Posted:
#51
looked earlier... never got chance to ck back... how regrettable 
goldfinger 1964
2025-2026 CBB
Posted:
#63
Quote Originally Posted by winddust:
I didnt watch the game just saw the stats. Is Hawaii defense that good or oregon ball handlers that bad?
lots of non defense related turnovers for the ducks. I heard the broadcaster say Hawaii is one of the oldest teams in the nation with a bunch of players that are mormon and did their 2 year mission thing.
I didnt watch the game just saw the stats. Is Hawaii defense that good or oregon ball handlers that bad?
It's all probabilities
Posted:
#67
I don’t know if they can make this line high enough….50? Both teams played to 90+ possessions in their first games and just freely ran with little to no D. The ‘Ville is definitely better/greater >0.5 pts/possession than JSU so I feel like I’d take this line to -45. That’s some good value to me all things considered. Early on in season but after a 2 game sample size (1 game each) and similar talent disparity, I feel like this’ll be a similar 104-62ish type. The Ville can name their score so this will come down to just how motivated they are to put on a highlight show, which, I think they’ll want to beat down JSU worse than the Illini did. College/NIL kids who are competitive and all about their egos care about stuff like that so that’s worth my $400. Still playing things small for first few weeks of season unless I see a big spot.
Posted:
#71
@ram,
I mean….. yes or no.
do I think they cover it? Maybe. But are my chances better? No.
if you think they’ll cover the large spread then it’s more likely show over the game than a half.
My opinion that they are >0.50 pts / possession better than JSU has a better chance to play out over a larger sample aka more possessions. I want more time for a cover of a # depending on possessions and if you look at the -22.5, it’s inflated, like most 1H lines always are, but in this case that detracts value since there will be less possession to cover a larger # so the Ville needs to be even better in the 1H to cover than the game. I’m on my phone typing so hope that’s clear but the math basically plays out at >.5625 pts/poss better to cover -22.5 in 1H vs >.475 pts/poss better to cover -38. On big #s like this, I’d rather have 2 halves of the better team than jus
Posted:
#73
Covers must limit length of post. I typed a longer response but it cut off the beginning. Then I retyped the beginning and it cutoff the end. Whatever. Suffice to say I think the chances of a cover of a big # are better over more time than less time. So I’m against the 1H play even though they could easily cover it.
Hot Forum Topics
