives me great pleasure in not only proving you wrong but also telling you my weekly bankroll exceeds your yearly.
Stop making me prove shit with your useless posts of disbelief. This was the worst week of my year your looking at.
0
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:
a 5 team parlay for 2000, yeah okay, thats believable
honestly Covers should charge membership fees to get rid of clowns like this
Bugs like you with short bankrolls who just can't imagine there's anyone in this world with means greater than your own, gives me great pleasure in not only proving you wrong but also telling you my weekly bankroll exceeds your yearly.
Stop making me prove shit with your useless posts of disbelief. This was the worst week of my year your looking at.
OK I realize I'm helping by consolidating but it would be best if my thread remains with my selections. Don't take this the wrong way as I highly appreciate your efforts but please start a new thread posting those, thank you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bearcubs07:
Hammer the books plays for the day
Xavier -8
Wisconsin -10
Davidson -2
TCU -1.5
Ill Chicago -9
Fresno st +12.5
Mich st +3.5
Georgia st -11.5
Flames ML (NHL)
Sharks ML (NHL)
Went 2-1 with him yesterday 2-0 with fat jack
Fat jack hasn't sent me his picks yet Today
OK I realize I'm helping by consolidating but it would be best if my thread remains with my selections. Don't take this the wrong way as I highly appreciate your efforts but please start a new thread posting those, thank you.
Good Luck tailer, but with 33 games or so in one day it is nearly impossible to be a consistent winner. Too much juice!
I understand your concern and while logical I'm of different opinion. The 4 sharps I tail are all highly skilled and rarely conflict as they manage different conferences, etc. I like you I presume was of the idea that less is best and while I found this to work with success then I experimented (not betting) with multiple experts (4 in cbb) and its been even more successful. Now note Neil (NROPP11) is a high volume player while the other three are low volume. When you gaze at today's card you will notice Neil makes up for 18 plays while the other 3 only combine for 6. Very nice of you to offer your words of advise and wish you gl on all your ventures.
0
Quote Originally Posted by rounders69:
Good Luck tailer, but with 33 games or so in one day it is nearly impossible to be a consistent winner. Too much juice!
I understand your concern and while logical I'm of different opinion. The 4 sharps I tail are all highly skilled and rarely conflict as they manage different conferences, etc. I like you I presume was of the idea that less is best and while I found this to work with success then I experimented (not betting) with multiple experts (4 in cbb) and its been even more successful. Now note Neil (NROPP11) is a high volume player while the other three are low volume. When you gaze at today's card you will notice Neil makes up for 18 plays while the other 3 only combine for 6. Very nice of you to offer your words of advise and wish you gl on all your ventures.
SO WAIT EACH STAR EQUALS 1K AND THATS JUST THE JUICE RIGHT?....SO YOU BET 25K ON KENT ST AND BRADLEY EACH RIGHT?LMAO SURE YOU DID JOKER....THAN 10K EACH ON THE NEXT 5...SO NOW YOU JUST BET 100K WITH 6 GAMES REMAINING....HAHAHAHA THATS A COMPLETE JOKE....ANYONE WHO COMES ON HERE AND SAYS THEY BET THAT MUCH DEF DOES NOT!!.....WITH THIS BEING SAID YOU PROB A DOLLAR A GAME BETTER AT BEST....BALLERS DONT BRAG ON A WEBSITE,LOL.....OH SORRY U ARE ROUNDING IT OFF U ACTUALLY BET HIGHER U SAID,HAHAHAA.....GIVE IT A REST BOZO
0
SO WAIT EACH STAR EQUALS 1K AND THATS JUST THE JUICE RIGHT?....SO YOU BET 25K ON KENT ST AND BRADLEY EACH RIGHT?LMAO SURE YOU DID JOKER....THAN 10K EACH ON THE NEXT 5...SO NOW YOU JUST BET 100K WITH 6 GAMES REMAINING....HAHAHAHA THATS A COMPLETE JOKE....ANYONE WHO COMES ON HERE AND SAYS THEY BET THAT MUCH DEF DOES NOT!!.....WITH THIS BEING SAID YOU PROB A DOLLAR A GAME BETTER AT BEST....BALLERS DONT BRAG ON A WEBSITE,LOL.....OH SORRY U ARE ROUNDING IT OFF U ACTUALLY BET HIGHER U SAID,HAHAHAA.....GIVE IT A REST BOZO
SO WAIT EACH STAR EQUALS 1K AND THATS JUST THE JUICE RIGHT?....SO YOU BET 25K ON KENT ST AND BRADLEY EACH RIGHT?LMAO SURE YOU DID JOKER....THAN 10K EACH ON THE NEXT 5...SO NOW YOU JUST BET 100K WITH 6 GAMES REMAINING....HAHAHAHA THATS A COMPLETE JOKE....ANYONE WHO COMES ON HERE AND SAYS THEY BET THAT MUCH DEF DOES NOT!!.....WITH THIS BEING SAID YOU PROB A DOLLAR A GAME BETTER AT BEST....BALLERS DONT BRAG ON A WEBSITE,LOL.....OH SORRY U ARE ROUNDING IT OFF U ACTUALLY BET HIGHER U SAID,HAHAHAA.....GIVE IT A REST BOZO
Kent St and Bradley were 2.5* and not 25*. Brag? $1,000 is nothing. My father earned over seven digits a year, my brother is the Vice President of a major cooperation, and I'm here wagering pennies, brag I think not. The utilization of upper case letters is not merited and anyone using LOL should give it a rest. one word delusional.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dawizard2011:
SO WAIT EACH STAR EQUALS 1K AND THATS JUST THE JUICE RIGHT?....SO YOU BET 25K ON KENT ST AND BRADLEY EACH RIGHT?LMAO SURE YOU DID JOKER....THAN 10K EACH ON THE NEXT 5...SO NOW YOU JUST BET 100K WITH 6 GAMES REMAINING....HAHAHAHA THATS A COMPLETE JOKE....ANYONE WHO COMES ON HERE AND SAYS THEY BET THAT MUCH DEF DOES NOT!!.....WITH THIS BEING SAID YOU PROB A DOLLAR A GAME BETTER AT BEST....BALLERS DONT BRAG ON A WEBSITE,LOL.....OH SORRY U ARE ROUNDING IT OFF U ACTUALLY BET HIGHER U SAID,HAHAHAA.....GIVE IT A REST BOZO
Kent St and Bradley were 2.5* and not 25*. Brag? $1,000 is nothing. My father earned over seven digits a year, my brother is the Vice President of a major cooperation, and I'm here wagering pennies, brag I think not. The utilization of upper case letters is not merited and anyone using LOL should give it a rest. one word delusional.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.